Showing posts with label Liver Failure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liver Failure. Show all posts

October 14, 2013

Herbal and Weight Loss Supplements, Energy Drink Associated with Liver Damage and Liver Failure: Four Case Reports

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE
Monday, October 14, 2013
8:00 a.m. EDT

San Diego, CA (October 14, 2013)– Severe liver damage, and even failure, has been associated with the consumption of weight loss supplements, an herbal supplement and an energy drink, according to four separate case reports presented at the American College of Gastroenterology’s 78th Annual Scientific Meeting in San Diego, CA. Use of herbal and dietary supplements is widespread for a variety of health problems. Because many patients do not disclose supplement use to their physicians, important drug side effects can be missed.

Case Report 1: SlimQuick™- Associated Hepatotoxicity Resulting in Fulminant Liver Failure

There have been many reports of toxicity associated with dietary supplement use over the years, some with severe and even fatal outcomes. Lead investigator Dina Halegoua-De Marzio, M.D., reported a rare case of fulminant liver failure associated with the ingestion of SlimQuick™, a weight loss supplement containing green tea extract.

A 52-year old female patient was admitted to the emergency room after one week of vomiting and progressive jaundice. The patient reported she had ingested SlimQuick™ for two days, while fasting three weeks prior to intake. Past medical and family histories of the patient were normal. According to Dr. Halegoua-De Marzio, the patient’s physical examination showed normal mental status, icteric sclera, mild abdominal distension and lower extremity edema. Her liver biopsy was consistent with confluent hepatic necrosis with collapse. The steroid prednisone was started but discontinued after two days, as liver function worsened and mental status deteriorated. After being evaluated and listed for liver transplant, the patient underwent transplantation two days later.

“There is a lack of knowledge about the status of Food and Drug Administration regulation of dietary supplements,” said Dr. Halegoua-De Marzio. “Currently, dietary supplements are not required to have safety or efficacy studies before they are marketed to the public, and they remain popular among consumers despite reports of hepatotoxicity. This case report is an example of how even minimal use of these unregulated dietary supplements can lead to fulminant liver failure requiring liver transplant. It is important that patients talk with their doctors before starting any new dietary supplements.”

Dr. Halegoua-De Marzio believes this is the first reported case of fulminant liver failure due to the consumption of SlimQuick™. The main ingredient in SlimQuick™ is green tea extract, a common ingredient in several dietary supplements, some of which have been withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns.

Case Report 2: Black Cohosh-induced Hepatotoxicity Leading to Early Cirrhosis

Lead investigator Khadija Haroon Chaudrey, M.D., presented a rare case of black cohosh-induced hepatotoxicity leading to early cirrhosis. A 44-year-old female had developed jaundice for one month,

and initial lab work revealed elevated liver function tests (LFTs). The patient had no history of alcohol intake, IV drug use, unprotected sex, recent travel outside the United States, NSAID ingestion or blood transfusions. After unsuccessful outpatient improvement on steroids, she was referred to inpatient evaluation because of gradual progression of her symptoms, marked scleral icterus and jaundiced skin.

The patient then reported she had started taking black cohosh about one month prior, to help with her menstrual symptoms. “Her ultrasound abdomen showed nodular contour of liver consistent with cirrhosis,” said Dr. Chaudrey. “Her liver biopsy showed histologic pattern consistent with cholestasis, hepatocellular injury and early cirrhosis. Given patient’s history of black cohosh use and the timing of her abnormal liver chemistries, it was clinically evident the culprit agent was black cohosh.”

Once the patient stopped taking black cohosh, her symptoms improved and her LFTs normalized. Dr. Chaudrey adds that clinician awareness can be the key to early diagnosis, therapeutic intervention, and even prevention of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). DILI is a common problem associated with herbal supplements and over the counter medications. Although drug-induced hepatitis with most herbal supplements is considered rare, significant outcomes can occur.

Case Report 3: Acute Liver Failure Following Consumption of a Popular Sugar-free Energy Drink for a Year

Lead author Brian Huang M.D., Chief Resident of the Internal Medicine Residency Program at Cedars Sinai Medical Center, presented a case which is one of only a few known reports that directly link energy drink consumption with liver failure. A 36-year-old male without prior medical history sought medical attention after symptoms of right upper quadrant abdominal pain, jaundice and fatigue. After abnormal lab work, he was brought to the hospital. The patient admitted to binge drinking (10 beers in a three-hour period) prior to symptom onset. He denied consuming herbal supplements, but admitted to having three energy drinks, specifically Rockstar® Sugar Free, on a daily basis for the past year.

According to Dr. Huang, “The patients’ pathology reports showed massive hepatocellular necrosis and parenchymal collapse consistent with drug-induced liver injury. We believe his prior history of binge drinking may have provided initial damage on his liver, making him more susceptible to develop liver failure. Although the patient had a history of weekend binge drinking, his liver biopsy was not consistent with alcoholic hepatitis. Thus, we believe the liver failure was linked to the long-term energy drink consumption.”

According to the authors, the patient’s liver biopsy showed severe active hepatitis with bridging necrosis consistent with an herbal/drug-toxicity pattern. Upon worsening LFTs, the patient was placed on a donor waiting list and within a couple days found a suitable donor and underwent a successful liver transplantation.

“As energy drinks have become increasingly popular over the years, their ingredients are being looked at more closely, many which do not have a well-established safety profile. Some of these products have even been banned in other countries. While drinking modest amounts of energy drinks may be relatively safe, frequent consumption over an extended period of time has been linked with liver injury,” said Dr. Huang. More studies are needed to look at the relationships between energy drinks and liver damage.

Case Report 4: A Case of Drug-induced Liver Injury Arising from Ripped Fuel®

Another case of drug-induced liver injury was found in the advanced weight loss supplement, Ripped Fuel®. The supplement contains herbal extract with 60 percent flavoids, caffeine and cacao. The following case report illustrates drug-induced liver injury secondary to its use.

A 36-year old female with history of depression and no prior liver disease was seen after having one week of abdominal pain, anorexia and nausea. On physical examination, she had scleral icterus and mild jaundice. The patient had started to take Ripped Fuel® three weeks prior to developing these symptoms, to lose weight. She denied use of other herbal medicine, supplements or acetaminophen. There had been no recent changes in her depression medication.

“Initial laboratory findings suggested fulminant hepatic failure,” said lead author Hye Yeon Jhun, M.D. “Findings of the liver biopsy was consistent with marked portal inflammation, with circumferential interface activity and bridging hepatocyte necrosis consistent with DILI.” With treatment, the patient continued to improve clinically, with no evidence of hepatic failure during hospitalization, and was safely discharged.

Flavonoids have been thought to cause significant liver injury in several case reports. Treatment after development of drug-induced liver injury has been poorly defined, besides discontinuing the triggering substance. Previously, steroids have been studied to prevent tissue damage from inflammatory response, which failed to show beneficial effects. Dr. Jhun adds, “The usage of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been shown to be favorable, due to protection of hepatocytes against cytotoxic effects of bile acids and stimulating hepatobiliary secretion. Recently, the combination of steroids and UDCA proved to benefit the outcome of patients with severe drug-induced liver injury.”

View the abstracts.

About the American College of Gastroenterology
Founded in 1932, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) is an organization with an international membership of more than 12,000 individuals from 80 countries. The College's vision is to be the pre-eminent professional organization that champions the evolving needs of clinicians in the delivery of high quality, evidence-based, and compassionate health care to gastroenterology patients. The mission of the College is to advance world-class care for patients with gastrointestinal disorders through excellence, innovation and advocacy in the areas of scientific investigation, education, prevention and treatment. www.gi.org. View releases on research breaking at the ACG meeting and follow ACG on Twitter and share your live updates #acg2013.

Source

October 11, 2012

Early Results Show Promise for Stem Cells in Treating Chronic Liver Failure

logo_prweb

Stem cell transfusions may someday replace the need for transplants in patients who suffer from liver failure caused by hepatitis B, according to a new study coming out of Beijing. . The results are published in the October issue of STEM CELLS Translational Medicine. Worldwide more than 500,000 people die each year from this condition.

Durham, NC (PRWEB) October 11, 2012

Stem cell transfusions may someday replace the need for transplants in patients who suffer from liver failure caused by hepatitis B, according to a new study coming out of Beijing. . The results are published in the October issue of STEM CELLS Translational Medicine. Worldwide more than 500,000 people die each year from this condition.

“In China, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection accounts for the highest proportion of liver failure cases. While liver transplantation is considered the standard treatment, it has several drawbacks including a limited number of donors, long waiting lists, high cost and multiple complications. Our study shows that mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) transfusions might be a good, safe alternative,” said Fu-Sheng Wang, Ph.D., M.D., the study’s lead author and director of the Research Center for Biological Therapy (RCBT) in Beijing.

Wang along with RCBT colleague, Drs. Ming Shi and Zheng Zhang of the Research Center for Biological Therapy, The Institute of Translational Hepatology led the group of physician-scientists from the centers and Beijing 302 Hospital who conducted the study.

MSC transfusions had already been shown to improve liver function in patients with end-stage liver diseases. This time, the researchers wanted to gauge the safety and initial efficacy of treating acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) with MSCs. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver define ACLF as an “acute deterioration of pre-existing chronic liver disease usually related to a precipitating event and associated with increased mortality at three months due to multisystem organ failure.” The short-term mortality rate for this condition is more than 50 percent.

MSCs have self-renewing abilities and the potential to differentiate into various types of cells. More importantly, they can interact with immune cells and cause the immune system to adjust to the desired level.

Of the 43 patients in this pilot study — each of whom had liver failure resulting from chronic HBV infection — 24 were treated with MSCs taken from donated umbilical cords and 19 were treated with saline as the control group. All received conventional therapy as well. The liver function, adverse events and survival rates were then evaluated during the 48-week or 72-week follow-up period.

Along with increased survival rates, the patients’ liver function improved and platelet count increased. No significant side effects were observed throughout the treatment and follow-up period.

“While the results are preliminary and this pilot study includes a small number of patients, MSC transfusions appear to be safe and may serve as a novel therapeutic approach for HBV-associated ACLF patients,” Dr. Shi said.

“The study also highlights several key issues that will need to be considered in the design of future clinical studies, such as the optimal type of stem cells that will be infused, the minimum effective number of the cells and the best route of administration,” Dr. Wang added.

“These results are certainly promising and the strategy merits additional study, especially considering the shortage of donor organs” said Anthony Atala, MD, Editor of STEM CELLS Translational Medicine and director of the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.

###

The full article, “Human mesenchymal stem cell transfusion is safe and improves liver function in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients,” can be accessed at: http://www.stemcellstm.com/.

About STEM CELLS Translational Medicine: STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (SCTM), published by AlphaMed Press, is a monthly peer-reviewed publication dedicated to significantly advancing the clinical utilization of stem cell molecular and cellular biology. By bridging stem cell research and clinical trials, SCTM will help move applications of these critical investigations closer to accepted best practices.

About AlphaMed Press: Established in 1983, AlphaMed Press with offices in Durham, NC, San Francisco, CA, and Belfast, Northern Ireland, publishes two other internationally renowned peer-reviewed journals: STEM CELLS® (http://www.StemCells.com), celebrating its 30th anniversary in 2012, is the world's first journal devoted to this fast paced field of research. The Oncologist® (http://www.TheOncologist.com), also a monthly peer-reviewed publication, entering its 17th year, is devoted to community and hospital-based oncologists and physicians entrusted with cancer patient care. All three journals are premier periodicals with globally recognized editorial boards dedicated to advancing knowledge and education in their focused disciplines.

Source

June 13, 2012

Acetaminophen overdoses common cause of kids' liver failure

si-acetaminophen-220-cp-564

Acetaminophen which is an ingredient in a variety of over-the-counter and prescription medications, is also one of the leading causes of acute liver failure. (Scott Olson/Getty )

Dosing misunderstanding common among adults

CBC News Posted: Jun 4, 2012 2:11 PM ET Last Updated: Jun 4, 2012 3:17 PM ET
Acetaminophen painkiller overdoses can cause life-threatening liver failure in children but the problem is avoidable, Canadian doctors say.

"Acetaminophen overdose is a major cause of acute liver failure and is the most common identifiable cause of acute liver failure in children," Dr. Rod Lim of the Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre and his co-authors wrote in Monday's issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Spoons are often used by parents but are inaccurate, as are liquid droppers, the pediatricians said.

They suggested:

  • Better packaging to make it easier for parents to calculate and give an appropriate dose.
  • Keeping children's acetaminophen behind the counter so a pharmacist can give parents written information on what dose and volume to use based on the child's weight.
  • Doctors should keep in mind that infants' livers metabolize acetaminophen differently than adults, which can influence the risk of liver damage in young patients.

The team reported on a 22-day-old boy they successfully treated in the emergency department at a community hospital after an accidental overdose.

A doctor told the newborn's parents to give him 40 milligrams of acetaminophen before bringing him in for a circumcision.

The boy weighed 4.1 kilograms so the intended dose was 10 milligrams per kilogram.

The bottle showed a concentration of acetaminophen of 80 milligrams per millilitre, which the parents misinterpreted as meaning the bottle contained 80 milligrams of acetaminophen in total. They gave him 10 millilitres, or about half the bottle.

The error was discovered during the circumcision.

He recovered after intravenous treatment and showed no evidence of any long-term consequences of the accidental overdose, the doctors said.

Substantial potential for errors

The boy's case illustrates how well-educated parents miscalculated the dose of acetaminophen.

The weight-based dosing and conversion from milligrams of weight to millilitres of volume for many liquid preparations of children's medications can pose challenges, doctors say.

Between 2000 and 2004 in the U.S., 24 deaths were reported to poison control centres, and one third were due to acetaminophen overdose, the researchers said in noted comparable Canadian data have not yet been compiled.

In 2009, Health Canada revised its labelling standards for products containing acetaminophen and mandated that weight-based dosing charts be included with the products.

Heavy users of acetaminophen

Despite regulatory moves in Canada and the U.S., the authors said there's still room to improve.

Last week, U.S. researchers concluded many adults are also at risk of overdosing from over-the-counter pain relievers containing acetaminophen, like Tylenol.

The researchers interviewed 500 adults patients at outpatient general medicine clinics in Atlanta and Chicago. More than half had used acetaminophen in the past six months and 19 per cent said they were heavy users who took acetaminophen every day or a couple of times a week.

Nearly a quarter, or 23.8 per cent, of the participants showed they would overdose on a single over-the-counter acetaminophen product by exceeding a dose of four grams in a 24-hour period.

About five per cent made serious errors by taking more than six grams over 24 hours.

And 45.6 per cent of the adults demonstrated they would overdose by 'double-dipping' with two acetaminophen-containing products.

"Misunderstanding of the active ingredient and proper instructions for over-the-counter medications containing acetaminophen is common," Dr. Michael Wolf, an associate professor of medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago and his co-authors wrote in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

"The potential for errors and adverse events associated with unintentional misuse of these products is substantial, particularly among heavy users of acetaminophen and those with limited literacy."

Source

November 2, 2010

New alternatives to the treatment of acute liver failure

Transplant Proc. 2010 Oct;42(8):2959-61.

Pareja E, Cortes M, Bonora A, Fuset P, Orbis F, Lopez R, Mir J.

Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain. pareja_eug@gva.es

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined as an acute deterioration of a chronic liver disease. The most effective treatment in these patients is orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), which is highly limited by the donor shortage. The aim of this study was to increase the usefulness of hepatocyte transplantation (HT) as a bridge or alternative to OLT.

METHODS: During the last 2 years, we have performed HT in 3 patients with ACLF. The diagnosis was graft cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus in 2 of them, who were already included on waiting lists for retransplantation, and the third, unknown alcoholic cirrhosis.

RESULTS: After the first HT infusion, we observed an improvement in the clinical condition in all patients, hyperammonemia, and a partial correction of the degree of encephalopathy; 1 patient was retransplanted 6 days after the first HT.

DISCUSSION: The main indications for HT are inborn errors of metabolism in children. Other indications especially in adults, are acute liver failure, ACLF in patients with end-stage-liver disease who are a waiting OLT, and acute liver failure after an hepatectomy. HT may be a new treatment to improve the clinical condition in patients awaiting OLT.

Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID: 20970581 [PubMed - in process]

Source

September 30, 2010

Use of Statins in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Southern Medical Journal:

October 2010 - Volume 103 - Issue 10 - pp 1018-1024
doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181f0c6b4
CME Topics, Questions, Submission Forms

Andrus, Miranda R. PharmD, BCPS, FCCP; East, Jessica PharmD
 
Author Information
 
From the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Huntsville, AL.
 
Reprint requests to Miranda R. Andrus, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, 301 Governors Drive, Suite 385B, Huntsville, AL 35801. Email: andrumr@auburn.edu

Dr. Andrus and Dr. East have no financial disclosures to declare and no conflicts of interest to report.

Accepted February 12, 2010.

Abstract
 
Hepatitis C is a leading cause of liver failure and transplantation in the United States and a major public health issue. Studies have shown that patients with hepatitis C are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, which make statins of particular benefit in this patient population. However, the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) lists active or chronic liver disease as an absolute contraindication to statin therapy. The available literature regarding the safety of statins in this patient population is limited, but has not shown clinically significant differences in aminotransferase elevations or evidence of hepatotoxicity in patients with hepatitis C who have received statins versus those who have not. Statins should continue to be avoided in advanced end-stage liver disease, as there is a lack of safety data in these patients and drug metabolism would be severely compromised. Treatment with statins can be used in those with chronic, stable hepatitis C with elevated cardiac risk or a previous cardiac event.
 
Key Points
 
* Patients with chronic hepatitis C often have elevated cardiac risk and could benefit from statin therapy.

* The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) lists active or chronic liver disease as an absolute contraindication to statins.

* Studies of statins in patients with chronic hepatitis C have not shown a clinically significant risk for hepatotoxicity.

* Statins should be considered in patients with chronic hepatitis C with elevated cardiac risk.

Hepatitis C is a major public health issue and a leading cause of liver failure and transplantation in the United States.1 The most recent data estimate that 1.6% of the United States population (about 4.1 million people) is infected with hepatitis C.2 Of these, over three-fourths (about 3.2 million) have chronic hepatitis C infection.

Two studies have shown that patients with hepatitis C are at an increased risk for cardiovascular disease based on an increased carotid intima-media thickness. In a Japanese study, a higher percentage of patients with persistent hepatitis C infection were found to have carotid plaque (P < 0.0001) and carotid intima-media thickening (P < 0.05) compared to a control group.3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed persistent hepatitis C infection to be an independent predictor of carotid plaque, with an odds ratio of 5.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06–15.26, P < 0.001). A second study also demonstrated that patients with hepatitis C had greater carotid intima-media thickness compared to control (P < 0.001).4

These increases in markers of early atherosclerosis in chronic hepatitis C may make 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) of particular benefit in this patient population. However, the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) lists active or chronic liver disease as an absolute contraindication to statin therapy.5 The guideline authors state that it is not known if statins worsen outcomes in patients with chronically elevated aminotransferase levels (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) due to hepatitis C. They do recognize that it is unknown if elevated aminotransferase levels due to statin therapy represents true hepatotoxicity, and that progression to liver failure is rare. Clinical trials of statins have generally excluded patients with a history of chronic liver disease, so safety data in this patient population are limited. However, patients with hepatitis C may actually have increased cardiovascular risk, and could greatly benefit from the lipid lowering and pleiotropic effects of statins.

The Liver Expert Panel of the National Lipid Association has affirmed that there is a relationship between statin therapy and elevations in aminotransferase levels.6 However, these experts acknowledge that liver failure associated with statins is extremely rare. Although there are reports of liver failure requiring transplantation, there are no reported deaths due to liver failure associated with statins.6 Elevations in aminotransferase levels of greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) have been seen in less than 1% of patients receiving starting or intermediate doses of statins, and up to 2–3% of those receiving maximal doses.7 Most of these elevations are asymptomatic, and usually return to baseline if the statin is discontinued.7 Often, these elevations are transient and resolve spontaneously, even if the statin is continued.7 The elevations also appear to be dose-related, with higher doses of statins more likely to cause enzyme elevations.7–9 Single, unconfirmed enzyme elevations may not be related to statin therapy at all, and these elevations generally do not indicate liver damage or failure.6,7

The exact mechanism by which statins cause increased aminotransferase levels is not clearly understood; however, the mechanism appears to be hepatocellular injury.7 The adverse effect is thought to be more related to the dose and concentration of the statin in tissues, rather than the degree of low density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction.7 Conditions that can increase statin concentrations—and therefore increase the risk of adverse effects—include advanced age, small body frame, declining renal function, infection, untreated hypothyroidism, drugs which inhibit the metabolism of statins, and alcohol abuse.7 The Liver Expert Panel has concluded that all marketed statins can cause elevations in aminotransferase levels, and that no particular statin causes these adverse effects more frequently than the others.6

Several review articles recommend that statins be considered, with careful monitoring, in chronic hepatitis C patients.7–9 The potential benefits of statins in patients with coexisting chronic hepatitis C and elevated cardiovascular risk led us to review the primary literature for specific evidence regarding the safety of statins in this population.

Literature Review
 
A literature search was conducted using Ovid Medline (1950 to January, Week 1, 2010), combining the medical subject heading search terms “hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors” and “hepatitis C.” References of relevant articles were also reviewed. Studies examining the safety of using statins in patients with hepatitis C are limited to 1 prospective study, 3 retrospective studies in the Veterans Affairs (VA) population (1 of which only included 17 patients), and 1 retrospective study in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). A summary of these trials is provided in the Table.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin (80 mg daily) in hypercholesterolemic subjects with well-compensated liver disease.10 The study enrolled 326 patients, of which 62% had nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL)/nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 27% had chronic hepatitis C, and the remainder had other liver diseases.
 
Inclusion criteria were a LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL after a 4-week lead-in phase of lifestyle modifications, triglycerides <400 mg/dL, age ≥18 years old, and chronic, well-compensated liver disease. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or breastfeeding, had AST or ALT levels >5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin level above normal, serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, creatinine kinase >3 times the ULN, albumin less than the lower limit of normal, prothrombin time >2 seconds, or platelet count less than the lower limit of normal. Patients were also excluded if they had ascites, jaundice, or cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score >5, had a disorder affecting serum bilirubin, were taking antiviral therapy for hepatitis B or C, had lipid lowering therapy in the previous 8 weeks or more, had cancer or cancer chemotherapy, or had significant cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal or thyroid disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus within 6 months prior to randomization.

The safety objective was to determine the number of patients who had an increase in the ALT ≥2 times the ULN for those with a normal ALT at baseline, or a doubling of the baseline ALT in those who had an elevated ALT at baseline. By these definitions, fewer patients in the pravastatin group experienced ALT elevations compared to the placebo group. The proportion of subjects who had sustained elevations in ALT was comparable, with 8/160 (5%) in the pravastatin group, and 11/160 (7%) in the placebo group. Side effects were experienced in 26.4% of pravastatin patients and 25.2% of placebo patients. Six patients receiving pravastatin and 4 patients receiving placebo experienced treatment-emergent adverse effects associated with aminotransferase elevations, and no clinically apparent hepatotoxicity was experienced in either group. The terminology “treatment-emergent adverse effects” and “clinically apparent hepatotoxicity” was not clearly defined by the study. No patients experienced an acute exacerbation of their underlying liver disease. The study was not specifically powered for the safety endpoint; however, the authors calculated that a sample size of 150 per treatment group would provide approximately 20% power for this endpoint.

A retrospective, multicenter study in the VA population was conducted to determine whether statin therapy increased the risk for developing hepatotoxicity in patients with hepatitis C.11 Eight hundred and thirty patients were divided into 3 cohorts, and the antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was used as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Cohort 1 included 166 patients positive for anti-HCV on statin therapy, Cohort 2 included 332 patients anti-HCV positive without statin therapy, and Cohort 3 included 332 patients who were anti-HCV negative and on statin therapy. Patients were excluded from Cohorts 1 and 3 if they did not have liver function tests checked within 1 year before and after initiation of statin therapy. Patients were excluded from Cohort 2 if they did not have liver function tests checked within 1 year before and after hepatitis C diagnosis. The majority of patients were taking simvastatin or lovastatin.

Patients in Cohort 1 (anti-HCV positive + statin) had a lower percentage change in median aminotransferase levels compared with those in Cohort 2 (anti-HCV positive + no statin; AST: 1% versus 5%, respectively, P = 0.032, ALT: 7.3% versus 6.0%, respectively, P < 0.01), and Cohort 3 (anti-HCV negative + statin; AST 5%, P = 0.004; ALT 4.8%, P = 0.002). However, none of the median changes were clinically significant, as all were less than 8%. A higher percentage of patients in Cohort 1 developed mild to moderate increases in aminotransferase levels (defined as AST or ALT ≤10 times the ULN or from baseline) compared to Cohort 2 (22.9% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.009). However, Cohort 2 had a higher percentage of patients with severe increases in liver function tests (defined as serum bilirubin value >3 mg/dL, or AST or ALT >10 times the ULN or baseline) compared to Cohort 1 (6.6% versus 1.2%, P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients with increased aminotransferase levels who discontinued statin therapy between Cohort 1 (21.6%) and Cohort 3 (9.2%; P = 0.147). The study was not adequately powered to detect idiosyncratic drug reactions.

In another retrospective study conducted in the VA system, 146 males who were seropositive for hepatitis C and received a statin between January 1, 1995, and September 9, 2003 were evaluated.12 Patients were excluded if there were no documented baseline lipid and aminotransferase levels before the start of statin therapy, or no documented follow-up levels. Patients were also excluded if triglyceride levels were ≥400 mg/dL. Hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in ALT >3 times the ULN.

More than 90% of patients were taking simvastatin (the formulary agent), and statins were taken for a mean of 2.5 years in the study. At baseline, 66% had ALT levels greater than the ULN, and 8% had ALT levels >3 times the ULN. There was no significant increase in ALT at short-term follow up (3–6 months), or long-term follow up (mean 22 months). One patient discontinued statin therapy due to ALT levels >3 times the ULN.

A post hoc analysis did not show a statistically significant increase in the frequency of patients with ALT levels >3 times the ULN at any point in time. When patients who had ALT levels >3 times the ULN at baseline or after statin discontinuation were excluded, only 10 patients had ALT levels >3 times the ULN while receiving statin therapy during the study period. In 3 of these patients, levels later returned to normal. Statin therapy was discontinued in 1 of the 10 patients due to excessive alcohol intake. Of the remaining 6 patients, 3 continued receiving the statin and had subsequent ALT levels between 1 and 3 times the ULN, 1 had subsequent ALT levels 4 to 5 times the ULN, 1 had therapy discontinued, and 1 was lost to follow up.

In another very small retrospective VA study, 17 male patients with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C taking statins were reviewed.13 Only 5 patients had elevations of aminotransferase levels while taking statins, and the greatest increase was 1.5 times the ULN.

In a retrospective Italian study reported as a letter to the editor, the safety of statin therapy in patients infected with both HIV and hepatitis C was examined.14 Patients with HIV who had taken statins were divided into 2 groups. Group A included 38 patients with HIV and hepatitis C co-infection who started statin therapy at least 6 months after diagnosis of hepatitis C. Group B included 42 patients with HIV who were hepatitis C and hepatitis B negative who were on statin therapy. Patients were excluded if they had a history of alcohol abuse, concomitant hepatotoxic medications other than antiretrovirals, or were on treatment for hepatitis C. The median age was 45.5 years, and 76.2% of patients were male.

No significant difference was found between the groups in aminotransferase levels. The percentage of patients with an increase of ≥1.5 times the baseline level of AST was 7.9% in Group A and 4.8% in Group B, and for ALT was 7.9% in Group A and 14.3% in Group B. No patients had an increase of aminotransferase levels ≥3 times the ULN, and no patients discontinued a statin due to liver toxicity. About 40% of patients actually experienced a decrease in their aminotransferase levels while on statin therapy. A positive correlation was found between patients who had a decrease in ALT and those who had higher baseline levels of ALT.

All of these studies had weaknesses, limiting their clinical applicability. Almost all patients in the studies were male, and though hepatitis C is more common in males, this may limit the applicability to female patients. Only 1 study was prospective, and it had extensive exclusion criteria, which limits the applicability to the general hepatitis C population (which often has numerous comorbidities). The other 4 studies were retrospective, and therefore not blinded or controlled. Some of the studies used positive anti-HCV as a marker for chronic HCV, which could have included patients without the disease. Other studies did not state how chronic hepatitis C was defined. The safety endpoints and definitions were not consistent between studies, and were not always the most appropriate endpoints. For example, one of the VA studies used the outcome percentage change in aminotransferase levels. If the enzymes were already increased at baseline, a percentage change would not be as significant as it would if the enzymes were normal at baseline. In general, the studies were probably not powered with a large enough sample size to detect a statistically significant difference in safety outcomes.

Potential Benefits of Statins
 
Interestingly, there is literature to support the theory that statins actually have anti-HCV activity that might be beneficial, in addition to lowering cholesterol. Statins have been identified to have antiviral properties by inhibiting hepatitis C replication.15 Lipid metabolism is part of the life cycle of many viruses, and the resulting metabolites are incorporated into a lipid raft membrane, which is enriched with cholesterols and sphingolipids.16 The hepatitis C virus also forms a replication complex on the lipid raft membrane; therefore, a reduction in cholesterol from the lipid raft structure could theoretically decrease hepatitis C viral replication.15,16 The authors of 1 in vitro study have suggested that the antiviral effect of statins might be useful in treating hepatitis C in combination with interferon alpha.17 In vivo studies have been small and inconclusive at this time.18,19

Conclusion
 
In summary, the available literature has not shown clinically significant differences in aminotransferase levels or evidence of hepatotoxicity in patients with hepatitis C who have received statins versus those who have not. Statins should continue to be avoided in advanced end-stage liver disease, as there is a lack of safety data in these patients, and drug metabolism would be severely compromised. Treatment with statins should be considered in those with chronic, stable hepatitis C with elevated cardiac risk or a previous cardiac event. If baseline AST or ALT levels are >3 times the ULN statins should be used cautiously, but can be considered if the disease is stable, as the benefit is likely to outweigh the risk of treatment.

When used in patients with hepatitis C, statins should be started at low doses, and the AST and ALT should be monitored more closely than in patients without underlying liver disease, especially at drug initiation. If elevations of >3 times the ULN do occur with statin therapy, these should be repeated and confirmed before discontinuing the drug. After enzymes return to baseline, another statin can be tried if there are no other signs of hepatitis. Alcohol use should be avoided.

We feel that, with careful monitoring of the AST and ALT, statins can be used to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic, stable hepatitis C.

References
 
1.Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, et al; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis, management and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology 2009;49:1335–1374.

2.Armstrong GL, Waley A, Simard EP, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:705–714.

3.Ishizaka Y, Ishizaka N, Takahashi E, et al. Association between hepatitis C virus core protein and carotid atherosclerosis. Circ J 2003;67:26–30.

4.Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, et al. Differences and similarities in early atherosclerosis between patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis B and C. J Hepatol 2007;46:1126–1132.

5.National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143–3421.

6.Cohen DE, Anania FA, Chalasani N; National Lipid Association Statin Safety Task Force Liver Expert Panel. An assessment of statin safety by hepatologists. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:77C–81C.

7.McKenney JM, Davidson MH, Jacobson TA, et al; National Lipid Association Statin Safety Assessment Task Force. Final conclusions and recommendations of the National Lipid Association Statin Safety Assessment Task Force. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:89C–94C.

8.Anfossi G, Massucco P, Bonoma K, et al. Prescription of statins to dyslipidemic patients affected by liver disease: a subtle balance between risk and benefits. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2004;14:215–224.

9.Russo MW, Jacobson IM. How to use statins in patients with chronic liver disease. Cleve Clin J Med 2004;71:58–62.

10.Lewis JH, Mortensen ME, Zweig S, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Hepatology 2007;46:1453–1463.

11.Khorashadi S, Hasson NK, Cheung RC. Incidence of statin hepatotoxicity in patients with hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:902–907.

12.Segarra-Newnham M, Parra D, Martin-Cooper EM. Effectiveness and hepatotoxicity of statins in men seropositive for hepatitis C virus. Pharmacotherapy 2007;27:845–851.

13.Gibson K, Rindone JP. Experience with statin use in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1278–1279.

14.Milazzo L, Menzaghi B, Corvasce S, et al. Safety of statin therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007;46:258–260.

15.Kim SS, Peng LF, Lin W, et al. A cell-based, high-throughput screen for small molecule regulators of hepatitis C virus replication. Gastroenterology 2007;132:311–320.

16.Ikeda M, Kato N. Life style-related diseases of the digestive system: cell culture system for the screening of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) reagents: suppression of HCV replication by statins and synergistic action with interferon. J Pharmacol Sci 2007;105:145–150.

17.Ikeda M, Abe K, Yamada M, et al. Different anti-HCV profiles of statins and their potential for combination therapy with interferon. Hepatology 2006;44:117–125.

18.O'Leary JG, Chan JL, McMahon CM, et al. Atorvastatin does not exhibit antiviral activity against HVC at conventional doses: a pilot clinical trial. Hepatology 2007;45:895–898.

19.Bader T, Fazili J, Madhoun M, et al. Fluvastatin inhibits hepatitis C replication in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1383–1389.

Source

August 26, 2010

Development of fatal acute liver failure in HIV-HBV coinfected patients

ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol 2010 August 28; 16(32): 4107-4111

CASE REPORT

Albert M Anderson, Marina B Mosunjac, Melody P Palmore, Melissa K Osborn, Andrew J Muir

Albert M Anderson, Marina B Mosunjac, Melody P Palmore, Melissa K Osborn, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Health System Infectious Diseases Program, 341 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30308, United States

Andrew J Muir, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 3913, Durham, North Carolina, CA 27710, United States

Author contributions: Anderson AM, Mosunjac MB, Palmore MP and Osborn MK performed the research; Mosunjac MB performed pathological analysis; Anderson AM and Muir AJ analyzed the research and wrote the paper.

Correspondence to: Albert M Anderson, MD, MHS, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Health System Infectious Diseases Program, 341 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia, GA 30308, United States. aande2@emory.edu
Telephone: +1-404-6166864 Fax: +1-404-6169732

Received: April 1, 2010 Revised: May 31, 2010
Accepted: June 7, 2010
Published online: August 28, 2010

Abstract

Coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is not uncommon in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals and patients with HIV-HBV coinfection are at high risk for progression of liver disease. Current guidelines regarding the treatment of HIV infection recommend that patients who are coinfected with HIV and HBV receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with activity against hepatitis B. While HIV-HBV coinfected patients often experience liver enzyme elevations after starting antiretroviral therapy, acute liver failure (ALF) is rare and typically occurs with older antiretroviral agents with known potential for hepatotoxicity. We describe two cases of fatal ALF in the setting of HIV-HBV coinfection after initiation of HAART. These cases occurred despite treatment with antiretrovirals that have activity against HBV and highlight the challenges in distinguishing drug hepatotoxicity and HBV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. HIV-HBV coinfected patients should be monitored closely when initiating HAART, even when treatment includes agents that have activity against HBV.

© 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Key words: Hepatitis B virus; Human immunodeficiency virus; Liver failure

Peer reviewers: Rosemary Joyce Burnett, MPH, Department of Epidemiology National School of Public Health, University of Limpopo, Medunsa Campus PO Box 173, MEDUNSA, Pretoria 0204, South Africa; Sang Hoon Ahn, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, 250 Seongsanno, Seoul, South Korea

Anderson AM, Mosunjac MB, Palmore MP, Osborn MK, Muir AJ. Development of fatal acute liver failure in HIV-HBV coinfected patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(32): 4107-4111 Available from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i32/4107.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i32.4107

INTRODUCTION

It is estimated that 10% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in the United States and Europe are chronically coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV)[1,2]. In other regions, rates of HBV coinfection in HIV-infected patients may be even higher[3]. HIV-HBV coinfected patients have higher rates of liver-related morbidity and mortality compared to patients infected with either virus alone[4,5]. Therefore, current guidelines suggest that HIV-infected patients with HBV infection should be treated with a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen that is also active against HBV[6]. However, HIV-HBV coinfected patients are particularly susceptible to certain complications of HAART. The vast majority of antiretroviral medications have been associated with some degree of hepatotoxicity and the presence of HBV infection is an independent risk factor for the development of clinically significant hepatotoxicity[7-9]. Additionally, coinfected patients are at risk for HBV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), which is characterized by a paradoxical hepatitis flare corresponding to an initial improvement in plasma HIV RNA level and CD4+ T-cell count on HAART[10]. Overall, liver enzyme elevations in HIV-HBV coinfected patients after starting HAART are not uncommon, but acute liver failure (ALF) is rare[11]. Reported cases have typically involved treatment with older thymidine analogue drugs such as stavudine and didanosine[12]. We describe two cases in which fatal ALF occurred in patients with HIV-HBV coinfection after beginning HAART regimens which did not include thymidine analogues but which did have activity against HBV.

CASE REPORT

Patient A

A 42-year-old African-American male with longstanding HIV/HBV coinfection was seen in clinic. He had been diagnosed with HIV infection over 10 years previously but had been on antiretrovirals for only short periods since diagnosis. As a result, his CD4+ T-cell count had reached a nadir of 5 cells/mL (1%) with a plasma HIV RNA level of 51 230 copies/mL. His plasma HBV DNA level was 147 million IU/mL. Both hepatitis B endogenous antigen (HBeAg) and anti-HBe antibody were negative. He was started on a new regimen of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, lamivudine, and abacavir. At that time, his alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were both slightly elevated at 94 U/L (normal range 17-63 U/L) and 73 U/L (normal range 10-42 U/L), respectively, with a normal bilirubin level. The patient had never undergone a liver biopsy. Eight weeks after starting therapy, he returned to clinic with nausea, vomiting, and jaundice. The ALT level had increased to 1352 U/L and the AST was 1765 U/L. Total bilirubin was 14.1 mg/dL, direct bilirubin was 8.9 mg/dL, and prothrombin time was 18.9 s (INR 1.62). HIV RNA level had decreased to 100 copies/mL. He was admitted to the hospital for further workup. The patient did not drink alcohol and acetaminophen level was undetectable. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA was undetectable, hepatitis D virus (HDV) antibody was negative, and hepatitis A virus (HAV) IgM was negative. HBV DNA had decreased to 4.42 million IU/mL. Anti-nuclear antibody screen was negative. All medications were held for 48 h. His ALT and AST levels decreased to 992 U/L and 1505 U/L. The appearance of the liver was normal on computed tomography of the abdomen with no suggestion of cirrhosis or portal hypertension. He was then discharged after starting a new regimen of ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Ten days later he was re-admitted to the hospital with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. ALT and AST levels had risen to 1214 U/L and 1992 U/L. Total bilirubin was 29.5 mg/dL, direct bilirubin was 18.3 mg/dL, and prothrombin time was 35.4 s (INR 3.19). HBV DNA level had decreased to 83 100 IU/mL. The ritonavir and fosamprenavir were discontinued and he was continued on emtricitabine/tenofovir. A liver biopsy showed marked septal fibrosis with nodule formation that was consistent with cirrhosis (Figure 1A and B). There was a severe mixed inflammatory infiltrate in portal and periportal areas containing lymphocytes, plasma cells and scant eosinophils (Figure 2A). The liver eosinophils were readily identified and no other special stains such as sirius red were used. Peripheral blood eosinophil count was within normal limits. Severe piecemeal necrosis was present diffusely around most of the portal tracts linking some of them together in so-called bridging necrosis (Figure 2B). After 10 d, his ALT and AST levels had come down to 405 U/L and 758 U/L, but total and direct bilirubin remained elevated at 28.8 mg/dL and 13.6 mg/dL. Due to concern for creating HIV resistance, he was switched from emtricitabine/tenofovir to adefovir. After 1 wk, he developed worsening renal failure and was switched from adefovir to emtricitabine and telbivudine. However, his condition continued to deteriorate. After 3 wk in the hospital, he became progressively encephalopathic, thrombocytopenic with a platelet count of 33 000/mL, and coagulopathic with prothrombin time of 37.7 s (INR 3.41). He developed hematemesis and became increasingly unresponsive with an ammonia level of 96 mmol/L (normal range 11-35 mmol/L). The patient was thought to be too unstable to undergo liver transplantation. After discussions with his family, he was placed on comfort care and died.

Patient B

A 46-year-old African-American male came to clinic with a new diagnosis of HIV infection. CD4+ T-cell count was 44 cells/mL (8%) with a plasma HIV RNA level of 9620 copies/mL. He was also diagnosed with hepatitis B infection with HBV DNA level > 500 million IU/mL. Duration of HBV infection was not known but HBV core IgM was negative. HCV antibody was negative, HBeAg was negative, anti-HBe antibody was positive, and HDV antibody was negative. ALT level was normal at 62 U/L and AST was slightly elevated at 53 U/L. He was started on a regimen of once daily ritonavir-boosted darunavir and tenofovir/emtricitabine. Five weeks after starting this regimen, he presented with nausea, vomiting, and jaundice. ALT was 1195 U/L and AST was 1396 U/L. Total bilirubin was 13.5 mg/dL, direct bilirubin was 7.7 mg/dL, and prothrombin time was 27.4 s (INR 2.42). HBV DNA level had decreased to 342 000 IU/mL. HIV RNA level was undetectable at < 50 copies/mL and CD4+ T-cell count was 52 cells/mL (10%). HAV IgM was negative and HCV antibody was negative on recheck. Both serum ethanol and acetaminophen levels were undetectable. The patient reported no sexual activity for over 1 year and he never used injectable drugs. Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen showed fibrotic changes throughout the liver and portal hypertension evidenced by splenomegaly, a recanalized umbilical vein and minimal perigastric and perisplenic varices. After all medications were held for 72 h, he was restarted on a regimen of ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir and tenofovir/emtricitabine. Over the next week, his ALT and AST levels trended down to 803 U/L and 773 U/L and his platelets remained within normal limits. However, over that period of time his prothrombin time increased to 42.5 s (INR 3.88) and he became profoundly encephalopathic with an ammonia level of 137 mmol/L. The patient was thought to be too unstable for liver transplantation. After a total of 10 d in the hospital he developed cardiac arrest and died.

DISCUSSION

The development of elevated liver enzymes is not uncommon in HIV-HBV coinfected patients after starting HAART[13]. In the majority of cases, these elevations are mild and do not require modification of treatment[11]. The development of more severe hepatotoxicity (liver enzymes > 10 times the upper limit of normal) is not common and ALF is rare[9]. Among HIV-infected patients in general, those who develop ALF while on HAART have experienced very high rates of mortality[14]. Therefore, an HIV-HBV coinfected patient who develops ALF after starting HAART may be at particularly high risk for mortality, given the presence of underlying liver disease and potentially impaired reserve.

The most appropriate management of such patients is not completely clear, and the optimal management of HIV-HBV coinfected patients who develop liver enzymes > 10 times the upper limit of normal after starting HAART but who do not have evidence of decompensated liver disease may be even more difficult to delineate. One question is whether it is possible to determine if the hepatic injury is from drug toxicity or HBV IRIS and whether this changes management of the patient. Liver biopsy may be helpful in identifying an opportunistic infection, such as mycobacterial disease or cytomegalovirus, that may contribute to liver disease. Liver biopsy may also indicate the presence of cirrhosis. The latter was present in the case of patient A and would have also been found in the case of patient B given radiographic findings. In patient A, liver biopsy showed severe inflammation with lymphocytes, plasma cells, and scant eosinophils. Many cases of HAART-induced ALF in patients without HBV show only mild hepatic inflammatory cell infiltration on biopsy[15]. However, the presence of portal plasma-lymphocytic infiltrate is nonspecific and can be found in chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and even some medication reactions[16]. The presence of eosinophils may be more specific for a drug reaction[17], though these were scant in this case. Overall, distinguishing between HBV IRIS and drug hepatotoxicity in such cases of ALF may not change management, particularly because it is not clear if anti-inflammatory medications such as corticosteroids are beneficial in HBV IRIS. Corticosteroids have been found to increase HBV replication[18] and this has led some to recommend against the use of corticosteroids in the setting of HBV IRIS[19].

The patients in our series met criteria for ALF according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guideline for liver failure[20]. In this guideline, it is recommended that “all non-essential medications” be discontinued in patients with ALF. Due to the fact that the majority of antiretrovirals, including protease inhibitors[8], have been associated with hepatotoxicity, it is advisable to hold HAART at least in the short term. However, HBV flares have been associated with the discontinuation of HAART regimens that contain anti-HBV activity[21]. This theoretically could contribute to ALF. At the same time, continuing single or dual therapy with anti-HBV agents such as lamivudine or tenofovir would create an environment in which HIV resistance might develop. This has led some to recommend stopping HAART and considering treatment of HBV with agents that do not have activity against HIV in cases of significant hepatitis flares on HAART in the setting of hepatitis B cirrhosis[22]. Adefovir is an option, but this drug has less potency against HBV than other agents[23]. Interferon a-based therapies might be considered, but are contraindicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Entecavir was initially thought to have no significant anti-HIV activity, but has subsequently been shown to be associated with the development of HIV resistance mutations when used in the absence of other antiretrovirals[24]. One report suggests that telbivudine may also have activity against HIV[25]. Overall, we believe that the effort to help the patient survive an episode of ALF overrides the preservation of one particular antiretroviral class for future use and that at least one agent with anti-HBV activity should be given in such a scenario. In general, it appears that patients who develop liver failure on HAART, whether coinfected with HBV or not, have a very poor prognosis. These patients should be considered for liver transplantation evaluation, as emerging data show that HIV-HBV coinfected patients have excellent outcomes with liver transplantation[26].

It is prudent to closely monitor the clinical status and liver enzymes of HIV-HBV infected patients after initiation of HAART in order to identify cases of hepatotoxicity early on. Additionally, two new antiretroviral classes have been introduced in recent years. These include the integrase inhibitor class currently represented by raltegravir and the CCR5 antagonist class currently represented by maraviroc. Based on published reports to date, these new agents appear to have minimal hepatotoxicity[27]. While they have only been available since 2007 and toxicities have yet to be fully described, these agents hold promise for HIV-infected patients with chronic liver diseases such as HBV. Perhaps most importantly, efforts should be made to prevent the acquisition of chronic HBV infection, and the HBV vaccine is recommended for all patients with HIV infection[28].

REFERENCES

1 Konopnicki D, Mocroft A, de Wit S, Antunes F, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, Zilmer K, Vella S, Kirk O, Lundgren JD. Hepatitis B and HIV: prevalence, AIDS progression, response to highly active antiretroviral therapy and increased mortality in the EuroSIDA cohort. AIDS 2005; 19: 593-601

2 Thio CL, Seaberg EC, Skolasky R Jr, Phair J, Visscher B, Muñoz A, Thomas DL. HIV-1, hepatitis B virus, and risk of liver-related mortality in the Multicenter Cohort Study (MACS). Lancet 2002; 360: 1921-1926

3 Rouet F, Chaix ML, Inwoley A, Anaky MF, Fassinou P, Kpozehouen A, Rouzioux C, Blanche S, Msellati P. Frequent occurrence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection among West African HIV type-1-infected children. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 361-366

4 Colin JF, Cazals-Hatem D, Loriot MA, Martinot-Peignoux M, Pham BN, Auperin A, Degott C, Benhamou JP, Erlinger S, Valla D, Marcellin P. Influence of human immunodeficiency virus infection on chronic hepatitis B in homosexual men. Hepatology 1999; 29: 1306-1310

5 Puoti M, Airoldi M, Bruno R, Zanini B, Spinetti A, Pezzoli C, Patroni A, Castelli F, Sacchi P, Filice G, Carosi G. Hepatitis B virus co-infection in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. AIDS Rev 2002; 4: 27-35

6 Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Bethesda: Department of Health and Human Services. December 1, 2009

7 Cooper CL. HIV antiretroviral medications and hepatotoxicity. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2007; 2: 466-473

8 Sulkowski MS. Hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy containing HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Semin Liver Dis 2003; 23: 183-194

9 Wit FW, Weverling GJ, Weel J, Jurriaans S, Lange JM. Incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral combination therapy. J Infect Dis 2002; 186: 23-31

10 Shelburne SA 3rd, Hamill RJ, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Greenberg SB, Atmar RL, Musher DW, Gathe JC Jr, Visnegarwala F, Trautner BW. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: emergence of a unique syndrome during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2002; 81: 213-227

11 den Brinker M, Wit FW, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, Jurriaans S, Weel J, van Leeuwen R, Pakker NG, Reiss P, Danner SA, Weverling GJ, Lange JM. Hepatitis B and C virus co-infection and the risk for hepatotoxicity of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. AIDS 2000; 14: 2895-2902

12 Vogel M, Rockstroh JK. Hepatotoxicity and liver disease in the context of HIV therapy. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2007; 2: 306-313

13 Ofotokun I, Smithson SE, Lu C, Easley KA, Lennox JL. Liver enzymes elevation and immune reconstitution among treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients instituting antiretroviral therapy. Am J Med Sci 2007; 334: 334-341

14 Puoti M, Torti C, Ripamonti D, Castelli F, Zaltron S, Zanini B, Spinetti A, Putzolu V, Casari S, Tomasoni L, Quiros-Roldan E, Favret M, Berchich L, Grigolato P, Callea F, Carosi G. Severe hepatotoxicity during combination antiretroviral treatment: incidence, liver histology, and outcome. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 32: 259-267

15 Clark SJ, Creighton S, Portmann B, Taylor C, Wendon JA, Cramp ME. Acute liver failure associated with antiretroviral treatment for HIV: a report of six cases. J Hepatol 2002; 36: 295-301

16 Watanabe S, Deguchi A, Uchida N, Kurokohchi K, Arima K, Nishioka M, Hasui H. Histopathologic comparison of anti-mitochondrial antibody-positive primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune cholangiopathy. Hepatol Res 2001; 19: 41-51

17 Kleiner DE. The pathology of drug-induced liver injury. Semin Liver Dis 2009; 29: 364-372

18 Sagnelli E, Manzillo G, Maio G, Pasquale G, Felaco FM, Filippini P, Izzo CM, Piccinino F. Serum levels of hepatitis B surface and core antigens during immunosuppressive treatment of HBsAg-positive chronic active hepatitis. Lancet 1980; 2: 395-397

19 Lesho E. Evidence base for using corticosteroids to treat HIV-associated immune reconstitution syndrome. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2006; 4: 469-478

20 Polson J, Lee WM. AASLD position paper: the management of acute liver failure. Hepatology 2005; 41: 1179-1197

21 Nüesch R, Ananworanich J, Srasuebkul P, Chetchotisakd P, Prasithsirikul W, Klinbuayam W, Mahanontharit A, Jupimai T, Ruxrungtham K, Hirschel B. Interruptions of tenofovir/emtricitabine-based antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV/hepatitis B virus co-infection. AIDS 2008; 22: 152-154

22 Crane M, Matthews G, Lewin SR. Hepatitis virus immune restoration disease of the liver. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2008; 3: 446-452

23 Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, Gane E, de Man RA, Krastev Z, Germanidis G, Lee SS, Flisiak R, Kaita K, Manns M, Kotzev I, Tchernev K, Buggisch P, Weilert F, Kurdas OO, Shiffman ML, Trinh H, Washington MK, Sorbel J, Anderson J, Snow-Lampart A, Mondou E, Quinn J, Rousseau F. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2442-2455

24 Sasadeusz J, Audsley J, Mijch A, Baden R, Caro J, Hunter H, Matthews G, McMahon MA, Olender SA, Siliciano RF, Lewin SR, Thio CL. The anti-HIV activity of entecavir: a multicentre evaluation of lamivudine-experienced and lamivudine-naive patients. AIDS 2008; 22: 947-955

25 Low E, Cox A, Atkins M, Nelson M. Telbivudine has activity against HIV. 16th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2009 Feb 8-11; Montreal, Canada

26 Tateo M, Roque-Afonso AM, Antonini TM, Medja F, Lombes A, Jardel C, Teicher E, Sebagh M, Roche B, Castaing D, Samuel D, Duclos-Vallee JC. Long-term follow-up of liver transplanted HIV/hepatitis B virus coinfected patients: perfect control of hepatitis B virus replication and absence of mitochondrial toxicity. AIDS 2009; 23: 1069-1076

27 Vispo E, Mena A, Maida I, Blanco F, Cordoba M, Labarga P, Rodriguez-Novoa S, Alvarez E, Jimenez-Nacher I, Soriano V. Hepatic safety profile of raltegravir in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 543-547

28 Aberg JA, Kaplan JE, Libman H, Emmanuel P, Anderson JR, Stone VE, Oleske JM, Currier JS, Gallant JE. Primary care guidelines for the management of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus: 2009 update by the HIV medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 651-681

S- Editor Wang JL L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Zheng XM

Source

August 21, 2010

FDA extends review on Acetadote for non-acetaminophen acute liver failure

21. August 2010 00:42  

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Nasdaq: CPIX) today announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended its review of the supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for the use of Acetadote® (acetylcysteine) Injection in patients with non-acetaminophen acute liver failure. The review has been extended by three months resulting in a new Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date in December 2010.
 
"We look forward to continued discussion with the FDA regarding this potentially life-saving treatment for patients who have few alternatives," said A.J. Kazimi, Chief Executive Officer of Cumberland Pharmaceuticals.

Acute liver failure is a rare syndrome associated with a high mortality rate and frequent need for liver transplantation. Approximately 50 percent of acute liver failure cases are caused by acetaminophen poisoning. Other causes of acute liver failure not induced by acetaminophen overdose include hepatitis B disease, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson disease, fatty liver of pregnancy, and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome. Currently, transplantation of the liver is the only treatment for patients with liver failure not caused by acetaminophen overdose. In March 2010, Cumberland submitted the sNDA to the FDA for the use of Acetadote in patients with non-acetaminophen acute liver failure. The FDA formally accepted the application for review and designated the review classification as Priority in May 2010.

Acetadote was launched by Cumberland in 2004 as the first U.S.-approved injectable drug to treat acetaminophen overdose. In 2006, the FDA approved Acetadote for use in pediatric patients. The Company also received FDA approval for updated labeling regarding the safety of Acetadote in 2008 based on new information from a post-marketing safety study reporting a lower-incidence of side effects compared to previously reported data.

Source: Cumberland Pharmaceuticals

Source

July 5, 2010

My skin had turned completely yellow

Anne Smyth: "I had total kidney failure and was put on life support in intensive care. I was placed on a double transplant waiting list, as I needed not just a new liver but a kidney also."
Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill

The Irish Times - Tuesday, July 6, 2010

MY HEALTH EXPERIENCE: ANNE SMYTH: Second transplant saved my life after organ failure

IT ALL started with what appeared to be an adverse reaction to a vaccination jab back in 1991. I was working in Dublin’s Beaumont Hospital, and as my job routinely brought me in contact with blood, it was necessary to get inoculated against hepatitis B.

I suppose you could say the vaccine, which was administered in three stages, highlighted an underlying illness. By the time I’d had the third injection, it was obvious something was wrong; my skin had turned completely yellow. I remember being startled at the colour of my eyeballs in the mirror.

I went to my doctor who carried out a series of blood tests, which pointed to a problem with my liver. I was referred to a specialist in Beaumont and taken in for another series of tests, which confirmed I had a condition known as primary biliary cirrhosis, an auto-immune disease which affects the liver.

As a 38-year-old mother of five young children, I was anxious and upset to find out I had a chronic condition. However, the doctors assured me the disease had a slow rate of progression, and it would be several years before the symptoms became what they termed “unmanageable”.

They even joked I’d probably be a grandmother before I needed a transplant. Unfortunately, things didn’t quite work out that way. What should have been a routine biopsy to assess the state of my liver function caused an internal bleed. I was told it only happens to one in a million and that I was simply the unlucky one.

My health deteriorated rapidly and I was forced to spend several months in hospital while the doctors tried in vain to find the source of the bleed. I received more than 25 blood transfusions in the space of several weeks.

The doctors were finally forced to take evasive action by shutting down 75 per cent of the blood supply to my liver. Although this stopped the bleed, it caused more damage to my liver.

Instead of needing a transplant at some point in the distant future, I was facing the prospect of needing a donor organ sooner rather than later.

Meantime though, I was discharged from hospital and returned to work a few months later. I remained weak and struggled a lot with fatigue.

It wasn’t long before I began to get pains in my abdomen and lower back. I was admitted to St Vincent’s Hospital, and told the pains were coming from a severely infected gall bladder, which would have to be removed immediately.

My overall liver function was by now declining rapidly. There are many symptoms associated with liver disease, but perhaps the worst, at least for me, was the itch. You get this unbearable itch in your body caused from all the toxins which your liver is unable to process.

The funny thing is that when your liver is failing, you can look quite healthy as your skin tends to glow. I lost more than three stone in weight in a few short months.

By April 1993 I was placed, for the first time, on the liver transplant waiting list. It’s strange but you have to be sick enough for a transplant, but well enough to undergo the operation.

I found this waiting period dreadful. Every single day, I would think that somebody out there is going to have to die in order for my life to be saved.

After some five months on the waiting list, an organ became available and I underwent an eight-hour transplant operation.

During my recovery, someone suggested I should enter the World Transplant Games. I laughed at the idea at first as I had been so ill and remained so weak. But the idea stuck and as I recovered I hatched a plan to go to the games to try to win a gold medal for my donor family as a way of saying thank you.

In 1995, two days before I was to travel to Manchester, where that year’s games were taking place, another biopsy on the liver revealed I was in a state of chronic organ rejection. Although I didn’t feel particularly unwell, the doctors assured me the symptoms would soon follow.

They said I was too ill to travel, but I insisted that I needed to go. They reluctantly let me go on the proviso that if I became ill I would take the next flight home. I went and won a gold medal in my age category in badminton, a sport I had played throughout my life.

Sadly, my plan to give the medal to my donor’s family never materialised. I was told the donor had been a young boy, an only child, whose parents had separated since his death, and there was no one to give the medal to.

I suppose because I have worked in hospitals, I have witnessed both sides of the transplant equation. I know it’s a life-saving procedure for so many people, but I’ve always felt there is a profound sadness behind it. It’s hard not to think of the donors and their families.

For several years after that, I battled with chronic rejection, in and out of hospital with various liver-related infections. I was angry the transplant could fail. The thought of going through another transplant operation scared me.

The situation eventually came to a head in late 2001 when both my kidneys began to fail, partly as a result of issues related to the initial transplant.

Shortly after, I had total kidney failure and was put on life support in intensive care. I was placed on a double transplant waiting list, as I needed not just a new liver but a kidney also.

There were several times when I didn’t think I’d make it. I weighed only five stone at this stage. But in June 2002, some nine years after my first transplant, I had a double transplant. My liver and both kidneys were removed and a donor liver and kidney transplanted.

To my astonishment, I was discharged from hospital and sent home after only two weeks. I haven’t looked back since. I have had little or no rejection problems up to this point.

I would encourage anyone facing the prospect of a second transplant, not to be afraid as it’s really so different than it used to be. The first time around transplant patients were pumped full of medicine which caused innumerable side effects. Now the medicines and dosages are more refined. The doctors here are also much more experienced in treating transplant patients.

Looking back, I suppose you could say I was unlucky to be ill for so long, but I don’t feel that way. I’ve two grandchildren that I never would have seen only for these operations.

Source

June 29, 2010

Bioartificial Human Liver Therapy Trial Progressing

Article Date: 09 Jun 2010 - 2:00 PDT

Vital Therapies, Inc., (VTI) is pleased to announce that the first two subjects have been enrolled at King's College Hospital in London in the expansion of its SILVER (Stabilization In LiVER failure) clinical trial in Europe. The trial is evaluating whether VTI's biological cellular therapy product, ELAD®, can prevent deterioration of liver function and improve the survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

The SILVER trial is an open label, multi center, controlled, randomized trial. To date, 29 subjects have been enrolled at 11 U.S. sites and one U.K. site at King's College Hospital, a major European centre for the treatment of complex liver disease. Several other sites will soon be open for enrollment in the U.K., Denmark and Saudi Arabia. More than 20 sites should eventually enroll a total of 80 or more patients in a 1:1 treated-to-control ratio. If successful, the resulting data will provide the basis for a Biological License Application (BLA) in the U.S., a Marketing Approval Application (MAA) in Europe, and a marketing approval application in Saudi Arabia.

The SILVER protocol enrolls subjects with chronic liver disease who have been hospitalized as a result of an event, such as an infection or an episode of bleeding, which has caused deterioration of their liver function (acute-on-chronic liver failure, ACLF). The trial is designed to explore whether the use of ELAD in this setting can prevent continued deterioration of liver function, called progression, and thus improve survival. The trial design uses a well-established measure of liver function called the MELD score to define the status of liver function. Treatment with ELAD, along with standard of care, is compared with standard of care alone. The time to either death or deterioration of liver function by a prespecified amount is measured. It is postulated that the use of ELAD may extend the time to progression and improve survival in this rapidly progressing patient population.

ELAD is a biologic liver support system using a proprietary line of allogeneic human liver cells originally derived from a human liver tumor and refined by several leading cell experts. The cells are stable, immortal, can be grown in unlimited quantities and retain their hepatocyte (liver cell) characteristics. About one pound of cells is used for each treatment. The cells are grown in specially designed cartridges at VTI's plant in San Diego, transported to the hospital and used to treat the patient's plasma outside the body for up to ten days.

At the recent European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) meeting in Vienna a symposium sponsored in part by Vital Therapies addressed the use of liver support systems in ACLF. Michael Millis, M.D., Head of Liver Transplantation at the University of Chicago presented results of earlier clinical trials with ELAD including Phase I/II data in patients with acute liver failure. He also presented results of a randomized, controlled trial of ELAD carried out in China in 69 patients with ACLF. The China data confirmed previously reported preliminary data in 60 patients, which showed that ELAD significantly improved transplant free survival in subjects with ACLF compared with standard of care alone, without unforeseen safety issues.

About Vital Therapies, Inc.

Vital Therapies, Inc. (VTI) is based in San Diego, California, with a wholly owned subsidiary in Beijing, China. VTI is developing the first human liver cell-based ELAD Extracorporeal Liver Assist System. ELAD could provide support for patients with severe liver failure by processing toxins and synthesizing proteins and metabolites that are key products of normal human liver function. ELAD is in investigational clinical trials and VTI completed a pivotal trial and filed for market approval in China in September 2007.

About King's College Hospital, Liver Unit

King's College Hospital is home to one of the largest liver units in Europe, performing over 200 liver transplants every year. It is also a major centre for the treatment of complex acute and chronic liver disease, as well as viral hepatitis and pancreato-biliary

Source: Vital Therapies, Inc
 
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/191269.php

June 22, 2010

Liver at Risk in Diabetes



By Crystal Phend, Senior Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: June 21, 2010
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston and Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner

Although the liver is often overlooked in diabetes, even newly-diagnosed cases carry a substantial risk of serious hepatic damage, researchers found.

In a population-based study, newly-diagnosed diabetes was associated with a near doubling in the rate of liver cirrhosis, liver failure, or liver transplant compared with people in the general population who did not have diabetes, according to Gillian Booth, MD, MSc, of St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, and colleagues.

After adjusting for important contributors to liver disease, the association remained significant with a 77% increased risk for newly-diagnosed diabetes patients (95% confidence interval 68% to 86%), they reported online in CMAJ.Action Points

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that the retrospective study could not determine whether diabetes caused the liver disease seen during follow-up.

Note that diabetes guidelines do not recommend screening for liver disease.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The negative impact of diabetes on the retinal, renal, nervous, and cardiovascular systems is well recognized, yet little is known about its effect on the liver," they wrote.

Although much still remains to be discovered about the mechanisms and cause of the link between diabetes and liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is almost certainly involved, according to Kenneth Cusi, MD, who has been studying this condition at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio.

Steatosis is known to arise in relationship to insulin resistance in obesity, and most people with the condition do have some degree of glucose abnormality, he explained in an interview.

The two seem to "feed on each other," Cusi said.

Unlike with eye disease, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease, guidelines for diabetes care don't recommend screening for liver disease.

"However, when the liver fails," Booth's group cautioned in the paper, "there is no equivalent form of management, such as hemodialysis or retinal photocoagulation."

They suggested that liver disease "may be appropriate for addition to the list of target-organ conditions related to diabetes," with annual screening by means of a blood test, such as for the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase.

But the sensitivity of blood tests and even ultrasound aren't great for identifying fatty liver disease that is the precursor to more serious liver problems and liver biopsy is not a feasible screening method, Cusi noted.

Also, it would first have to be shown that preventive measures such as weight loss and glycemic and lipid control are effective in diabetes, as they are in isolated fatty liver without diabetes, the researchers said.

To expand evidence for the link, the researchers retrospectively examined the administrative databases of the universal healthcare system in the province of Ontario from 1994 through 2006.

They compared 438,069 adults with newly diagnosed diabetes and an age-, sex-, and regionally-matched control group of 2,059,708 individuals without known diabetes. Preexisting liver or alcohol-related disease were cause for exclusion.

During a median of 6.4 years of follow-up, serious liver disease -- liver cirrhosis, liver failure, or liver transplant -- developed in 2,463 newly-diagnosed diabetes cases and 5,902 controls.

Thus, unadjusted liver disease incidence was 92% higher with diabetes (8.19 per 10,000 person-years with diabetes and 4.17 without it).

This difference remained significant across mutually-adjusted patient subgroups by age, gender, urban versus rural residence, and income level.

Diabetes appeared to have the most pronounced link with liver cirrhosis (adjusted hazard ratio 2.55, 95% CI 2.35 to 2.76) and the least with liver transplantation (adjusted HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.64).

Hypertension and obesity didn't appear to entirely account for the relationship with diabetes. The risk of serious liver disease in nondiabetic individuals with preexisting hypertension or obesity was elevated but less so than among those with diabetes.

But the researchers cautioned that it is difficult to separate out the effects of these related conditions.

"Although our findings and those of the U.S. study [which found elevated chronic NASH risk in veterans with diabetes] edge forward the idea that diabetes may be harmful to the liver, the question remains of whether this effect extends beyond the metabolic syndrome," they wrote.

Another question that remains to be answered is causality.

Booth's group pointed out that hepatic fat content rises in parallel with insulin resistance and glucose dysregulation and that diabetes as a complication of cirrhosis typically doesn't arise until cirrhosis reaches an advanced stage.

However, they noted, they couldn't rule out the pre-existence of subclinical liver disease before study entry.

The study was funded by the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre at the University of Toronto and by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.

Cusi reported support from the American Diabetes Association and the Boris Welcome Fund and an award from the VA. Takeda provided the study drug for research he is doing in NASH but no personal renumeration to Cusi.

Primary source: CMAJ
Source reference:
Porepa L, et al "Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for serious liver disease" CMAJ 2010