Liver Transplantation
Original Article
Zhiwei Li†, Zhenhua Hu†, Jie Xiang, Jie Zhou, Sheng Yan, Jian Wu, Lin Zhou, Shusen Zheng*
DOI: 10.1002/lt.23774
©2013. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Keywords: Liver transplant; HbsAg; HBIG; Registry; Marginal donor
Abstract
The scarcity of available donor organs is the key challenge in orthotopic liver transplantation. A viable way to expand the donor pool is the use of liver grafts from hepatitis B virus surface antigen–positive donors. The present study used the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database (1987–2010), and 78 patients undergoing OLTs with HBsAg-positive grafts were each matched for urgent status, gender of donor and recipient, age of donor and recipient, transplant date, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and warm ischemia time with four patients receiving HBsAg-negative grafts. Overall graft and patient survival was similar in recipients with HBsAg-positive grafts and matched controls (five-year survival: 66% versus 64%, P = 0.954 and 71% versus 71%, P = 0.870, respectively). Cox proportional regression analysis adjusting for other variables showed no impact of donor HBsAg status on graft or patient survival. The use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin was independently associated with better post-transplant graft and patient survival in recipients with HBsAg-positive grafts (HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.06–0.81 and HR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04–0.75, respectively). In conclusion, the use of HBsAg-positive liver grafts did not reduce post-transplant graft or patient survival. Moreover, matching these donors to recipients treated with HBIG may improve safety. Liver Transpl , 2013. © 2013 AASLD.
No comments:
Post a Comment