Showing posts with label People who use drugs (PWUD). Show all posts
Showing posts with label People who use drugs (PWUD). Show all posts

November 30, 2013

Hepatitis C prevention and treatment for substance users in the UnitedStates: acknowledging the elephant in the room

International Journal of Drug Policy 15 (2004) 81–91

Commentary

Brian R. Edlin

Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

Received 20 March 2002; received in revised form 3 October 2003; accepted 9 October 2003

Like many countries, the United States faces a major epi-demic of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Nearly 3 millionAmericans are estimated to be infected with HCV (Alteret al., 1999),and some 35,000 new infections are believed tooccur annually (Williams, 1999).The virus causes chronicinfection in about 85% of those infected, and among thosechronically infected, cirrhosis may eventually develop infrom 5 to 20% (Freeman et al., 2001;Liang, Rehermann,Seeff, & Hoofnagle, 2000).HCV infection is thought to re-sult in 8000–10,000 deaths annually. It is already the mostcommon cause of chronic liver disease and the most com-mon reason for liver transplantation in the United States,and morbidity and mortality from HCV infection are risingand are expected to continue rising in the coming decades(Armstrong, Alter, McQuillan, & Margolis, 2000).

In the United States, as in many other developed coun-tries, injection drug users (IDUs) constitute the largest groupof persons infected with HCV, and most new infectionsoccur in IDUs. Injection drug use predominates as a modeof transmission in most countries where the endemicity of HCV is low. There are probably a million or more currentIDUs with HCV infection in the U.S.; of the estimated1.2–1.3 million current IDUs in the U.S. (Normand, Vlahov,& Moses, 1995), some 80–90% have been infected withHCV (Lorvick, Kral, Seal, Gee, & Edlin, 2001;Thomaset al., 1995),although recent studies have shown that preva-lence rates in young IDUs and recent initiates are now muchlower (Garfein et al., 1998;Hahn, Page-Shafer, Lum, Ochoa,& Moss, 2001;Thorpe, Ouellet, Levy, Williams,&Monterroso, 2000).The incidence of new infections amongIDUs is also quite high, however, generally ranging from10 to 20% per year in the U.S. (Garfein et al., 1998; Haganet al., 1999, 2001; Hahn et al., 2001; Thorpe et al., 2000).

The situation is similar in other developed countries (Crofts,Jolley, Kaldor, van Beek, & Wodak, 1997;Patrick et al.,2001;Van Ameijden, Van den Hoek, Mientjes, & Coutinho,1993;van Beek, Dwyer, Dore, Luo, & Kaldor, 1998).Moreover, initiation of heroin use and injection drug use isincreasing among young people (CDC, 2001a).Controllingthe HCV epidemic, therefore, will require developing, test-ing, and implementing prevention and treatment strategiesthat will be effective for persons who inject drugs. Fortu-nately, substantial research and clinical experience exists inthe prevention and management of chronic viral infectionsamong IDUs, particularly because of the HIV epidemic.Learning from this experience will be critical for efforts tocontrol HCV

The public health response to the HCV epidemic in theU.S. to date has, unfortunately, fallen short of what is neededto stop the epidemic. Until recently, official documents pro-duced by the U.S. Public Health Service about its responseto the HCV epidemic were silent on most of the interven-tions described in this article (CDC, 1998; CDC, 2001b;NIH, 1997a).In 2002, NIH issued an updated ConsensusStatement on the Management of Hepatitis C that took asubstantially more comprehensive approach to the problem(NIH, 2002).This statement challenges the medical, scien-tific, and public health communities to address numerousproblems that remain unsolved and continue to contribute tothe HCV epidemic.

Preventing morbidity and mortality from HCV can bedivided into primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention(Table 1).This paper summarises recommendations for ef-fective prevention in each of these categories, and discussessome of the barriers that have hampered their implementa-tion.

Continue reading full article here (PDF) – Free …..

November 21, 2013

A novel program for treating patients with trimorbidity: hepatitis C, serious mental illness, and active substance use

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;25(12):1377-84. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283624a28.

Sockalingam S, Blank D, Banga CA, Mason K, Dodd Z, Powis J.

aMedical Psychiatry Program, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Departments of bPsychiatry cPsychology dMedicine, University of Toronto eSouth Riverdale Community Health Centre fToronto East General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment have yielded improved virological response rates, and yet, many individuals with psychiatric illness still fail to receive HCV therapy. Concerns about safety, adherence, and efficacy of HCV treatment are compounded and treatment is further deferred when substance use is also present. This is especially problematic given the disproportionately high rates of both mental health issues and substance use among individuals living with HCV.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine HCV treatment outcomes in clients with serious mental illness (SMI) and with high rates of active substance use who were participating in a community-based HCV treatment program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 129 clients was carried out. Patients were classified as having an SMI if they had a history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, past suicide attempt or mental health related hospitalization.

RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were defined as having an SMI. Among the 46 patients with SMI and a detectable HCV viral load, HCV antiviral therapy was initiated in nine (19.6%). A relapse or an increase in substance use was common (77.8% or n=7), as was the requirement for adjustment or initiation of psychotropic medications (66.7% or n=6) during HCV antiviral therapy. Despite these barriers, rates of adherence to antiviral therapy were high and overall sustained virological response rates were comparable with published trials.

CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report HCV treatment outcomes in a population in which SMI and active polysubstance use was prevalent and suggests that with appropriate models of care, clients with trimorbidity can be treated safely and effectively.

PMID: 23680911 [PubMed - in process]

Source

October 1, 2013

Hepatitis C treatment for multimorbid patients with substance use disorder in a primary care-based integrated treatment centre: a retrospective analysis

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;25(11):1300-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32836140bb.

Brunner N, Senn O, Rosemann T, Falcato L, Bruggmann P.

aDepartment of Research, Institute of General Practice and Health Services, University of Zurich bDepartment of Internal Medicine, ARUD, Centres for Addiction Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: The population of people who use drugs (PWUD) has the highest prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in Europe. PWUD are multimorbid patients who are difficult to integrate into existing healthcare systems. In our study, we evaluated the feasibility of providing HCV treatment within opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) programmes offering integrated primary care-based health services under one roof.

METHODS: We evaluated 66 charts of patients in four outpatient clinics (OMT) with HCV treatment (between 2002 and 2010). Fourteen of the patients were treated with heroin and nine patients had an HIV coinfection. Data on the socioeconomic characteristics and quality of life were assessed. We counted the number of consultations in the clinic to assess how much supportive care the patients needed.

RESULTS: Overall, 62% of all patients (41 out of 66) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). A total of 84% of patients with genotype 3 achieved an SVR. Sixty-four percent of patients treated with heroin achieved an SVR. The majority of patients (71%) used illicit drugs during HCV treatment and over 80% were diagnosed with psychiatric comorbidities. Comparisons of patient characteristics according to SVR or non-SVR showed that a longer duration of OMT, more consultations per week during HCV treatment and poor self-reported physical condition were associated with non-SVR.

CONCLUSION: We conclude that offering HCV treatment in an integrated primary care-based setting with OMT and individualized use of different supporting strategies allows for treatment success rates in the population of PWUD that is comparable to the ones in the population of patients without drug use. Heroin maintenance treatment programmes offer a feasible and safe setting for providing HCV treatment.

PMID: 23571610 [PubMed - in process]

Source