January 12, 2014

Original Articles
January 2014, Volume 28 Issue 1: 23- 30

G Sebastiani | P Ghali | P Wong | MB Klein | M Deschenes | RP Myers

OBJECTIVE: To determine practices among physicians in Canada for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases.

METHODS: Hepatologists, gastroenterologists, infectious diseases specialists, members of the Canadian Gastroenterology Association and/or the Canadian HIV Trials Network who manage patients with liver diseases were invited to participate in a web-based, national survey.

RESULTS: Of the 237 physicians invited, 104 (43.9%) completed the survey. Routine assessment of liver fibrosis was requested by the surveyed physicians mostly for chronic hepatitis C (76.5%), followed by autoimmune/cholestatic liver disease (59.6%) and chronic hepatitis B (52.9%). Liver biopsy was the main diagnostic tool for 46.2% of the respondents, Fibroscan (Echosens, France) for 39.4% and Fibrotest (LabCorp, USA) for 7.7%. Etiology-specific differences were observed: noninvasive methods were mostly used for hepatitis C (63% versus 37% liver biopsy) and hepatitis B (62.9% versus 37.1% liver biopsy). For 42.7% of respondents, the use of noninvasive methods reduced the need for liver biopsy by >50%. Physicians’ characteristics associated with higher use of noninvasive methods were older age and being based at a university hospital or in private practice versus community hospital. Physicians’ main concerns regarding noninvasive fibrosis assessment methods were access/availability (42.3%), lack of guidelines for clinical use (26.9%) and cost/lack of reimbursement (14.4%).

CONCLUSIONS: Physicians who manage patients with chronic liver diseases in Canada require routine assessment of liver fibrosis stage. Although biopsy remains the primary diagnostic tool for almost one-half of respondents, noninvasive methods, particularly Fibroscan, have significantly reduced the need for liver biopsy in Canada. Limitations in access to and availability of the noninvasive methods represent a significant barrier. Finally, there is a need for clinical guidelines and a better reimbursement policy to implement noninvasive tools to assess liver fibrosis.

Canadian physicians | Chronic liver diseases | Liver biopsy | Liver fibrosis | Noninvasive fibrosis methods

Conitnue reading full article (PDF) here ….. [Free]

Original Article (Online only)
January 2014, Volume 28 Issue 1: e 1-e 4

R Pai | A Ramji | SS Lee | WW Wong | EM Yoshida

OBJECTIVE: To survey gastroenterologists in British Columbia and Alberta with regard to awareness of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) management and practice patterns among physicians who treat and do not treat HCV-infected patients.

METHODS: An anonymous two-page mail survey was distributed to actively practicing adult gastroenterologists in British Columbia and Alberta. Among physicians who treated HCV patients, respondents answered assessment of fibrosis pretreatment, measurement of rapid virological response, prescription of protease inhibitors (PIs), barriers to using these agents and referral patterns. For those who did not treat HCV, referral of patients for treatment and to whom was assessed.

RESULTS: Seventy-seven of 166 individuals completed the survey (46% response rate). Most (49%) practiced in academic or large community (42%) settings. Chronic liver disease comprised <25% of individual practice in 71%. Forty-eight (62%) treated HCV and two-thirds prescribed a PI. Barriers to prescription included unfamiliarity (six of 16), lack of allied health (five of 16) and few suitable patients (seven of 16). Pretreatment liver biopsy was performed by 33% (16 of 48) and 69% (33 of 48) used noninvasive measures. Rapid virological response was measured in 83% (40 of 48). Referral patterns changed in 46% (22 of 48) of physicians who treated HCV. All respondents who did not treat HCV referred patients for consideration, with 90% (26 of 29) made to hepatologists.

CONCLUSIONS: Chronic liver disease comprised <25% of practice in the majority of surveyed respondents. Among those who treated HCV, one-third have not prescribed a PI. Barriers to prescription and referral pattern changes are noted by those currently treating patients with HCV infection.

Barriers | Guidelines | HCV | Practice | Rapid virological response | Referral | Survey

Continue reading full article here (PDF) ….. [Free]

Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis patients


Year : 2014  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-8

Hossein Khedmat1, Mohsen Amini1, Mohammad Ebrahim Ghamar-Chehreh1, Shahram Agah2
1 Baqiyatalah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Colorectal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication 7-Jan-2014


Despite the introduction of strict hygienic precautions preventing infection spread of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in dialysis settings, this infection is still prevalent among dialysis patients due to procedures making the patients vulnerable to infection through blood contamination. Treatment of HCV infection in dialysis patients is also less successful than that in the non-uremic population due to contraindication of using ribavirin, a main drug, in the infected patients. In this review article we aim to investigate the feasibility of the current antiviral therapies in dialysis patients infected with HCV infection.

How to cite this article:
Khedmat H, Amini M, Ghamar-Chehreh ME, Agah S. Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2014;25:1-8

How to cite this URL:
Khedmat H, Amini M, Ghamar-Chehreh ME, Agah S. Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2014 [cited 2014 Jan 12];25:1-8. Available from: http://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2014/25/1/1/124455


The World Health Organization estimates the global prevalence of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) to be 3%, with wide epidemiological variation. [1] In patients under going maintenance hemodialysis (HD), the prevalence of HCV infection substantially increases to up to 90%, [1],[2] and this disease has been shown to be associated with severe complications from chronic hepatitis to fatal cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. [3] Furthermore, there are other malignancies associated with

HCV infection in some patient populations. [4] Moreover, data on the natural history of HCV infection in kidney disease patients demonstrate that these patients may have significant liver disease on liver biopsy, despite normal serum liver enzymes, [5] and it also reportedly impairs the quality of life of chronic HD patients. [6] Accordingly, eradication of HCV infection in this specific population is highly recommended. [7]

Interferon-based therapy, a standard treatment for HCV infection, has many drawbacks in HD patients, such as poor tolerance and marginal response. [8] Prescription of ribavirin in HD patients is generally contraindicated due to a risk of hemolytic anemia. [9] Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), which has a large polyethylene glycol moiety bound to IFN, has higher stability and prolonged systemic bio-availability [10] with more efficiency compared with regular IFN. [9] However, data on the efficiency and safety of PEG-IFN in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are limited. There are also newly introduced agents, including telaprevir and boceprevir, which have been successfully employed to manage HCV infection in the non-dialysis context. [10],[11] However, there is an absolute scarcity of data on the efficacy and/or safety of these drugs in dialysis patients, although one study suggested that renal dysfunction does not affect the serum levels of boceprevir. [12]

We aim in this review article to discuss the course and management of HCV-positive patients on maintenance HD.

HCV Infection Course in HD Patients

Because of the chronic nature of HCV infection and the high rate of morbidities and mortalities in dialysis patients owing to their renal disease, the long-term evaluation of the natural history of HCV infection in this patient population has several limitations. However, evidence suggests that HCV infection increases all-cause mortality in dialysis patients, [13],[14],[15],[16],[17] and this risk of death exists irrespective of the type of dialysis. [18] In a meta-analysis, Fabrizi et al. [19] reported that the presence of anti-HCV antibody was an independent factor for death, with a relative risk of 1.57 in patients on maintenance dialysis. They also reported that dialysis patients with HCV infection are significantly more likely to develop hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis. [19] On the other hand, renal transplantation has been recommended for HCV-positive dialysis patients because of its survival advantage over patients remaining in the waiting list, [20] although, not surprisingly, viral replication of HCV has been shown to adversely affect renal graft survival. [21] The proposed explanation for this observation is that HCV-induced hepatic necro-inflammation would be accelerated, especially after renal transplantation, due to immunosuppression therapy. [22]

 Diagnosis of HCV Infection in ESRD Patients

There are two types of assays that measure the anti-HCV antibodies: Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and recombinant immunoblotting assay (RIBA). Although RIBA is a known confirmative test for the diagnosis of HCV infection in case of positive EIA samples, molecular assays detecting circulating HCV-RNA have thoroughly replaced it. It has been demonstrated that the false-negative rates of EIA-2 were too high, rendering the HCV-RNA polymerization as the gold standard test to confirm the HCV infection. [23],[24] However, the EIA-3, as a serological assay, has a high sensitivity in patients on maintenance dialysis and can be effectively used for HCV diagnosis in the HD population. [3]

Detection of serum aminotransferase levels in HCV-infected HD patients is of less value because it is suggested that ESRD itself lowers the aminotransferase levels; however, some authors suggested different cut-off levels for them in this patient population. , Although some authors suggested some clinical values for elevated aminotransferase levels in dialysis patients, multivariable analysis in one of them showed no independently significant relationship. [27]

The distribution of HCV genotypes widely varies in different geographical areas, although HCV genotype 1 predominates in dialysis patients with chronic HCV infection, regardless of geographic area. [28],[29],[30] Detection of HCV-RNA is the direct method of evaluating HCV infection. Moreover, this method enables us to estimate the viral replication rate in the liver; thus, it is a reliable test to assess the response to antiviral treatment and helps physicians determine the optimal duration and dosage of anti-viral agents. Most studies indicate that the HCV-RNA levels decrease transiently during HD sessions. [31] Several mechanisms have been suggested for this observation, including the adsorption of HCV onto the dialysis membrane, destruction of HCV particles, escape of HCV into the dialysate and an increase of plasma IFN-α levels during dialysis. [32],[33] However, recent studies have reported different observations such as a steady state or an increasing rate of HCV-RNA concentration during HD sessions. [34],[35] Interestingly, this observation was independent from HD procedures, dialysis membrane, heparin concentration and uremic toxins. [35]

Role of Histological Evaluation of the Liver

The histopathological evaluation of a liver biopsy specimen is of substantial value in determining the severity of liver fibrosis and necro-inflammation in chronic HCV infection. This also rules out other disorders, including the very prevalent non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which may be able to induce similar damages to the liver. [36] However, liver biopsies are limited by complications including potentially mass bleeding events, patients' unwillingness and technical errors in obtaining the specimen or its evaluation. Compared with HCV patients with normal renal function, dialysis patients with HCV infection have milder hepatic necro-inflammation and fibrosis. The predictors of a hepatic damage in this patient population include a longer duration of infection, advanced age at infection, elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and severe hepatic necro-inflammation on liver biopsy. [37] Clinical relevance of evaluating liver histopathology in dialysis patients includes the necessity for IFN-based therapy, the long-term prognosis and the eligibility for kidney transplantation. [38],[39],[40]

For dialysis patients on a transplantation waiting list, the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recommends liver biopsies in the HCV-infected patients, while the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) limits the biopsies to only the dialysis patients with genotypes 1 and 4 HCV infection. [42]

There is an increased risk of bleeding in patients with chronic kidney disease because of platelet dysfunction and anticoagulation therapies. Accordingly, the preferred method of a liver biopsy in HD patients is the trans-jugular or transfemoral routes. Moreover, through this method, one can also estimate the hepatic venous pressure gradient as well as the portal hypertension.

Treatment of Acute Infection with Hepatitis C Virus

Despite the introduction of a new generation of anti-HCV agents, IFN-α is still considered a very effective treatment in dialysis patients developing acute HCV infection according to recent publications. In a recent meta-analysis of eight clinical studies including 173 unique patients, Fabrizi et al [7] reported that IFN-based therapy of acute hepatitis C in dialysis populations results in a sustained virological response (SVR) in almost half of the patients. The patients who received higher doses of IFN developed higher rates of SVR. [44],[45]

In non-uremic patients, PEG-IFN-α-2b increases the SVR rate up to 94% in acute hepatitis C infection. [46] Nevertheless, data on the efficacy of PEG-IFN in dialysis patients are limited and suggestive of less-promising results than in non-uremic individuals. A recent study by Liu et al [47] on 35 HD patients who developed acute hepatitis C and did not have spontaneous HCV clearance by 16 weeks concluded that treatment with PEG-IFN-α-2a at a dosage of 135 μg weekly for 24 weeks was associated with almost 90% virological response, while this rate in 36 control patients who did not receive therapy was only 17%. In another study, 32 ESRD patients with acute HCV infection were followed and ten of them received PEG-IFN-α-2b, and only 40% developed SVR and one died. [48]

Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Dialysis Patients

[Table 1] summarizes the data of previous metaanalyses on the treatment of chronic HCV infection in HD patients. Despite the introduction of more potent drugs and combination therapies of HCV infection in dialysis patients, IFN monotherapy is still considered a very effective therapeutic option in patients on maintenance dialysis. Conventional IFN monotherapy at a dose of 1-6 MU daily or three times per week for 12-48 weeks has been associated with SVR rates of 20-71% in dialysis patients. [3],[49],[50],[51] The predictive factors of SVR in these patients include a low baseline HCV-RNA level, mild liver histology and treating patients by IFN at a dose of 3 MU for at least six months.[3],[52] Previous review articles have excellently included articles published earlier on the efficacy and safety of IFN monotherapy for chronic HCV infection in dialysis patients. [3] In our review, we only found one more article published recently to add. Fucuta Pereira Pda et al, [53] evaluating 40 HD patients, reported septal fibrosis or cirrhosis in 38% of patients. HCV-RNA was undetectable at Week 12 in 68% and SVR was observed in 30% of patients.


Table 1: Meta-analyses investigating efficacy of chronic HCV treatment in dialysis patients.

Peg-IFN has also been extensively used to treat chronic HCV infection in HD patients. Among recent studies, Kose et al. [5] investigated the largest patient population. PEG-IFN-α-2a 135 mcg/week was given for 48 weeks, which was administered in 41 patients, of whom 38 completed the study. Virological response rates for Weeks 12 and 72 were 60% and 50%, respectively. Furthermore, Alsaran et al. [2]treated 13 patients with PEG-IFN for 48 weeks, with no drop-out. After 24 weeks of therapy, 76% of patients responded to therapy and 24% of patients were resistant. Six months after termination of therapy, nine (69%) patients had SVR. [2] [Table 2] summarizes the recent studies investigating anti-HCV therapy in ESRD patients.


Table 2: Recent studies investigating treatment of HCV infection in dialysis patients.

Resistant Cases of Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Dialysis Patients to Interferon Therapy

Although treatment of HCV infection with IFN-based regimens in dialysis patients has been reportedly considered a safe and feasible method of therapy, many ESRD patients with HCV infection show resistance toward it. Intolerance to IFN due to its side-effects is the most significant cause of resistance to this therapy. There is a wide spectrum of side-effects associated with IFN therapy, which includes loss of appetite, fatigue, dry skin, influenzalike symptoms and gastrointestinal disturbances as well as neuropsychiatric symptoms and hematological abnormalities. [64] These side-effects often result in discontinuation or dose reduction of the drug, which can endanger viral response in HCV-infected dialysis patients. [55],[56] The incidence of these side-effects can be as high as 30% in patients using PEG-IFN, with lower rates in those using standard IFN. [64] Data on the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFN in ESRD patients are more limited and future studies are required to extend our knowledge on this issue.


1.Aoufi Rabih S, García Agudo R. Management of HCV infection in chronic kidney disease. Nefrologia 2011;31:260-7. 

2.Alsaran K, Sabry A, Shaheen N. Pegylated interferon alpha-2a for treatment of chronic HCV infection in hemodialysis patients: A single Saudi center experience. Int Urol Nephrol 2011;43:865-73.  [PUBMED]   

3.Liu CH, Kao JH. Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:228-39.  [PUBMED]   

4.Khedmat H, Taheri S. Hepatitis C virus infection can affect lymphoproliferative disorders only as a cofactor for Epstein-Barr virus in liver transplant recipients: PTLD.Int survey. Exp Clin Transplant 2012;10:141-7.  [PUBMED]   

5.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P, Martin P. Hepatitis C-related liver disease in dialysis patients. Contrib Nephrol 2012;176:42-53.  [PUBMED]   

6.Afsar B, Elsurer R, Sezer S, Ozdemir NF. Quality of life in hemodialysis patients: Hepatitis C virus infection makes sense. Int Urol Nephrol 2009;41:1011-9.  [PUBMED]   

7.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P, Martin P. Interferon therapy of acute hepatitis C in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat 2012;19: 784-91.  [PUBMED]   

8.Russo MW, Goldsweig CD, Jacobson IM, Brown RS. Interferon monotherapy for dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: An analysis of the literature on efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1610-5. 

9.Teta D, Lüscher BL, Gonvers JJ, Francioli P, Phan O, Burnier M. Pegylated interferon for the treatment of hepatitis C virus in haemo-dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:991-3. 

10.McHutchison JG, Everson GT, Gordon SC, et al. PROVE1 Study Team. Telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:1827-38.  [PUBMED]   

11.Available from: http://www.aasld.org/Liver Learning%C2%AE/TEST/Renal%20Insufficie ncy-Hemodialysis.pdf. (Last accessed on 22 April 2013). 

12.Treitel M, Marbury T, Preston RA, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of boceprevir in subjects with impaired hepatic or renal function. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012;51:619-28.  [PUBMED]   

13.Vispo E, Barreiro P, Soriano V. Pharmacokinetics of new oral hepatitis C antiviral drugs. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2013;9:5-16.  [PUBMED]   

14.Khedmat H, Alavian SM, Miri SM, et al. Trends in seroprevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, and syphilis infections in Iranian blood donors from 2003 to 2005. Hepat Mon 2009;9:24-8. 

15.Alavian SM. A shield against a monster: Hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:641-6.  [PUBMED]   

16.Ohsawa M, Kato K, Tanno K, et al. Seropositivity for anti-HCV core antigen is independently associated with increased all-cause, cardiovascular, and liver disease-related mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Epidemiol 2011;21:491-9.  [PUBMED]   

17.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P. Impact of hepatitis C on survival in dialysis patients: A link with cardiovascular mortality? J Viral Hepat 2012;19:601-7.  [PUBMED]   

18.Bose B, McDonald SP, Hawley CM, et al. Effect of dialysis modality on survival of hepatitis C-infected ESRF patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:2657-61.  [PUBMED]   

19.Fabrizi F, Martin P, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Dulai G. Meta-analysis: Effect of hepatitis C virus infection on mortality in dialysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:1271-7.  [PUBMED]   

20.Roth D, Gaynor JJ, Reddy KR, et al. Effect of kidney transplantation on outcomes among patients with hepatitis C. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1152-60.  [PUBMED]   

21.Gentil Govantes MA, Esforzado N, Cruzado JM, et al. Harmful effects of viral replication in seropositive hepatitis C virus renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 2012;94:1131-7.  [PUBMED]   

22.Töz H, Ok E, Yilmaz F, et al. Clinicopathological features of hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis and renal transplantation. J Nephrol 2007;15:308-12. 

23.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Miller LG, Daar ES. Diagnostic discordance for hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2005;46:290-300.  [PUBMED]   

24.Alavian SM, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Rahnavardi M. Hepatitis C among Hemodialysis Patients: A Review on Epidemiologic, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Features. Hepat Mon 2007;7:153-62. 

25.Lampe E, Yoshida CF, De Oliveira RV, Lauer GM, Lewis-Ximenez LL. Molecular analysis and patterns of ALT and hepatitis C virus seroconversion in haemodialysis patients with acute hepatitis. Nephrology (Carlton) 2008;13: 186-92.  Back to cited text no. 25

26.Lopes EP, Gouveia EC, Albuquerque AC, et al. Determination of the cut-off value of serum alanine aminotransferase in patients undergoing hemodialysis, to identify biochemical activity in patients with hepatitis C viremia. J Clin Virol 2006;35:298-302.  [PUBMED]   

27.Dzekova-Vidimliski P, Severova-Andreevska G, Trajceska L, et al. Aminotransferase activity as a poor predictor of liver disease progression in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C. Bratisl Lek Listy 2011;112:568-71.  [PUBMED]   

28.Fallahian F, Najafi A. Epidemiology of hepatitis C in the Middle East. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2011;22:1-9.  [PUBMED

29.Joukar F, Khalesi AK, Jafarshad R, Rahimabadi MS, Mansour-Ghanaei F. Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in haemodialysis patients of Guilan, northern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 2012;18:236-40.  [PUBMED]   

30.Al Balwi MA. Prevalence of mixed hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes among recently diagnosed dialysis patients with HCV infection. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2011;22:712-6.  [PUBMED

31.Kaiser T, Damerow HC, Tenckhoff S, et al. Kinetics of hepatitis C viral RNA and HCV-antigen during dialysis sessions: Evidence for differential viral load reduction on dialysis. J Med Virol 2008;80:1195-201.  [PUBMED]   

32.Mizuno M, Higuchi T, Yanai M, Kanmatsuse K, Esumi M. Dialysis-membrane-dependent reduction and adsorption of circulating hepatitis C virus during hemodialysis. Nephron 2002;91:235-42.  [PUBMED]   

33.Badalamenti S, Catania A, Lunghi G, et al. Changes in viremia and circulating interferon-alpha during hemodialysis in hepatitis C virus-positive patients: Only coincidental pheno-mena? Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42:143-50.  [PUBMED]   

34.Martins RS, Martins Filho OA, Gonçales NS, et al. Kinetics of hepatitis C virus load and hemodialysis: Is there any influence of the reuse of dialysis membrane on HCV viremia? Scand J Infect Dis 2012;44:190-6. 

35.Putz-Bankuti C, Kessler HH, Schilcher G, et al. Increase of HCV RNA concentration during hemodialysis treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Virol 2012;54:110-4.  [PUBMED]   

36.Khedmat H, Taheri S. Non-alcoholic Steato-hepatitis: An update in pathophysiology, diag-nosis and therapy. Hepat Mon 2011;11:74-85. 

37.Trevizoli JE, de Paula Menezes R, Ribeiro Velasco LF, et al. Hepatitis C is less aggressive in hemodialysis patients than in nonuremic patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1385-90.  [PUBMED]   

38.Roth D, Bloom R. Selection and management of hepatitis C virus-infected patients for the kidney transplant waiting list. Contrib Nephrol 2012;176:66-76.  [PUBMED]   

39.Morales JM, Bloom R, Roth D. Kidney transplantation in the patient with hepatitis C virus infection. Contrib Nephrol 2012;176:77-86.  [PUBMED]   

40.Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology 2009;49:1017-44. 

41.Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2008;73(Suppl 109):S53-68. 

42.Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update. Hepatology 2009;49:1335-74.  [PUBMED]   

43.Kojima A, Kakizaki S, Hosonuma KI, et al. Interferon treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C complicated with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28:690-9. 

44.Rocha CM, Perez RM, Narciso JL, et al. Interferon-alpha therapy within the first year after acute hepatitis C infection in hemodialysis patients: Efficacy and tolerance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;19:119-23.  [PUBMED]   

45.Smirne C, Minisini R, Burlone ME, et al. Interferon alpha concentrations in blood and peritoneal fluid during treatment for hepatitis C. Perit Dial Int 2012;32:664-6.  [PUBMED]   

46.Santantonio T, Fasano M, Sinisi E, et al. Efficacy of a 24-week course of PEG-interferon alpha-2b monotherapy in patients with acute hepatitis C after failure of spontaneous clearance. J Hepatol 2005;42:329-33.  [PUBMED]   

47.Liu CH, Liang CC, Liu CJ, et al. Pegylated interferon alfa-2a monotherapy for hemodialysis patients with acute hepatitis C. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:541-9.  [PUBMED]   

48.Engel M, Malta FM, Gomes MM, et al. Acute hepatitis C virus infection assessment among chronic hemodialysis patients in the Southwest Parana State, Brazil. BMC Public Health 2007;7:50.  [PUBMED]   

49.Grgureviæ I, Vince A, Buljevac M, et al. Efficacy of interferon-alpha in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: Two therapeutic protocols compared. Nephron Clin Pract 2006;103:c8-11. 

50.Liu CH, Liang CC, Lin JW, et al. Pegylated interferon alpha-2a versus standard interferon alpha-2a for treatment-naive dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: A randomised study. Gut 2008;57:525-30.  [PUBMED]   

51.Buargub M, El Huni S, Tagdi M. Tolerance and efficacy of interferon-alpha in hemodialysis patients in Tripoli. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2006;17:338-43.  [PUBMED

52.Gordon CE, Uhlig K, Lau J, Schmid CH, Levey AS, Wong JB. Interferon for hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis-an individual patient meta-analysis of factors associated with sustained virological response. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1449-58.  [PUBMED]   

53.Fucuta Pereira Pda S, Uehara SN, de Mello Perez R, et al. Is early virological response as predictive of the hepatitis C treatment response in dialysis patients as in non-uremic patients? Int J Infect Dis 2013;17:e50-3. 

54.Köse S, Senger SS, Ersan G, Cavdar G. Virological responses of pegylated interferon alpha-2a treatment in hemodialysis patients infected with hepatitis C. Clin Exp Nephrol 2013;17:115-9. 

55.Fabrizi F, Dulai G, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Martin P. Meta-analysis: Interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18: 1071-81.  [PUBMED]   

56.Russo MW, Goldsweig CD, Jacobson IM, Brown RS Jr. Interferon monotherapy for dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: An analysis of the literature on efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1610-5.  [PUBMED]   

57.Gordon CE, Uhlig K, Schmid CH, Levey AS, Wong JB. Long-term viral negativity after interferon for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:2226-34.  [PUBMED]   

58.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P, Martin P. Interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Viral Hepat 2008;15:79-88.  [PUBMED]   

59.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P, Martin P. Pegylated interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Med Virol 2010;82:768-75.  [PUBMED]   

60.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P, Messa P. Combined antiviral therapy of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Viral Hepat 2011;18:e263-9.  [PUBMED]   

61.Tae HJ, Jun DW, Choi JW, et al. A case of pegylated interferon alpha-2a monotherapy in a peritoneal dialysis patient with chronic hepatitis C. Korean J Gastroenterol 2011;58: 107-10.  [PUBMED]   

62.Giguere A, Anas A, Nasser T, et al. Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A single United Arab Emirates center experience. Eur J Intern Med 2011;22:582-6.  [PUBMED]   

63.Fucuta Pereira Pda S, Uehara SN, de Mello Perez R, et al. Is early virological response as predictive of the hepatitis C treatment response in dialysis patients as in non-uremic patients? Int J Infect Dis 2013;17:e50-3. 

64.Fried MW. Side effects of therapy of hepatitis C and their management. Hepatology 2002; 36(5 Suppl 1):S237-44.