Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;11(12):1573-1584.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: email@example.com.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), using elastography, can independently predict outcomes of patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs). However, there is much variation in reporting and consistency of findings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between LSM and outcomes of patients with CLDs.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, through February 2013, for studies that followed up patients with CLDs prospectively for at least 6 months and reported the association between baseline LSM and subsequent development of decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as mortality. Summary relative risk (RR) estimates per unit of LSM and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random effects model.
RESULTS: Our final analysis included 17 studies, reporting on 7058 patients with CLDs. Baseline LSM was associated significantly with risk of hepatic decompensation (6 studies; RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11), HCC (9 studies; RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.18), death (5 studies; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.43), or a composite of these outcomes (7 studies; RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.16-1.51). We observed considerable heterogeneity among studies-primarily in the magnitude of effect, rather than the direction of effect. This heterogeneity could not be explained by variations in study locations, etiologies and stages of CLD, techniques to measure liver stiffness, adjustment for covariates, or method of imputing relationship in the meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis of cohort studies, the degree of liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensated cirrhosis, HCC, and death in patients with CLDs. LSM therefore might be used in risk stratification.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS: CI, CLD, Cancer, Cirrhosis, Elastography, HCC, HCV, HR, HVPG, LSM, LT, MELD, MRE, Outcomes, Prognosis, RR, TE, chronic liver disease, confidence interval, hazard ratio, hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver stiffness measurement, liver transplantation, magnetic resonance elastography, model for end-stage liver disease, relative risk, transient elastography
PMID: 23954643 [PubMed - in process]