November 7, 2014

Janssen Highlights its Hepatitis C Clinical Development Program in Advance of 2014 AASLD

Janssen Highlights its Hepatitis C Clinical Development Program in Advance of 2014 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Annual Meeting

-- Studies focused on patients where there is a high unmet need today or anticipated in the near future --

BOSTON, Nov. 7, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Janssen R&D Ireland (Janssen) highlights its hepatitis C (HCV) clinical development program in advance of The Liver Meeting®, the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), being held November 7-11, 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts.

Given the size, complexity and diversity of the HCV patient population, physicians will continue to need multiple treatment options and combinations in order to offer patients an opportunity for cure into the next decade.

The Janssen HCV clinical development program includes studies that investigate the use of simeprevir in several interferon-free regimens using selected combinations of direct-acting antivirals with different mechanisms of action targeting diverse patient populations. These studies are focused on potentially offering alternative and more immediate treatment options for physicians and patients where there is a high unmet need today or anticipated in the near future. Ongoing clinical studies include:

  • Phase 3 OPTIMIST studies examining the safety and efficacy of simeprevir and the nucleotide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir without interferon or ribavirin for the treatment of chronic HCV infection for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis.
  • Phase 2 IMPACT study evaluating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir administered once daily in combination with sofosbuvir and the NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 1 and 4 infection and decompensated liver disease.

With the closing of the acquisition of Alios Biopharma, Inc. earlier today, Janssen now holds a platform of nucleotide analog polymerase inhibitors, the early-clinical stage compounds AL-335 and AL-516. 

"Janssen is committed to combating hepatitis C by exploring the potential to bring forth, in a timely manner, an in-house interferon-free combination regimen to make a difference in patients' lives," said Gaston Picchio, Ph.D., Hepatitis disease area leader, Janssen.

About Hepatitis C
Hepatitis C, a blood-borne infectious disease of the liver and a leading cause of chronic liver disease, is a major global public health concern. Approximately 170 million people are infected with hepatitis C worldwide and 350,000 people per year die from the disease globally. When left untreated, hepatitis C can cause significant damage to the liver including cirrhosis. Additionally, hepatitis C may increase the risk of developing complications from cirrhosis, which may include liver failure.

About Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson
At Janssen, we are dedicated to addressing and solving some of the most important unmet medical needs of our time in oncology, immunology, neuroscience, infectious diseases and vaccines, and cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Driven by our commitment to patients, we develop innovative products, services and healthcare solutions to help people throughout the world. Janssen R&D Ireland is part of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. Please visit http://www.janssenrnd.com for more information.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

What is the most important information I should know about OLYSIO®?

  • If you are pregnant, or plan to become pregnant, talk with your healthcare provider before taking OLYSIO®. It is not known if OLYSIO® will harm your unborn baby. Also read the Medication Guides for peginterferon alfa (Peg-IFN-alfa) and ribavirin (RBV) if your healthcare provider prescribes these medications for you in combination with OLYSIO®.
    • Females must use an effective form of birth control during treatment with OLYSIO®. Talk with your healthcare provider about birth control methods that you may use during treatment with OLYSIO®.
  • OLYSIO® combination treatment may cause rashes and skin reactions to sunlight. These rashes and skin reactions to sunlight can be severe and you may need to be treated in a hospital. Rashes and skin reactions to sunlight are most common during the first 4 weeks of treatment, but can happen at any time during combination treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Use sunscreen, and wear a hat, sunglasses, and protective clothing when you will be exposed to sunlight during treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Limit sunlight exposure during treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Avoid use of tanning beds, sunlamps, or other types of light therapy during treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Call your healthcare provider right away if you get any of the following symptoms:
      • burning, redness, swelling or blisters on your skin
      • mouth sores or ulcers
      • red or inflamed eyes, like "pink eye" (conjunctivitis)
  • You should not take OLYSIO® alone. OLYSIO® should be used together with other medicines to treat chronic hepatitis C infection.

What should I tell my healthcare provider before taking OLYSIO®?

Before taking OLYSIO®, tell your healthcare provider if you:

  • have liver problems other than hepatitis C virus infection
  • have ever taken any medicine to treat hepatitis C virus infection
  • had a liver transplant
  • are receiving phototherapy
  • have any other medical condition
  • are of East Asian descent
  • are breastfeeding. It is not known if OLYSIO® passes into your breast milk. You and your healthcare provider should decide if you will take OLYSIO® or breastfeed. You should not do both.
  • Tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements.
  • OLYSIO® and other medicines may affect each other. This can cause you to have too much or not enough OLYSIO® or other medicines in your body, which may affect the way OLYSIO® or your other medicines work, or may cause side effects. Do not start taking a new medicine without telling your healthcare provider or pharmacist.
  • Especially tell your healthcare provider if you take any of the following medicines (when taken by mouth or given by injection, where applicable): amiodarone (Cordarone®, Pacerone®), amlodipine (Norvasc®), atazanavir (Reyataz®), atorvastatin (Lipitor®, Caduet®), carbamazepine (Carbatrol®, Epitol®, Equetro®, Tegretol®), cisapride (Propulsid®, Propulsid Quicksolv®), clarithromycin (Biaxin®, Prevpac®), cobicistat-containing medicine (Stribild®), cyclosporine (Gengraf®, Neoral®, Sandimmune®), darunavir (Prezista®), delavirdine mesylate (Rescriptor®), dexamethasone, digoxin (Lanoxin®), diltiazem (Cardizem®, Dilacor XR®, Tiazac®), disopyramide (Norpace®), efavirenz (Sustiva®, Atripla®), erythromycin (E.E.S.®, Eryc®, Ery‑Tab®, Erythrocin®, Erythrocin Stearate®), etravirine (Intelence®), felodipine (Plendil®), flecainide (Tambocor®), fluconazole (Diflucan®), fosamprenavir (Lexiva®), indinavir (Crixivan®), itraconazole (Sporanox®, Onmel®), ketoconazole (Nizoral®), lopinavir (Kaletra®), lovastatin (Advicor®, Altoprev®, Mevacor®), mexiletine (Mexitil®), midazolam, milk thistle (Silybum marianum) or products containing milk thistle, nelfinavir (Viracept®), nevirapine (Viramune®, Viramune XR®), nicardipine (Cardene®), nifedipine (Adalat CC®, Afeditab CR®, Procardia®), nisoldipine (Sular®), oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XRTM,Trileptal®), phenobarbital (Luminal®), phenytoin (Dilantin®, Phenytek®), pitavastatin (Livalo®), posaconazole (Noxafil®), pravastatin (Pravachol®), propafenone (Rythmol SR®), quinidine (Nuedexta®, Duraquin®, Quinaglute®), rifabutin (Mycobutin®), rifampin (Rifadin®, Rifamate®, Rifater®, Rimactane®), rifapentine (Priftin®), ritonavir (Norvir®), rosuvastatin (Crestor®), saquinavir mesylate (Invirase®), sildenafil (Revatio®, Viagra®), simvastatin (Zocor®, Vytorin®, Simcor®), sirolimus (Rapamune®), St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) or products containing St. John's wort, tadalafil (Adcirca®, Cialis®), telithromycin (Ketek®), tipranavir (Aptivus®), triazolam (Halcion®), verapamil (Calan®, Covera‑HS®, Isoptin®, Tarka®), voriconazole (Vfend®).
  • This is not a complete list of medicines that could interact with OLYSIO®. Ask your healthcare provider or pharmacist if you are not sure if your medicine is one that is listed above.
  • Know the medicines you take. Keep a list of your medicines and show it to your healthcare provider and pharmacist when you get a new medicine.

What are the possible side effects of OLYSIO®?

  • The most common side effects in combination with Peg-IFN-alfa and RBV are skin rash, itching and nausea.
  • The most common side effects in combination with sofosbuvir are tiredness, headache and nausea.
  • Tell your healthcare provider if you have any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away. These are not all of the possible side effects of OLYSIO®. For more information, ask your healthcare provider or pharmacist. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to FDA at 1‑800‑FDA‑1088.

When taking OLYSIO® in combination with Peg-IFN-alfa and RBV, you should also read those Medication Guides. When taking OLYSIO® in combination with sofosbuvir, you should also read its Patient Information leaflet.

Please see full Prescribing Information and Patient Information for more details.  

MEDIA CONTACTS:

Daniel de Schryver
+49 173 76 89 149
ddschryv@its.jnj.com

Ronan Collins
+47 488 425 00
Rcollin5@its.jnj.com

INVESTOR RELATIONS:
Stan Panasewicz
+1 732 524 2524

Louise Mehrotra
+1 732 524 6491

Logo- http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140324/NY88746LOGO

SOURCE Janssen R&D Ireland

RELATED LINKS
http://www.janssenrnd.com

Source

Largest ever genomic study of liver cancer identifies mutations that distinguish Asian and Western disease

Baylor College of Medicine News

Glenna Picton
713-798-4710
Houston, TX - Nov 7, 2014

The largest ever study of the genomes of liver tumors identified a mutation signature that contributes more to cases of the disease in Japanese males that in men of European ancestry, said an international consortium of researchers in a report online in the journal Nature Genetics.

“The novelty of this study involves associating mutation patterns with different ethnic groups,” said Dr. David Wheeler, professor in the Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Center and a corresponding author of the report. Researchers from the University of Tokyo, The National Cancer Center Research Institute and the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan, were also colleagues on this work.

“Patients are subject to different environmental factors or they are genetically different,” said Wheeler, also a member of the NCI-designated Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center at Baylor. The profiles of the tumors were not associated with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or cirrhosis, which are known environmental factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (liver) cancers.

“Liver cancer occurs in males at two to five times the frequency of females,” he said.

Data from 503 liver cancer genomes derived from different populations identified 30 candidates as genes that drive the cancer and 11 cancer pathways. In addition, the collaboration of two large-scale genome projects analyzed the changes found in 608 liver cancer cases and in doing so, identified the mutational pattern associated in the disease in Japanese men, said Wheeler.

The study found more extensive mutation in the mTOR pathways than had been realized before, suggesting that drugs that inhibit that pathway might be useful. One such drug is everolimus, an anti-cancer drug used in treating kidney as well as some types of pancreatic, breast and brain cancers, might also be effective in liver cancer, said Wheeler. (The mTOR pathway is an intracellular pathway important in programmed cell death and, thus, cancer.)’

The study’s first authors include Yasushi Totoki of the Division of Cancer Genomics at the National Cancer Center Research Institute in Tokyo, Kenji Tatsuno of the Genome Science Division of the Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Tokyo and Kyle R. Covington of the Human Genome Sequencing Center at Baylor College of Medicine. Research also took place at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo and Nihon University School of Medicine in Tokyo.

Corresponding authors include Wheeler, Dr. Hiroyuki Aburatani of the Genome Science Division, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo and Dr. Tatsuhiro Shibata of the Division of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute in Tokyo, Japan.

Funding came from Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan for the third-term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control, grants from the U.S. National Human Genome Research Institute ( 5U54HG003273) and National Cancer Institute (HHSN261201000053C), the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences from the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO) and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Funds (23-A-8). The National Cancer Center Biobank is supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, Japan. The supercomputing resource SHIROKANE was provided by the Human Genome Center at the University of Tokyo.

Source

New Hepatitis C Vaccine May Overcome Previous Barriers

Medscape Medical News

Lara C. Pullen, PhD

November 06, 2014

A prophylactic hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine produces a long-lasting, sustained T-cell response that is characteristic of the T-cell response associated with a controlled HCV infection. Researchers have evaluated the vaccine in humans, and it is now ready for phase 2 efficacy studies.

Leo Swadling, a graduate student in the Nuffield Department of Medicine at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, and colleagues published the results from the phase 1 trial published online November 5 in Science Translational Medicine. They described their heterologous T-cell vaccine, which combines replication-defective chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAd3) and modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectors, both encoding the HCV nonstructural (NS) proteins. The vaccine is referred to as ChAd3/MVA.

T-cell immunity appears to be critical in protection against natural infection from HCV. In particular, CD4+ T cells generate the CD8+ T-cell immunity that is associated with HCV viral control in both natural infection in humans and chimpanzee challenge studies. Thus, vaccinologists anticipate that an effective HCV vaccine will generate a robust T-cell response.

The ChAd3/MVA vaccine induced a large HCV-specific T-cell response in humans. In most individuals, vaccination induced T-cell responses against all six NS antigenic pools. Vaccination also increased CD8+ T-cell polyfunctionality. The investigators found no signs that the vaccine induced regulatory T cells that might suppress an anti-HCV immune response.

Vaccinated individuals possessed antigen-experienced T cells that were on a continuum from naive to memory populations. Vaccinated individuals also generated CD8+ memory T cells. All told, the phenotype of T cells after vaccination with ChAd3/MVA resembled T-cell populations after vaccination with the highly efficacious yellow fever and smallpox vaccines.

The ChAd3/MVA vaccine appeared to be significantly better than the previously tested ChAd3/Ad6 vaccine. It elicited a higher magnitude of T-cell response immediately, as well as long term after boost immunization.

The diversity of the HCV genome represents an additional barrier to the development of protective HCV vaccine. ChAd3/MVA appears to overcome this barrier though generation of cross-reactive T-cell responses between heterologous viral genotypes.

"I am impressed by the ability of this combination of ChAd3 prime/MVA boost with the NSmut HCV sequence to recapitulate the natural human immune response to HCV infection, to sustain a strong response, and to impart some cross-reactive response to other HCV genotypes. On a public health note, development of a vaccine against HCV has traditionally been challenging and the disease burden remains significant in the US. In particular, the disease is generally asymptomatic initially but has a high probability to become chronic, leading to bad outcomes," Litjen Tan, PhD, from the Immunization Action Coalition in St. Paul, Minnesota, told Medscape Medical News.

Several authors of the study are named inventors for patent applications covering the vaccine. Dr Tan has received honoraria from Baxter, Pfizer, Novartis, Temptime Corp, TruMedSystems, and Sanofi Pasteur for service as a scientific consultant.

Sci Transl Med. Published online November 5, 2014. Abstract

Source

New drug for common liver disease improves liver health

For Immediate Release: Friday, November 7, 2014

An experimental drug aimed at treating a common liver disease showed promising results and potential problems in a multicenter clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health. The FLINT study found that people with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) who took obeticholic acid (OCA) had improved liver health during that period, including decreased inflammation and fat in the liver and decreased body weight versus people receiving a placebo. OCA was also associated with increases in itching and total cholesterol.

“NASH is a common and potentially serious disease that currently has no approved treatment.”

—Averell Sherker, M.D.
NIDDK program official for the NASH Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN)

The findings of FLINT, or the Farnesoid X Receptor Ligand Obeticholic Acid in NASH Treatment Trial, were published online Nov. 6 in The Lancet. FLINT was sponsored by the NIH’s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

“NASH is a common and potentially serious disease that currently has no approved treatment. Management typically includes weight loss through diet and exercise,” said Averell Sherker, M.D., NIDDK program official for the NASH Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN), which performed the FLINT study.

Liver health improved in 45 percent of people on OCA versus 21 percent of the placebo group. “Although obeticholic acid did not eliminate liver disease in FLINT participants, it demonstrated a promising effect. Larger studies will be required to determine the drug’s safety and efficacy,” Sherker said.

FLINT enrolled 283 people at eight centers across the country. At the study’s start, participants were 18 and older and had been diagnosed with definite or borderline NASH. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one took 25 milligrams of OCA daily and one received a placebo that resembled the OCA pill. The study was double-blinded, so neither participants nor investigators knew which person was in which group.

Trial investigators intended for the groups to receive the drug or placebo for 72 weeks, with an additional 24 weeks of follow-up off treatment. However, planned interim analysis for safety and efficacy showed that OCA had significant beneficial effects on NASH-related liver health.

The analysis also found unanticipated increases in total cholesterol in the OCA group. They had increased LDL cholesterol (“bad” cholesterol) and decreased HDL cholesterol (“good” cholesterol) – notable because NASH patients are already at higher risk for cardiovascular diseases. As cholesterol treatment was not standardized as part of the study, further research is needed to fully understand the potential effect of OCA on cholesterol.

Because of both factors, and with the concurrence of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board, NIDDK decided to stop treatment but continue the study, move all patients into the follow-up phase, and perform no additional liver biopsies – which carry their own risks. Adverse cholesterol increases were not sustained after stopping OCA.

“The FLINT trial represents an important advance in the search for treatments of NASH. The causes of NASH are not fully understood, and causes and treatments may be different among patients,” said the study’s lead author, Brent Neuschwander-Tetri, M.D., a professor at St. Louis University. “We need to study the changes in cholesterol levels more to know if the increases caused by obeticholic acid increase the risk of hardening of the arteries. We found that the improvement in liver enzymes with obeticholic acid were not sustained after treatment was stopped, so we would expect that treatment would need to be indefinite, much like the medications for diabetes and hypertension.”

The major feature of NASH is fat in the liver, along with inflammation and damage.  Over time, these may lead to loss of liver function, the need for liver transplantation and death. NASH may have no symptoms and can only be diagnosed with a liver biopsy. Beyond maintaining a healthy weight, people with NASH are advised to avoid alcohol and unnecessary medications. New cases of NASH have grown alongside the obesity epidemic. NASH is the third leading diagnosis requiring U.S. liver transplantation.

The FLINT trial (Clinical Trials No. NCT01265498) was supported by the NIDDK, National Cancer Institute and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, all part of NIH. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. provided partial funding and supplies.

The NIDDK, a component of the NIH, conducts and supports research on diabetes and other endocrine and metabolic diseases; digestive diseases, nutrition and obesity; and kidney, urologic and hematologic diseases. Spanning the full spectrum of medicine and afflicting people of all ages and ethnic groups, these diseases encompass some of the most common, severe and disabling conditions affecting Americans. For more information about the NIDDK and its programs, see http://www.niddk.nih.gov.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

NIH...Turning Discovery Into Health®

Source

November 6, 2014

Watchful waiting: role of disease progression on uncertainty and depressive symptoms in patients with chronic Hepatitis C

Journal of Viral Hepatitis

Volume 21, Issue 10, pages 727–733, October 2014

Original Article

J. P. Colagreco1,*, D. E. Bailey2, J. J. Fitzpatrick3, C. M. Musil3, N. H. Afdhal1 and M. Lai1

Article first published online: 7 NOV 2013

DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12207

© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Abstract

Background and Aims: New therapies for HCV are rapidly emerging and providers are advising select patients to defer treatment and elect ‘watchful waiting’. During the watchful waiting period, patients have been shown to have high rates of illness uncertainty and depression. We sought to answer the question of whether reassuring histological data (showing minimal fibrosis or no fibrosis progression over time) is associated with less illness uncertainty and depressive symptoms.

Methods: This was a single-centre outpatient prospective cohort study to determine whether stage of fibrosis, fibrosis progression and reasons for treatment deferral were related to illness uncertainty and depressive symptoms in patients following watchful waiting.

Results: Illness uncertainty was significantly related to depressive symptoms (r = 0.49, P < 0.01). More than half of the participants (54%) had moderate levels of uncertainty. About 40% of the participants were at risk for clinical depression (21.7% at mild to moderate risk and 18.5% at high risk). Treatment naïve subjects had lower mean scores on both the CES-D (depressive symptoms measure) and the MUIS-A (illness uncertainty measure) total score, MUIS-A Ambiguity subscale and MUIS-A Inconsistency subscale than subjects who failed treatment or were interferon intolerant or ineligible. Surprisingly, liver fibrosis stage and progression were not significantly associated with overall illness uncertainty or depressive symptoms.

Conclusion: Patients with chronic hepatitis C on watchful waiting are at high risk for significant illness uncertainty and depressive symptoms. Reassuring histological data does not seem to correlate with less uncertainty or depressive symptoms.

Source

AASLD: HCV Not Main Attraction Anymore

48434

Published: Nov 6, 2014

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage Today

As the therapeutic picture for hepatitis C begins to settle down, the volume of abstracts on the topic is plateauing at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD).

That's not to say that new HCV therapies won't get a lot of play, according to Gary Davis, MD, president of MedLogician Consulting of Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla., and secretary of the liver association.

But, he told MedPage Today in advance of the meeting, "there's a big shift toward fatty liver disease ... that reflects what people are seeing in the clinics."

Over the past several years, direct-acting HCV medications have stolen the show, with a host of new drugs and drug combinations working through the clinical trials process.

Now, with many of those drugs approved and others in the home stretch, meeting participants will be getting mature data, he said.

For instance, the meeting will get an update on the research that underpinned the recent approval of Gilead's ledipasvir/sofosbuvir combination, trade-named Harvoni.

And, Davis said, they can look forward to seeing the data that AbbVie is using to support its multidrug combination -- dubbed 3D -- which is now under review at the FDA.

"It's going to be pretty exciting to see where that's at," he said.

Gilead famously unleashed a firestorm of debate when it priced sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) at $1 a pill and Davis said participants might take all the drug-makers to task over pricing of HCV drugs.

"I'm anxious to hear the audience questions on this, what with the whole controversy over pricing," he said.

The picture in fatty liver disease is less clear than in HCV, but the condition is increasingly prevalent and researchers are now turning their attention to it, looking at the basic mechanisms as well as drug therapy.

It's a "hot area," he said.

Among the hot topics this year:

  • The role of bariatric surgery in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
  • Prednisone and pentoxifylline in alcoholic hepatitis
  • Combinations of direct-acting HCV agents post-transplant.
  • A recombinant enzyme in liposomal acid lipase deficiency.

Davis also said that there is increased interest in possible curative options for hepatitis B, an area of research that has been "stuck in the mud for years." HBV is tricky to cure, because the virus integrates itself into host cells and -- rather like HIV -- therapy has aimed at suppressing the virus rather than getting rid of it.

But several new compounds in the early stages of investigation aim to change that and the "HBV people are quite excited about it," Davis said.

As well, he said, participants will get results from a major trial of terlipressin, a drug for hepatorenal syndrome that is approved in several countries but not the U.S.

An initial report from the so-called REVERSE study -- of terlipressin plus albumin versus albumin alone -- will attract considerable interest, Davis said, since improvement in renal function in patients with the syndrome is correlated with improved survival.

Source

Maintenance Opioid Agonists Protect Against HCV in Injection Drug Users

Judith I. Tsui, MD, MPH1,2; Jennifer L. Evans, MS3; Paula J. Lum, MD, MPH4; Judith A. Hahn, PhD3,4; Kimberly Page, PhD, MPH5

[+-] Author Affiliations

1Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
2Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
4Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
5Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque

JAMA Intern Med. Published online October 27, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5416

Abstract

Importance Injection drug use is the primary mode of transmission for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Prior studies suggest opioid agonist therapy may reduce the incidence of HCV infection among injection drug users; however, little is known about the effects of this therapy in younger users.

Objective To evaluate whether opioid agonist therapy was associated with a lower incidence of HCV infection in a cohort of young adult injection drug users.

Design, Setting, and Participants Observational cohort study conducted from January 3, 2000, through August 21, 2013, with quarterly interviews and blood sampling. We recruited young adult (younger than 30 years) injection drug users who were negative for anti-HCV antibody and/or HCV RNA.

Exposures Substance use treatment within the past 3 months, including non–opioid agonist forms of treatment, opioid agonist (methadone hydrochloride or buprenorphine hydrochloride) detoxification or maintenance therapy, or no treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures Incident HCV infection documented with a new positive result for HCV RNA and/or HCV antibodies. Cumulative incidence rates (95% CI) of HCV infection were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit adjusting for age, sex, race, years of injection drug use, homelessness, and incarceration.

Results Baseline characteristics of the sample (n = 552) included median age of 23 (interquartile range, 20-26) years; 31.9% female; 73.1% white; 39.7% who did not graduate from high school; and 69.2% who were homeless. During the observation period of 680 person-years, 171 incident cases of HCV infection occurred (incidence rate, 25.1 [95% CI, 21.6-29.2] per 100 person-years). The rate ratio was significantly lower for participants who reported recent maintenance opioid agonist therapy (0.31 [95% CI, 0.14-0.65]; P = .001) but not for those who reported recent non–opioid agonist forms of treatment (0.63 [95% CI, 0.37-1.08]; P = .09) or opioid agonist detoxification (1.45 [95% CI, 0.80-2.69]; P = .23). After adjustment for other covariates, maintenance opioid agonist therapy was associated with lower relative hazards for acquiring HCV infection over time (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.18-0.87]; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort of young adult injection drug users, recent maintenance opioid agonist therapy was associated with a lower incidence of HCV infection. Maintenance treatment with methadone or buprenorphine for opioid use disorders may be an important strategy to prevent the spread of HCV infection among young injection drug users.

Source

November 5, 2014

OLYSIO® (simeprevir) Gains Additional FDA Approval as Once-Daily, All-Oral Interferon- and Ribavirin-Free Treatment Option in Combination with Sofosbuvir for Adults with Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection

--Expanded indication includes both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adult patients with or without cirrhosis--

TITUSVILLE, N.J., Nov. 5, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Janssen Therapeutics, Division of Janssen Products, LP (Janssen) announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved OLYSIO® (simeprevir), a hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, in combination with sofosbuvir as an all-oral, interferon- and ribavirin-free treatment option for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection in adult patients as part of a combination antiviral treatment regimen. Sofosbuvir is an HCV nucleotide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitor developed by Gilead Sciences, Inc.

HCV is a blood-born infectious disease of the liver that affects an estimated 3.2 million people in the U.S.[1] Approximately 75 to 85 percent of people who become infected with HCV develop chronic infection.[2] Most persons with CHC infection are asymptomatic, which means they do not show symptoms of the disease.[3] When left untreated, CHC infection may cause significant liver damage, including cirrhosis, which is severe scarring of the liver. CHC may also increase the risk of developing complications from cirrhosis, which may include liver failure.[4]

Data supporting the OLYSIO® and sofosbuvir combination regimen are from the COSMOS study, an open-label, randomized Phase 2 clinical trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of 12 or 24 weeks of OLYSIO® (150 mg once daily) in combination with sofosbuvir (400 mg once daily) with or without ribavirin in HCV genotype 1 chronically infected treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adult patients with compensated liver disease.

"It's a very encouraging time for patients with chronic hepatitis as the advent of new direct-acting treatment combinations, like OLYSIO® plus sofosbuvir offer all-oral, interferon- and ribavirin-free treatment options," said Eric Lawitz, M.D., primary investigator for the COSMOS clinical study, and vice president, Scientific and Research Development, The Texas Liver Institute and professor of medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center. "The availability of multiple treatment options is important to physicians and patients so optimal treatment decisions can be made, given the complexity of the disease and diversity of patient population."

"I lived with hepatitis C for nearly thirty years," said Norman Walsh, a COSMOS clinical trial patient. "I will never forget the moment that my clinical trial healthcare team told me the news following my treatment with the combination of OLYSIO® and sofosbuvir. I was elated, relieved – and cured."*

OLYSIO® in Combination with Sofosbuvir in HCV Adult, Genotype 1 Patients
The recommended treatment duration of OLYSIO® with sofosbuvir is 12 weeks for patients without cirrhosis or 24 weeks for patients with cirrhosis.

The data for this expanded indication are based on two cohorts in the COSMOS study, published in The Lancet. Cohort 1 included prior non-responder patients (patients who failed prior interferon-based therapy) with no to moderate liver fibrosis (defined as METAVIR F0 to F2 scores), and Cohort 2 included treatment-naive patients (patients who have not received other treatments previously) and prior non-responder patients to peginterferon alfa and ribavirin near cirrhosis (METAVIR F3) and with cirrhosis (METAVIR F4). METAVIR scores measure the severity or stage of liver fibrosis, from early to advanced.

In pooled analyses of both cohorts, 95 percent of patients (20/21) with METAVIR F0-F3 receiving 12 weeks of OLYSIO® with sofosbuvir achieved sustained virologic response (SVR12) or cure, the absence of HCV detected in the blood 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Viral relapse occurred in 5 percent (1/21) and 0 percent (0/20) of patients with METAVIR F0-F3 after 12 or 24 weeks of combination therapy, respectively. Regardless of whether patients were treatment-naive or treatment-experienced, 86 percent of patients (6/7) with METAVIR F4 receiving 12 weeks of OLYSIO® in combination with sofosbuvir achieved SVR12, while 100 percent of patients (10/10) with cirrhosis who were treated with the combination for 24 weeks achieved SVR12. Viral relapse occurred in 14 percent (1/7) and 0 percent (0/10) of patients with cirrhosis after 12 or 24 weeks of combination therapy, respectively.

For all patients in the COSMOS trial (treatment-naive and treatment-experienced, METAVIR F0-F4), 93 percent (26/28) achieved SVR12 after 12 weeks and 97 percent (30/31) achieved SVR12 after 24 weeks of treatment. Viral relapse occurred in 7 percent of patients (2/28) after 12 weeks and 0 percent of patients (0/30) after 24 weeks of treatment overall.

In the COSMOS trial, the most common (> 10 percent) adverse reactions reported during 12 weeks of treatment with OLYSIO® in combination with sofosbuvir without ribavirin were fatigue (25 percent), headache (21 percent), nausea (21 percent), insomnia (14 percent) and pruritus (11 percent). Rash and photosensitivity were reported in 11 percent and 7 percent of patients, respectively. During 24 weeks of treatment with OLYSIO® in combination with sofosbuvir, dizziness (16 percent), and diarrhea (16 percent) were also commonly reported.

Prior to initiation of treatment with OLYSIO® with sofosbuvir, screening patients infected with HCV genotype 1a for the presence of virus with the NS3 Q80K polymorphism is not strongly recommended but may be considered.

Janssen is continuing its clinical development program for OLYSIO®, including Phase 3 study commitments. For more information please visit www.clinicaltrials.gov.

"We're pleased that an interferon-free, ribavirin-free OLYSIO®-based combination is now approved in the United States for patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection. The availability of multiple treatment options is important to help offer an opportunity for cure and we believe OLYSIO® will play a meaningful role in this respect," said Gaston Picchio, PhD., Hepatitis disease area leader, Janssen Research & Development, LLC. "We're passionate about finding new treatment options for patients living with hepatitis C worldwide and will continue to pursue innovative approaches to help address this disease."

Access and Support for OLYSIO®
Janssen partners with a variety of stakeholders to support patient access and compliance to medicines. A substantial part of this effort is working closely with public and private payers to ensure that patients who need OLYSIO® can obtain access to it.

For patients, Janssen offers OLYSIO® Support, a comprehensive support program designed to assist in the HCV treatment journey so that they, their caregivers and their healthcare providers can help them focus on treatment. OLYSIO® Support provides benefit verifications, assistance with the prior authorization process, and information about a variety of affordability programs, including those for patients with commercial insurance, federally-funded insurance or no insurance coverage.

Eligible patients with commercial insurance coverage for OLYSIO® may pay only $5 per fill with the OLYSIO® Savings Card. This is subject to a $50,000 annual maximum benefit or 12 months from the card activation date, whichever comes first. For more information about OLYSIO® Support, visit www.OLYSIO.com or call 1-855-5-OLYSIO (1-855-565-9746), 8 a.m. - 8 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday.

"The approval of OLYSIO® in combination with sofosbuvir is welcome news for people living with chronic hepatitis C infection and their families," said Gloria Searson, ACSW, founder and president, Coalition on Positive Health Empowerment (COPE). "As an organization focused on serving people trying to make sense of their HCV diagnosis, we're encouraged by the work Janssen is doing to provide new treatment options and support programs to help patients navigate their journey."**

About OLYSIO® (simeprevir)
OLYSIO® is an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor jointly developed by Janssen R&D Ireland and Medivir AB and indicated for the treatment of CHC infection as a component of a combination antiviral treatment regimen.

Janssen is responsible for the global clinical development of simeprevir and has exclusive, worldwide marketing rights, except in the Nordic countries. Medivir AB retains marketing rights for simeprevir in these countries under the marketing authorization held by Janssen-Cilag International NV. Simeprevir was approved in September 2013 in Japan, in November 2013 in Canada and the U.S., in March 2014 in Russia, and in July 2014 in Mexico and Australia. In May 2014 simeprevir was granted marketing authorization by the European Commission (EC) (indications vary by market).

For additional information about OLYSIO®, please visit www.OLYSIO.com.

What is OLYSIO®?

  • OLYSIO® is a prescription medicine used with other antiviral medicines to treat chronic (lasting a long time) hepatitis C infection in adults. OLYSIO® should not be taken alone. It is not known if OLYSIO® is safe and effective in children under 18 years of age.

Important Safety Information

What is the most important information I should know about OLYSIO®?

  • If you are pregnant, or plan to become pregnant, talk with your healthcare provider before taking OLYSIO®. It is not known if OLYSIO® will harm your unborn baby. Also read the Medication Guides for peginterferon alfa (Peg-IFN-alfa) and ribavirin (RBV) if your healthcare provider prescribes these medications for you in combination with OLYSIO®.
    • Females must use an effective form of birth control during treatment with OLYSIO®. Talk with your healthcare provider about birth control methods that you may use during treatment with OLYSIO®.
  • OLYSIO® combination treatment may cause rashes and skin reactions to sunlight. These rashes and skin reactions to sunlight can be severe and you may need to be treated in a hospital. Rashes and skin reactions to sunlight are most common during the first 4 weeks of treatment, but can happen at any time during combination treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Use sunscreen, and wear a hat, sunglasses, and protective clothing when you will be exposed to sunlight during treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Limit sunlight exposure during treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Avoid use of tanning beds, sunlamps, or other types of light therapy during treatment with OLYSIO®.
    • Call your healthcare provider right away if you get any of the following symptoms:
      • burning, redness, swelling or blisters on your skin
      • mouth sores or ulcers
      • red or inflamed eyes, like "pink eye" (conjunctivitis)
  • You should not take OLYSIO® alone. OLYSIO® should be used together with other medicines to treat chronic hepatitis C infection.

What should I tell my healthcare provider before taking OLYSIO®?
Before taking OLYSIO®, tell your healthcare provider if you: 

  • have liver problems other than hepatitis C virus infection
  • have ever taken any medicine to treat hepatitis C virus infection
  • had a liver transplant
  • are receiving phototherapy
  • have any other medical condition
  • are of East Asian descent
  • are breastfeeding. It is not known if OLYSIO® passes into your breast milk. You and your healthcare provider should decide if you will take OLYSIO® or breastfeed. You should not do both.
  • Tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements.
  • OLYSIO® and other medicines may affect each other. This can cause you to have too much or not enough OLYSIO® or other medicines in your body, which may affect the way OLYSIO® or your other medicines work, or may cause side effects. Do not start taking a new medicine without telling your healthcare provider or pharmacist.
  • Especially tell your healthcare provider if you take any of the following medicines (when taken by mouth or given by injection, where applicable): amiodarone (Cordarone®, Pacerone®), amlodipine (Norvasc®), atazanavir (Reyataz®), atorvastatin (Lipitor®, Caduet®), carbamazepine (Carbatrol®, Epitol®, Equetro®, Tegretol®), cisapride (Propulsid®, Propulsid Quicksolv®), clarithromycin (Biaxin®, Prevpac®), cobicistat-containing medicine (Stribild®), cyclosporine (Gengraf®, Neoral®, Sandimmune®), darunavir (Prezista®), delavirdine mesylate (Rescriptor®), dexamethasone, digoxin (Lanoxin®), diltiazem (Cardizem®, Dilacor XR®, Tiazac®), disopyramide (Norpace®), efavirenz (Sustiva®, Atripla®), erythromycin (E.E.S.®, Eryc®, Ery‑Tab®, Erythrocin®, Erythrocin Stearate®), etravirine (Intelence®), felodipine (Plendil®), flecainide (Tambocor®), fluconazole (Diflucan®), fosamprenavir (Lexiva®), indinavir (Crixivan®), itraconazole (Sporanox®, Onmel®), ketoconazole (Nizoral®), lopinavir (Kaletra®), lovastatin (Advicor®, Altoprev®, Mevacor®), mexiletine (Mexitil®), midazolam, milk thistle (Silybum marianum) or products containing milk thistle, nelfinavir (Viracept®), nevirapine (Viramune®, Viramune XR®), nicardipine (Cardene®), nifedipine (Adalat CC®, Afeditab CR®, Procardia®), nisoldipine (Sular®), oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XRTM,Trileptal®), phenobarbital (Luminal®), phenytoin (Dilantin®, Phenytek®), pitavastatin (Livalo®), posaconazole (Noxafil®), pravastatin (Pravachol®), propafenone (Rythmol SR®), quinidine (Nuedexta®, Duraquin®, Quinaglute®), rifabutin (Mycobutin®), rifampin (Rifadin®, Rifamate®, Rifater®, Rimactane®), rifapentine (Priftin®), ritonavir (Norvir®), rosuvastatin (Crestor®), saquinavir mesylate (Invirase®), sildenafil (Revatio®, Viagra®), simvastatin (Zocor®, Vytorin®, Simcor®), sirolimus (Rapamune®), St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) or products containing St. John's wort, tadalafil (Adcirca®, Cialis®), telithromycin (Ketek®), tipranavir (Aptivus®), triazolam (Halcion®), verapamil (Calan®, Covera‑HS®, Isoptin®, Tarka®), voriconazole (Vfend®).
  • This is not a complete list of medicines that could interact with OLYSIO®. Ask your healthcare provider or pharmacist if you are not sure if your medicine is one that is listed above.
  • Know the medicines you take. Keep a list of your medicines and show it to your healthcare provider and pharmacist when you get a new medicine.

What are the possible side effects of OLYSIO®?

  • The most common side effects in combination with Peg-IFN-alfa and RBV are skin rash, itching and nausea.
  • The most common side effects in combination with sofosbuvir are tiredness, headache and nausea.
  • Tell your healthcare provider if you have any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away. These are not all of the possible side effects of OLYSIO®. For more information, ask your healthcare provider or pharmacist. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to FDA at 1‑800‑FDA‑1088.

When taking OLYSIO® in combination with Peg-IFN-alfa and RBV, you should also read those Medication Guides. When taking OLYSIO® in combination with sofosbuvir, you should also read its Patient Information leaflet.

Please see full Prescribing Information and Patient Information for more details.

About Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies 
At Janssen, we are dedicated to addressing and solving some of the most important unmet medical needs of our time in hepatitis C, HIV and other infectious diseases. Driven by our commitment to patients, we develop innovative products, services and healthcare solutions to help people throughout the world. Headquartered in Titusville, New Jersey, Janssen Therapeutics, Division of Janssen Products, LP, is one of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. Visit www.JanssenTherapeutics.com for more information and follow us on Twitter at @JanssenUS.

* Norman Walsh is a patient representative. Individual results may vary.

**Janssen has provided funding to the Coalition on Positive Health Empowerment for educational and support initiatives benefiting hepatitis C patients and their families.

(This press release contains "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding product development. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections of Janssen Products, LP, Janssen Research & Development, LLC and/or Johnson & Johnson. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: challenges inherent in new product development, including obtaining regulatory approvals; competition, including technological advances, new products and patents attained by competitors; challenges to patents; changes in behavior and spending patterns or financial distress of purchasers of healthcare products and services; changes to laws and regulations and domestic and foreign healthcare reforms; and general industry conditions including trends toward healthcare cost containment. A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors can be found in Johnson & Johnson's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013, including in Exhibit 99 thereto, and our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of these filings are available online at www.sec.gov, www.jnj.com or on request from Johnson & Johnson. None of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies or Johnson & Johnson undertakes to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events or developments.)

[1] Center for Disease Control and Prevention. "Hepatitis C FAQs for the Public." Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/c/cfaq.htm. Accessed October 2014.

[2] World Health Organization (WHO). "Hepatitis C." Available at: www.who.int/csr/disease/hepatitis/Hepc.pdf. Accessed October 2014.

[3] National Institute of Health, Medline Plus Dictionary. "Hepatitis C." Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000284.htm. Accessed October 2014.

[4] World Health Organization (WHO). "Hepatitis C." Available at: www.who.int/csr/disease/hepatitis/Hepc.pdf. Accessed October 2014.

Media contacts:
Lisa Vaga (U.S.)
Office: +1 (609) 730-2020
Mobile: +1 (908) 670-0363
Ronan Collins (Global)
Mobile: +47 488 42 500

Investor contacts:
Stan Panasewicz
Office: +1 (732) 524-2524
Louise Mehrotra
Office: +1 (732) 524-6491

Source

GSK hepatitis C shot shows promise, bodes well for Ebola vaccines

By Kate Kelland

LONDON Thu Nov 6, 2014 12:31am IST

(Reuters) - A new hepatitis C vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline based on the same technology as an experimental Ebola shot being fast-tracked through human trials has shown promise in early clinical tests, prompting strong and broad immune responses.

Researchers testing the vaccine -- the first hepatitis C vaccine to reach second stage clinical trials -- said their results in a group of 15 healthy human volunteers showed it was very safe and well tolerated, and generated immune responses of a strength never seen before in a vaccine against this disease.

"This is as good at it could be for a first go, and I'm optimistic that it will work (in second stage trials)," said Ellie Barnes, a professor at Britain's Oxford University who led the initial human tests.

She said results also bode well for GSK's experimental Ebola vaccine currently being tested in healthy volunteers in Britain, Africa and the United States, as well as another experimental Ebola shot from Johnson & Johnson.

The vaccines are based on similar science, using a common cold virus called an adenovirus to take the key ingredient into the cells.

The idea is that the adenovirus infects cells in a vaccinated person, causing them to take up genes from the target virus - be it Ebola or hepatitis C - and produce their proteins.

This primes the immune system to attack the proteins of the pathogenic viruses when an infection occurs.

"What's special about adenovirus vaccines is that they are trying to induce a totally separate part of the immune response -- the T-cells," Barnes explained in a telephone interview. "And T-cells target the inner machinery of a pathogen."

Publishing their results in the journal Science Translational Medicine on Wednesday, Barnes' team explained that the hepatitis C vaccine uses a "prime-boost" strategy with two separate vaccine formulations.

CLEAR THE VIRUS

The first, or prime, vaccine is based on a chimpanzee adenovirus called ChAd3 developed by the Italian biotech firm Okairos -- now owned by GSK -- to which genes encoding four proteins from hepatitis C are added.

The second, or boost, vaccine adds the same four hepatitis C genes to a different viral vaccine base -- a so-called modified vaccininia Ankara (MVA) virus.

Neither the adenovirus nor MVA is able to replicate, so they cannot cause infection. The four genes packaged up inside cannot cause a hepatitis C infection either.

An estimated 180 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C, a chronic infection where the virus stays in the body for many years. It is a leading cause of liver cirrhosis and can in some cases lead to liver failure and liver cancer.

However, around a quarter of people infected are naturally able to clear the virus from their body. This suggests it is possible for the body to mount an immune response to fight off the infection.

"In our lab we spent a lot of time looking at the immune response of people who are able to clear the virus," Barnes said. "We know from that work that you need a strong immune response that targets multiple parts of the virus and that is sustained over time -- and those are the characteristics that we've been able to reproduce in this vaccine trial."

Leading drugmakers said last month they will work together to speed the development of an Ebola vaccine designed to help beat a vast epidemic of the disease which has killed more than 5,000 people, mainly in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia.

Clinical tests on GSK's vaccine and another from NewLink Genetics are under way, while human tests on J&J's vaccine will start in January.

(Reporting by Kate Kelland; Editing by Tom Heneghan)

Source

What's Hot at the Liver Meeting 2014

Medscape Medical News > Conference News

Neil Osterweil

November 04, 2014

BOSTON — The 2014 Liver Meeting returns to Boston, home of splendors such as beans, cod, the Boston Red Sox, world-class medical centers, and pharmaceutical research hubs.

The meeting, during which the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) struts it stuff each year, will be held at the John B. Hynes Veterans Memorial Convention Center from November 7 to 11.

The Hynes, sandwiched between Boylston Street — the city's liveliest thoroughfare — and the hotels, shops, and restaurants of the Prudential Center complex, has hosted many previous Liver Meetings, and is ideally located to take advantage of the wealth of science the conference provides and all of the amenities that Boston has to offer.

Nearly 3000 abstracts were submitted by clinicians and scientists for this year's event, covering the latest clinical trial results, practice-changing clinical findings, and basic research into the mechanisms and molecular targets of diseases of the liver.

"We're going to hear a lot about fatty liver disease; the number of abstracts about fatty liver disease this year just exploded, as did the number of abstracts about complications of cirrhosis," Gary Davis, MD, AASLD secretary, told Medscape Medical News.

"This reflects what people are seeing in the clinic. The buzz for hepatitis C has died down a bit, I think because the treatment is so effective now and it's so easy to administer," he said.

Cutting Edge

That the care of patients with hepatitis C would become almost routine — or indeed that such an entity as hepatitis C ever existed — would have seemed like wild fantasy 40 years ago.

But that's just what attendees can expect to hear during the President's Choice Lecture from Willis Maddrey, MD, from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.

"Dr Maddrey is always a pretty dynamic speaker," Dr Davis said.

He pointed out that Dr Maddrey has witnessed the advent of genetic research into fatty liver disease, pegylated interferons, protease inhibitors, and other discoveries in his more than 40 years in the trenches.

Of course, with the advent of effective combination therapies for hepatitis C comes the inevitable increase in costs, just as pressures for accountability and value in medical care rise.

"There will be some presentations on cost-effectiveness, but surprisingly not a lot, given all the press it has gotten over the past year, but I want to be in the room for those. I think the discussions after the abstracts are presented will be pretty good," Dr Davis said.

On a related theme, new this year will be a symposium on value-based medicine in hepatology. The session will focus on coping in the era of Accountable Care Organizations and the Affordable Care Act. Or as the Liver Meeting program describes it, "the concept of value-based medicine and the importance of returning the practice of hepatology to its appropriate focus: enabling the health and effective care of patients with liver disease."

The $1000-per-dose therapies for hepatitis C viral infections are a challenge in this era.

The Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Surgery State-of-the-Art Lecture, by Jean Edmond, MD, from New York Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia Medical Center in New York City, will focus on the controversial topic of living-donor transplantation. Dr Edmond will outline patient and donor selection and describe the most up-to-date methods of harvesting and transplantation.

The Emerging Trends Symposium, which will follow Dr Edmond's talk, will center on a topic that might be new to some conference goers: acute on chronic liver failure. The condition is defined as acute decompensation of a patient with cirrhosis and characterized by multiple organ failure. Attendees will learn about the pathophysiology of acute liver failure, clinical issues associated with the syndrome, and investigational therapies.

The Hans Popper Basic Science State-of the-Art Lecture will be devoted to induced pluripotent stem cells and their use in the study of liver disease and development. Stephen Duncan, DPhil, from the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, is expected to describe his groundbreaking work coaxing stem cells to differentiate into hepatocytes, Dr Davis said.

Abstract Sessions and Late-Breakers

The scientific sessions kick off on Saturday, November 8, with the first of four poster sessions covering more than 2000 research projects, from basic science findings to the latest in clinical practice, drug development, and clinical trials.

Sunday will feature transplant plenary sessions, Monday basic science and clinical plenary, and Tuesday the hepatitis plenary.

Late-breaking oral abstracts will be presented on Monday afternoon, and late-breaking posters will be on view all day Monday, with presenters available from 12:30 to 3:00 pm.

This year's late-breakers will include:

  • Results of the STOPAH trial comparing steroids with pentoxifylline for alcoholic hepatitis

  • Phase 3 results from the UNITY-2 trial of an oral fixed-dose combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infections and compensated cirrhosis

  • Results of the phase 3 ALLY-3 study looking at an oral ribavirin-free combination for the treatment of hepatitis C genotype 3

  • A study of post-transplant direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C

  • Results from a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of an enzyme replacement therapy in children and adults with lysosomal acid lipase deficiency

  • A report on a phase 2a proof-of-concept trial of a hepatitis B and hepatitis D entry inhibitor

Ticketed educational sessions will run the gamut, from endoscopy, transplantation, pediatric hepatology, and basic research, to practical matters such as competency training and career development.

As you can still hear in some of Boston's more traditional neighborhoods, this year's Liver Meeting promises to be "wicked good."

Dr Davis have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Source

Re-treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection After Relapse: An Open-Label Pilot Study Re-treatment of Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Infection After Relapse

Original Research | 4 November 2014

Anu Osinusi, MD; Anita Kohli, MD; Miriam M. Marti, BS; Amy Nelson, RN; Xiaozhen Zhang, MS; Eric G. Meissner, MD, PhD; Rachel Silk, RN; Kerry Townsend, BA; Phillip S. Pang, MD, PhD; G. Mani Subramanian, MD, PhD; John G. McHutchison, MD; Anthony S. Fauci, MD; Henry Masur, MD; and Shyam Kottilil, MD, PhD

[+-] Article and Author Information

Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(9):634-638. doi:10.7326/M14-1211

Background: The interferon (IFN)–free regimen of sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 24 weeks was recently approved to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT-1) infection for patients ineligible for IFN. However, sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy is associated with relapse in 15% to 30% of patients with HCV GT-1. Neither the mechanism of relapse nor the optimal re-treatment strategy for these patients is defined.

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir in patients with chronic HCV GT-1 that relapsed after sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy.

Design: Phase 2a, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01805882)

Setting: Single U.S site.

Patients: 14 patients with HCV GT-1 that relapsed after treatment with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks were re-treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks.

Measurements: HCV RNA concentration and population sequencing to detect NS5B S282T mutations.

Results: All 14 patients treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks achieved a sustained virologic response, including 7 with advanced liver disease (Knodell Histology Activity Index score of 3 or 4) and 1 with a detectable NS5B S282T mutation after sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy. Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir was well-tolerated with few adverse events. Four grade 3 events (elevated serum creatinine in a patient with baseline renal insufficiency, hypercholesterolemia, and hypophosphatemia) occurred. There were no grade 4 events or treatment discontinuations.

Limitation: Small sample size.

Conclusion: The fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir was efficacious in a small cohort of patients with HCV GT-1 that relapsed after sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy, even in the setting of advanced liver disease. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary efficacy results.

Primary Funding Source: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and Gilead Sciences.

Source

June 23, 2014

Hepatitis C Care: Check Your Biases at the Door

Medscape Infectious Diseases

International Conference on Viral Hepatitis (ICVH) 2014

Helen-Maria Lekas, PhD, Gloria J. Searson, MSW, Alyson L. Harty, RN, BSN, William Thompson

June 23, 2014

Editor's Note: During the International Conference on Viral Hepatitis, held in New York, some of the participants in a panel discussion titled "Patient Perspectives on What Providers Need to Know About Stigma and Other Barriers to Hepatitis Care"[1] convened afterwards for a discussion. During the conversation, they discussed the stigma surrounding hepatitis C and some of the barriers to diagnosis and treatment for patients.

Living With Hepatitis C

Helen-Maria Lekas, PhD: My name is Helen-Maria Lekas. I am from Columbia University, and I am in New York at the International Conference on Viral Hepatitis. I'm here with a panel of experts, including Gloria Searson, Alyson Harty, and William Thompson. I would like to start by asking you about stigma. As patients and experts living with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, what do you want your providers to know about the stigma associated with the disease?

Gloria J. Searson, MSW: Stigma is horrible. I don't want to be looked at or judged, and I don't want you to bring your biases into the room with us. I just want you to treat me as a human being and take care of the problem.

Alyson Harty, RN, BSN: I agree, from both the provider and patient perspective. When I was 17 and I found out I had HCV, I didn't want to tell any of my friends. You don't want your friends knowing that you have a virus because it's often associated with other viruses that have a broad stigma against them, and there is no need. You got it -- however you got it, you got it -- let's solve the problem.

Dr. Lekas: What can providers do to ameliorate the stigma associated with HCV?

William Thompson: One thing that I find very important is the support group that I go to. We get a lot of information from the doctor and we also get a lot of information from other patients. To me, stigma is like "sticks and stones can break my bones." It doesn't really affect me. I don't think anybody can say anything to me that would make me feel bad about my condition, especially when you have conditions yourself. It's all up to the individual in how you feel about it.

Persisting Barriers to Diagnosis and Treatment

Dr. Lekas: I'm very glad to hear that you don't internalize other people's stigmatizing attitudes. If we leave stigma aside, what are some of the other barriers that patients are encountering in getting care for HCV?

Ms. Searson: Patients don't have the same care teams available to them for HCV that they did for other diseases. One of the good things about HIV was that they had funding and manpower to help deal with teaching the patient things that the doctor may not have been able to get through to the patient, or convince the patient of the urgency of something. They even had someone there to provide the education and support so that they can buy into the fact that they had the disease. There are some systemic barriers that we have to fix in healthcare in general. It is disproportionately dispensed in different areas, in different ways, and we have to make sure that people can access the same things wherever they are geographically. That's one of the largest barriers. The treatments are good, but we can't just take them without understanding them. So, who is going to provide that education is the key.

Dr. Lekas: Do you think that patients with HCV know about the new treatments coming down the pipeline?

Ms. Harty: It varies. You have your highly educated patients who know that they have HCV and who have been following the disease and the press releases, and then you have patients who were told back in the late 1990s and early 2000s that they have this problem but nothing can be done about it. There is a wide variety, and we need re-education for those patients who were turned away from care. For example, they may have been told that because they were black or obese that the treatment wouldn't work for them. We need to relink these patients back to care, as well as screen the 80% of patients who we know haven't been tested.

Ms. Searson: The campaigning and awareness are out there for those who access social media or the Internet or who watch television, but there is a whole group of people who do not access information the way it is being disseminated. If you are not in the healthcare system or working with a substance abuse group, a senior population, or a veterans' group, you still may be out of the loop for hepatitis. We need the healthcare team around patients who get HCV to understand them as a whole -- where they are and what may or may not be necessary for this particular patient to get through treatment. The pills and the medications only address one barrier, and that's the biological barrier. They don't address the personal issues or the systemic barriers, and they certainly don't address the infrastructure and lack of healthcare providers able to deal with this disease.

Improving on the HIV Model for Hepatitis C

Dr. Lekas: Would you propose a team-based approach for hepatitis C, like that for HIV, with a provider, a medical physician, and a nurse?

Ms. Harty: We need a lot more funding for that. Personally, working in a private office, I know that we don't have the funds to hire a psychiatrist. I am the social worker, psychiatrist, and nurse -- all of the above. It takes a lot of manpower to put people through this therapy, and the providers also need more support from the states and the private insurers who don't pay for psychological therapy unless the patient has Medicaid and can access a therapist. It is very hard for privately insured people to get the psychological therapy that they need.

Dr. Lekas: Do you think the HIV model is a good one?

Ms. Harty: Definitely.

Ms. Searson: Yes, especially because this is a complicated thing to explain, and you want to have people you can trust, like we have with case managers in HIV. But here is one thing I would like to see be different from the HIV model: We did not bring the case managers along in the science, so they were not able to offer the support to patients around understanding the disease and the importance of medication, because they were left out of the education. If you create a team, then all of them have to have the necessary information. In HIV, that is where we made some missteps; we kept the science separated from the prevention and services, and there was no interaction. The patient was better known by the people who knew the least about the disease itself and the benefits of treatment. Without that knowledge, how could those who have the confidence of the patient convince the patient of the importance of being treated? That is why we have people who are still not detectable, as well as the continuing struggles of being on multiple regimens, because the patients didn't get buy-in from the people that they trust.

Mr. Thompson: At the facility that I go to, Mount Sinai, the doctors work as a team. They all discuss the patient and reach a conclusion about where they are going with the patient and what their expected results are. They are very informative. I didn't know that I had stage 4 cirrhosis or that it could be stabilized. To me, stage 4 meant I was going to continue to decline. I didn't know that the liver repairs itself, and that with the elimination of the HCV infection the liver can regroup and reverse, to a point -- it's not going to be a completely healthy liver again. But I learned all of this from the doctors and the team where I get care. How well the doctors work together depends on the facility that you go to.

Dr. Lekas: With the massive restructuring of our healthcare system, this is a good note to end on. How HCV treatment will be integrated into this restructuring is an important issue. Thank you all.

References

  1. Lekas HM, Levin J, Searson G. Patient perspectives on what providers need to know about stigma and other barriers to hepatitis care; March 17-18, 2014; New York, New York. Panel 1.

Source

June 22, 2014

Nutrition and exercise in the management of liver cirrhosis

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 June 21; 20(23): 7286-7297.

Published online 2014 June 21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7286.

Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Nobuyuki Toshikuni, Tomiyasu Arisawa and Mikihiro Tsutsumi.

Nobuyuki Toshikuni, Tomiyasu Arisawa, Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan

Mikihiro Tsutsumi, Department of Hepatology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan

Author contributions: Toshikuni N wrote the manuscript; Arisawa T and Tsutsumi M supervised the work.

Correspondence to: Nobuyuki Toshikuni, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan. n.toshikuni@gmail.com

Telephone: +81-76-2862211 Fax: +81-76-2860892

Received January 4, 2014; Revised March 22, 2014; Accepted April 30, 2014;

Abstract

Liver cirrhosis (LC) patients often have protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and decreased physical activity. These conditions often lead to sarcopenia, which is the loss of skeletal muscle volume and increased muscle weakness. Recent studies have demonstrated that PEM and sarcopenia are predictors for poor survival in LC patients. Nutrition and exercise management can improve PEM and sarcopenia in those patients. Nutrition management includes sufficient dietary intake and improved nutrient metabolism. With the current high prevalence of obesity, the number of obese LC patients has increased, and restriction of excessive caloric intake without the exacerbation of impaired nutrient metabolism is required for such patients. Branched chain amino acids are good candidates for supplemental nutrients for both obese and non-obese LC patients. Exercise management can increase skeletal muscle volume and strength and improve insulin resistance; however, nutritional status and LC complications should be assessed before an exercise management regimen is implemented in LC patients. The establishment of optimal exercise regimens for LC patients is currently required. In this review, we describe nutritional status and its clinical impact on the outcomes of LC patients and discuss general nutrition and exercise management in LC patients.

Keywords: Liver cirrhosis, Protein-energy malnutrition, Sarcopenia, Obesity, Exercise

Core tip: Recent studies have shown that sarcopenia is a predictor of poor survival in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. LC-associated sarcopenia develops based on impaired nutrient metabolism and decreased physical activity. To improve this condition, nutrition and exercise management is imperative. Energy intake with branched chain amino acid supplementation is a promising method for nutrition management. Exercise can increase skeletal muscle volume and strength; however, nutritional status and LC complications should be assessed before exercise management begins. Obesity is another health issue for LC patients; improvement of insulin resistance is a key component in nutrition and exercise management for obese LC patients.

INTRODUCTION

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a critical stage of chronic liver disease with poor outcomes. Substantial data have indicated that poor liver function and the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are responsible for the shortened survival of LC patients[1-4]. Accumulating data have also demonstrated that LC patients often develop protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) at a rate of 25.1%-65.5%[5-8] and that PEM plays a crucial role in their poor survival[6,9-11]. LC-associated PEM occurs in combination with poor dietary intake, malabsorption, increased intestinal protein loss, decreased hepatic protein synthesis, abnormal substrate utilization, and hypermetabolism[12,13]. Individuals with PEM typically suffer from a loss of skeletal muscle volume and from muscle weakness; this condition is classified as sarcopenia[14]. Aging-related sarcopenia is defined as primary sarcopenia, while LC is a cause of secondary sarcopenia[15]. Recent studies have demonstrated that sarcopenia is an independent predictor of poor survival in LC patients with or without HCC[16,17]. However, over-nutrition is increasingly affecting humans worldwide[18], and thus, overweight/obesity are frequently observed in LC patients. For example, 72.4% of patients had excess caloric intake in a study of compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related LC[19], and 61% of compensated HCV-related LC patients have a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2[20]. Both chronic HCV infection[21] and overweight/obesity can cause insulin resistance, which raises the risk of liver fibrosis progression[22] and HCC occurrence[23] in HCV-related LC. Thus, clinicians are now confronted with problems related to malnutrition and overnutrition in the management of LC. In this review, we describe nutritional status and its clinical impact on the outcomes of LC patients and discuss nutrition and exercise management strategies for LC patients.

ENERGY METABOLISM ASSOCIATED WITH PEM IN LC PATIENTS

Metabolic activity

Metabolic activity can be assessed by comparing a measured resting energy expenditure (REE) and a predicted REE[24]. There are notable differences in metabolic activity among LC patients; previous studies have reported that 15%-33.8% of LC patients exhibited hypermetabolism, while 8%-31% were hypometabolic[7,8,25,26]. Earlier studies with LC patients demonstrated that a hypermetabolic state is strongly associated with decreased muscle volume[27]. Increased beta-adrenergic activity may explain, at least in part, hypermetabolism[26]. In a multicenter prospective study, a detailed analysis of metabolic activity and energy balance in LC patients was conducted. The results showed that PEM significantly correlated with Child-Pugh grade, that hypermetabolic and hypometabolic patients showed a significant decrease in kg of free fat mass, and that hypermetabolic patients had a positive energy balance due to decreased physical activity, while hypometabolic patients had a negative energy balance due to a reduced caloric intake[7].

The relationship between metabolic activity and outcomes in LC patients has been investigated. A study found that survival rate is significantly higher in normal metabolic LC patients than in hypometabolic or hypermetabolic LC patients[10]. Furthermore, some results have suggested that LC-related hypermetabolism is a factor associated with both transplant-free[25,28] and post-transplantation survival[29]. Hypermetabolic LC patients have decreased transplant-free survival compared with non-hypermetabolic LC patients (9.7 mo vs 31.8 mo, P = 0.05)[28]. Moreover, in a study of patients with end-stage liver disease, pre-transplantation hypermetabolism was associated with decreased post-transplantation survival[29].

Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism

The liver plays a critical role in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Ingested carbohydrates are taken up by the liver and converted into and stored as glycogen. In the fasting state, glucose is generated in the liver via glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis; thus, blood glucose levels are maintained[30]. Because LC patients have decreased gluconeogenesis ability and glycogen stores capacity[31], they are prone to entering into a starvation state after a relatively short fasting period (e.g., overnight)[32]. In this situation, lipid metabolism is enhanced; energy metabolism shifts from a carbohydrate preference to lipid oxidation preference[33-35]. Accordingly, free fatty acid (FFA) levels are elevated in LC patients. A previous study found that impaired re-esterification rather than accelerated lipolysis elevates FFA in LC patients[36].

Protein metabolism

Because albumin synthesis is decreased in LC patients, serum albumin levels inversely correlate with the grade of liver dysfunction[37]. Furthermore, in a study of compensated LC patients with alanine aminotransferase levels > 50 IU/L, a positive correlation between serum albumin levels and skeletal muscle volume was observed[38]. LC-associated PEM accelerates protein catabolism, which is the overall breakdown of cellular proteins, mainly in skeletal muscles, and which provides amino acids, especially branched chain amino acids (BCAAs), for protein synthesis and energy supply[39-41]. BCAAs consist of leucine, isoleucine, and valine. In a study with LC patients, energy efficacy (increased energy expenditure/energy equivalent of the supplemented nutrient) was significantly higher in BCAAs (96% ± 16%) than in glucose (96% ± 16% vs 41% ± 8%, P < 0.01) and fatty acids (96% ± 16% vs 27% ± 13%, P < 0.05)[42]. Moreover, BCAAs are consumed for ammonia detoxification in LC patients in whom hepatic detoxification to urea is impaired. Skeletal muscles and, to a lesser extent, the brain clear blood ammonia by incorporating ammonia into the process of glutamine production from glutamate. During the process, BCAAs are required for glutamate synthesis[40]. Thus, there is a frequent lack of BCAAs in LC patients, resulting in decreased albumin synthesis. In contrast to decreased BCAA levels, aromatic amino acid (AAA) levels are typically increased in LC patients[43,44], although underlying mechanisms for the altered AAA metabolism in LC are not fully understood. A decrease in the BCAA to AAA ratio (Fischer ratio; BCAA to tyrosine ratio, BTR) is thought to play a causal role in hepatic encephalopathy by enhanced brain AAA uptake and subsequent neurotransmission disturbance[45]. Recent studies have suggested that this amino acid imbalance occurs in the early stages of LC[46].

IMPACT OF SARCOPENIA ON LC PATIENT OUTCOMES

Sarcopenia

As described above, protein breakdown from skeletal muscles is an important pathologic mechanism for sarcopenia in LC patients. Recently, some analyses have indicated that hyperammonemia can cause sarcopenia. The results of an animal experiment demonstrated that skeletal muscle autophagy is induced by hyperammonemia and may contribute to sarcopenia in cases of LC[47]. Another study showed that skeletal muscle from LC patients had increased expression of myostatin, a known inhibitor of skeletal muscle accretion and growth. That study found that myostatin expression is induced by hyperammonemia in murine myotubes, suggesting a mechanism by which sarcopenia develops in LC patients[48].

Recent studies have examined outcomes in LC patients with sarcopenia[16,17]. In a study of LC patients in which sarcopenia was observed in 40% of the patients, sarcopenia, Child-Pugh scores, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were each found to be independent factors for mortality, with the mortality risk more than 2-fold higher in sarcopenic than nonsarcopenic patients[16]. Interestingly, the study also revealed a strong relationship between sarcopenia and sepsis-related death, which may reflect the impaired immunity found in LC patients. In line with those findings, a prospective study of LC patients demonstrated that PEM is an independent predictor of bacterial infection[49]. Furthermore, sarcopenia has been shown to correlate with poor survival after liver transplantation[50,51].

Sarcopenic obesity

The current global obesity epidemic has created a new condition: the combination of sarcopenia and obesity, described as sarcopenic obesity[52]. Because LC patients occasionally have sarcopenia (40%)[16] and obesity (30%-31%)[53,54], it can be deduced that a considerable number of them may have sarcopenic obesity. Furthermore, obesity is frequently accompanied by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and the prevalence of this liver disease is increasing in industrialized countries[55-57]. NAFLD can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and LC. Given this global trend, sarcopenic obesity will likely be a major condition in LC patients in the future.

Obesity typically occurs in tandem with decreased physical activity[58,59], which may create a vicious cycle of sarcopenia progression. Obesity also induces insulin resistance and systemic inflammation, both of which prompt hypercatabolism and impair the anabolic effect of muscles, resulting in protein breakdown stimulation and muscle synthesis suppression[59-61]. Moreover, a recent study revealed that sarcopenic obesity is more closely associated with insulin resistance than sarcopenia or obesity alone[62]. Taken together, this new condition appears to accelerate sarcopenia progression.

Although sarcopenia has been reported to be predictive of poor survival in LC patients[16,17], the impact of sarcopenic obesity on LC patient outcomes remains unknown. However, it has been suggested that obesity is an independent predictor of hepatic decompensation in LC patients[53]. Furthermore, obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for LC-related death or hospitalization[63,64]. A study of cancer patients revealed that sarcopenic obesity is associated with a poorer functional status compared with obesity without sarcopenia and is an independent predictor of survival[65]. These findings provide the rationale for further studies to clarify whether sarcopenic obesity worsens LC patient outcomes.

Table 1 lists the methods used to assess PEM and sarcopenia.

Capture

Indirect calorimetry

Indirect calorimetry can measure oxygen consumption per minute (VO2) and carbon dioxide production per minute (VCO2), thus calculating energy expenditure and non-protein respiratory quotient (npRQ). npRQ is considered to be a good marker for PEM assessment. In LC patients, npRQ is lower than in normal controls due to a shift of preferred energy metabolism from carbohydrate to lipid oxidation. A recent study of LC patients has revealed that the survival rate is significantly lower in patients with low npRQ (< 0.85) than in patients with scores above 0.85 (P < 0.01)[10]. Although the utility of indirect calorimetry in assessing energy metabolism has been proven, the high cost constrains its clinical application.

Anthropometric measurement

Because skeletal muscle volume reflects nutritional status, anthropometric measurement has been conducted to assess PEM in LC patients[66,67]. PEM indices include triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), arm muscle circumference (AMC), and arm circumference (AC). A study with LC patients reported that decreased AMC and TSF correlate with malnutrition and decreased liver functional reserve[67]. Accumulated data found a significant association between nutritional status estimated by anthropometric measurement and outcomes in LC patients. A previous study suggested that AMC may improve the prognostic capacity of Child-Pugh scores in LC patients[68]. Another study demonstrated that AMC and TSF may be useful in predicting survival of LC patients. In addition, the prognostic power of AMC was found to be higher than that of TSF[9]. A more recent study examined whether the anthropometric indices are alternatives to npRQ. When the measured values were expressed as percentages of normal values, percent of AMC and percent of AC were found to significantly correlate with npRQ, and a formula using %AC and Child-Pugh scores could represent npRQ[69]. External validation is needed to verify the relationship between the measurement values and npRQ. Although anthropometric measurements are simply and inexpensively performed, the interpretation of the measured values should be performed carefully. For example, a study suggested that AMC may be affected by edema[70], a symptom frequently observed in LC patients. Furthermore, possible errors related to anthropometric measurements should be noted: repeated measurements providing different values (unreliability, imprecision, undependability) and measurements departing from true values (inaccuracy, bias)[71].

Bioimpedance analysis

Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) is another measure to assess PEM. This method is based on the measurement of tissue conductivity[72]. Skeletal muscle is a major body component with low resistance and is therefore a dominant conductor[73]. A study with LC patients has demonstrated that BIA is a reliable bedside tool for the estimation of body cell mass, although it is limited in the case of LC with ascites[74]. The phase angle (PA) is a derived measure calculated from two parameters of BIA: PA = arc-tangent reactance/resistance × 180°/π[75]. Several studies have demonstrated that PA is useful in the assessment of the nutritional status in hemodialysis[76] or preoperative[77] patients. Another study has suggested that PA can serve as a prognostic indicator in cancer patients[78]. With regard to LC, a recent study indicated that PA is a promising parameter for the assessment of patient nutritional status[79]. Furthermore, a study suggested that PA is more predictive of survival than commonly used body composition information: a low PA is associated with shorter survival time[80]. Several studies have revealed that the estimated values of skeletal muscle mass obtained by BIA are not significantly different from those obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)[73] or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)[81] (see below). Because of its convenience and low cost, BIA is a potential alternative to these imaging methods[14].

Methods for sarcopenia assessment

Imaging methods: There are several methods for sarcopenia assessment. Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging method that permits the precise measurement of skeletal muscle volume. CT technology enables specific tissue demarcation according to a CT measure of the tissue, thereby permitting calculation of its area. Human muscle tissue has a CT number in the range of -29 to +150 hounsfield units (HU). Muscles at the third lumbar (L3) vertebra encompass the psoas, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, transversus abdominis, external and internal obliques, and rectus abdominis. A recent analysis revealed that the calculated L3 muscle area accurately represents the whole-body skeletal muscle volume (r = 0.86-0.94, P < 0.001)[82]. Based on that finding, the L3 muscle area normalized for stature (cm2/m2) can be used as an index of skeletal muscle volume (the L3 skeletal muscle index, L3 SMI)[65]. Although cutoff values for diagnosing sarcopenia have not been established, a recent study used cutoff values of 38.5 cm2/m2 for women and 52.4 cm2/m2 for men[65]. MRI has also been used for the assessment of skeletal muscle volume and sarcopenia[73,83,84].

DXA is another imaging method used in sarcopenia assessment. This method allows for the measurement of bone, fat, and lean-tissue content. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) accounts for more than 75% of the total body skeletal muscle mass and can thus serve as a marker for sarcopenia[59,85]. ASM divided by height squared (ASM/Ht2; kg/m2)[86] and ASM as a percentage of body weight (ASM/Wt)[87] have been proposed as indices for sarcopenia. Sarcopenia has been defined as an ASM < 1 SD[62] or < 2 SD[59] below the sex-specific mean for a young reference group. The accuracy of the DXA method has been shown to be comparable to that of the CT or MRI method[84,88], and the DXA method requires less radiation exposure and costs than the CT method[88].

Handgrip strength: Decreased muscle strength reflects a decreased volume of skeletal muscle. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) recommends handgrip strength as a practical measure of muscle strength[14]. Handgrip strength has been shown to be a useful marker for the assessment of nutritional status in LC patients[89]. Moreover, a previous analysis has revealed that handgrip strength can be a useful predictor of hepatic decompensation in LC patients[6]. However, it should be noted that considerable variation in the measurement methods has the potential to introduce measurement errors[90].

NUTRITION MANAGEMENT FOR LC PATIENTS

Management for PEM in LC patients

Dietary management: Poor dietary intake is an important cause of PEM in LC patients. In a study of nutritional status in LC patients, decrease in daily caloric intake paralleled worsening of progressive liver failure: 48% and 34% of Child A patients, 51.7% and 35.8% of Child B patients, and 80.3% and 62.9% of Child C patients at admission had a caloric intake below 30 kcal/kg of body weight and protein intakes below 1 g/kg of body weight, respectively (P < 0.001). Furthermore, poor dietary intake was found to be an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality[67]. Some studies have aimed to clarify whether efforts to increase dietary intake can improve the outcome of LC patients, and short-term follow-up has suggested an improvement of nutritional status[91,92]. A study of alcoholic LC patients demonstrated that an increase in dietary intake altered the energy metabolism of Child C patients from preferred lipid oxidation to preferred carbohydrate metabolism. However, the dietary management appeared to be limited in improving nutritional status in end-stage LC patients, such as those with refractory ascites[92]. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines recommend that energy and protein intake should be 35-40 kcal/kg of body weight per day and 1.2-1.5 g/kg of body weight per day, respectively[93].

The timing of dietary intake can influence energy metabolism. Because LC patients are prone to entering a starvation state after a relatively short fasting period, a large number of small meals (“nibbling” pattern) rather than a small number of large meals (“gorging” pattern) is considered preferable to maintain optimal energy metabolism[94,95]. Several studies of LC patients found that late nocturnal energy supplementation altered energy metabolism from preferred lipid oxidation to preferred carbohydrate metabolism[96,97]. More recently, a randomized controlled trial with LC patients suggested that nocturnal energy supplementation may be superior to daytime energy supplementation for protein accretion[98].

BCAA supplementation: As previously discussed, a lack of BCAAs in LC patients can accelerate muscular protein catabolism, decreased albumin synthesis, and hyperammonemia and associated hepatic encephalopathy. A loss of skeletal muscle volume (i.e., sarcopenia)[16], low serum albumin levels[99-104], and hepatic encephalopathy[105] have been found to be predictors of poor survival in LC patients. These findings lead to the notion that BCAA supplementation may restore impaired protein metabolism and thereby improve outcomes of LC patients. Indeed, previous studies have revealed that BCAA administration stimulates albumin synthesis[40] and protein synthesis in skeletal muscles[106]. Of the BCAAs, leucine[106-108] is considered to play a central role in the synthesis process, of which, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)[106,107] appears to be a key component in controlling its signaling pathway.

BCAA administration can be conducted either orally or intravenously. A BCAA-enriched amino acid solution has been used in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy for several decades, and its utility has been demonstrated[109]. Oral BCAA-enriched formulas, BCAA granules and BCAA and carbohydrate mixtures, have been used in the effort to achieve preferred nutritional status and improved outcomes of decompensated LC patients[110]. Studies with LC patients have demonstrated that serum albumin levels and npRQ increased with oral BCAA supplementation[111,112]. In a study of HCV-related LC, the intake of BCAA and carbohydrate mixtures as late evening snacks was more effective in increasing serum albumin levels and improving energy metabolism than ordinary food intake[111]. Long-term follow-up studies of BCAA supplementation for LC patients showed positive results. In a randomized clinical trial with decompensated LC patients, supplementation with BCAA granules contributed to preventing progressive liver failure[113]. A similar randomized controlled trial found that supplementation with BCAA granules increased serum albumin levels and contributed to decreased liver failure and mortality[114].

Thus, BCAA supplementation is an effective therapeutic strategy for improving energy metabolism and overall outcomes in LC patients. This nutritional treatment is recommended in several guidelines[93,115]. The optimal timing of BCAA administration during the course of LC remains to be determined, although one randomized controlled trial suggested that patients with a BTR of < 4 should begin BCAA treatment even in cases of compensated LC[116]. Given the close relationship between BCAAs and protein synthesis in skeletal muscles, future studies focusing on the benefits of BCAA supplementation on sarcopenia in LC are necessary. In addition, some evidence suggests that BCAAs are essential for lymphocyte responsiveness and are necessary to support other immune cell functions[117]. Whether BCAA treatment can improve immunity in LC patients with sarcopenia and decrease the incidence of severe infection requires investigation.

Nutrition management of obese LC patients

With the increasing prevalence of obesity worldwide, the prevalence of obese LC patients is increasing[54]. Given that obesity accompanied by LC can accelerate hepatic decompensation[53], enhance hepatocarcinogenesis[118,119], and result in poor patient survival[63,64], nutrition management is imperative for obese LC patients. The restriction of excessive caloric intake without exacerbation of impaired nutrient metabolism is necessary for successful LC management. Furthermore, obesity is closely linked to insulin resistance; this metabolic problem increases the risk of disease progression, hepatocarcinogenesis, and mortality in LC patients[120]. Considering that obesity can exacerbate sarcopenia-associated insulin resistance[62,121], nutrition strategies for insulin resistance appear to be important, particularly in LC patients with sarcopenic obesity. Recent studies have suggested that BCAA supplementation is effective in improving insulin resistance[122,123]. Of the BCAAs, leucine appears to play a critical role in controlling carbohydrate metabolism; the amino acid regulates the oxidative use of glucose by skeletal muscle through the stimulation of glucose recycling via the glucose-alanine cycle[122]. Further trials are required to establish dietary regimens, such as dietary nutrient balance, for obese LC patients.

EXERCISE MANAGEMENT FOR LC PATIENTS

Physical activity and exercise capacity in LC patients

A recent survey of LC patients reported that physical activity levels were lower in LC patients than in healthy controls[124]. The survey results also suggested that low levels of physical activity were inversely associated with insulin resistance. In a study of compensated LC, low levels of physical activity and poor caloric intake were closely linked to sarcopenia[125]. These findings indicate that increased physical activity may prevent and improve sarcopenia in LC patients. Indeed, in studies of the elderly[126] or patients with certain types of chronic diseases[127], exercise management has been shown to be effective in preventing and improving sarcopenia.

Exercise capacity is described as the ability to use oxygen during exercise. The commonly used measure of exercise capacity is maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max)[128]. Studies with LC patients have shown decreased exercise capacity as evaluated by VO2max[129,130] and an inverse relationship between exercise capacity and the severity of liver disease[130-132]. Recent research has demonstrated that a decrease in exercise capacity is not only associated with LC severity but also predictive of mortality after liver transplantation[133,134]. Earlier studies on exercise management demonstrated that physical training programs as short as approximately one month were useful in increasing VO2max or peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) in LC patients[131,135].

Given these findings, exercise management is a key component in the management of LC patients because it can lead to increases in physical activity, skeletal muscle volume and strength, and exercise capacity, ultimately improving the quality of life and survival.

Assessment of nutritional status and complications for exercise management

The current guidelines for physical activity and health in older adults (men and women aged ≥ 65 years and adults aged 50-64 years with clinically significant chronic conditions and/or functional limitations) recommend that moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity should be performed for a minimum of 30 min five days each week in addition to two sessions of resistance training and flexibility exercises each week[136]. The applicability of these recommendations depends on the severity of the chronic conditions and complications. With regard to LC, inappropriate exercise may cause undesirable outcomes due to the impaired energy metabolism and/or complications associated with LC, including ascites[137], hepatic encephalopathy[138], portal hypertension[139], and hepatopulmonary syndrome[140]. For example, in patients with LC, portal pressure and portal hypertension reportedly increased with moderate exercise (30% of the maximum), suggesting that such physical load poses a risk for variceal bleeding[139]. Moreover, exercise under insufficient nutrient intake can promote protein catabolism and thereby a loss of skeletal muscle mass in LC patients[141,142]. The assessment of nutritional status and complications is therefore mandatory before any exercise management of LC patients.

Exercise regimens for LC patients

The optimal exercise regimens for LC patients remain uncertain. However, there are some preliminary data with regard to efficacious exercise management for LC patients. Recently, based on a survey of compensated LC patients, researchers recommended the following exercise regimen: walking 5000 or more steps per day with a total caloric intake of approximately 30 kcal/ideal body weight[125]. The authors claimed that the regimen has the potential to maintain and increase skeletal muscle volume in LC patients. Most recently, a randomized pilot study with LC patients, in which most participants had Child-Pugh grade A LC, examined whether an exercise program combined with leucine supplementation (10 g/d) can improve patient outcome. The program included three sessions per week of a 1-h treadmill and cycle ergometry exercise at an intensity of 60%-70% of the maximum heart rate, over a period of 12 wk. The intervention group had improved exercise capacity, as shown by the 6-min walk test (from median 365 m to median 445 m) and the 2-min step test (from median 100 steps to median 150 steps), increased lower thigh circumference, and improved health-related quality of life; the control group had no significant changes[143]. During the study, no adverse events due to the implementation of the exercise program were observed. These studies suggest the possibility that moderate exercise combined with LC-specific nutritional support can increase skeletal muscle volume and improve the outcomes of LC patients. Other studies have indicated that aerobic exercise can be expected to improve insulin resistance in patients with chronic liver disease[144,145]. This favorable effect of exercise on insulin sensitivity is particularly important for obese patients[144,146]. Future intensive studies are required to establish efficacious and safe exercise regimens for LC patients.

CONCLUSION

Substantial data exist clearly demonstrating that PEM confers a risk of poor survival in LC patients. PEM in LC patients is highly associated with sarcopenia and a decrease in serum albumin levels. These conditions have also been reported to be predictors of poor patient survival. Nutrition and exercise management can improve PEM and sarcopenia in LC patients. Nutrition management includes sufficient dietary intake and an improvement of impaired nutrient metabolism. In contrast, the current rise in obesity prevalence has increased the number of obese LC patients. Restriction of excessive caloric intake without exacerbation of impaired nutrient metabolism is necessary for those patients. BCAAs are good candidates for supplemental nutrients for both obese and non-obese LC patients. Exercise management can increase skeletal muscle volume and strength and can improve insulin resistance; however, assessment of nutritional status and LC complications is mandatory before the implementation of an exercise program for LC patients. The establishment of optimal exercise regimens for LC patients is required. Figure 1 shows a tentative practical approach for managing LC patients with sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity. The further development of methods for nutrition and exercise management will improve the overall health outcomes of LC patients.

WJG-20-7286-g001

Figure 1 A practical approach for managing liver cirrhosis patients with sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity. LC: Liver cirrhosis; PEM: Protein-energy malnutrition; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; DXA: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; BCAA: Branched chain amino acid.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers: Maasoumy B, Ruiz-Margain A S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: A E- Editor: Zhang DN

References

1. Wilt TJ, Shamliyan T, Shaukat A, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Yuan JM, Johnson JR, Tacklind J, Rutks I, Kane RL. Management of chronic hepatitis B. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;(174):1-671. [PubMed] 

2. Alazawi W, Cunningham M, Dearden J, Foster GR. Systematic review: outcome of compensated cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:344-355. [PubMed] [DOI]

3. Schwartz JM, Reinus JF. Prevalence and natural history of alcoholic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2012;16:659-666. [PubMed] [DOI]

4. Duvnjak M, Lerotić I, Barsić N, Tomasić V, Virović Jukić L, Velagić V. Pathogenesis and management issues for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:4539-4550. [PubMed] 

5. Lautz HU, Selberg O, Körber J, Bürger M, Müller MJ. Protein-calorie malnutrition in liver cirrhosis. Clin Investig. 1992;70:478-486. [PubMed] 

6. Alvares-da-Silva MR, Reverbel da Silveira T. Comparison between handgrip strength, subjective global assessment, and prognostic nutritional index in assessing malnutrition and predicting clinical outcome in cirrhotic outpatients. Nutrition. 2005;21:113-117. [PubMed] [DOI]

7. Guglielmi FW, Panella C, Buda A, Budillon G, Caregaro L, Clerici C, Conte D, Federico A, Gasbarrini G, Guglielmi A. Nutritional state and energy balance in cirrhotic patients with or without hypermetabolism. Multicentre prospective study by the ‘Nutritional Problems in Gastroenterology’ Section of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE). Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37:681-688. [PubMed] [DOI]

8. Peng S, Plank LD, McCall JL, Gillanders LK, McIlroy K, Gane EJ. Body composition, muscle function, and energy expenditure in patients with liver cirrhosis: a comprehensive study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1257-1266. [PubMed] 

9. Alberino F, Gatta A, Amodio P, Merkel C, Di Pascoli L, Boffo G, Caregaro L. Nutrition and survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2001;17:445-450. [PubMed] 

10. Tajika M, Kato M, Mohri H, Miwa Y, Kato T, Ohnishi H, Moriwaki H. Prognostic value of energy metabolism in patients with viral liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2002;18:229-234. [PubMed] 

11. Sam J, Nguyen GC. Protein-calorie malnutrition as a prognostic indicator of mortality among patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Liver Int. 2009;29:1396-1402. [PubMed] [DOI]

12. Tsiaousi ET, Hatzitolios AI, Trygonis SK, Savopoulos CG. Malnutrition in end stage liver disease: recommendations and nutritional support. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:527-533. [PubMed] [DOI]

13. O’Brien A, Williams R. Nutrition in end-stage liver disease: principles and practice. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1729-1740. [PubMed] [DOI]

14. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412-423. [PubMed] [DOI]

15. Lang T, Streeper T, Cawthon P, Baldwin K, Taaffe DR, Harris TB. Sarcopenia: etiology, clinical consequences, intervention, and assessment. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:543-559. [PubMed] [DOI]

16.nMontano-Loza AJ, Meza-Junco J, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, Bain VG, Sawyer MB. Muscle wasting is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:166-173, 173.e1. [PubMed] [DOI]

17. Meza-Junco J, Montano-Loza AJ, Baracos VE, Prado CM, Bain VG, Beaumont C, Esfandiari N, Lieffers JR, Sawyer MB. Sarcopenia as a prognostic index of nutritional status in concurrent cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:861-870. [PubMed] [DOI]

18. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez HR, Lu Y, Bahalim AN. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557-567. [PubMed] [DOI]

19. Yasutake K, Bekki M, Ichinose M, Ikemoto M, Fujino T, Ryu T, Wada Y, Takami Y, Saitsu H, Kohjima M. Assessing current nutritional status of patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis in the compensated stage. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21:400-405. [PubMed] 

20. Moucari R, Asselah T, Cazals-Hatem D, Voitot H, Boyer N, Ripault MP, Sobesky R, Martinot-Peignoux M, Maylin S, Nicolas-Chanoine MH. Insulin resistance in chronic hepatitis C: association with genotypes 1 and 4, serum HCV RNA level, and liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:416-423. [PubMed] [DOI]

21. Harrison SA. Insulin resistance among patients with chronic hepatitis C: etiology and impact on treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:864-876. [PubMed] [DOI]

22. Cammà C, Petta S, Di Marco V, Bronte F, Ciminnisi S, Licata G, Peralta S, Simone F, Marchesini G, Craxì A. Insulin resistance is a risk factor for esophageal varices in hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2009;49:195-203. [PubMed] [DOI]

23. Wang C, Wang X, Gong G, Ben Q, Qiu W, Chen Y, Li G, Wang L. Increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:1639-1648. [PubMed] [DOI]

24. Plank LD, Metzger DJ, McCall JL, Barclay KL, Gane EJ, Streat SJ, Munn SR, Hill GL. Sequential changes in the metabolic response to orthotopic liver transplantation during the first year after surgery. Ann Surg. 2001;234:245-255. [PubMed] 

25. Müller MJ, Lautz HU, Plogmann B, Bürger M, Körber J, Schmidt FW. Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in patients with cirrhosis: the impact of cause, clinical staging and nutritional state. Hepatology. 1992;15:782-794. [PubMed] 

26. Müller MJ, Böttcher J, Selberg O, Weselmann S, Böker KH, Schwarze M, von zur Mühlen A, Manns MP. Hypermetabolism in clinically stable patients with liver cirrhosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:1194-1201. [PubMed] 

27. Müller MJ, Böker KH, Selberg O. Are patients with liver cirrhosis hypermetabolic?. Clin Nutr. 1994;13:131-144. [PubMed] 

28. Mathur S, Peng S, Gane EJ, McCall JL, Plank LD. Hypermetabolism predicts reduced transplant-free survival independent of MELD and Child-Pugh scores in liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2007;23:398-403. [PubMed] [DOI]

29. Selberg O, Böttcher J, Tusch G, Pichlmayr R, Henkel E, Müller MJ. Identification of high- and low-risk patients before liver transplantation: a prospective cohort study of nutritional and metabolic parameters in 150 patients. Hepatology. 1997;25:652-657. [PubMed] [DOI]

30. Postic C, Dentin R, Girard J. Role of the liver in the control of carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis. Diabetes Metab. 2004;30:398-408. [PubMed] 

31. Changani KK, Jalan R, Cox IJ, Ala-Korpela M, Bhakoo K, Taylor-Robinson SD, Bell JD. Evidence for altered hepatic gluconeogenesis in patients with cirrhosis using in vivo 31-phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Gut. 2001;49:557-564. [PubMed] 

32. Schneeweiss B, Graninger W, Ferenci P, Eichinger S, Grimm G, Schneider B, Laggner AN, Lenz K, Kleinberger G. Energy metabolism in patients with acute and chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 1990;11:387-393. [PubMed] 

33. Campillo B, Chapelain C, Bonnet JC, Frisdal E, Devanlay M, Bouissou P, Fouet P, Wirquin E, Atlan G. Hormonal and metabolic changes during exercise in cirrhotic patients. Metabolism. 1990;39:18-24. [PubMed] 

34. Merli M, Riggio O, Romiti A, Ariosto F, Mango L, Pinto G, Savioli M, Capocaccia L. Basal energy production rate and substrate use in stable cirrhotic patients. Hepatology. 1990;12:106-112. [PubMed] 

35. Riggio O, Merli M, Romiti A, Pinto G, Fanella R, Attili AF, Capocaccia L. Early postprandial energy expenditure and macronutrient use after a mixed meal in cirrhotic patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:445-450. [PubMed] 

36. Shangraw RE, Jahoor F. Lipolysis and lipid oxidation in cirrhosis and after liver transplantation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;278:G967-G973. [PubMed] 

37. Tessari P. Protein metabolism in liver cirrhosis: from albumin to muscle myofibrils. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003;6:79-85. [PubMed] [DOI]

38. Kotoh K, Nakamuta M, Fukushima M, Matsuzaki C, Enjoji M, Sakai H, Nawata H. High relative fat-free mass is important for maintaining serum albumin levels in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1356-1360. [PubMed] 

39. Blonde-Cynober F, Aussel C, Cynober L. Abnormalities in branched-chain amino acid metabolism in cirrhosis: influence of hormonal and nutritional factors and directions for future research. Clin Nutr. 1999;18:5-13. [PubMed] [DOI]

40. Moriwaki H, Miwa Y, Tajika M, Kato M, Fukushima H, Shiraki M. Branched-chain amino acids as a protein- and energy-source in liver cirrhosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:405-409. [PubMed] [DOI]

41. Laviano A, Muscaritoli M, Cascino A, Preziosa I, Inui A, Mantovani G, Rossi-Fanelli F. Branched-chain amino acids: the best compromise to achieve anabolism?. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:408-414. [PubMed] 

42. Kato M, Miwa Y, Tajika M, Hiraoka T, Muto Y, Moriwaki H. Preferential use of branched-chain amino acids as an energy substrate in patients with liver cirrhosis. Intern Med. 1998;37:429-434. [PubMed] 

43. Dejong CH, van de Poll MC, Soeters PB, Jalan R, Olde Damink SW. Aromatic amino acid metabolism during liver failure. J Nutr. 2007;137:1579S-1585S; discussion 1597S-1598S. [PubMed] 

44. Michitaka K, Hiraoka A, Kume M, Uehara T, Hidaka S, Ninomiya T, Hasebe A, Miyamoto Y, Ichiryu M, Tanihira T. Amino acid imbalance in patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatol Res. 2010;40:393-398. [PubMed] [DOI]

45. Fischer JE, Baldessarini RJ. False neurotransmitters and hepatic failure. Lancet. 1971;2:75-80. [PubMed] 

46. Habu D, Nishiguchi S, Nakatani S, Lee C, Enomoto M, Tamori A, Takeda T, Ohfuji S, Fukushima W, Tanaka T. Comparison of the effect of BCAA granules on between decompensated and compensated cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:1719-1723. [PubMed] 

47. Qiu J, Tsien C, Thapalaya S, Narayanan A, Weihl CC, Ching JK, Eghtesad B, Singh K, Fu X, Dubyak G. Hyperammonemia-mediated autophagy in skeletal muscle contributes to sarcopenia of cirrhosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;303:E983-E993. [PubMed] [DOI]

48. Qiu J, Thapaliya S, Runkana A, Yang Y, Tsien C, Mohan ML, Narayanan A, Eghtesad B, Mozdziak PE, McDonald C. Hyperammonemia in cirrhosis induces transcriptional regulation of myostatin by an NF-κB-mediated mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:18162-18167. [PubMed] [DOI]

49. Merli M, Lucidi C, Giannelli V, Giusto M, Riggio O, Falcone M, Ridola L, Attili AF, Venditti M. Cirrhotic patients are at risk for health care-associated bacterial infections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:979-985. [PubMed] [DOI]

50. Englesbe MJ, Patel SP, He K, Lynch RJ, Schaubel DE, Harbaugh C, Holcombe SA, Wang SC, Segev DL, Sonnenday CJ. Sarcopenia and mortality after liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:271-278. [PubMed] [DOI]

51.Kaido T, Ogawa K, Fujimoto Y, Ogura Y, Hata K, Ito T, Tomiyama K, Yagi S, Mori A, Uemoto S. Impact of sarcopenia on survival in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1549-1556. [PubMed] [DOI]

52. Zamboni M, Mazzali G, Fantin F, Rossi A, Di Francesco V. Sarcopenic obesity: a new category of obesity in the elderly. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;18:388-395. [PubMed] [DOI]

53. Berzigotti A, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Morillas R, Escorsell A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Patch D, Matloff DS. Obesity is an independent risk factor for clinical decompensation in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011;54:555-561. [PubMed] [DOI]

54. Shiraki M, Nishiguchi S, Saito M, Fukuzawa Y, Mizuta T, Kaibori M, Hanai T, Nishimura K, Shimizu M, Tsurumi H. Nutritional status and quality of life in current patients with liver cirrhosis as assessed in 2007-2011. Hepatol Res. 2013;43:106-112. [PubMed] [DOI]

55. Kojima S, Watanabe N, Numata M, Ogawa T, Matsuzaki S. Increase in the prevalence of fatty liver in Japan over the past 12 years: analysis of clinical background. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:954-961. [PubMed] [DOI]

56. McCullough AJ. Epidemiology of the metabolic syndrome in the USA. J Dig Dis. 2011;12:333-340. [PubMed] [DOI]

57. Fan JG. Epidemiology of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28 Suppl 1:11-17. [PubMed] [DOI]

58. Launer LJ, Harris T, Rumpel C, Madans J. Body mass index, weight change, and risk of mobility disability in middle-aged and older women. The epidemiologic follow-up study of NHANES I. JAMA. 1994;271:1093-1098. [PubMed] 

59. Levine ME, Crimmins EM. The impact of insulin resistance and inflammation on the association between sarcopenic obesity and physical functioning. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:2101-2106. [PubMed] [DOI]

60. Lee CG, Boyko EJ, Strotmeyer ES, Lewis CE, Cawthon PM, Hoffman AR, Everson-Rose SA, Barrett-Connor E, Orwoll ES. Association between insulin resistance and lean mass loss and fat mass gain in older men without diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:1217-1224. [PubMed] [DOI]

61. Lee CG, Boyko EJ, Barrett-Connor E, Miljkovic I, Hoffman AR, Everson-Rose SA, Lewis CE, Cawthon PM, Strotmeyer ES, Orwoll ES. Insulin sensitizers may attenuate lean mass loss in older men with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2381-2386. [PubMed] [DOI]

62. Lim S, Kim JH, Yoon JW, Kang SM, Choi SH, Park YJ, Kim KW, Lim JY, Park KS, Jang HC. Sarcopenic obesity: prevalence and association with metabolic syndrome in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA). Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1652-1654. [PubMed] [DOI]

63. Ioannou GN, Weiss NS, Kowdley KV, Dominitz JA. Is obesity a risk factor for cirrhosis-related death or hospitalization? A population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1053-1059. [PubMed] [DOI]

64. Ioannou GN, Weiss NS, Boyko EJ, Kowdley KV, Kahn SE, Carithers RL, Tsai EC, Dominitz JA. Is central obesity associated with cirrhosis-related death or hospitalization? A population-based, cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:67-74. [PubMed] 

65. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L, Baracos VE. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:629-635. [PubMed] [DOI]

66. Nutritional status in cirrhosis. Italian Multicentre Cooperative Project on Nutrition in Liver Cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1994;21:317-325. [PubMed] 

67. Campillo B, Richardet JP, Scherman E, Bories PN. Evaluation of nutritional practice in hospitalized cirrhotic patients: results of a prospective study. Nutrition. 2003;19:515-521. [PubMed] 

68. Abad-Lacruz A, Cabré E, González-Huix F, Fernández-Bañares F, Esteve M, Planas R, Llovet JM, Quer JC, Gassull MA. Routine tests of renal function, alcoholism, and nutrition improve the prognostic accuracy of Child-Pugh score in nonbleeding advanced cirrhotics. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:382-387. [PubMed] 

69. Terakura Y, Shiraki M, Nishimura K, Iwasa J, Nagaki M, Moriwaki H. Indirect calorimetry and anthropometry to estimate energy metabolism in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2010;56:372-379. [PubMed] 

70. Heymsfield SB, Casper K. Anthropometric assessment of the adult hospitalized patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11:36S-41S. [PubMed] 

71. Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999;82:165-177. [PubMed] 

72. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, Heitmann BL, Kent-Smith L, Melchior JC, Pirlich M. Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1226-1243. [PubMed] [DOI]

73. Chien MY, Huang TY, Wu YT. Prevalence of sarcopenia estimated using a bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equation in community-dwelling elderly people in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1710-1715. [PubMed] [DOI]

74. Pirlich M, Schütz T, Spachos T, Ertl S, Weiss ML, Lochs H, Plauth M. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful bedside technique to assess malnutrition in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Hepatology. 2000;32:1208-1215. [PubMed] [DOI]

75. Baumgartner RN, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Bioelectric impedance phase angle and body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:16-23. [PubMed] 

76. Oliveira CM, Kubrusly M, Mota RS, Silva CA, Choukroun G, Oliveira VN. The phase angle and mass body cell as markers of nutritional status in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2010;20:314-320. [PubMed] [DOI]

77. Cardinal TR, Wazlawik E, Bastos JL, Nakazora LM, Scheunemann L. Standardized phase angle indicates nutritional status in hospitalized preoperative patients. Nutr Res. 2010;30:594-600. [PubMed] [DOI]

78. Paiva SI, Borges LR, Halpern-Silveira D, Assunção MC, Barros AJ, Gonzalez MC. Standardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis as prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2010;19:187-192. [PubMed] [DOI]

79. Fernandes SA, Bassani L, Nunes FF, Aydos ME, Alves AV, Marroni CA. Nutritional assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Arq Gastroenterol. 2012;49:19-27. [PubMed] 

80. Selberg O, Selberg D. Norms and correlates of bioimpedance phase angle in healthy human subjects, hospitalized patients, and patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;86:509-516. [PubMed] [DOI]

81. Bosaeus I, Wilcox G, Rothenberg E, Strauss BJ. Skeletal muscle mass in hospitalized elderly patients: comparison of measurements by single-frequency BIA and DXA. Clin Nutr. 2014;33:426-431. [PubMed] [DOI]

82. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:997-1006. [PubMed] [DOI]

83. Beneke R, Neuerburg J, Bohndorf K. Muscle cross-section measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63:424-429. [PubMed] 

84. Chen Z, Wang Z, Lohman T, Heymsfield SB, Outwater E, Nicholas JS, Bassford T, LaCroix A, Sherrill D, Punyanitya M. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a valid tool for assessing skeletal muscle mass in older women. J Nutr. 2007;137:2775-2780. [PubMed] 

85. Gallagher D, Visser M, De Meersman RE, Sepúlveda D, Baumgartner RN, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997;83:229-239. [PubMed] 

86. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, Garry PJ, Lindeman RD. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:755-763. [PubMed] 

87. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R. Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:889-896. [PubMed] 

88. Wang ZM, Visser M, Ma R, Baumgartner RN, Kotler D, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB. Skeletal muscle mass: evaluation of neutron activation and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry methods. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996;80:824-831. [PubMed] 

89. Hirsch S, Bunout D, de la Maza P, Iturriaga H, Petermann M, Icazar G, Gattas V, Ugarte G. Controlled trial on nutrition supplementation in outpatients with symptomatic alcoholic cirrhosis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993;17:119-124. [PubMed] 

90. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40:423-429. [PubMed] [DOI]

91. Bories PN, Campillo B. One-month regular oral nutrition in alcoholic cirrhotic patients. Changes of nutritional status, hepatic function and serum lipid pattern. Br J Nutr. 1994;72:937-946. [PubMed] 

92. Campillo B, Bories PN, Pornin B, Devanlay M. Influence of liver failure, ascites, and energy expenditure on the response to oral nutrition in alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 1997;13:613-621. [PubMed] 

93. Plauth M, Cabré E, Riggio O, Assis-Camilo M, Pirlich M, Kondrup J, Ferenci P, Holm E, Vom Dahl S, Müller MJ. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Liver disease. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:285-294. [PubMed] [DOI]

94. Swart GR, Zillikens MC, van Vuure JK, van den Berg JW. Effect of a late evening meal on nitrogen balance in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. BMJ. 1989;299:1202-1203. [PubMed] 

95. Verboeket-van de Venne WP, Westerterp KR, van Hoek B, Swart GR. Energy expenditure and substrate metabolism in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: effects of the pattern of food intake. Gut. 1995;36:110-116. [PubMed] 

96. Chang WK, Chao YC, Tang HS, Lang HF, Hsu CT. Effects of extra-carbohydrate supplementation in the late evening on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in patients with liver cirrhosis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:96-99. [PubMed] 

97. Miwa Y, Shiraki M, Kato M, Tajika M, Mohri H, Murakami N, Kato T, Ohnishi H, Morioku T, Muto Y. Improvement of fuel metabolism by nocturnal energy supplementation in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2000;18:184-189. [PubMed] 

98. Plank LD, Gane EJ, Peng S, Muthu C, Mathur S, Gillanders L, McIlroy K, Donaghy AJ, McCall JL. Nocturnal nutritional supplementation improves total body protein status of patients with liver cirrhosis: a randomized 12-month trial. Hepatology. 2008;48:557-566. [PubMed] [DOI]

99. Alvarez MA, Cirera I, Solà R, Bargalló A, Morillas RM, Planas R. Long-term clinical course of decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis: a prospective study of 165 patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:906-911. [PubMed] [DOI]

100. Masson S, Emmerson I, Henderson E, Fletcher EH, Burt AD, Day CP, Stewart SF. Clinical but not histological factors predict long-term prognosis in patients with histologically advanced non-decompensated alcoholic liver disease. Liver Int. 2014;34:235-242. [PubMed] [DOI]

101. Serfaty L, Aumaître H, Chazouillères O, Bonnand AM, Rosmorduc O, Poupon RE, Poupon R. Determinants of outcome of compensated hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1998;27:1435-1440. [PubMed] [DOI]

102. Hu KQ, Tong MJ. The long-term outcomes of patients with compensated hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and history of parenteral exposure in the United States. Hepatology. 1999;29:1311-1316. [PubMed] [DOI]

103. Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Hosaka T, Sezaki H, Someya T, Akuta N, Suzuki F, Suzuki Y, Saitoh S, Arase Y. Natural history of compensated cirrhosis in the Child-Pugh class A compared between 490 patients with hepatitis C and 167 with B virus infections. J Med Virol. 2006;78:459-465. [PubMed] [DOI]

104. Toshikuni N, Izumi A, Nishino K, Inada N, Sakanoue R, Yamato R, Suehiro M, Kawanaka M, Yamada G. Comparison of outcomes between patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and those with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1276-1283. [PubMed] [DOI]

105. Bustamante J, Rimola A, Ventura PJ, Navasa M, Cirera I, Reggiardo V, Rodés J. Prognostic significance of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1999;30:890-895. [PubMed] 

106. Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms through which branched-chain amino acids mediate translational control of protein synthesis. J Nutr. 2006;136:227S-231S. [PubMed] 

107. Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr. 2001;131:856S-860S. [PubMed] 

108.Nicastro H, Artioli GG, Costa Ados S, Solis MY, da Luz CR, Blachier F, Lancha AH. An overview of the therapeutic effects of leucine supplementation on skeletal muscle under atrophic conditions. Amino Acids. 2011;40:287-300. [PubMed] [DOI]

109. Freund H, Dienstag J, Lehrich J, Yoshimura N, Bradford RR, Rosen H, Atamian S, Slemmer E, Holroyde J, Fischer JE. Infusion of branched-chain enriched amino acid solution in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Ann Surg. 1982;196:209-220. [PubMed] 

110. Sato S, Watanabe A, Muto Y, Suzuki K, Kato A, Moriwaki H, Kato M, Nakamura T. Clinical comparison of branched-chain amino acid (l-Leucine, l-Isoleucine, l-Valine) granules and oral nutrition for hepatic insufficiency in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (LIV-EN study). Hepatol Res. 2005;31:232-240. [PubMed] [DOI]

111. Nakaya Y, Okita K, Suzuki K, Moriwaki H, Kato A, Miwa Y, Shiraishi K, Okuda H, Onji M, Kanazawa H. BCAA-enriched snack improves nutritional state of cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2007;23:113-120. [PubMed] [DOI]

112. Urata Y, Okita K, Korenaga K, Uchida K, Yamasaki T, Sakaida I. The effect of supplementation with branched-chain amino acids in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:510-516. [PubMed] [DOI]

113. Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Merli M, Amodio P, Panella C, Loguercio C, Rossi Fanelli F, Abbiati R. Nutritional supplementation with branched-chain amino acids in advanced cirrhosis: a double-blind, randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1792-1801. [PubMed] 

114. Muto Y, Sato S, Watanabe A, Moriwaki H, Suzuki K, Kato A, Kato M, Nakamura T, Higuchi K, Nishiguchi S. Effects of oral branched-chain amino acid granules on event-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:705-713. [PubMed] 

115. ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force.Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26:1SA-138SA. [PubMed] 

116. Nishiguchi S, Habu D. Effect of oral supplementation with branched-chain amino acid granules in the early stage of cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2004;30S:36-41. [PubMed] [DOI]

117. Calder PC. Branched-chain amino acids and immunity. J Nutr. 2006;136:288S-293S. [PubMed] 

118. Shen C, Zhao CY, Zhang R, Qiao L. Obesity-related hepatocellular carcinoma: roles of risk factors altered in obesity. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012;17:2356-2370. [PubMed] 

119. Shimizu M, Tanaka T, Moriwaki H. Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma: targeting obesity-related inflammation for chemoprevention of liver carcinogenesis. Semin Immunopathol. 2013;35:191-202. [PubMed] [DOI]

120. Garcia-Compean D, Jaquez-Quintana JO, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JA, Maldonado-Garza H. Liver cirrhosis and diabetes: risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical implications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:280-288. [PubMed] 

121. Srikanthan P, Hevener AL, Karlamangla AS. Sarcopenia exacerbates obesity-associated insulin resistance and dysglycemia: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10805. [PubMed] [DOI]

122. Layman DK, Walker DA. Potential importance of leucine in treatment of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr. 2006;136:319S-323S. [PubMed] 

123. Zhang Y, Guo K, LeBlanc RE, Loh D, Schwartz GJ, Yu YH. Increasing dietary leucine intake reduces diet-induced obesity and improves glucose and cholesterol metabolism in mice via multimechanisms. Diabetes. 2007;56:1647-1654. [PubMed] [DOI]

124. Hayashi F, Momoki C, Yuikawa M, Simotani Y, Kawamura E, Hagihara A, Fujii H, Kobayashi S, Iwai S, Morikawa H. Nutritional status in relation to lifestyle in patients with compensated viral cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5759-5770. [PubMed] [DOI]

125. Hayashi F, Matsumoto Y, Momoki C, Yuikawa M, Okada G, Hamakawa E, Kawamura E, Hagihara A, Toyama M, Fujii H. Physical inactivity and insufficient dietary intake are associated with the frequency of sarcopenia in patients with compensated viral liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2013;43:1264-1275. [PubMed] [DOI]

126. Montero-Fernández N, Serra-Rexach JA. Role of exercise on sarcopenia in the elderly. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49:131-143. [PubMed] 

127. Zinna EM, Yarasheski KE. Exercise treatment to counteract protein wasting of chronic diseases. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003;6:87-93. [PubMed] [DOI]

128. Jones JC, Coombes JS, Macdonald GA. Exercise capacity and muscle strength in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:146-151. [PubMed] [DOI]

129. Lemyze M, Dharancy S, Nevière R, Wallaert B. Cardiopulmonary response to exercise in patients with liver cirrhosis and impaired pulmonary gas exchange. Respir Med. 2011;105:1550-1556. [PubMed] [DOI]

130. Terziyski K, Andonov V, Marinov B, Kostianev S. Exercise performance and ventilatory efficiency in patients with mild and moderate liver cirrhosis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:135-140. [PubMed] [DOI]

131. Campillo B, Fouet P, Bonnet JC, Atlan G. Submaximal oxygen consumption in liver cirrhosis. Evidence of severe functional aerobic impairment. J Hepatol. 1990;10:163-167. [PubMed] 

132. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Zilberberg MD, Kaplan LM, Jacoby C, Freeman R, Kaplan MM. Analysis of impaired exercise capacity in patients with cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:1701-1707. [PubMed] 

133. Lemyze M, Dharancy S, Wallaert B. Response to exercise in patients with liver cirrhosis: implications for liver transplantation. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:362-366. [PubMed] [DOI]

134. Bernal W, Martin-Mateos R, Lipcsey M, Tallis C, Woodsford K, McPhail MJ, Willars C, Auzinger G, Sizer E, Heneghan M. Aerobic capacity during cardiopulmonary exercise testing and survival with and without liver transplantation for patients with chronic liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:54-62. [PubMed] [DOI]

135. Ritland S, Petlund CF, Knudsen T, Skrede S. Improvement of physical capacity after long-term training in patients with chronic active hepatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1983;18:1083-1087. [PubMed] 

136. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1435-1445. [PubMed] [DOI]

137. Saló J, Guevara M, Fernández-Esparrach G, Bataller R, Ginès A, Jimenez W, Ginès P, Rivera F, Arroyo V, Rodés J. Impairment of renal function during moderate physical exercise in cirrhotic patients with ascites: relationship with the activity of neurohormonal systems. Hepatology. 1997;25:1338-1342. [PubMed] [DOI]

138. Sinniah D, Fulton TT, McCullough H. The effect of exercise on the venous blood ammonium concentration in man. J Clin Pathol. 1970;23:715-719. [PubMed] 

139. García-Pagàn JC, Santos C, Barberá JA, Luca A, Roca J, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Bosch J, Rodés J. Physical exercise increases portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1300-1306. [PubMed] 

140. Epstein SK, Zilberberg MD, Jacoby C, Ciubotaru RL, Kaplan LM. Response to symptom-limited exercise in patients with the hepatopulmonary syndrome. Chest. 1998;114:736-741. [PubMed] 

141. Shimomura Y, Murakami T, Nakai N, Nagasaki M, Harris RA. Exercise promotes BCAA catabolism: effects of BCAA supplementation on skeletal muscle during exercise. J Nutr. 2004;134:1583S-1587S. [PubMed] 

142. Shimomura Y, Honda T, Shiraki M, Murakami T, Sato J, Kobayashi H, Mawatari K, Obayashi M, Harris RA. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism in exercise and liver disease. J Nutr. 2006;136:250S-253S. [PubMed] 

143. Román E, Torrades MT, Nadal MJ, Cárdenas G, Nieto JC, Vidal S, Bascuñana H, Juárez C, Guarner C, Córdoba J. Randomized Pilot Study: Effects of an Exercise Programme and Leucine Supplementation in Patients with Cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;:Epub ahead of print. [PubMed] [DOI]

144. Hickman IJ, Jonsson JR, Prins JB, Ash S, Purdie DM, Clouston AD, Powell EE. Modest weight loss and physical activity in overweight patients with chronic liver disease results in sustained improvements in alanine aminotransferase, fasting insulin, and quality of life. Gut. 2004;53:413-419. [PubMed] 

145. Konishi I, Hiasa Y, Tokumoto Y, Abe M, Furukawa S, Toshimitsu K, Matsuura B, Onji M. Aerobic exercise improves insulin resistance and decreases body fat and serum levels of leptin in patients with hepatitis C virus. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:928-935. [PubMed] [DOI]

146. Goodpaster BH, Katsiaras A, Kelley DE. Enhanced fat oxidation through physical activity is associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity in obesity. Diabetes. 2003;52:2191-2197. [PubMed] 

Source