Showing posts with label Viral Hepatitis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viral Hepatitis. Show all posts

November 19, 2013

Ending the Silent Epidemic of Viral Hepatitis in the U.S. - Ronald Valdiserri MD HHS

Provided by NATAP

Reported by Jules Levin
AASLD Nov 1-4 2013 Wash DC

Ronald O. Valdiserri, M.D., M.P.H.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health, Infectious Diseases Director, Office of HIV/AIDS & Infectious Disease Policy American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases November 5, 2013

AASLD1

AASLD2

"The CHeCS investigators examined 1.2 million people who used the four integrated medical care systems during 2006 through 2008, and 57% of the number estimated to have HCV infection had actually been tested and identified as infected. In the broader population from which the 30,140 NHANES participants were drawn, 50% of persons who had tested positive for antibodies to HCV and provided information during in-depth telephone interviews were aware of their HCV-infection status before being notified of that infection by the NHANES.3 The CHeCS researchers are currently examining reasons why the people who were found to be infected in their study had or had not been tested previously. In the population on which the CHeCS draws, less than half of people who had had two or more abnormal alanine aminotransferase results were subsequently tested for HCV infection.2......(38%) had no follow-up HCV RNA testing documented in the electronic database1......From these data it seems reasonable to deduce that 63 to 77% of people who have tested positive for HCV antibodies - 32 to 38% of all HCV-infected people in the United States - received follow-up hepatitis care......Among those receiving care, such as the 8810 who were initially examined in the CHeCS, 5540 (63%) had had at least one HCV RNA measurement between 2001 and 2010.....Of the HCV-infected people in the CHeCS - people who are more likely than average to be receiving specialist care for HCV - 3380 (38%) had undergone a liver biopsy between 2001 and 2010.1 In the NHANES, of 66 persons who said they received care for their HCV infection, 31 (47%) said they had undergone a biopsy. These proportions translate to about 12 to 18% of the total HCV-infected population......In the CHeCS, 36% of people who knew they were infected - about 18% of the estimated total infected population who had been identified as infected - had evidence in their electronic or hard-copy chart of any treatment for HCV.1 In the NHANES, 22 of the 170 HCV-infected persons who answered follow-up surveys (13%) said they had received treatment for HCV infection.3.....It is more difficult to determine whether treatment has been successful, but in the CHeCS the most recent test results indicated that HCV RNA was "undetectable" in 21% of patients, and 80% of patients with such results had documentation of having received antiviral therapy1 - that is, about 17% of the total CHeCS cohort, or about 5 to 6% of all HCV-infected people......resulting estimates may actually be high.....there is also a need to do a better job of getting HCV-infected persons who know their HCV status into care, evaluated, and, as appropriate, treated. It is past time to address more vigorously what Assistant Secretary for Health Howard Koh has called the silent epidemic of viral hepatitis."

Hepatitis C in the United States Perspective (screening/care) - Natap www.natap.org/2013/HCV/051613_02.htm

Continue here to view full slide presentation …..

November 18, 2013

Viral Hepatitis Policy Meets Practice at the Liver Meeting

November 18, 2013 • 0 comments • By Ronald Valdiserri, M.D., M.P.H., Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health, Infectious Diseases, and Director, Office of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

AASLD-2013-JK-iPhone-Pics-028-300x225

Earlier this month, the “Liver Meeting” – the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD )– took place in Washington, DC. As part of a session re-capping the major viral hepatitis highlights from the conference, I had the pleasure of sharing with several thousand scientists and healthcare professionals from around the world who specialize in liver disease, updates on federal activities aimed at ending the silent epidemic of viral hepatitis in the United States.

The meeting featured exciting new research announcements from experts working to make progress toward expanding what we know about viral hepatitis and liver disease. Working in parallel, improved policies and clinical advances can pave the way to a future in which people are routinely screened for viral hepatitis and once identified, receive timely, high quality care and, in many instances, treatment that results in a cure.

The conference also featured a number of presentations highlighting research, clinical practice models, and other important activities underway at federal agencies including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and others. These included a presentation by my former colleague at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Dr. Lisa Backus who presented on VA research  that supports the CDC recommendation to screen “Baby Boomers” for hepatitis C (HCV) and steps that the VA is taking to enhance their already impressive HCV screening rates. Dr. Backus and her colleagues believe that additional screening efforts could find up to an additional 51,000 veterans of the baby boomer generation who are infected with HCV and not yet diagnosed.

This year, advances in the treatment of hepatitis C captured tremendous attention at the Liver Meeting. These advances herald a new era in which people who are chronically infected with HCV could access vastly improved and easier to take treatments. New treatments on the horizon have fewer side effects and a shorter duration of therapy and some result in cure rates of up to 90 percent – or more. But improved treatments alone cannot turn the tide of an epidemic. As my colleague, Corinna Dan, R.N., M.P.H., Viral Hepatitis Policy Advisor noted, “In order to realize the goals of the national Viral Hepatitis Action Plan, we must learn to use the improved therapies effectively and work with new partners to identify all patients who can benefit from them, especially the hundreds of thousands of individuals who are undiagnosed and therefore unaware of their infection.”

Toward that end and guided by the Action Plan for the Prevention, Care & Treatment of Viral Hepatitis, federal partners have prioritized a number of efforts to engage greater numbers of health care providers and increase their capacity to diagnose, care for, and treat hepatitis C, hepatitis B and other forms of viral hepatitis. Among the examples I shared during my presentation at the Liver Meeting, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funds a number of training initiatives:

  • Hepatitis Web Study , a free education service developed by the Seattle STD/HIV Prevention Training Center and the University of Washington which offers free continuing medical and nursing education on hepatitis A, B, and C on a state-of-the-art website. Case-based learning modules provide training on diagnosis and care for health care providers as well as training on counseling for health educators.
  • In response to the rapidly evolving HCV treatment field, the Hepatitis C Online Course  for healthcare providers currently offers four modules and soon will include two additional modules on hepatitis C treatment.
  • The CDC-funded National Hepatitis Training Institute , offered by the University of Alabama at Birmingham, provides training on hepatitis prevention, diagnosis, management, treatment, and the integration of viral hepatitis into existing activities via practice-focused distance learning programs for frontline HIV and STD prevention workers in community-based organizations and clinics.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has long led the charge on improving care and treatment of Americans with chronic hepatitis C. The VA is the single largest provider of medical care to people living with HCV in the U.S. and is making significant contributions to increasing provider capacity through the National Hepatitis C Program. The online resources for providers include useful guidelines, best practices, clinical tools, and much more. Equally important are the resources for Veterans and the public including an introductory guide for patients, information on the importance of reducing alcohol intake, and simple handouts on how to take the current treatment.

Non-federal partners such as AASLD, the leading organization of scientists and healthcare professionals committed to preventing and curing liver disease, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) , an organization of physicians, scientists, and other health care professionals dedicated to promoting health through excellence in infectious diseases research, education, prevention, and patient care, play critical roles in building health care provider capacity to diagnose and treat chronic HCV.

Recognizing that the confluence of the rapid development of new HCV treatments along with increasing numbers of people being identified with HCV will greatly increase the need for updated expert clinical guidance, AASLD announced on World Hepatitis Day in July 2013 that they are collaborating with IDSA to develop clinical recommendations for the management of HCV. Working together, leadership from these organizations will review current treatment recommendations and use evidence-based, consensus guidance to develop updated recommendations for managing patients. These recommendations will be updated regularly and made available online. AASLD and IDSA are key partners in the national, indeed global, response to viral hepatitis.

Source

October 21, 2013

Survey on knowledge of liver cancer and viral hepatitis

janssenemea_logo

On 17 October Janssen announced the results of a new survey to mark Liver Cancer Awareness Month (October). The survey showed a lack of awareness among the general public about viral hepatitis and its link to liver cancer – approximately nine out of ten (91%) people surveyed do not know anything or only very little about viral hepatitis and only around one in six (15%) name hepatitis as the main cause of liver cancer. 

The survey, commissioned by Janssen, with the support of the World Hepatitis Alliance (WHA), the European Liver Patients Association (ELPA) and the International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA), was conducted in Russia, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom (UK) involving more than 5,000 members of the general public to provide a snapshot of public awareness across the WHO European Region.

The survey highlights the lack of awareness of viral hepatitis and demonstrated that improved public awareness about the virus is necessary so that people can assess whether they have been at risk of infection, and come forward for testing. This survey clearly reinforces the need for national governments across Europe to develop comprehensive strategies to address this.

Read the full press release here and download visual infographics detailing the key findings of the survey and information on viral hepatitis via the links below.

Infographic Awareness of Hepatitis C and Liver Cancer
Infographic Viral Hepatitis – A global pandemic

Janssen Liver Cancer Awareness Month Survey Results

Source

September 10, 2013

Bermuda Triangle for the liver: Alcohol, obesity, and viral hepatitis

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Special Issue: 7th International Symposium on Alcoholic Liver and Pancreatic Diseases and Cirrhosis. Funding for this conference was made possible (in part) by Grant 5 R13AA20691-02 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Guest Editors: Bin Gao and Fu-Sheng Wang

Volume 28, Issue Supplement S1, pages 18–25, August 2013

Review

Samir Zakhari

Article first published online: 15 JUL 2013

DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12207

© 2013 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

Keywords: Alcohol; viral hepatitis; liver; oxidative stress; free radicals; CYP2E1

Abstract

jgh12207-fig-5001

Despite major progress in understanding and managing liver disease in the past 30 years, it is now among the top 10 most common causes of death globally. Several risk factors, such as genetics, diabetes, obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, viral infection, gender, immune dysfunction, and medications, acting individually or in concert, are known to precipitate liver damage. Viral hepatitis, excessive alcohol consumption, and obesity are the major factors causing liver injury. Estimated numbers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected subjects worldwide are staggering (370 and 175 million, respectively), and of the 40 million known human immunodeficiency virus positive subjects, 4 and 5 million are coinfected with HBV and HCV, respectively. Alcohol and HCV are the leading causes of end-stage liver disease worldwide and the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe. In addition, the global obesity epidemic that affects up to 40 million Americans, and 396 million worldwide, is accompanied by an alarming incidence of end-stage liver disease, a condition exacerbated by alcohol. This article focuses on the interactions between alcohol, viral hepatitis, and obesity (euphemistically described here as the Bermuda Triangle of liver disease), and discusses common mechanisms and synergy.

The global burden

Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represent end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and thus are associated with mortality. Globally, the incidence and prevalence of liver cirrhosis vary markedly based largely on the causative factors. In the developed world, alcohol, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are the leading causes of cirrhosis, whereas viral hepatitis (especially hepatitis B virus [HBV]) is considered the leading cause in developing countries. Data from 2001 indicate that in developed countries, cirrhosis was the sixth most common cause of death among adults, and in developing countries, it claimed 320 000 lives, ranking as the ninth most common cause of death. In the European Union alone, approximately 29 million individuals suffer from chronic liver disease of whom 170 000 and 47 000 die annually from cirrhosis and liver cancer, respectively.[1] In the United States, approximately 46 700 individuals died from liver cirrhosis and cancer in 2002.[2] HBV and HCV infection are major causes of morbidity and mortality. According to World Health Organization, an estimated 2 billion people have been infected with HBV, and more than 240 million have chronic liver infections worldwide. About 600 000 people die every year from the acute or chronic consequences of HBV infection, which is endemic in China and other parts of Asia, where most people become infected during childhood; 8–10% of the adult population is chronically infected. HBV-induced liver cancer is among the top three causes of death from cancer in men, and a major cause of cancer in women in this region. Globally, cirrhosis attributable to HBV or HCV accounted for 30% and 27%, respectively, and HCC was attributable to HBV (53%) or HCV (25%). Applied to 2002 worldwide mortality estimates, chronic HBV and HCV infections represent 929 000, including 446 000 cirrhosis deaths (HBV: 235 000; HCV: 211 000) and 483 000 liver cancer deaths (HBV: 328 000; HCV: 155 000).[3]

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) comprises a wide spectrum of liver damage including steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis in patients who do not consume large amount of alcohol.[4] NAFLD is a significant factor for serious liver disease because of its rising prevalence in the general population,[5] and the potential to progress to ESLD and HCC.[6] NAFLD commonly occurs in patients with obesity, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. In the past two decades, obesity in North America has more than doubled and continues to rise worldwide. In 2005, 8% of men and 12% of women were obese. By 2030, the number of obese adults globally is projected to be 573 million individuals.[7]

The combination of chronic heavy alcohol consumption, viral hepatitis infection, and obesity represent a major assault on liver's health worldwide.

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD)

Chronic alcohol consumption results in liver disease which varies extensively between individuals in severity and progression for comparable levels of alcohol consumption. This variability could be attributed to variations in the expression and activity of individual isoforms of the alcohol-metabolizing enzymes: alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), but is also influenced by variations in patterns of alcohol intake (binge vs chronic drinking), nutritional status, gender, smoking, or abuse of other drugs. In addition, the onset and severity of ALD is strongly influenced by other comorbid conditions such as obesity or HCV infection. This increase in susceptibility to ALD is not due solely to intrahepatic factors, but may also involve alcohol-induced changes in other tissues, such as adipose tissue, central nervous system, the gut, and the immune system. Factors contributing to alcohol-induced liver disease are thus complex and systemic.[8] The spectrum of ALD includes:

  1. Fatty liver (hepatic steatosis), characterized histologically by lipid droplets in hepatocytes. This condition is usually reversible upon cessation of alcohol consumption, and thus is thought to be a relatively innocuous side effect of heavy drinking. However, hepatic steatosis often develops in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes, clinical conditions that involve significant metabolic defects. Thus, fatty liver by itself reflects a condition of metabolic stress that is a risk factor for the development of more severe forms of liver disease.
  2. Alcoholic hepatitis, an inflammatory condition characterized by significantly increased serum levels of liver enzymes (alanine aminotranferease and aspartate aminotransferase) and moderate to severe tissue damage, including necrotic foci with neutrophil infiltration. Acute alcoholic hepatitis is a potentially fatal disease that develops in a significant fraction (30–40%) of chronic heavy drinkers.
  3. Liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, about 10–15% of chronic heavy drinkers proceed to develop fibrosis and cirrhosis.
  4. HCCs occur in about 2% of cirrhotic patients.

Although factors that facilitate the development of hepatitis and cirrhosis are not well characterized, impairment in the cellular stress defense mechanisms, (e.g. oxidative stress),[9] or derailment of the balance of autocrine or paracrine mediators that are critical in maintaining normal homeostatic conditions are documented. In addition, chronic alcohol consumption interferes with liver regeneration, which under normal conditions is a highly effective repair mechanism that avoids scar tissue formation.

Mechanisms of ALD

Various mechanisms have been identified for ALD (Fig. 1) which are involved at various stages of progression.

jgh12207-fig-0001

Figure 1. Known mechanisms of alcoholic liver damage. CB, cannabinoid receptor; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; Fe, Ferrous molecule; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; HSC, hepatic stellate cell; KC, Kupffer cells; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MAA, malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adduct; MDA, malondialdehyde; Mt GSH, mitochondrial glutathione; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH, reduced NAD; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TGF, transforming growth factor.

Fatty liver

Both intrahepatic and extrahepatic mechanisms are involved in hepatic steatosis:

a) Intrahepatic factors

Hepatic steatosis due to heavy alcohol consumption has been attributed to a metabolic stress imposed by the fact that the liver is the predominant site of ethanol metabolism. Possible mechanisms include: (i) suppression of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation; (ii) a limitation in the permeability of the outer mitochondrial membrane pore protein voltage-dependent anion-selective channel;[10] (iii) enhancement of hepatic uptake of free fatty acids from the circulation; (iv) increase in de novo synthesis of fatty acids and triglycerides; and (v) derailment of lipoprotein synthesis and secretion.

Chronic alcohol consumption induces a marked increase in cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) activity, with a resultant increased demand for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), an increased rate of formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and a decrease in oxidative stress defense capacity. At the same time, impairment of mitochondrial respiratory capacity caused by defects in the electron transport and ATP synthase complexes results in further increase in ROS formation at the mitochondrial level.[11] The ethanol-induced stress is further exacerbated by defects in the methionine cycle, resulting in a decrease in glutathione (GSH) synthesis, which contributes to the decline in oxidative stress defenses. Importantly, these conditions also reflect an increase in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, a common response do the accumulation of defective proteins.[12] The resulting accumulation of stress conditions in hepatocytes causes an increased susceptibility to cell death signals. Accompanying the structural and functional changes in subcellular organelles, chronic ethanol treatment results in significant changes in the profile of transcription factors that regulate lipid homeostasis in the liver. Ethanol consumption elicits a decrease in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α activity, thereby suppressing the catabolic lipid metabolic pathways, including peroxisomal and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. At the same time, ethanol increases the activity of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1c and SREBP-2, which enhances lipid synthetic pathways. In addition, there has been some evidence that the adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is inhibited by ethanol. However, it is difficult to distinguish direct and indirect effects of ethanol. For instance, AMPK activity in the liver is regulated not only by the availability of AMP in the cell, but also responds to extracellular signals, including the adipose tissue derived cytokine adiponectin.

A related regulatory pathway affected by ethanol may involve the deacetylase silent information regulator-1 (SIRT-1), which requires activation by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). Thus, the change in NAD redox state in the liver during ethanol oxidation may facilitate inhibition of SIRT-1. It has been reported that SIRT-1 activity in the liver of mice is decreased after ethanol treatment.[13] Among the targets of SIRT-1 are several key regulators of lipid metabolism, including the transcriptional coregulators peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α). Its deacetylation by SIRT-1 allows it to stimulate gene expression through its interactions with PPAR-α. Furthermore, SREBP-1c is a target for SIRT-1 and its acetylation state may affect its transcriptional activity.

b) Extrahepatic factors

Lipid metabolism in the liver is integrated with a variety of signals, including circulating hormones, cytokines, nutrition, and other factors that impinge on the intrahepatic processes leading to steatosis. While some of these factors are intrahepatic (e.g. cytokines released from Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, or stellate cells), others are dispatched by remote tissues. Of particular relevance are hormones (e.g. insulin), adiponectin and leptin (secreted from adipose tissue), and stress hormones and satiety factors that act through the hypothalamus or other brain structures to regulate food intake. Chronic ethanol consumption has a notable impact on the synthesis and secretion of several of these factors, in addition to affecting their capacity to impact lipid metabolic pathways in the liver.

Adiponectin, one of the adipokines secreted by adipose tissue to regulate lipid homeostasis, acts on multiple tissues including the liver to sensitize the response to insulin and enhance fatty acid oxidation. In animal experiments, ethanol feeding tends to suppress adiponectin secretion from adipose tissue. However, the effects of ethanol on adiponectin levels may depend on dietary factors such as the content of saturated and unsaturated fat.[14] Whether circulating adiponectin levels are similarly correlated with liver damage in human alcoholics remains unclear.[15]

Insulin plays a dominant role in integrating fatty acid and carbohydrate metabolism in the liver with the energetic needs of other tissues. Nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis that occurs in the metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes is commonly associated with insulin resistance, that is, a decreased capacity to respond to changes in circulating insulin, in multiple tissues including liver and muscle. There is strong evidence that stress responses mediated by free fatty acid accumulation or ER stress result in activation of stress response protein kinases, including protein kinase C and Jun-N-terminal kinase, which affect the intracellular signaling pathways through which insulin exerts its effects.

Alcoholic hepatitis

As described earlier, hepatic steatosis represents a severe condition of increased oxidative stress, ER, and metabolic stress. However, the mechanisms by which such stress conditions can lead to a more severe inflammatory condition remain only partly understood. Increased cell death (by necrosis or apoptosis) sets in motion further pro-inflammatory responses in the liver by producing cytokines and chemokines that help mobilize neutrophils and other inflammatory cells that further enhance liver damage. Also, it appears that overproduction of ROS by the damaged mitochondria could play a salient role. Factors that may be involved in the precipitation of alcoholic hepatitis are briefly discussed later.

Oxidative alcohol metabolism in the liver

Only about 2–10% of the absorbed alcohol is eliminated via the lungs and kidneys; the remaining 90% is metabolized mainly by oxidative pathways in the liver and by nonoxidative pathways in extrahepatic tissues. Oxidative metabolism in the liver results in extensive displacement of the liver's normal metabolic substrates, the production of acetaldehyde and ROS, and an increase in the NADH/NAD+ ratio (Fig. 2).

jgh12207-fig-0002

Figure 2. Hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcohol metabolism, and liver damage. ALD, alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase; GSH, glutathione; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IFN, interferon; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH, reduced NAD; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

The major pathway of oxidative metabolism of ethanol in the liver involves multiple isoforms of cytosolic ADH, which results in the production of acetaldehyde. Accumulation of this highly reactive and toxic molecule contributes to liver damage. The oxidation of ethanol is accompanied by the reduction of NAD+ to NADH and, thereby, generates a highly reduced cytosolic environment in hepatocytes. The cytochrome P450 isozymes, including CYP2E1, 1A2, and 3A4, which are predominantly localized to the ER, also contribute to ethanol's oxidation to acetaldehyde in the liver. CYP2E1 is induced by chronic ethanol consumption and assumes an important role in metabolizing ethanol to acetaldehyde at elevated alcohol concentration. It also produces ROS, including hydroxyethyl, superoxide anion, and hydroxyl radicals.

Acetaldehyde, produced by ethanol oxidation, is rapidly metabolized mainly by mitochondrial ALDH2 to form acetate and NADH. Mitochondrial NADH is reoxidized by the electron transport chain (ETC). Most of the acetate resulting from ethanol metabolism escapes the liver to the blood and is eventually metabolized to CO2 by way of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in tissues such as heart, skeletal muscle, and brain, where mitochondria are capable of converting acetate to the intermediate acetyl coenzyme A.

Consequences of alcohol metabolism by oxidative pathways

a) Acetaldehyde generation/adduct formation: if accumulated to high concentrations, acetaldehyde can form adducts with DNA and RNA, and decrease DNA repair. It also has the capacity to react with lysine residues on proteins including enzymes, microsomal proteins, microtubules, and affect their function. Formation of protein adducts in hepatocytes may contribute to impaired protein secretion, resulting in hepatomegaly. In addition, acetaldehyde and malondialdehyde (a by-product of lipid peroxidation) can combine and react with lysine residues on proteins, giving rise to stable malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde-protein adducts that are immunogenic and, thus, can contribute to immune-mediated liver damage.

b) Change in hepatocyte redox state (increase in NADH/NAD+ ratio): both acute and chronic alcohol consumption shift the redox state of the liver to a more reduced level, similar to but more pronounced than the shift observed in diabetes and during starvation. Alcohol metabolism produces a significant increase in the hepatic NADH/NAD+ ratio in both the cytosol and the mitochondria, as evidenced by an increase in the lactate/pyruvate and β-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratios, respectively, and vastly increases the availability of oxidizable NADH to the ETC in the mitochondria. The liver responds to ethanol exposure in part by increasing the rate of oxygen uptake, which may lead to periods of hypoxia, particularly in the downstream (pericentral) parts of the liver lobule.

c) Formation of ROS, reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and oxidative stress: Hepatic mitochondria produce ROS through the activity of the ETC as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation. Normally, a small fraction of electrons entering the ETC can prematurely escape from complexes I and III and directly react with 1–3% of respiratory oxygen molecules to generate the superoxide anion radical, which is then dismutated by the mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Mitochondrial glutathione peroxidase (GPx) then converts H2O2 into water by using reduced glutathione (GSH) as a cofactor. Thus, most of the ROS generated by the ETC in the normal state are detoxified by the mitochondrial antioxidant defenses. The nondetoxified portion of ROS diffuses out of mitochondria, and affects signal transduction pathways and gene expression, triggering cytokines, hormones, and growth factors, which if excessive may lead to hepatic inflammation, necrosis, and/or apoptosis. In addition, metals (e.g. iron and copper) can further react with H2O2 to produce hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction (Fig. ).

jgh12207-fig-0003

Figure 3. Alcohol, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial dysfunction. CYP2E1, cytochrome P450 2E1; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; NO●, nitric oxide; O2, speroxide; ●OH, hydroxyl radical; ONOO, peroxinitrite.

Nitric oxide (NO), an RNS critical for hepatocyte biology, can interact with peroxides to generate peroxynitrite, which could be detrimental to the liver depending on the amount and duration. NO is produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase which is expressed in all liver cells (i.e. hepatocytes, stellate cells, Kupffer cells, and vascular endothelial cells) and its expression is induced by interleukin (IL)-1β alone or in combination with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, and/or lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

Ethanol-induced oxidative stress has been attributed to a decrease in the NAD+ : NADH ratio, acetaldehyde formation, CYP2E1 induction, hypoxia, cytokine signaling, mitochondrial damage, LPS activation of Kupffer cells, reduction in antioxidants particularly mitochondrial and cytosolic GSH, one electron oxidation of ethanol to 1-hydroxy ethyl radical, and the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase.

Fibrosis and cirrhosis

Fibrosis is a common response of the liver to a chronic inflammatory condition, where hepatic stellate cells (HSC) play a critical (though not exclusive) role.[19] HSCs exist in a quiescent state in the normal liver, but can be activated directly or indirectly in response to apoptotic or necrotic cell death. Cytokines released in the tissue as a result of injury further contribute to HSC activation, resulting in the expression of a myofibroblast phenotype and stimulating the expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, in particular collagen type 1, which are not normally expressed in the liver. Under conditions of an acute tissue injury, the deposition of collagen fibers is a transient wound-healing response and is followed by fibrinolysis mediated by metalloproteases that are activated as damaged tissue is replaced by newly generated liver cells by the regenerative response. Continuous tissue damage and repair after chronic inflammation, and an imbalance in the normal liver repair mechanisms results in excessive deposition of collagen fibers.[19]

Chronic ethanol consumption can influence this process at multiple levels: (i) enhancement of the pro-inflammatory environment in the liver by stimulating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from macrophages and decreasing the activity of protective cell types, including natural killer cells;[20] (ii) enhancement of hepatocyte apoptosis and necrosis in response to oxidative stress and shifting in stress defense signaling pathways; (iii) activation of HSCs and collagen formation (studies on isolated HSCs have demonstrated that ethanol alters their response to transforming growth factor (TGF-β) and IFN-γ through effects on intracellular signaling pathways); and (iv) suppression of the regenerative response to tissue damage that is an essential component of the liver's repair mechanism and thereby facilitates the deposition of scar tissue, which is the hallmark of fibrosis. This is probably accompanied by a suppression of metalloproteases (e.g. by the activation of inhibitor proteins, such as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1]), which normally would maintain the balance of ECM deposition and resolution to facilitate tissue repair.[21]

Common factors involved in alcohol, obesity, and viral infection

Chronic heavy alcohol consumption, obesity, and viral infection have some common features/mechanisms that may contribute to exacerbation of liver damage when these conditions coexist. Several common mechanisms between two or more of these conditions have been advocated, including oxidative stress, CYP2E1 induction, increased fat synthesis and mobilization, selected gut bacteria, free fatty acids, ER stress, immune response, among others.[22-25] Because of page limitations, only the first two mechanisms (oxidative stress and CYP2E1 induction) will be discussed. Oxidative stress due to alcohol has been discussed earlier.

Obesity and oxidative stress

Obesity involves the accumulation of body fat and is a major risk factor for metabolic syndrome, which is characterized by hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.[26] Increased oxidative stress in accumulated fat has been reported as a pathogenic mechanism of obesity-associated metabolic syndrome. In nondiabetic humans, systemic oxidative stress correlated positively with fat accumulation and negatively with plasma adiponectin levels. In obese mice, ROS production was selectively increased in adipose tissue, and was accompanied by enhanced expression of NADPH oxidase and decreased expression of anti-oxidative enzymes such as superoxide dismutase in white adipose tissue and GPx in liver.[27] In cultured adipocytes, mitochondrial and peroxisomal oxidation of fatty acids activates NADPH oxidase resulting in increased oxidative stress, which caused increase in messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of inflammatory (PAI-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1), and suppression of mRNA and secretion of anti-inflammatory (adiponectin, leptin) adipocytokines. Conversely, in obese KKAy mice, treatment with apocynin, an NADPH oxidase inhibitor, reduced ROS production in adipose tissue, increased plasma adiponectin levels, and improved hyperlipidemia and hepatic steatosis. Because oxidative stress underlies the pathophysiology of hepatic steatosis,[28] these results suggest that increased oxidative stress in obese individuals could be further exacerbated by oxidative stress due to chronic heavy alcohol consumption.

Viral infection and oxidative stress

Infection with HCV, in most cases, develops into chronic disease which is manifested by steatosis and fibrosis, as well as HCC. HCV replication induces oxidative stress (Figure 2), which contributes to insulin and interferon resistance, as well as disorders of iron metabolism. Specifically, virus core and nonstructural NS5A proteins increase ROS levels through alteration of calcium homeostasis[29] via a primary effect on the uniporter,[30] and the induction of NADPH oxidase 4.[31] In addition, E1 and E2 and the transmembrane protein NS4B increase ROS generation via ER stress and unfolded protein response,[32, 33] and activates the antioxidant defense regulated by NF-E2-related factor 2.[34] Furthermore, HCV causes mitochondrial damage and induction of double-stranded DNA breaks mediated by NO and ROS, which is abolished by NO and ROS inhibitors.[35] HCV-induced ROS causes hepatic iron accumulation in mice by reducing hepcidin transcription, further magnifying ROS production,[36] and regulating TGF-β1.[37]

CYP2E1, alcohol, and oxidative stress

As mentioned earlier, alcohol-induced oxidative stress is a major mechanism by which ethanol causes liver injury. Of the many suggested pathways by which ethanol induces a state of oxidative stress, induction of CYP2E1 is a central one. Levels of CYP2E1 are increased after acute and chronic alcohol treatment. CYP2E1 generates ROS such as the superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide and, in the presence of iron catalysts, produces the hydroxyl radical, a powerful oxidant (Figure 3). The role of CYP2E1 in chronic ethanol-induced liver injury was studied in wild-type (WT) mice, CYP2E1 knockout (KO) mice and humanized CYP2E1 knockin (KI) mice. Alcohol produced oxidant stress and steatosis in WT mice, but these effects were blunted in the KO mice and restored in the KI mice. These studies show that CYP2E1 contributes to ethanol-induced oxidant stress and liver injury.[38] For a discussion of the biochemical and toxicological properties of CYP2E1 and possible therapeutic implications for treatment of ALD by CYP2E1 inhibitors, the reader is referred to the review article by Lu and Cederbaum.[39]

CYP2E1, obesity, and oxidative stress

As discussed earlier, CYP2E1 is an important factor in liver disease. Several studies suggest that hepatic CYP2E1 activity is increased in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic alcoholism, or morbid obesity. To study the correlation between obesity and CYP2E1, Emery et al.[40] assessed hepatic CYP2E1 activity—by determining the clearance of chlorzoxazone (CLZ), a CYP2E1-selective probe—in morbidly obese subjects with varying degrees of hepatic steatosis, and normal-weight controls. Obese subjects were evaluated at baseline and 1 year after gastroplasty, a procedure that leads to weight loss. Compared with controls, oral CLZ clearance was elevated approximately threefold in morbidly obese subjects, and was significantly higher among subjects with steatosis involving > 50% of hepatocytes. One year after gastroplasty, the median body mass index decreased by 33%, and total oral CLZ clearance declined by 46%. Thus, hepatic CYP2E1 activity is upregulated in morbidly obese subjects, and the positive association between the degree of steatosis and CYP2E1 activity preoperatively suggests that CYP2E1 induction is related to morbid obesity.[40] Similar results were obtained in genetically obese Zucker rats fed a normal diet (OB) when compared with normal Zucker rats fed a high-fat diet (HF). CYP2E1 induction was greater in both liver and fat of OB rats than in those of HF rats. The induction of CYP2E1 in liver and fat of obese patients may potentially alter the pharmacokinetics of lipophilic drugs metabolized by CYP2E1.[41]

In a recent study, Cederbaum reported that CYP2E1 induction potentiated liver injury in obese mice, and the elevated oxidative stress could be blunted by CYP2E1 inhibitors.[38] In addition, S-Adenosyl-L-methionine decreased oxidative stress, steatosis, liver injury, and mitochondrial dysfunction in the pyrazole-treated obese mice, an important finding with therapeutic implications in obesity-induced metabolic complications.

CYP2E1, HCV, and oxidative stress

CYP2E1 expression in the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis C correlated with the progression of hepatic disease (both lobular inflammation and fibrosis indices), and observed variations were consistent with the preferential distribution of CYP2E1 in the lobular zone.[42] The effect of alcohol metabolism on HCV replication and the antiviral action of IFN was studied in Huh-7 cells that harbor HCV replication and metabolize ethanol via the introduced expression of CYP2E1. Alcohol (up to 100 mmol/L) significantly increased HCV replication, which was dependent on CYP2E1 expression and alcohol-induced oxidative stress, and attenuated the anti-HCV action of IFN.[43] In chronic hepatitis C patients, cross-reactivity between CYP2E1 and specific sequences in HCV-NS5b protein can promote the development of auto-antibodies targeting conformational epitopes on the CYP2E1 surface that might contribute to hepatic injury.[44]

Alcohol's elevation of HCV titer in patients and increase of HCV RNA in replicon cells suggest that HCV replication is increased in the presence and absence of the complete viral replication cycle. Seronello et al.[45] used Huh7 human hepatoma cells that naturally express comparable levels of CYP2E1 as human liver to demonstrate that ethanol, at physiologically relevant concentrations, enhances complete HCV replication. Acetaldehyde, the first metabolite of ethanol, also enhanced HCV replication. They reported that elevated NADH/NAD+ is required for the potentiation of HCV replication by ethanol, and inhibiting CYP2E1 or ALDH suppressed replication. Thus, alteration of cellular NADH/NAD ratio is likely to play a critical role in the potentiation of HCV replication by ethanol (Fig. 4).

jgh12207-fig-0004

Figure 4. Summary of alcohol and HCV interactions. HCV, hepatitis C virus; IFN, interferon; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Concluding remarks

Chronic heavy alcohol consumption in the presence of obesity and viral hepatitis could be damaging for the liver. While moderate alcohol consumption was associated with decreased prevalence of steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD,[46] heavy alcohol consumption is discouraged whether an individual has NAFLD or not. The presence of common mechanisms for liver damage due to viruses, obesity, or chronic heavy alcohol consumption is relevant and may exacerbate damage to the liver when these three conditions exist. Further research is needed to clarify the interaction, if any, between moderate drinking, NAFLD, and viral hepatitis.

Conflict of interests

The author does not have any conflicting interests to declare.

References

Source

August 18, 2013

Impact of Coffee on Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review

Liver International

Accepted Article (Accepted, unedited articles published online and citable. The final edited and typeset version of record will appear in future.)

Reviews

Sammy Saab1,2,*,Divya Mallam3, Gerald A. Cox II2, Myron Tong1,2,4

DOI: 10.1111/liv.12304

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Accepted manuscript online: 12 AUG 2013 07:54AM EST, Manuscript Revised: 5 AUG 2013, Manuscript Accepted: 5 AUG 2013, Manuscript Received: 3 JUN 2013

Keywords: Coffee; Liver disease

Abstract

Coffee is one of the most commonly consumed beverages in the world. Its health benefits including improved overall survival have been demonstrated in a variety of disease states. To examine the association of coffee consumption with liver disease, a systematic review of studies on the effects of coffee on liver associated laboratory tests, viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was performed.

Coffee consumption was associated with improved serum gamma glutamyltransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values in a dose dependent manner in individuals at risk for liver disease. In chronic liver disease patients who consume coffee, a decreased risk of progression to cirrhosis, a lowered mortality rate in cirrhosis patients, and a lowered rate of HCC development were observed. In chronic hepatitis C patients, coffee was associated with improved virologic responses to antiviral therapy. Moreover, coffee consumption was inversely related to the severity of steatohepatitis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Therefore, in patients with chronic liver disease, daily coffee consumption should be encouraged.

Read full article (PDF) here …..

June 3, 2013

WHO: Improving the health of patients with viral hepatitis

World Health Organization

EXECUTIVE BOARD EB133/17
133rd session 29 May 2013
Agenda item 6.5

Report by the Secretariat

1. Viral hepatitis is caused by five distinct viruses (hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E), each of which has a distinct transmission route, and consequent disease course. Hepatitis A and E viruses are spread through fecal–oral contamination and hepatitis E virus is also transmitted by consumption of meat from infected animals. The disease caused by hepatitis A and E viruses is usually self-limiting, but can cause death due to acute liver failure. In addition, infection with hepatitis E virus results in high mortality among pregnant women. Hepatitis B and C viruses are spread through bloodborne transmission (e.g. blood transfusion, contaminated injections); through sexual intercourse; and from mother to child. Although these viruses cause some cases of acute disease, their greatest damage is caused decades after infection, as most deaths result from liver cancer and cirrhosis. For this reason, viral hepatitis is called the “silent epidemic”.

2. Viral hepatitis causes a significant burden of disease. Estimates vary, but approximately 240 million persons are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus and 150 million with hepatitis C virus. These viruses are also responsible for significant mortality. Annually, some 500 000 persons die from diseases related to hepatitis B and some 350 000 from hepatitis-C-related diseases. The most notable new piece of evidence that catalogues the burden of hepatitis-related disease comes from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study: the estimate is that, annually, a total of 1.4 million deaths are due to acute and chronic hepatitis infections (hepatitis A–E). This is similar to the number of deaths attributable to HIV infection, and makes viral hepatitis the eighth leading cause of death globally.

3. In view of the different routes of transmission, effective prevention requires a comprehensive approach that includes a number of interventions. To reduce infection with hepatitis A and E viruses, improved sanitation and access to clean water are a priority. The improvement in living standards in many countries has resulted in a documented reduction in incidence of hepatitis A disease. Vaccination is also an effective preventive strategy. Several countries have adopted universal vaccination of infants against hepatitis A infection, further reducing the incidence of hepatitis A disease.

4. An effective vaccine also exists against hepatitis B infection. Over the past two decades, countries have adopted universal vaccination for children, and by 2011, 180 countries had included universal vaccination against hepatitis B for infants as well. Globally, coverage with hepatitis B vaccine is estimated at 75% and is as high as 91% in the Western Pacific Region, and 90% in the Region of the Americas. Vaccination against hepatitis B in the South-East Asia Region reached 56% in 2011. The current emphasis is on raising the universal coverage of vaccination of infants at birth against hepatitis B (i.e. within 24 hours of birth). Thanks to these interventions, the Western Pacific Region was the first WHO region to achieve the goal of controlling hepatitis B (the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen is less than 2% among five-year-olds). According to a WHO analysis, through continued investments in hepatitis B vaccination, an estimated 3.4 million hepatitis B-related deaths due to liver cancer and cirrhosis will be prevented. In fact, vaccination coverage against hepatitis B virus is one of the 25 indicators of the draft action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020.1

5. Progress is also noted in the prevention of bloodborne transmission of hepatitis B and C. Among countries that provide reports, 90% indicate that all blood donations are screened for hepatitis B and C viruses. Regarding injection safety, continued efforts both to improve access to disposable syringes and needles, and to train health care workers in universal precautions have decreased the rate of unsafe injections.

6. The most significant advances regarding hepatitis control are in the area of treatment. Treatment experts predict that in the next two to five years, 90% of hepatitis C infections will be curable with an all-oral, once-daily,12-week regimen of safe medicines (as compared to the current regimen that requires 24 to 48 weeks of weekly injections and that has a cure rate of between 45% and 80%). The new medicines have the potential to cure millions of persons who have chronic infection and thereby prevent deaths from cancer and cirrhosis. Therapy to treat chronic hepatitis B infection is also improving; new medicine regimens are being developed that are more potent and are easier to administer. The complexity and toxicity of existing regimens have deterred advocacy for making these medicines available in low-income countries. Few national governments have plans for scaling up hepatitis therapy. However, with the arrival of the new medicines in the next few years, Member States, WHO and other international organizations can expect patients’ advocacy groups to exert significant pressure in pursuit of lower prices and greater access to the medicines. Currently, some groups are advocating for WHO to include pegylated interferon in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, to prequalify diagnostic tests and medicines for hepatitis, and to negotiate with industry for lower medicine prices.

PREVIOUS HEALTH ASSEMBLY ACTION AND SECRETARIAT ONGOING RESPONSE

7. The Health Assembly has previously considered specific aspects of hepatitis. In 2010, the Health Assembly adopted resolution WHA63.18, in which, inter alia, it urged Member States to support or enable an integrated and cost-effective approach to the prevention, control and management of viral hepatitis, recognizing the scale of the disease burden attributable to viral hepatitis. To facilitate implementation of the resolution, the Secretariat established the global hepatitis programme in December 2011. In 2012 the Sixty-fifth World Health Assembly noted a progress report on implementation of the resolution.2

8. Resolution WHA63.18 requests the Director-General, inter alia, to establish in collaboration with Member States the necessary guidelines, strategies, time-bound goals and tools for the surveillance, prevention and control of viral hepatitis. The framework for global action responds to this request, with work aligned along four strategic axes:

1 See document A66/9, Appendix 2.

2 Document A65/26, section G, and document WHA65/2012/REC/3, summary record of the sixth meeting of Committee B.

  • Strategic axis 1: raising awareness and mobilizing resources. Activities focus on increasing awareness about viral hepatitis among policy-makers, health professionals and the public; strengthening prevention and control measures; and removing discrimination against those who are infected. Priority activities include working with Member States to commemorate World Hepatitis Day (July 28) more visibly.
  • Strategic axis 2: data for policy and action. The Secretariat is updating estimates of the global prevalence and burden of viral hepatitis. Guidelines and standards for disease surveillance are being finalized so that countries can better prioritize resources and select appropriate interventions. The Secretariat is developing approaches that will allow countries to better assess the cost-effectiveness of various hepatitis interventions, including expanding therapy. The next step is to create a comprehensive approach to the development of national hepatitis control plans and programmes.
  • Strategic axis 3: prevention of transmission. Successful prevention efforts are being adapted in response to growing populations, changing epidemiology and new economic constraints. WHO is re-examining policies on immunization such as those relating to immunization schedules, the protection of neonates and health care workers (especially against infection with hepatitis B virus), expanded roles for existing hepatitis A vaccines and new hepatitis E vaccines, and innovative approaches for the future. WHO continues to work with partners to enhance the screening of blood for bloodborne pathogens including hepatitis B and C viruses and to reduce unnecessary and unsafe injections.
  • Strategic axis 4: screening, care and treatment. The Secretariat is developing guidelines for treatment of infection with hepatitis B and C viruses. WHO is also assessing whether pegylated interferon should be included in the WHO List of Essential Medicines and is initiating discussions with global partners to advocate for increased access to medicines to treat hepatitis.

ACTION BY THE EXECUTIVE BOARD

9. The Executive Board is invited to take note of the report and provide further strategic guidance.

Source

April 8, 2012

EpiCept's compound EP1013 identifies as new drug candidate to treat late-stage viral hepatitis

Tarrytown, New York
Saturday, April 07, 2012, 16:00 Hrs [IST]

EpiCept Corporation, a company focused on the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products for the treatment of pain and cancer, has announced that new preclinical research for its apoptosis inhibitor drug candidate EP1013 (now renamed F573) has concluded that F573 is a new therapeutic drug candidate for the treatment of late-stage viral infection-induced hepatitis.

The data were published in the Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin (2102 Volume 28 (1):136-139). F573 was discovered by EpiCept and licensed to GNI Group Ltd. in 2008 for clinical development in Asia, Australia and New Zealand.

F573 delivered intravenously demonstrated a therapeutic effect in a study involving 60 mice with acute liver injury, including a reduction in TNF-a and cell apoptosis. GNI Group Ltd. also noted that F573 reduced mice mortality caused by acute liver injury and that these animal studies provide important proof and direction for future human studies.

EpiCept president and CEO Jack Talley commented, "This is the first published evidence of F573's activity in viral hepatitis, an inflammation of the liver caused mainly by three specific viruses (hepatitis A, B and C). According to the C. Everett Koop Institute, 3-5 million Americans are infected with hepatitis C alone, with at least 170 million people infected globally. GNI's continued progress against this disease may enable us to advance the development of the compound in other territories, particularly North America and Europe."

As part of its license agreement with GNI Group Ltd., EpiCept is eligible to receive milestone payments of more than $12 million based on the clinical advancement of F573 in Asia, Australia and New Zealand, as well as royalties on commercial sales. EpiCept retains the commercial rights to F573/EP1013 in all other markets. The next potential milestone payment would occur in conjunction with initiation of a phase I trial in any of the territories outlined in the agreement. In July 2011, Shanghai Genomics, a wholly owned subsidiary of GNI Group Ltd., filed an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for F573 in China.

F573 is a di-peptide small-molecule compound with a potent inhibitory effect on caspases, a class of enzymes involved in cell death and inflammation. Drug efficacy has been shown in animal models relating to liver failure, brain ischemia and myocardial infarction. GNI Group Ltd. has secured a series of patent rights for F573 in China, Japan other key territories from EpiCept Corporation to develop this drug for liver diseases.

Source

April 4, 2012

EpiCept’s Licensed Compound EP1013 Identified as a New Drug Candidate for Treatment of Late-Stage Viral Hepatitis

PRESS RELEASE

April 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EDT

TARRYTOWN, N.Y., Apr 04, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Regulatory News:

EpiCept Corporation (nasdaq omx stockholm exchange and otcqx:EPCT) announced today that new preclinical research for its apoptosis inhibitor drug candidate EP1013 (now renamed F573) has concluded that F573 is a new therapeutic drug candidate for the treatment of late-stage viral infection-induced hepatitis. The data were published in the Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin (2102 Volume 28 (1):136-139). F573 was discovered by EpiCept and licensed to GNI Group Ltd. in 2008 for clinical development in Asia, Australia and New Zealand.

F573 delivered intravenously demonstrated a therapeutic effect in a study involving 60 mice with acute liver injury, including a reduction in TNF-a and cell apoptosis. GNI Group Ltd. also noted that F573 reduced mice mortality caused by acute liver injury and that these animal studies provide important proof and direction for future human studies.

EpiCept President and CEO Jack Talley commented, “This is the first published evidence of F573’s activity in viral hepatitis, an inflammation of the liver caused mainly by three specific viruses (hepatitis A, B and C). According to the C. Everett Koop Institute, 3-5 million Americans are infected with hepatitis C alone, with at least 170 million people infected globally. GNI’s continued progress against this disease may enable us to advance the development of the compound in other territories, particularly North America and Europe.”

As part of its license agreement with GNI Group Ltd., EpiCept is eligible to receive milestone payments of more than $12 million based on the clinical advancement of F573 in Asia, Australia and New Zealand, as well as royalties on commercial sales. EpiCept retains the commercial rights to F573/EP1013 in all other markets. The next potential milestone payment would occur in conjunction with initiation of a Phase I trial in any of the territories outlined in the agreement. In July 2011, Shanghai Genomics, a wholly owned subsidiary of GNI Group Ltd., filed an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for F573 in China.

About EP1013/F573

F573 is a di-peptide small-molecule compound with a potent inhibitory effect on caspases, a class of enzymes involved in cell death and inflammation. Drug efficacy has been shown in animal models relating to liver failure, brain ischemia and myocardial infarction. GNI Group Ltd. has secured a series of patent rights for F573 in China, Japan other key territories from EpiCept Corporation to develop this drug for liver diseases.

About EpiCept Corporation

EpiCept is focused on the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products for the treatment of pain and cancer. The Company's pain portfolio includes AmiKet™, a prescription topical analgesic cream in late-stage clinical development designed to provide effective long-term relief of pain associated with peripheral neuropathies. The Company's lead oncology product is Ceplene®, which has been granted full marketing authorization by the European Commission for the remission maintenance and prevention of relapse in adult patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in first remission. The Company has other oncology drug candidates currently in clinical development that were discovered using in-house technology and have been shown to act as vascular disruption agents in a variety of solid tumors.

In January 2012, EpiCept engaged SunTrust Robinson Humphrey to assist the Company in exploring strategic alternatives to maximize the commercial opportunity of AmiKet™ for the treatment of CIPN following taxane-based therapy. The engagement is focused on the identification and implementation of a strategy designed to optimize AmiKet’s value for the Company’s stockholders, which includes the evaluation of potential transactions involving the sale of the Company.

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release and any oral statements made with respect to the information contained in this news release contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include statements which express plans, anticipation, intent, contingency, goals, targets, future development and are otherwise not statements of historical fact. These statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or developments to be materially different from historical results or from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results or developments to differ materially include: the risk that the development of our EP1013 product candidate will not be successful, the risk that we will not be able to find a partner to help conduct the Phase III trials for AmiKet™ on attractive terms, a timely basis or at all, the risk that Ceplene® will not receive regulatory approval or marketing authorization in the United States or Canada, the risk that Ceplene® will not achieve significant commercial success, the risk that any required post-approval clinical study for Ceplene® will not be successful, the risk that we will not be able to maintain our final regulatory approval or marketing authorization for Ceplene®, the risk that Azixa™ will not receive regulatory approval or achieve significant commercial success, the risk that we will not receive any significant payments under our agreement with Myrexis, , the risk that clinical trials for AmiKet™ or crolibulin(TM) will not be successful, the risk that AmiKet™ or crolibulin(TM) will not receive regulatory approval or achieve significant commercial success, the risk that our other product candidates that appeared promising in early research and clinical trials do not demonstrate safety and/or efficacy in larger-scale or later-stage clinical trials, the risk that we will not obtain approval to market any of our product candidates, the risks associated with the adequacy of our existing cash resources and our ability to continue as a going concern, the risks associated with our ability to continue to meet our obligations under our existing debt agreements, the risks associated with dependence upon key personnel, the risks associated with reliance on collaborative partners and others for further clinical trials, development, manufacturing and commercialization of our product candidates; the cost, delays and uncertainties associated with our scientific research, product development, clinical trials and regulatory approval process; our history of operating losses since our inception; the highly competitive nature of our business; risks associated with litigation; and risks associated with our ability to protect our intellectual property. These factors and other material risks are more fully discussed in our periodic reports, including our reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q and 10-K and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You are urged to carefully review and consider the disclosures found in our filings which are available at www.sec.gov or at www.epicept.com . You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, any of which could turn out to be wrong due to inaccurate assumptions, unknown risks or uncertainties or other risk factors.

*Azixa is a registered trademark of Myrexis, Inc.

EPCT-GEN

SOURCE: EpiCept Corporation

Source

March 28, 2012

Association Between Viral Hepatitis and Erectile Dysfunction: A Population-Based Case-Control Analysis

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)

Shiu-Dong Chung MD1,2,3, Joseph J. Keller MPH4, Yu-Chih Liang PhD4, Herng-Ching Lin PhD3,*

Article first published online: 29 FEB 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02663.x

© 2012 International Society for Sexual Medicine

Keywords:
  • Chronic Liver Diseases;
  • Erectile Dysfunction;
  • Hepatitis
ABSTRACT

Introduction. Chronic liver diseases are often accompanied by hypogonadism, testicular atrophy, and a reduction in libido, all of which are factors that may contribute to the development of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, large-scaled studies investigating the association between ED and viral hepatitis are still sparse.

Aim. This study aimed to estimate the association between ED and a prior diagnosis of viral hepatitis using a population-based dataset with a case-control design in Taiwan.

Methods. We identified 6,429 patients with ED as cases and randomly selected 32,145 subjects as controls. We used conditional logistic regression to compute the odds ratio (OR) for having previously received a diagnosis of viral hepatitis between cases and controls.

Main Outcome Measure. The prevalence and odds of having been previously diagnosed with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, a coinfection with hepatitis B and C, and viral hepatitis of other etiology were calculated between cases and controls.

Results. Of the 38,574 sampled subjects, 3,930 (10.2%) had viral hepatitis before the index date; viral hepatitis was found in 900 (14.0%) cases and in 3,030 (9.4%) controls. After adjusting for monthly income, geographic location, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hepatic steatosis, coronary heart disease, obesity, and alcohol abuse/alcohol dependence syndrome, cases were found to be more likely to have prior viral hepatitis than controls (OR = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39–1.64, P < 0.001). A much higher proportion of coinfection with viral hepatitis B and C was additionally found among cases (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.72–1.97) than controls.

Conclusions. We conclude that ED was associated with prior viral hepatitis, especially with a coinfection of hepatitis B and C, after adjusting for potential confounders. Chung S-D, Keller JJ, Liang YC, and Lin HC. Association between viral hepatitis and erectile dysfunction: A population-based case-control analysis. J Sex Med **;**:**–**.

Source