Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun 17. [Epub ahead of print]
Shoeb D, Rowe IA, Freshwater D, Mutimer D, Brown A, Moreea S, Sood R, Marley R, Sabin CA, Foster GR.
aThe Liver Unit, Blizard Institute for Cellular and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University of London bThe Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham cSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London dBradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford eResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We completed a retrospective analysis of patients with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing therapy in four UK centres with large populations of patients from the Indian subcontinent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Notes on all patients treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin were reviewed and factors that influenced the response were examined.
RESULTS: Six hundred and four patients with genotype 3 HCV were studied, of whom 299 were Asians. Median age was 43 years, 65% were men and 24% had cirrhosis. Overall, 457 (76%) patients achieved sustained virological response (SVR). By multivariable analysis it was found that ethnicity was not associated with an impaired response but age, cirrhosis and diabetes were significantly associated with a reduced SVR, the likelihood of a response was reduced by 25% per 10-year increment in age, by 59% among individuals with cirrhosis and by 62% among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Most patients who did not achieve an SVR relapsed (15%) rather than failing to achieve an end of treatment response.
CONCLUSION: The response to antiviral therapy in genotype 3 HCV is not affected by South Asian (vs. Caucasian) ethnicity, but age, cirrhosis and diabetes reduce the response. Treatment failure most often is due to relapse.
PMID: 21691208 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source
June 27, 2011
Host targeting cyclophilin inhibitor alisporivir (DEB025) presents a high barrier to resistance with no cross-resistance to direct acting antivirals, in Phase 3 Now
Reported by Jules Levin
6th International Workshop on Hepatitis C, Resistance
and New Compounds. Cambridge, MA, June 24th, 2011
"Phase III study with DEB025 commenced recently with previously untreated patients infected by the most common form of hepatitis C virus....DEB025 is the first in a new class of drugs called cyclophilin inhibitors. Unlike other compounds in development that target the virus directly, DEB025 is a host targeting antiviral (HTA) that targets so-called host proteins which are essential for the replication of HCV.....Phase II study with the first-in-class antiviral DEB025 (alisporivir) met its primary endpoint for achieving viral cure (24 weeks after stopping treatment) in 76% of patients with chronic hepatitis C[1]. The study involved nearly 300 previously untreated patients infected with the most common form of hepatitis C virus (HCV), the genotype 1 (G1)[1].".....The findings show that 76% of G1 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with DEB025 plus standard of care (pegylated-interferon alfa 2a/ribavirin) achieved superior viral cure (known as sustained viral response, or SVR) compared to 55% of patients on standard of care alone (p=0.008)[1]. Treatment with DEB025 demonstrated a low incidence of adverse events, with discontinuation rates comparable between treatment groups[1]."
EASL: Once daily alisporivir (DEB025) plus Peg-IFN-alfa-2A/ ribavirin results in superior sustained virologic response (SVR24) in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients - The ESSENTIAL study - (03/31/11)
EASL: Once daily alisporivir (DEB025) plus Peg-IFN-alfa-2A/ ribavirin results in superior sustained virologic response (SVR24) in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients - The ESSENTIAL study - (03/31/11)
New HCV Drugs at EASL Apr 3, 2011 Ð TMC435 & BI201335 are in phase 3. ... EASL: Once daily alisporivir (DEB025) plus Peg-IFN-alfa-2A/ ribavirin results in superior sustained ... www.natap.org/2011/EASL/EASL_109.htm
"For all DAAs discovered to date, a single mutation can confer high-level resistance: Resistance develops quickly both in vitro and in patients (except nucs); Thus, it may take ≥3 DAA's to completely suppress resistance in an IFN-free regimen.....A complementary approach is to target host factors that are essential for viral replication, which may present a higher genetic barrier to resistance.....Resistance clones were selected in vitro using gen 1b (con 1) or 1a (H77) replicon: Replicon cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of DEB025 to 750 nM for gen 1a or 675 nM (7.5xEC90) for gen 1b for three weeks.....D320E in NS5A was the only mutation consistently selected in both gen 1a (H77) and gen 1b (con 1) replicons.....Only 2.65-fold EC50 increase with D320E and 4.76-fold with entire mutant NS5A: No significant effect on fitness with the substitutions; Fully sensitive to NS5A inhibitor (targeting domain I), NS3 inhibitor, or IFN-a....D320E was identified in three patients receiving alisporivir 1000 mg monotherapy for four weeks by population and clonal sequencing; However, D320E alone does not appear to be sufficient to cause viral breakthrough.....No change in sensitivity to NS3 protease inhibitor (BILN2061) or IFN-a, [or NSB5 (polymerase)].....Alisporivir is fully active against DAA resistant mutants (protease156, 168)"
Continue Reading ...
6th International Workshop on Hepatitis C, Resistance
and New Compounds. Cambridge, MA, June 24th, 2011
"Phase III study with DEB025 commenced recently with previously untreated patients infected by the most common form of hepatitis C virus....DEB025 is the first in a new class of drugs called cyclophilin inhibitors. Unlike other compounds in development that target the virus directly, DEB025 is a host targeting antiviral (HTA) that targets so-called host proteins which are essential for the replication of HCV.....Phase II study with the first-in-class antiviral DEB025 (alisporivir) met its primary endpoint for achieving viral cure (24 weeks after stopping treatment) in 76% of patients with chronic hepatitis C[1]. The study involved nearly 300 previously untreated patients infected with the most common form of hepatitis C virus (HCV), the genotype 1 (G1)[1].".....The findings show that 76% of G1 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with DEB025 plus standard of care (pegylated-interferon alfa 2a/ribavirin) achieved superior viral cure (known as sustained viral response, or SVR) compared to 55% of patients on standard of care alone (p=0.008)[1]. Treatment with DEB025 demonstrated a low incidence of adverse events, with discontinuation rates comparable between treatment groups[1]."
EASL: Once daily alisporivir (DEB025) plus Peg-IFN-alfa-2A/ ribavirin results in superior sustained virologic response (SVR24) in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients - The ESSENTIAL study - (03/31/11)
EASL: Once daily alisporivir (DEB025) plus Peg-IFN-alfa-2A/ ribavirin results in superior sustained virologic response (SVR24) in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients - The ESSENTIAL study - (03/31/11)
New HCV Drugs at EASL Apr 3, 2011 Ð TMC435 & BI201335 are in phase 3. ... EASL: Once daily alisporivir (DEB025) plus Peg-IFN-alfa-2A/ ribavirin results in superior sustained ... www.natap.org/2011/EASL/EASL_109.htm
"For all DAAs discovered to date, a single mutation can confer high-level resistance: Resistance develops quickly both in vitro and in patients (except nucs); Thus, it may take ≥3 DAA's to completely suppress resistance in an IFN-free regimen.....A complementary approach is to target host factors that are essential for viral replication, which may present a higher genetic barrier to resistance.....Resistance clones were selected in vitro using gen 1b (con 1) or 1a (H77) replicon: Replicon cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of DEB025 to 750 nM for gen 1a or 675 nM (7.5xEC90) for gen 1b for three weeks.....D320E in NS5A was the only mutation consistently selected in both gen 1a (H77) and gen 1b (con 1) replicons.....Only 2.65-fold EC50 increase with D320E and 4.76-fold with entire mutant NS5A: No significant effect on fitness with the substitutions; Fully sensitive to NS5A inhibitor (targeting domain I), NS3 inhibitor, or IFN-a....D320E was identified in three patients receiving alisporivir 1000 mg monotherapy for four weeks by population and clonal sequencing; However, D320E alone does not appear to be sufficient to cause viral breakthrough.....No change in sensitivity to NS3 protease inhibitor (BILN2061) or IFN-a, [or NSB5 (polymerase)].....Alisporivir is fully active against DAA resistant mutants (protease156, 168)"
Continue Reading ...
Pretreatment prediction of anemia progression by pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C infection: decision-tree analysis
J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun 17. [Epub ahead of print]
Hiramatsu N, Kurosaki M, Sakamoto N, Iwasaki M, Sakamoto M, Suzuki Y, Sugauchi F, Tamori A, Kakinnuma S, Matsuura K, Izumi N.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a model to predict the development of severe anemia during pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy.
METHODS: Data were collected from 1081 genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients who were treated at 6 hospitals in Japan. These patients were randomly assigned to a model-building group (n = 691) or an internal validation group (n = 390). Factors predictive of severe anemia (hemoglobin, Hb < 8.5 g/dl) were explored using data-mining analysis.
RESULTS: Hb values at baseline, creatinine clearance (Ccr), and an Hb concentration decline by 2 g/dl at week 2 were used to build a decision-tree model, in which the patients were divided into 5 subgroups based on variable rates of severe anemia ranging from 0.4 to 11.8%. The reproducibility of the model was confirmed by the internal validation group (r (2) = 0.96). The probability of severe anemia was high in patients whose Hb value was <14 g/dl before treatment (6.5%), especially (a) in those whose Ccr was <80 ml/min (11.8%) and (b) those whose Ccr was ≥80 ml/min but whose Hb concentration decline at week 2 was ≥2 g/dl (11.5%). The probability of severe anemia was low in the other patients (0.4-2.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The decision-tree model that included Hb values at baseline, Ccr, and an Hb concentration decline by 2 g/dl at week 2 was useful for predicting the probability of severe anemia, and has the potential to support clinical decisions regarding early dose reduction of ribavirin.
PMID: 21681410 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source
Hiramatsu N, Kurosaki M, Sakamoto N, Iwasaki M, Sakamoto M, Suzuki Y, Sugauchi F, Tamori A, Kakinnuma S, Matsuura K, Izumi N.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a model to predict the development of severe anemia during pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy.
METHODS: Data were collected from 1081 genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients who were treated at 6 hospitals in Japan. These patients were randomly assigned to a model-building group (n = 691) or an internal validation group (n = 390). Factors predictive of severe anemia (hemoglobin, Hb < 8.5 g/dl) were explored using data-mining analysis.
RESULTS: Hb values at baseline, creatinine clearance (Ccr), and an Hb concentration decline by 2 g/dl at week 2 were used to build a decision-tree model, in which the patients were divided into 5 subgroups based on variable rates of severe anemia ranging from 0.4 to 11.8%. The reproducibility of the model was confirmed by the internal validation group (r (2) = 0.96). The probability of severe anemia was high in patients whose Hb value was <14 g/dl before treatment (6.5%), especially (a) in those whose Ccr was <80 ml/min (11.8%) and (b) those whose Ccr was ≥80 ml/min but whose Hb concentration decline at week 2 was ≥2 g/dl (11.5%). The probability of severe anemia was low in the other patients (0.4-2.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The decision-tree model that included Hb values at baseline, Ccr, and an Hb concentration decline by 2 g/dl at week 2 was useful for predicting the probability of severe anemia, and has the potential to support clinical decisions regarding early dose reduction of ribavirin.
PMID: 21681410 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source
Cholesterol and chronic hepatitis C virus infection
Hepatol Res. 2011 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00838.x. [Epub ahead of print]
Honda A, Matsuzaki Y.
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Abstract
Cholesterol is an essential molecule for the life cycle of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). This review focuses on the roles of cholesterol in HCV infection and introduces HCV events related to cholesterol metabolism and applications for cholesterol metabolism as a therapeutic target. HCV appears to alter host lipid metabolism into its preferable state, which is clinically recognized as steatosis and hypocholesterolemia. While hepatic fatty acid and triglyceride syntheses are upregulated in chronic hepatitis C patients, no direct evidence of increased hepatic de novo cholesterol biosynthesis has been obtained. Impaired VLDL secretion from hepatocytes is suggested to increase intracellular cholesterol concentrations, which may lead to hypocholesterolemia. Clinically, lower serum cholesterol levels are associated with lower rates of sustained virological responses (SVR) to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin therapy, but the reason remains unclear. Clinical trials targeting HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway, are being conducted using statins. Anti-HCV actions by statins appear to be caused by the inhibition of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthesis rather than their cholesterol lowering effects. Other compounds that block various steps of cholesterol metabolic pathways have also been studied to develop new strategies for the complete eradication of this virus.
© 2011 The Japan Society of Hepatology.
Source
Honda A, Matsuzaki Y.
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Abstract
Cholesterol is an essential molecule for the life cycle of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). This review focuses on the roles of cholesterol in HCV infection and introduces HCV events related to cholesterol metabolism and applications for cholesterol metabolism as a therapeutic target. HCV appears to alter host lipid metabolism into its preferable state, which is clinically recognized as steatosis and hypocholesterolemia. While hepatic fatty acid and triglyceride syntheses are upregulated in chronic hepatitis C patients, no direct evidence of increased hepatic de novo cholesterol biosynthesis has been obtained. Impaired VLDL secretion from hepatocytes is suggested to increase intracellular cholesterol concentrations, which may lead to hypocholesterolemia. Clinically, lower serum cholesterol levels are associated with lower rates of sustained virological responses (SVR) to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin therapy, but the reason remains unclear. Clinical trials targeting HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway, are being conducted using statins. Anti-HCV actions by statins appear to be caused by the inhibition of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthesis rather than their cholesterol lowering effects. Other compounds that block various steps of cholesterol metabolic pathways have also been studied to develop new strategies for the complete eradication of this virus.
© 2011 The Japan Society of Hepatology.
Source
Early TIPS with covered stents in high-risk patients with cirrhosis presenting with variceal bleeding: are we ready to dive into the deep end of the pool?
Journal of Hepatology
Articles in Press
Dominique Thabuta, Marika Rudlera, Didier Lebrecbc
Received 24 February 2011; received in revised form 11 May 2011; accepted 12 May 2011. published online 27 June 2011.
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
Background
Patients with cirrhosis in Child-Pugh class C or those in class B who have persistent bleeding at endoscopy are at high risk for treatment failure and a poor prognosis, even if they have undergone rescue treatment with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This study evaluated the earlier use of TIPS in such patients.
Methods
We randomly assigned, within 24 hours after admission, a total of 63 patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding who had been treated with vasoactive drugs plus endoscopic therapy to treatment with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent within 72 hours after randomization (early-TIPS group, 32 patients) or continuation of vasoactive-drug therapy, followed after 3 to 5 days by treatment with propranolol or nadolol and long-term endoscopic band ligation (EBL), with insertion of a TIPS if needed as rescue therapy (pharmacotherapy-EBL group, 31 patients).
Results
During a median follow-up of 16 months, rebleeding or failure to control bleeding occurred in 14 patients in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group as compared with 1 patient in the early-TIPS group (P=0.001). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of this composite end point was 50% in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group versus 97% in the early-TIPS group (P<0.001). Sixteen patients died (12 in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group and 4 in the early-TIPS group, P=0.01). The 1-year actuarial survival was 61% in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group versus 86% in the early-TIPS group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group received TIPS as rescue therapy, but four died. The number of days in the intensive care unit and the percentage of time in the hospital during follow-up were significantly higher in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group than in the early-TIPS group. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to serious adverse events.
Conclusions
In these patients with cirrhosis who were hospitalized for acute variceal bleeding and at high risk for treatment failure, the early use of TIPS was associated with significant reductions in treatment failure and in mortality. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN58150114.)
Abbreviations: TIPS, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, HVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradient
Keywords: Child-Pugh score
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
a Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Service d’hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
b INSERM, Unité 773, Centre de Recherche Biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon CRB3, Paris and Clichy, France Université Denis Diderot-Paris 7, site Bichat, Paris, France
c Service d’Hépatologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
PII: S0168-8278(11)00496-X
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.013
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Source
Articles in Press
Dominique Thabuta, Marika Rudlera, Didier Lebrecbc
Received 24 February 2011; received in revised form 11 May 2011; accepted 12 May 2011. published online 27 June 2011.
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
Background
Patients with cirrhosis in Child-Pugh class C or those in class B who have persistent bleeding at endoscopy are at high risk for treatment failure and a poor prognosis, even if they have undergone rescue treatment with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This study evaluated the earlier use of TIPS in such patients.
Methods
We randomly assigned, within 24 hours after admission, a total of 63 patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding who had been treated with vasoactive drugs plus endoscopic therapy to treatment with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent within 72 hours after randomization (early-TIPS group, 32 patients) or continuation of vasoactive-drug therapy, followed after 3 to 5 days by treatment with propranolol or nadolol and long-term endoscopic band ligation (EBL), with insertion of a TIPS if needed as rescue therapy (pharmacotherapy-EBL group, 31 patients).
Results
During a median follow-up of 16 months, rebleeding or failure to control bleeding occurred in 14 patients in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group as compared with 1 patient in the early-TIPS group (P=0.001). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of this composite end point was 50% in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group versus 97% in the early-TIPS group (P<0.001). Sixteen patients died (12 in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group and 4 in the early-TIPS group, P=0.01). The 1-year actuarial survival was 61% in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group versus 86% in the early-TIPS group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group received TIPS as rescue therapy, but four died. The number of days in the intensive care unit and the percentage of time in the hospital during follow-up were significantly higher in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group than in the early-TIPS group. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to serious adverse events.
Conclusions
In these patients with cirrhosis who were hospitalized for acute variceal bleeding and at high risk for treatment failure, the early use of TIPS was associated with significant reductions in treatment failure and in mortality. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN58150114.)
Abbreviations: TIPS, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, HVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradient
Keywords: Child-Pugh score
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
a Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Service d’hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
b INSERM, Unité 773, Centre de Recherche Biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon CRB3, Paris and Clichy, France Université Denis Diderot-Paris 7, site Bichat, Paris, France
c Service d’Hépatologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
PII: S0168-8278(11)00496-X
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.013
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Source
June 26, 2011
Telaprevir Alone or with Peginterferon and Ribavirin Reduces HCV RNA in Patients with Chronic Genotype 2 but Not 3 Infections
Gastroenterology
Article in Press
Graham R. Foster, Christophe Hézode, Jean-Pierre Bronowicki, Giampiero Carosi, Ola Weiland, Lieselotte Verlinden, Rolf van Heeswijk, Ben van Baelen, Gaston Picchio, Maria Beumont
Received 8 December 2010; received in revised form 12 April 2011; accepted 16 May 2011. published online 01 June 2011.
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
Background & Aims
We evaluated antiviral activity of 2 weeks therapy with telaprevir alone (T), peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (PR), or all 3 drugs (TPR) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (G) 2 or 3 infections.
Methods
We performed a randomized, multicenter, partially-blinded study of patients (23 with HCV G2, 26 with G3) who received telaprevir (750 mg every 8 hours) , placebo plus PR (Peg-IFN, 180 μg, once weekly and RBV, 400 mg, twice daily), or TPR for 15 days, followed by PR for 22 or 24 weeks. We quantified levels of HCV RNA in plasma.
Results
Levels of HCV RNA decreased in all patients with HCV G2, including those that received telaprevir monotherapy. The decrease was faster among patients that received telaprevir. By Day 15, 0 (telaprevir), 40% (TPR), and 22% (PR) of patients with HCV G2 had undetectable levels of HCV RNA; rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 56%, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Overall, 6/9 HCV G2 patients that received only telaprevir had viral breakthrough within 15 days. HCV RNA levels decreased slightly among patients with HCV G3 who received telaprevir, and decreased rapidly among patients given PR or TPR (telaprevir had no synergistic effects). SVR rates were 50%, 67%, and 44% among patients given telaprevir, TPR, or PR respectively; 7 patients with HCV G3 relapsed after therapy (2 given telaprevir, 3 given TPR, and 2 given PR) and 3 patients with HCV G3 had viral breakthrough during telaprevir monotherapy. The incidence of adverse events was similar among groups.
Conclusions
Telaprevir monotherapy reduces levels of HCV RNA in patients with chronic HCV G2 infections, but has limited activity in patients with HCV G3.
Keywords: C209, VX-950, liver disease, clinical trial
Source
Article in Press
Graham R. Foster, Christophe Hézode, Jean-Pierre Bronowicki, Giampiero Carosi, Ola Weiland, Lieselotte Verlinden, Rolf van Heeswijk, Ben van Baelen, Gaston Picchio, Maria Beumont
Received 8 December 2010; received in revised form 12 April 2011; accepted 16 May 2011. published online 01 June 2011.
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
Background & Aims
We evaluated antiviral activity of 2 weeks therapy with telaprevir alone (T), peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (PR), or all 3 drugs (TPR) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (G) 2 or 3 infections.
Methods
We performed a randomized, multicenter, partially-blinded study of patients (23 with HCV G2, 26 with G3) who received telaprevir (750 mg every 8 hours) , placebo plus PR (Peg-IFN, 180 μg, once weekly and RBV, 400 mg, twice daily), or TPR for 15 days, followed by PR for 22 or 24 weeks. We quantified levels of HCV RNA in plasma.
Results
Levels of HCV RNA decreased in all patients with HCV G2, including those that received telaprevir monotherapy. The decrease was faster among patients that received telaprevir. By Day 15, 0 (telaprevir), 40% (TPR), and 22% (PR) of patients with HCV G2 had undetectable levels of HCV RNA; rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 56%, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Overall, 6/9 HCV G2 patients that received only telaprevir had viral breakthrough within 15 days. HCV RNA levels decreased slightly among patients with HCV G3 who received telaprevir, and decreased rapidly among patients given PR or TPR (telaprevir had no synergistic effects). SVR rates were 50%, 67%, and 44% among patients given telaprevir, TPR, or PR respectively; 7 patients with HCV G3 relapsed after therapy (2 given telaprevir, 3 given TPR, and 2 given PR) and 3 patients with HCV G3 had viral breakthrough during telaprevir monotherapy. The incidence of adverse events was similar among groups.
Conclusions
Telaprevir monotherapy reduces levels of HCV RNA in patients with chronic HCV G2 infections, but has limited activity in patients with HCV G3.
Keywords: C209, VX-950, liver disease, clinical trial
Source
Telaprevir Isn't Useful for All HCV Genotypes
Telaprevir-based triple therapy showed some promise against hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection but had limited activity against genotype 3 infection.
Recently, telaprevir received FDA approval for use in triple therapy to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. The new triple regimens — peginterferon, ribavirin, and a protease inhibitor — are more efficacious than combination therapy (peginterferon and ribavirin) in patients with such infection. Although patients with HCV genotype 2 (G2) or genotype 3 (G3) infection generally respond well to combination therapy, 20% to 30% do not attain a sustained virologic response (SVR).
To evaluate the antiviral activity of telaprevir in treatment-naive adults with chronic HCV G2 or G3 infection, researchers conducted a phase IIa, manufacturer-sponsored, randomized, partially blinded study involving 23 G2-infected patients and 26 G3-infected patients.
Participants received one of three regimens for 2 weeks:
• Telaprevir 750 mg orally every 8 hours (monotherapy)
• Telaprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a 180 µg once weekly plus ribavirin 400 mg twice daily (triple therapy)
• Placebo (every 8 hours) plus peginterferon and ribavirin
Thereafter, all participants received peginterferon and ribavirin for 22 or 24 weeks.
Among HCV G2-infected patients, SVR rates were 56% (5 of 9) with telaprevir monotherapy, 100% (5 of 5) with triple therapy, and 89% (8 of 9) with peginterferon plus ribavirin. However, among the HCV G3-infected patients, SVR rates were 50% (4 of 8), 67% (6 of 9), and 44% (4 of 9), respectively.
Comment: In this small exploratory study, telaprevir-based triple therapy showed some promise against HCV G2 but had limited activity against HCV G3. These findings highlight the fact that although protease inhibitor–based HCV treatment regimens are superior to peginterferon plus ribavirin for treating genotype 1 infection, the same might not be true for treating infections caused by other genotypes.
— Atif Zaman, MD, MPH
Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology June 10, 2011
Citation(s):
Foster GR et al. Telaprevir alone or with peginterferon and ribavirin reduces HCV RNA in patients with chronic genotype 2 but not 3 infections. Gastroenterology 2011 Jun 1; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.046)
Source
Recently, telaprevir received FDA approval for use in triple therapy to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. The new triple regimens — peginterferon, ribavirin, and a protease inhibitor — are more efficacious than combination therapy (peginterferon and ribavirin) in patients with such infection. Although patients with HCV genotype 2 (G2) or genotype 3 (G3) infection generally respond well to combination therapy, 20% to 30% do not attain a sustained virologic response (SVR).
To evaluate the antiviral activity of telaprevir in treatment-naive adults with chronic HCV G2 or G3 infection, researchers conducted a phase IIa, manufacturer-sponsored, randomized, partially blinded study involving 23 G2-infected patients and 26 G3-infected patients.
Participants received one of three regimens for 2 weeks:
• Telaprevir 750 mg orally every 8 hours (monotherapy)
• Telaprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a 180 µg once weekly plus ribavirin 400 mg twice daily (triple therapy)
• Placebo (every 8 hours) plus peginterferon and ribavirin
Thereafter, all participants received peginterferon and ribavirin for 22 or 24 weeks.
Among HCV G2-infected patients, SVR rates were 56% (5 of 9) with telaprevir monotherapy, 100% (5 of 5) with triple therapy, and 89% (8 of 9) with peginterferon plus ribavirin. However, among the HCV G3-infected patients, SVR rates were 50% (4 of 8), 67% (6 of 9), and 44% (4 of 9), respectively.
Comment: In this small exploratory study, telaprevir-based triple therapy showed some promise against HCV G2 but had limited activity against HCV G3. These findings highlight the fact that although protease inhibitor–based HCV treatment regimens are superior to peginterferon plus ribavirin for treating genotype 1 infection, the same might not be true for treating infections caused by other genotypes.
— Atif Zaman, MD, MPH
Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology June 10, 2011
Citation(s):
Foster GR et al. Telaprevir alone or with peginterferon and ribavirin reduces HCV RNA in patients with chronic genotype 2 but not 3 infections. Gastroenterology 2011 Jun 1; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.046)
Source
Maintenance Therapy With Peginterferon Alfa-2b Does Not Prevent Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C
Gastroenterology
Volume 140, Issue 7 , Pages 1990-1999, June 2011.
Jordi Bruix, Thierry Poynard, Massimo Colombo, Eugene Schiff, Kelly Burak, Elizabeth J.L. Heathcote, Thomas Berg, Jorge–Luis Poo, Carlos Brandao Mello, Rainer Guenther, Claus Niederau, Ruben Terg, Pierre Bedossa, Navdeep Boparai, Louis H. Griffel, Margaret Burroughs, Clifford A. Brass, Janice K. Albrecht, EPIC3 Study Group
Received 1 October 2010; accepted 4 March 2011. published online 18 March 2011.
Abstract
Background & Aims
Several studies have reported that low doses of interferon can delay the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and progression of chronic hepatitis C. We investigated the incidence of clinical events among participants of the Evaluation of PegIntron in Control of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis (EPIC)3 program.
Methods
Data were analyzed from an open-label randomized study of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to interferon alfa plus ribavirin. All patients had compensated cirrhosis with no evidence of HCC. Patients received peginterferon alfa-2b (0.5 μg/kg/week; n = 311) or no treatment (controls, n = 315) for a maximum period of 5 years or until 98 patients had a clinical event (hepatic decompensation, HCC, death, or liver transplantation). The primary measure of efficacy was time until the first clinical event.
Results
There was no significant difference in time to first clinical event among patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b compared with controls (hazard ratio [HR], 1.452; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.880–2.396). There was no decrease in the development of HCC with therapy. The time to disease progression (clinical events or new or enlarged varices) was significantly longer for patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b compared with controls (HR, 1.564; 95% CI: 1.130–2.166). In a prospectively defined subanalysis of patients with baseline portal hypertension, peginterferon alfa-2b significantly increased the time to first clinical event compared with controls (P = .016). There were no new safety observations.
Conclusions
Maintenance therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b is not warranted in all patients and does not prevent HCC. However, there is a potential clinical benefit of long-term suppressive therapy in patients with preexisting portal hypertension.
Keywords: Liver Cancer, Evaluation of PegIntron in Control of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis Program, EPIC3 Program, Clinical Trial
Source
Volume 140, Issue 7 , Pages 1990-1999, June 2011.
Jordi Bruix, Thierry Poynard, Massimo Colombo, Eugene Schiff, Kelly Burak, Elizabeth J.L. Heathcote, Thomas Berg, Jorge–Luis Poo, Carlos Brandao Mello, Rainer Guenther, Claus Niederau, Ruben Terg, Pierre Bedossa, Navdeep Boparai, Louis H. Griffel, Margaret Burroughs, Clifford A. Brass, Janice K. Albrecht, EPIC3 Study Group
Received 1 October 2010; accepted 4 March 2011. published online 18 March 2011.
Abstract
Background & Aims
Several studies have reported that low doses of interferon can delay the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and progression of chronic hepatitis C. We investigated the incidence of clinical events among participants of the Evaluation of PegIntron in Control of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis (EPIC)3 program.
Methods
Data were analyzed from an open-label randomized study of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to interferon alfa plus ribavirin. All patients had compensated cirrhosis with no evidence of HCC. Patients received peginterferon alfa-2b (0.5 μg/kg/week; n = 311) or no treatment (controls, n = 315) for a maximum period of 5 years or until 98 patients had a clinical event (hepatic decompensation, HCC, death, or liver transplantation). The primary measure of efficacy was time until the first clinical event.
Results
There was no significant difference in time to first clinical event among patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b compared with controls (hazard ratio [HR], 1.452; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.880–2.396). There was no decrease in the development of HCC with therapy. The time to disease progression (clinical events or new or enlarged varices) was significantly longer for patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b compared with controls (HR, 1.564; 95% CI: 1.130–2.166). In a prospectively defined subanalysis of patients with baseline portal hypertension, peginterferon alfa-2b significantly increased the time to first clinical event compared with controls (P = .016). There were no new safety observations.
Conclusions
Maintenance therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b is not warranted in all patients and does not prevent HCC. However, there is a potential clinical benefit of long-term suppressive therapy in patients with preexisting portal hypertension.
Keywords: Liver Cancer, Evaluation of PegIntron in Control of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis Program, EPIC3 Program, Clinical Trial
Source
Noninvasive Tests for Fibrosis and Liver Stiffness Predict 5-Year Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C
Gastroenterology
Volume 140, Issue 7 , Pages 1970-1979.e3, June 2011.
Julien Vergniol, Juliette Foucher, Eric Terrebonne, Pierre–Henri Bernard, Brigitte le Bail, Wassil Merrouche, Patrice Couzigou, Victor de Ledinghen
Received 28 November 2010; accepted 18 February 2011. published online 03 March
Abstract
Background & Aims
Liver stiffness can be measured noninvasively to assess liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. In patients with chronic liver diseases, level of fibrosis predicts liver-related complications and survival. We evaluated the abilities of liver stiffness, results from noninvasive tests for fibrosis, and liver biopsy analyses to predict overall survival or survival without liver-related death with a 5-year period.
Methods
In a consecutive cohort of 1457 patients with chronic hepatitis C, we assessed fibrosis and, on the same day, liver stiffness, performed noninvasive tests of fibrosis (FibroTest, the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, FIB-4), and analyzed liver biopsy samples. We analyzed data on death, liver-related death, and liver transplantation collected during a 5-year follow-up period.
Results
At 5 years, 77 patients had died (39 liver-related deaths) and 16 patients had undergone liver transplantation. Overall survival was 91.7% and survival without liver-related death was 94.4%. Survival was significantly decreased among patients diagnosed with severe fibrosis, regardless of the noninvasive method of analysis. All methods were able to predict shorter survival times in this large population; liver stiffness and results of FibroTest had higher predictive values. Patient outcomes worsened as liver stiffness and FibroTest values increased. Prognostic values of stiffness (P < .0001) and FibroTest results (P < .0001) remained after they were adjusted for treatment response, patient age, and estimates of necroinflammatory grade.
Conclusions
Noninvasive tests for liver fibrosis (measurement of liver stiffness or FibroTest) can predict 5-year survival of patients with chronic hepatitis C. These tools might help physicians determine prognosis at earlier stages and discuss specific treatments, such as liver transplantation.
Keywords: Survival, Cirrhosis, FibroTest, FibroScan, Hepatitis C
Source
Volume 140, Issue 7 , Pages 1970-1979.e3, June 2011.
Julien Vergniol, Juliette Foucher, Eric Terrebonne, Pierre–Henri Bernard, Brigitte le Bail, Wassil Merrouche, Patrice Couzigou, Victor de Ledinghen
Received 28 November 2010; accepted 18 February 2011. published online 03 March
Abstract
Background & Aims
Liver stiffness can be measured noninvasively to assess liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. In patients with chronic liver diseases, level of fibrosis predicts liver-related complications and survival. We evaluated the abilities of liver stiffness, results from noninvasive tests for fibrosis, and liver biopsy analyses to predict overall survival or survival without liver-related death with a 5-year period.
Methods
In a consecutive cohort of 1457 patients with chronic hepatitis C, we assessed fibrosis and, on the same day, liver stiffness, performed noninvasive tests of fibrosis (FibroTest, the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, FIB-4), and analyzed liver biopsy samples. We analyzed data on death, liver-related death, and liver transplantation collected during a 5-year follow-up period.
Results
At 5 years, 77 patients had died (39 liver-related deaths) and 16 patients had undergone liver transplantation. Overall survival was 91.7% and survival without liver-related death was 94.4%. Survival was significantly decreased among patients diagnosed with severe fibrosis, regardless of the noninvasive method of analysis. All methods were able to predict shorter survival times in this large population; liver stiffness and results of FibroTest had higher predictive values. Patient outcomes worsened as liver stiffness and FibroTest values increased. Prognostic values of stiffness (P < .0001) and FibroTest results (P < .0001) remained after they were adjusted for treatment response, patient age, and estimates of necroinflammatory grade.
Conclusions
Noninvasive tests for liver fibrosis (measurement of liver stiffness or FibroTest) can predict 5-year survival of patients with chronic hepatitis C. These tools might help physicians determine prognosis at earlier stages and discuss specific treatments, such as liver transplantation.
Keywords: Survival, Cirrhosis, FibroTest, FibroScan, Hepatitis C
Source
A Revised Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Optimizes Prediction of Mortality Among Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation
Gastroenterology
Volume 140, Issue 7 , Pages 1952-1960, June 2011.
D. Leise, W. Ray Kim, Walter K. Kremers, Joseph J. Larson, Joanne T. Benson, Terry M. Therneau
Received 30 June 2010; accepted 14 February 2011. published online 21 February 2011.
Abstract
Background & Aims
The Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was originally developed based on data from patients who underwent the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. An updated MELD based on data from patients awaiting liver transplantation should improve mortality prediction and allocation efficiency.
Methods
Wait-list data from adult primary liver transplantation candidates from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network were divided into a model derivation set (2005–2006; n = 14,214) and validation set (2007–2008; n = 13,945). Cox regression analysis was used to derive and validate an optimized model that updated coefficients and upper and lower bounds for MELD components and included serum levels of sodium. Main outcomes measure was ability to predict 90-day mortality of patients on the liver transplantation wait list.
Results
Optimized MELD score updated coefficients and implemented new upper and lower bounds for creatinine (0.8 and 3.0 mg/dL, respectively) and international normalized ratio (1 and 3, respectively). Serum sodium concentrations significantly predicted mortality, even after adjusting for the updated MELD model. The final model, based on updated fit of the 4 variables (ie, bilirubin, creatinine, international normalized ratio, and sodium) had a modest yet statistically significant gain in discrimination (concordance: 0.878 vs 0.865; P < .01) in the validation dataset. Utilization of the new score could affect up to 12% of patients (based on changed score for 459 of 3981 transplants in the validation set).
Conclusions
Modification of MELD score to update coefficients, change upper and lower bounds, and incorporate serum sodium levels improved wait-list mortality prediction and should increase efficiency of allocation of donated livers.
Keywords: Liver Disease, Surgery, Prognosis, Survival
Source
Volume 140, Issue 7 , Pages 1952-1960, June 2011.
D. Leise, W. Ray Kim, Walter K. Kremers, Joseph J. Larson, Joanne T. Benson, Terry M. Therneau
Received 30 June 2010; accepted 14 February 2011. published online 21 February 2011.
Abstract
Background & Aims
The Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was originally developed based on data from patients who underwent the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. An updated MELD based on data from patients awaiting liver transplantation should improve mortality prediction and allocation efficiency.
Methods
Wait-list data from adult primary liver transplantation candidates from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network were divided into a model derivation set (2005–2006; n = 14,214) and validation set (2007–2008; n = 13,945). Cox regression analysis was used to derive and validate an optimized model that updated coefficients and upper and lower bounds for MELD components and included serum levels of sodium. Main outcomes measure was ability to predict 90-day mortality of patients on the liver transplantation wait list.
Results
Optimized MELD score updated coefficients and implemented new upper and lower bounds for creatinine (0.8 and 3.0 mg/dL, respectively) and international normalized ratio (1 and 3, respectively). Serum sodium concentrations significantly predicted mortality, even after adjusting for the updated MELD model. The final model, based on updated fit of the 4 variables (ie, bilirubin, creatinine, international normalized ratio, and sodium) had a modest yet statistically significant gain in discrimination (concordance: 0.878 vs 0.865; P < .01) in the validation dataset. Utilization of the new score could affect up to 12% of patients (based on changed score for 459 of 3981 transplants in the validation set).
Conclusions
Modification of MELD score to update coefficients, change upper and lower bounds, and incorporate serum sodium levels improved wait-list mortality prediction and should increase efficiency of allocation of donated livers.
Keywords: Liver Disease, Surgery, Prognosis, Survival
Source
Rapid virological response is the most important predictor of sustained virological response across genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection
Journal of Hepatology
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 69-75 (July 2011)
Michael W. Fried 1, Stephanos J. Hadziyannis 2, Mitchell L. Shiffman 3, Diethelm Messinger 4, Stefan Zeuzem 5
Received 21 June 2010; received in revised form 12 October 2010; accepted 18 October 2010. published online 09 December 2010.
Background & Aims
The probability of response to peginterferon and ribavirin is associated with numerous host and virological factors. Attainment of a rapid virological response (RVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 during treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, is highly predictive of sustained virological response (SVR). The aim of the present study was to determine the relative importance of the kinetics of antiviral response compared to baseline host and virological factors for predicting SVR.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 1383 patients, encompassing genotypes 1–4, treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin, was performed. Baseline characteristics were compared across HCV genotypes and pretreatment factors associated with RVR were identified. The relative significance of RVR compared to other baseline factors for predicting SVR was analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results
RVR was achieved by 16% of patients with genotype 1 and 71% and 60% of those with genotype 2 and 3, respectively. Among patients who achieved RVR, the rate of SVR was high across all genotypes and ranged from 88% to 100% (genotypes 1–4). Baseline factors predictive of RVR included genotype, younger age, lower initial viral load, higher ALT ratio, absence of advanced fibrosis, and younger age. Notably, the presence of RVR generated the highest odds ratio (5.47, 95% confidence interval 3.97–7.52) for predicting SVR in multiple logistic regression analysis of these factors.
Conclusions
Attainment of RVR varies by genotype and is associated with several baseline factors. Patients who achieve RVR have the highest rates of SVR, regardless of genotype. These findings have important implications for predicting and managing response-guided combination antiviral therapies.
1 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
2 Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece
3 Bon Secours Health System, Liver Institute of Virginia, Newport News, VA, USA
4 IST, Mannheim, Germany
5 J.W. Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
Corresponding author. Address: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7584, Room 8015 Burnett-Womack Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Tel.: +1 919 966 2516 fax: +1 919 966 1700.
PII: S0168-8278(10)01093-7
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.032
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Source
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 69-75 (July 2011)
Michael W. Fried 1, Stephanos J. Hadziyannis 2, Mitchell L. Shiffman 3, Diethelm Messinger 4, Stefan Zeuzem 5
Received 21 June 2010; received in revised form 12 October 2010; accepted 18 October 2010. published online 09 December 2010.
Background & Aims
The probability of response to peginterferon and ribavirin is associated with numerous host and virological factors. Attainment of a rapid virological response (RVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 during treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, is highly predictive of sustained virological response (SVR). The aim of the present study was to determine the relative importance of the kinetics of antiviral response compared to baseline host and virological factors for predicting SVR.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 1383 patients, encompassing genotypes 1–4, treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin, was performed. Baseline characteristics were compared across HCV genotypes and pretreatment factors associated with RVR were identified. The relative significance of RVR compared to other baseline factors for predicting SVR was analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results
RVR was achieved by 16% of patients with genotype 1 and 71% and 60% of those with genotype 2 and 3, respectively. Among patients who achieved RVR, the rate of SVR was high across all genotypes and ranged from 88% to 100% (genotypes 1–4). Baseline factors predictive of RVR included genotype, younger age, lower initial viral load, higher ALT ratio, absence of advanced fibrosis, and younger age. Notably, the presence of RVR generated the highest odds ratio (5.47, 95% confidence interval 3.97–7.52) for predicting SVR in multiple logistic regression analysis of these factors.
Conclusions
Attainment of RVR varies by genotype and is associated with several baseline factors. Patients who achieve RVR have the highest rates of SVR, regardless of genotype. These findings have important implications for predicting and managing response-guided combination antiviral therapies.
1 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
2 Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece
3 Bon Secours Health System, Liver Institute of Virginia, Newport News, VA, USA
4 IST, Mannheim, Germany
5 J.W. Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
Corresponding author. Address: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7584, Room 8015 Burnett-Womack Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Tel.: +1 919 966 2516 fax: +1 919 966 1700.
PII: S0168-8278(10)01093-7
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.032
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Source
Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease ☆
Journal of Hepatology
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 38-44 (July 2011)
Eric Trépo 12†, Andrej Potthoff 6† , Pierre Pradat 345, Rakesh Bakshi 6, Bradford Young 7, Robert Lagier8, Christophe Moreno 12, Laurine Verset8, Richard Cross 9, Delphine Degré 12, Arnaud Lemmers 12, Thierry Gustot 12, Pascale Berthillon 45, William Rosenberg 10, Christian Trépo 345, John Sninsky7, Michael Adler 2, Heiner Wedemeyer 6
Received 20 April 2010; received in revised form 22 September 2010; accepted 1 October 2010. published online 09 December 2010.
Background & Aims
Fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is highly variable. A Cirrhosis Risk Score (CRS) based on seven genetic variants has been recently developed for identifying patients at risk for cirrhosis. The objective of this study was to assess the role of the CRS for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in CHC patients with mild liver fibrosis. In addition, we evaluated the potential benefit, for prediction accuracy, of a recently described non-invasive fibrosis staging assay, the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test.
Methods
Two separate cohorts of HCV patients (Brussels, Belgium/Hannover, Germany) were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with a fibrosis Ishak or METAVIR score of F0–F1 at baseline were included. Patients were classified as progressors if they showed an increase 2 fibrosis stages at the second histological evaluation after a follow-up 5years. The CRS was calculated locally. Genotyping was performed by PCR and oligonucleotide ligation with the resulting signal detected with a Luminex® 200TM and computer analysis.
Results
In Brussels, 12/25 patients progressed (48%); similarly in Hannover, 16/31 (52%) patients progressed. In both sample sets, the CRS was significantly associated with fibrosis progression (p=0.050 in Brussels; p=0.018 in Hannover). The ELF test was only a significant predictor in Hannover (p=0.015). In multivariate analysis the CRS remained the only variable associated with fibrosis progression (odds-ratio=2.23, 95%CI 1.21–4.11 p=0.01).
Conclusions
Although conducted on a limited number of patients, this study in two independent centres confirms that the CRS predicts fibrosis progression in initially mild CHC.
See Editorial, pages 3–4
Abbreviations: HCV, hepatitis C virus, CHC, chronic hepatitis C, CRS, cirrhosis risk score, ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis, BMI, body mass index, OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval
Keywords: Hepatitis C, Cirrhosis risk score (CRS), Fibrosis progression, Minimal liver disease
1 Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
3 Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôtel Dieu, Service d’hépatogastroentérologie, Lyon, France
4 INSERM, U871, Lyon, France
5 Université Lyon 1, IFR62 Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
6 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany
7 Celera, Alameda, CA, USA
8 Department of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
9 iQur Ltd., Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
10 Centre for Hepatology, University College London, London, UK
Corresponding author. Address: Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon Cedex 4, France. Tel: +33 4 26 73 27 15
☆ Orally presented in part at the Digestive Disease Week May 30–June 4 2009 in Chicago – USA.
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
PII: S0168-8278(10)01078-0
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.018
© 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 38-44 (July 2011)
Eric Trépo 12†, Andrej Potthoff 6† , Pierre Pradat 345, Rakesh Bakshi 6, Bradford Young 7, Robert Lagier8, Christophe Moreno 12, Laurine Verset8, Richard Cross 9, Delphine Degré 12, Arnaud Lemmers 12, Thierry Gustot 12, Pascale Berthillon 45, William Rosenberg 10, Christian Trépo 345, John Sninsky7, Michael Adler 2, Heiner Wedemeyer 6
Received 20 April 2010; received in revised form 22 September 2010; accepted 1 October 2010. published online 09 December 2010.
Background & Aims
Fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is highly variable. A Cirrhosis Risk Score (CRS) based on seven genetic variants has been recently developed for identifying patients at risk for cirrhosis. The objective of this study was to assess the role of the CRS for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in CHC patients with mild liver fibrosis. In addition, we evaluated the potential benefit, for prediction accuracy, of a recently described non-invasive fibrosis staging assay, the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test.
Methods
Two separate cohorts of HCV patients (Brussels, Belgium/Hannover, Germany) were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with a fibrosis Ishak or METAVIR score of F0–F1 at baseline were included. Patients were classified as progressors if they showed an increase 2 fibrosis stages at the second histological evaluation after a follow-up 5years. The CRS was calculated locally. Genotyping was performed by PCR and oligonucleotide ligation with the resulting signal detected with a Luminex® 200TM and computer analysis.
Results
In Brussels, 12/25 patients progressed (48%); similarly in Hannover, 16/31 (52%) patients progressed. In both sample sets, the CRS was significantly associated with fibrosis progression (p=0.050 in Brussels; p=0.018 in Hannover). The ELF test was only a significant predictor in Hannover (p=0.015). In multivariate analysis the CRS remained the only variable associated with fibrosis progression (odds-ratio=2.23, 95%CI 1.21–4.11 p=0.01).
Conclusions
Although conducted on a limited number of patients, this study in two independent centres confirms that the CRS predicts fibrosis progression in initially mild CHC.
See Editorial, pages 3–4
Abbreviations: HCV, hepatitis C virus, CHC, chronic hepatitis C, CRS, cirrhosis risk score, ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis, BMI, body mass index, OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval
Keywords: Hepatitis C, Cirrhosis risk score (CRS), Fibrosis progression, Minimal liver disease
1 Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
3 Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôtel Dieu, Service d’hépatogastroentérologie, Lyon, France
4 INSERM, U871, Lyon, France
5 Université Lyon 1, IFR62 Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
6 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany
7 Celera, Alameda, CA, USA
8 Department of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
9 iQur Ltd., Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
10 Centre for Hepatology, University College London, London, UK
Corresponding author. Address: Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon Cedex 4, France. Tel: +33 4 26 73 27 15
☆ Orally presented in part at the Digestive Disease Week May 30–June 4 2009 in Chicago – USA.
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
PII: S0168-8278(10)01078-0
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.018
© 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Prediction of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C infection: Are genetics ready for clinical use?
Journal of Hepatology Volume 55 Issue 1 Pages 3-4 July 2011
Hermann E. Wasmuth, Christian Trautwein
Received 10 December 2010; received in revised form 9 February 2011; accepted 9 February 2011. published online 21 February 2011.
Refers to article:
Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease , 09 December 2010
Eric Trépo, Andrej Potthoff, Pierre Pradat, Rakesh Bakshi, Bradford Young, Robert Lagier, Christophe Moreno, Laurine Verset, Richard Cross, Delphine Degré, Arnaud Lemmers, Thierry Gustot, Pascale Berthillon, William Rosenberg, Christian Trépo, John Sninsky, Michael Adler, Heiner Wedemeyer
Journal of Hepatology
July 2011 (Vol. 55, Issue 1, Pages 38-44)
Abstract Full Text Full-Text PDF (702 KB)
See Article, pages 38–44
Article Outline
• Conflict of interest
• Financial support
• References
• Copyright
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease worldwide and results in complications, such as decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, large epidemiological studies have suggested that only about half of all HCV infected patients show significant fibrosis and only a fraction of these are at risk of developing end-stage liver disease [1]. These large inter-individual differences in the progression of HCV infection are partly due to exogenous factors (e.g. alcohol intake, co-infections, diabetes) [2]. Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated that fibrosis development significantly depends on host genetic factors. In this respect, liver fibrosis is considered to be a complex genetic trait, in which multiple genes and their interactions contribute to the severity of liver fibrosis.
This hypothesis has been supported by multiple cross-sectional case-control studies which were based on the a priori hypothesis that the distribution of polymorphic alleles is different between subjects with mild versus patients with severe fibrosis. A major limitation of these studies was their lack of reproducibility and the limited number of polymorphisms investigated within the respective cohorts [3]. The elucidation of the genetic basis for liver fibrosis was taken a step further by the first large-scale genetic screen in patients with HCV induced liver fibrosis in 2007 [4]. In this analysis more than 20,000 single polymorphisms were analyzed in two independent cohorts of patients of Caucasian ethnicity in a genome-wide scan. The genetic data were subsequently analyzed in depth and a genetic score was calculated which predicted the presence of severe fibrosis in the investigated patients [4]. This gene signature was termed the “cirrhosis risk score” (CRS) and consisted of single nucleotide polymorphisms in seven different genes (AP3S2, AQP2, AZIN1, DEGS1, STXBP5L, TLR4, and TRPM5). Such a combination of SNPs into a score has also been applied in studies on the genetic basis of cholesterol levels and prostate cancer [5].
The validity and potential clinical applicability of the CRS was subsequently validated in a cohort from Italy [6]. All of the patients in this study had mild fibrosis at initial biopsy but did not undergo antiviral therapy due to various clinical reasons. After a median follow-up of 60months the subjects underwent a second liver biopsy. Overall, 24.4% showed no histologic progression, while 75.6% progressed by at least one stage. In this group 45.0% progressed by at least two stages, and 10.3% by more than two stages. When the CRS was applied to this cohort, the mean CRS values were significantly higher in patients with fibrosis progression compared with those without progression [6].
In the current issue of the Journal of Hepatology, the clinical value of the CRS in predicting fibrosis progression has now been prospectively validated in two further cohorts of HCV infected patients with minimal liver fibrosis at baseline [7]. Although both cohorts were significantly smaller than the number of patients investigated by Marcolongo et al. [6], the CRS was again significantly associated with fibrosis progression in untreated patients for a follow-up period of at least five years. These results suggest that the CRS remains a prognostic marker even in relatively low powered studies. An additional strength of the study by Trepo et al. is that the CRS was also analyzed together with a recent non-invasive fibrosis staging score, the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test [8]. This biomarker based score includes the serum levels of hyaluronic acid, amino-terminal propeptide of type III collagen (PNIIIP), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) and has been validated as a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis in cross-sectional studies of different liver disease etiologies. Notably, this score has now been identified to predict histologic fibrosis progression in the study by Trepo et al. [7]. Since the ELF score is a combination of matrix components and functional inhibitors of their degradation, this new and interesting observation again underscores that fibrosis is a dynamic process involving different aspects of matrix biology. Clinically, the association of the ELF score with fibrosis progression in HCV infection needs confirmation in larger cohorts, but might lead to new predictive parameters in the future.
In a regression model, the CRS was associated with an OR of 2.23 for fibrosis progression, an effect size which is low for combined SNP scores but in the range of large-scale SNP analysis in complex diseases [9]. In ROC analysis the combination of the CRS with the ELF test together with readily available clinical parameters (gender, alcohol consumption and presence of diabetes) yielded an area under the curve of 0.87, which is better than the predictive value of clinical parameters (AUC 0.74) or the CRS (AUC 0.85) score alone [7]. These analyses indeed suggest that the specificity and sensitivity of the combined markers are sufficient for predicting fibrosis progression in clinical practice.
The findings by Trepo et al. stress the question whether there is a clinical need for predicting fibrosis progression in patients with chronic HCV infection since some current guidelines [10] recommend the treatment of almost all HCV-RNA positive patients. Indeed, prediction of fibrosis progression might be reserved for subjects with relative contraindications to interferon and ribavirin treatment (e.g. psychiatric disorders, hemoglobin abnormalities, concurrent autoimmune diseases), patients who failed to achieve a sustained virological response to current regimens or who are candidates for clinical studies which assess the utility of anti-fibrotic treatments. However, these populations represent a significant number of individuals seen at specialised centers and the CRS might help to personalise clinical care of these individuals. Personalised decision making might even be supplemented by genetic determination of the likelihood of treatment response by genotyping the IL28B locus [11] and by estimation of the risk for ribavirin induced anemia by ITPA variants [12]. However, with such genetic parameters on the horizon, the question arises about how to deal with persons who carry the at-risk alleles for fibrosis progression, treatment failure, or anemia. These aspects need to be thoroughly discussed with the affected patients prior to starting antiviral therapy and a clinical consensus needs to be established in the hepatologists community.
What other lessons can be drawn from the validated association of the CRS with fibrosis progression in HCV infection? Despite the fact that all genes included into the score have now been identified, only one (TLR4) has yet been functionally associated with liver fibrosis in vitro and in vivo [13]. However, the other genes of the CRS might also point to interesting molecular pathways of fibrogenesis, such as aquaporins which seem to be implicated in chronic kidney injury [14]. According to this hypothesis, we have learned from large-scale genetic association studies in age-related macular degeneration and Crohn’s disease that strong and reliable associations might lead to new molecular driven concepts for these diseases. This has already led to the first clinical trials in age-related macular degeneration by blocking the complement pathway [15], although a few years ago the involvement of this inflammatory pathway in the disease had not even been suspected. Thus, it remains a great scientific challenge to further elucidate the functional importance of the genes involved in the CRS with regards to fibrogenesis in HCV infection. Based on this knowledge new interventional anti-fibrotic strategies for patients who fail to respond to current or future antiviral therapies might be developed. In such studies the CRS might guide the selection of patients who would most benefit from anti-fibrotic therapies. Furthermore, the CRS should be tested in other fibrotic liver diseases (including alcoholic, NASH, or biliary disease) in order to better understand the predictive and pathophysiological impact of this score and its genes across different etiologies.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.
Financial support
Work in the lab of the authors is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TRR57) and Aachen University (IZKF grants to HEW).
References
[1]Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P. Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet. 1997;349:825–832.
[2]Mallat A, Hezode C, Lotersztajn S. Environmental factors as disease accelerators during chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2008;48:657–665.
[3]Weber SN, Wasmuth HE. Liver fibrosis: from animal models to mapping of human risk variants. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:635–646.
[4]Huang H, Shiffman ML, Friedman S, Venkatesh R, Bzowej N, Abar OT, et al. A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007;46:297–306.
[5]Manolio TA. Genomic association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:166–176.
[6]Marcolongo M, Young B, Dal Pero F, Fattovich G, Peraro L, Guido M, et al. A seven-gene signature (cirrhosis risk score) predicts liver fibrosis progression in patients with initially mild chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2009;50:1038–1044.
[7]Trepo E, Potthoff A, Pradat P, Bakshi R, Young B, Lagier R, et al. Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of the fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55:38–44.
[8]Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, et al. Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1704–1713.
[9]Hardy J, Singleton A. Genomewide association studies and human disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1759–1768.
[10]Sarrazin C, Berg T, Ross RS, Schirmacher P, Wedemeyer H, Neumann U, et al. Prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: the German guidelines on the management of HCV infection. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48:289–351.
[11]Suppiah V, Moldovan M, Ahlenstiel G, Berg T, Weltman M, Abate ML, et al. IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1100–1104.
[12]Fellay J, Thompson AJ, Ge D, Gumbs CE, Urban TJ, Shianna KV, et al. ITPA gene variants protect against anaemia in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Nature. 2010;464:405–408.
[13]Seki E, De Minicis S, Osterreicher CH, Kluwe J, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007;13:1324–1332.
[14]Bedford JJ, Leader JP, Walker RJ. Aquaporin expression in normal human kidney and in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:2581–2587.
[15]Wagner E, Frank MM. Therapeutic potential of complement modulation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:43–56.
Medical Department III, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
PII: S0168-8278(11)00157-7
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.003
© 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Hermann E. Wasmuth, Christian Trautwein
Received 10 December 2010; received in revised form 9 February 2011; accepted 9 February 2011. published online 21 February 2011.
Refers to article:
Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease , 09 December 2010
Eric Trépo, Andrej Potthoff, Pierre Pradat, Rakesh Bakshi, Bradford Young, Robert Lagier, Christophe Moreno, Laurine Verset, Richard Cross, Delphine Degré, Arnaud Lemmers, Thierry Gustot, Pascale Berthillon, William Rosenberg, Christian Trépo, John Sninsky, Michael Adler, Heiner Wedemeyer
Journal of Hepatology
July 2011 (Vol. 55, Issue 1, Pages 38-44)
Abstract Full Text Full-Text PDF (702 KB)
See Article, pages 38–44
Article Outline
• Conflict of interest
• Financial support
• References
• Copyright
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease worldwide and results in complications, such as decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, large epidemiological studies have suggested that only about half of all HCV infected patients show significant fibrosis and only a fraction of these are at risk of developing end-stage liver disease [1]. These large inter-individual differences in the progression of HCV infection are partly due to exogenous factors (e.g. alcohol intake, co-infections, diabetes) [2]. Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated that fibrosis development significantly depends on host genetic factors. In this respect, liver fibrosis is considered to be a complex genetic trait, in which multiple genes and their interactions contribute to the severity of liver fibrosis.
This hypothesis has been supported by multiple cross-sectional case-control studies which were based on the a priori hypothesis that the distribution of polymorphic alleles is different between subjects with mild versus patients with severe fibrosis. A major limitation of these studies was their lack of reproducibility and the limited number of polymorphisms investigated within the respective cohorts [3]. The elucidation of the genetic basis for liver fibrosis was taken a step further by the first large-scale genetic screen in patients with HCV induced liver fibrosis in 2007 [4]. In this analysis more than 20,000 single polymorphisms were analyzed in two independent cohorts of patients of Caucasian ethnicity in a genome-wide scan. The genetic data were subsequently analyzed in depth and a genetic score was calculated which predicted the presence of severe fibrosis in the investigated patients [4]. This gene signature was termed the “cirrhosis risk score” (CRS) and consisted of single nucleotide polymorphisms in seven different genes (AP3S2, AQP2, AZIN1, DEGS1, STXBP5L, TLR4, and TRPM5). Such a combination of SNPs into a score has also been applied in studies on the genetic basis of cholesterol levels and prostate cancer [5].
The validity and potential clinical applicability of the CRS was subsequently validated in a cohort from Italy [6]. All of the patients in this study had mild fibrosis at initial biopsy but did not undergo antiviral therapy due to various clinical reasons. After a median follow-up of 60months the subjects underwent a second liver biopsy. Overall, 24.4% showed no histologic progression, while 75.6% progressed by at least one stage. In this group 45.0% progressed by at least two stages, and 10.3% by more than two stages. When the CRS was applied to this cohort, the mean CRS values were significantly higher in patients with fibrosis progression compared with those without progression [6].
In the current issue of the Journal of Hepatology, the clinical value of the CRS in predicting fibrosis progression has now been prospectively validated in two further cohorts of HCV infected patients with minimal liver fibrosis at baseline [7]. Although both cohorts were significantly smaller than the number of patients investigated by Marcolongo et al. [6], the CRS was again significantly associated with fibrosis progression in untreated patients for a follow-up period of at least five years. These results suggest that the CRS remains a prognostic marker even in relatively low powered studies. An additional strength of the study by Trepo et al. is that the CRS was also analyzed together with a recent non-invasive fibrosis staging score, the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test [8]. This biomarker based score includes the serum levels of hyaluronic acid, amino-terminal propeptide of type III collagen (PNIIIP), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) and has been validated as a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis in cross-sectional studies of different liver disease etiologies. Notably, this score has now been identified to predict histologic fibrosis progression in the study by Trepo et al. [7]. Since the ELF score is a combination of matrix components and functional inhibitors of their degradation, this new and interesting observation again underscores that fibrosis is a dynamic process involving different aspects of matrix biology. Clinically, the association of the ELF score with fibrosis progression in HCV infection needs confirmation in larger cohorts, but might lead to new predictive parameters in the future.
In a regression model, the CRS was associated with an OR of 2.23 for fibrosis progression, an effect size which is low for combined SNP scores but in the range of large-scale SNP analysis in complex diseases [9]. In ROC analysis the combination of the CRS with the ELF test together with readily available clinical parameters (gender, alcohol consumption and presence of diabetes) yielded an area under the curve of 0.87, which is better than the predictive value of clinical parameters (AUC 0.74) or the CRS (AUC 0.85) score alone [7]. These analyses indeed suggest that the specificity and sensitivity of the combined markers are sufficient for predicting fibrosis progression in clinical practice.
The findings by Trepo et al. stress the question whether there is a clinical need for predicting fibrosis progression in patients with chronic HCV infection since some current guidelines [10] recommend the treatment of almost all HCV-RNA positive patients. Indeed, prediction of fibrosis progression might be reserved for subjects with relative contraindications to interferon and ribavirin treatment (e.g. psychiatric disorders, hemoglobin abnormalities, concurrent autoimmune diseases), patients who failed to achieve a sustained virological response to current regimens or who are candidates for clinical studies which assess the utility of anti-fibrotic treatments. However, these populations represent a significant number of individuals seen at specialised centers and the CRS might help to personalise clinical care of these individuals. Personalised decision making might even be supplemented by genetic determination of the likelihood of treatment response by genotyping the IL28B locus [11] and by estimation of the risk for ribavirin induced anemia by ITPA variants [12]. However, with such genetic parameters on the horizon, the question arises about how to deal with persons who carry the at-risk alleles for fibrosis progression, treatment failure, or anemia. These aspects need to be thoroughly discussed with the affected patients prior to starting antiviral therapy and a clinical consensus needs to be established in the hepatologists community.
What other lessons can be drawn from the validated association of the CRS with fibrosis progression in HCV infection? Despite the fact that all genes included into the score have now been identified, only one (TLR4) has yet been functionally associated with liver fibrosis in vitro and in vivo [13]. However, the other genes of the CRS might also point to interesting molecular pathways of fibrogenesis, such as aquaporins which seem to be implicated in chronic kidney injury [14]. According to this hypothesis, we have learned from large-scale genetic association studies in age-related macular degeneration and Crohn’s disease that strong and reliable associations might lead to new molecular driven concepts for these diseases. This has already led to the first clinical trials in age-related macular degeneration by blocking the complement pathway [15], although a few years ago the involvement of this inflammatory pathway in the disease had not even been suspected. Thus, it remains a great scientific challenge to further elucidate the functional importance of the genes involved in the CRS with regards to fibrogenesis in HCV infection. Based on this knowledge new interventional anti-fibrotic strategies for patients who fail to respond to current or future antiviral therapies might be developed. In such studies the CRS might guide the selection of patients who would most benefit from anti-fibrotic therapies. Furthermore, the CRS should be tested in other fibrotic liver diseases (including alcoholic, NASH, or biliary disease) in order to better understand the predictive and pathophysiological impact of this score and its genes across different etiologies.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.
Financial support
Work in the lab of the authors is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TRR57) and Aachen University (IZKF grants to HEW).
References
[1]Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P. Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet. 1997;349:825–832.
[2]Mallat A, Hezode C, Lotersztajn S. Environmental factors as disease accelerators during chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2008;48:657–665.
[3]Weber SN, Wasmuth HE. Liver fibrosis: from animal models to mapping of human risk variants. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:635–646.
[4]Huang H, Shiffman ML, Friedman S, Venkatesh R, Bzowej N, Abar OT, et al. A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007;46:297–306.
[5]Manolio TA. Genomic association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:166–176.
[6]Marcolongo M, Young B, Dal Pero F, Fattovich G, Peraro L, Guido M, et al. A seven-gene signature (cirrhosis risk score) predicts liver fibrosis progression in patients with initially mild chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2009;50:1038–1044.
[7]Trepo E, Potthoff A, Pradat P, Bakshi R, Young B, Lagier R, et al. Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of the fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55:38–44.
[8]Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, et al. Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1704–1713.
[9]Hardy J, Singleton A. Genomewide association studies and human disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1759–1768.
[10]Sarrazin C, Berg T, Ross RS, Schirmacher P, Wedemeyer H, Neumann U, et al. Prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: the German guidelines on the management of HCV infection. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48:289–351.
[11]Suppiah V, Moldovan M, Ahlenstiel G, Berg T, Weltman M, Abate ML, et al. IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1100–1104.
[12]Fellay J, Thompson AJ, Ge D, Gumbs CE, Urban TJ, Shianna KV, et al. ITPA gene variants protect against anaemia in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Nature. 2010;464:405–408.
[13]Seki E, De Minicis S, Osterreicher CH, Kluwe J, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007;13:1324–1332.
[14]Bedford JJ, Leader JP, Walker RJ. Aquaporin expression in normal human kidney and in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:2581–2587.
[15]Wagner E, Frank MM. Therapeutic potential of complement modulation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:43–56.
Medical Department III, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
PII: S0168-8278(11)00157-7
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.003
© 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Response-guided Peg-interferon plus ribavirin treatment duration in chronic hepatitis C: Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and implications for the future
Hepatology. 2011 Jun 14. doi: 10.1002/hep.24480. [Epub ahead of print]
Di Martino V, Richou C, Cervoni JP, Sanchez-Tapias JM, Jensen DM, Mangia A, Buti M, Sheppard F, Ferenci P, Thévenot T.
Service d'hépatologie, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; EA API 4266, Université de Franche Comté. vdimartino@chu-besancon.fr.
Abstract
Response-guided peg-interferon plus ribavirin (P/R) therapy trials on genotype(G)1 and G2/G3 HCV-infected patients provide contradictory results. We conducted meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to address 1) the benefit of a 72 week-extended duration therapy in G1-slow responders and 2) adequate shortened duration therapy in G1 and G2/G3-rapid responders. Seventeen trials were selected, including 624 G1-rapid responders, 570 G1-slow responders and 2062 G2/G3-rapid responders. Virologic outcomes and treatment discontinuation data were collected from published papers and by asking authors. Pooled estimates of sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse and dropouts were calculated using the random effects model, considering the variability of shortened duration, ribavirin dose, genotype and baseline viral load. In G1-slow responders, a 72 week-extended duration increased SVR (+10.7%, 95%CI:+4.4%-+17.1%), decreased relapse (-12.3%, 95%CI:-25.4%-0%), and did not significantly increase drop-out rates (+4.5%, 95%CI:-0.6%-+9.6%). The benefit of extended duration was lower when using weight-based ribavirin regimen (+8.7%, 95%CI:+1.7%-+15.8%). In G1-rapid responders, a 24 week-shortened duration decreased SVR (-12.5%, 95%CI:-19.2%--5.8%), and increased relapse rates (+8.8%, 95%CI:+2.9%- +14.8%). Such differences were not significant in patients with baseline viral load <400,000UI/mL (-4.4%, 95%CI:-9.8%-+1%). In G2/G3-rapid responders, SVR was more common for standard 24-week duration than for shortened durations (+4.1%, 95%CI:+0.1%-+8.5), but this benefit was not significant when the ribavirin was weight-adjusted and the short duration was 16 weeks (-1.7%, 95%CI:-6.1% -+2.7%), and for G2 patients (+1.6%, 95%CI: -0.2%-+5.5%). In Conclusion, long durations of P/R therapy improve SVR, regardless of genotype. This effect is nonetheless negligible in rapid responders with the most favourable conditions for SVR (G2, G1 with low viral load, and G3 with weight-adjusted ribavirin regimen). (HEPATOLOGY 2011.).
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Source
Di Martino V, Richou C, Cervoni JP, Sanchez-Tapias JM, Jensen DM, Mangia A, Buti M, Sheppard F, Ferenci P, Thévenot T.
Service d'hépatologie, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; EA API 4266, Université de Franche Comté. vdimartino@chu-besancon.fr.
Abstract
Response-guided peg-interferon plus ribavirin (P/R) therapy trials on genotype(G)1 and G2/G3 HCV-infected patients provide contradictory results. We conducted meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to address 1) the benefit of a 72 week-extended duration therapy in G1-slow responders and 2) adequate shortened duration therapy in G1 and G2/G3-rapid responders. Seventeen trials were selected, including 624 G1-rapid responders, 570 G1-slow responders and 2062 G2/G3-rapid responders. Virologic outcomes and treatment discontinuation data were collected from published papers and by asking authors. Pooled estimates of sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse and dropouts were calculated using the random effects model, considering the variability of shortened duration, ribavirin dose, genotype and baseline viral load. In G1-slow responders, a 72 week-extended duration increased SVR (+10.7%, 95%CI:+4.4%-+17.1%), decreased relapse (-12.3%, 95%CI:-25.4%-0%), and did not significantly increase drop-out rates (+4.5%, 95%CI:-0.6%-+9.6%). The benefit of extended duration was lower when using weight-based ribavirin regimen (+8.7%, 95%CI:+1.7%-+15.8%). In G1-rapid responders, a 24 week-shortened duration decreased SVR (-12.5%, 95%CI:-19.2%--5.8%), and increased relapse rates (+8.8%, 95%CI:+2.9%- +14.8%). Such differences were not significant in patients with baseline viral load <400,000UI/mL (-4.4%, 95%CI:-9.8%-+1%). In G2/G3-rapid responders, SVR was more common for standard 24-week duration than for shortened durations (+4.1%, 95%CI:+0.1%-+8.5), but this benefit was not significant when the ribavirin was weight-adjusted and the short duration was 16 weeks (-1.7%, 95%CI:-6.1% -+2.7%), and for G2 patients (+1.6%, 95%CI: -0.2%-+5.5%). In Conclusion, long durations of P/R therapy improve SVR, regardless of genotype. This effect is nonetheless negligible in rapid responders with the most favourable conditions for SVR (G2, G1 with low viral load, and G3 with weight-adjusted ribavirin regimen). (HEPATOLOGY 2011.).
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Source
A Comparison of Four Fibrosis Indexes in Chronic HCV
Development of New Fibrosis-cirrhosis Index (FCI)
Waqar Ahmad; Bushra Ijaz; Fouzia T Javed; Sana Gull; Humera Kausar; Muhammad T Sarwar; Sultan Asad; Imran Shahid; Aleena Sumrin; Saba Khaliq; Shah Jahan; Asim Pervaiz; Sajida Hassan
Posted: 06/24/2011; BMC Gastroenterology. 2011;11 © 2011 BioMed Central, Ltd.
Abstract and Introduction
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis C can lead to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. We compared readily available non-invasive fibrosis indexes for the fibrosis progression discrimination to find a better combination of existing non-invasive markers.
Methods: We studied 157 HCV infected patients who underwent liver biopsy. In order to differentiate HCV fibrosis progression, readily available AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 serum indexes were tested in the patients. We derived a new fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) comprised of ALP, bilirubin, serum albumin and platelet count. FCI = [(ALP × Bilirubin)/(Albumin × Platelet count)].
Results: Already established serum indexes AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 were able to stage liver fibrosis with correlation coefficient indexes 0.130, 0.444, 0.578 and 0.494, respectively. Our new fibrosis cirrhosis index FCI significantly correlated with the histological fibrosis stages F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4 (r = 0.818, p < 0.05) with AUROCs 0.932 and 0.996, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of FCI at a cutoff value < 0.130 for predicting fibrosis stage F0-F1 was 81% and 82%, respectively with AUROC 0.932. Corresponding value of FCI at a cutoff value ≥1.25 for the prediction of cirrhosis was 86% and 100%.
Conclusions: The fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) accurately predicted fibrosis stages in HCV infected patients and seems more efficient than frequently used serum indexes.
Background
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is considered as a major basis of liver associated diseases throughout the world. More than 350 million people (3% of the world's populations)[1,2] and almost 10 million people in Pakistan are infected with HCV.[3] The genotypes 3a, 3b, 1a and 4a are most prevalent in Pakistan.[4] It is predicted that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops in 1–4% of HCV infected patients in the first five years following the onset of cirrhosis, but cirrhosis may occur with in the range of 10–50 years.[5] In HCV infected patients, liver biopsy is considered essential to stage liver fibrosis. Procedure of liver biopsy is invasive, expensive and not suitable for all patients. Patients can have severe side effects like pain andharsh complications also leading to death [[1,3] and.[5]] Many previous studies reported that host factors reflect fibrosis development leading to HCC,[6,7] so these can be used as non-invasive means to overcome the weaknesses arise from biopsy procedures. Chronic hepatitis C is known as hepatic lesions associated with increased levels of aminotransferases more than 6 months. Moreover, treatment with interferon therapy should be based on the liver fibrosis stage.[8] Various authors tried to find accurate non-invasive markers and develop correlations between the serum aminotransferases levels, hyluronic acid level, collagen level, platelet count and HCV viral titer with fibrosis stages but no clear conclusions were formed. Several scoring systems like AST to ALT ratio (AAR), AST-Platelet ratio (APRI), Fibrotest (FT), Fibrosis Index (FI) and FIB-4 with different thresholds to predict presence or absence of fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients infected with HCV had been proposed. However, mild fibrosis (F0) to end stage cirrhosis cannot be predicted accurately using a single system.[9–18]
In this study, we compared and evaluated diagnostic accuracy of the readily available non-invasive serum indexes including AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 to find accurate and reliable non-invasive markers for evaluating fibrosis progression. We also developed a new non-invasive serum marker index for this purpose by evaluating several clinic-pathological features. A marker with high predictive values would eliminate the need of liver biopsy that also reduces the cost and risks associated to it.
Methods
Patients
This study was conducted at the Department of Pathology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore; Mayo Hospital, Lahore and Liver Centre, Faisalabad in collaboration with Applied and Functional Genomics Lab, National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. HCV RNA-positive patients were identified among HCV antibody (anti-HCV) positive patients. Later, the study plan was discussed with patients and the biopsy was taken only from those patients who were willing for this procedure. The purpose of this study was to design a new Index so that disease progression can be evaluated non-invasively and future need of biopsy can be eliminated. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. This analytical study was carried out from March 2008 to September 2010.
Patients who received a previous course of INF or immunosuppressive therapy or who had clinical evidence of HBV or HIV and any type of liver cancer were excluded from the study. Patients who refused to have a liver biopsy or for whom it was contraindicated, i.e., because of a low platelet count, prolonged prothrombin time or decompensated cirrhosis were also excluded from the study. The liver biopsy procedure, its advantages and possible adverse effects were explained to the patients. Informed consent were obtained from patients contained information about demographic data, possible transmission route of HCV infection, clinical, virological and biochemical data. This study included 157 patients (M/F 114/43; mean age 38.1 ± 10.2, age range 19–58 years). The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB, CEMB). The Federal-wide Assurance document (ID: FWA00001758) was approved by the local office for Human Research Protection.
Histological Evaluation of Biopsy Samples
The histological evaluation of paraffin-embedded liver specimens was carried out at the Pathology Department, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, according to METAVIR scoring system.[19] Liver biopsies were evaluated by two independent pathologists without prior information to patient's history. Histological staging based on the degree of fibrosis have five degrees of fibrosis: as F0 (no fibrosis), F1 (mild fibrosis without septa), F2 (moderate fibrosis with few septa), F3 (severe fibrosis with numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 (cirrhosis). We further grouped fibrosis stages as F0-F1 (minimal fibrosis), F2-F3 (advanced fibrosis), F4 (cirrhosis) and F2-F4 (significant fibrosis).
HCV RNA Detection and Quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted from 140 μl serum samples using QIAamp viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen USA cat # 52906) according to the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus (MmLV) reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA). First round and nested PCRs were carried out with Taq Polymerase (Fermentas USA) and analyzed on 2% agarose gel. Qiagen HCV quantitative kit was used to perform HCV RNA quantification with 10 ul of the extracted RNA on Roche Real Time PCR using fluorescent probes to detect amplification after each replicating cycle.
HCV Genotyping
HCV genotyping was carried out using Invader HCV genotyping assay (Third wave technology USA). Briefly, about 100 ng of the HCV RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using 200U of MmLV (Invitrogen, USA). From the amplified product, 2 μl was taken and the genotyping assay was performed for 12 different HCV types.
Comparison of Already Available Non-invasive Serum Biomarkers to Evaluate Patient's Liver Biopsy Data
Serum samples and liver specimens collected from each patient were stored at -70°C for further biochemical analysis. The routine liver function tests (LFTs), Hb, serum albumin and direct bilirubin levels were anticipated for each patient. All biochemical tests and their scores were made without knowledge of liver biopsy results and all patients were evaluated for AAR, APRI, Fibrosis Index (FI) and FIB-4 indexes.
The following formulas were used to review the predicted scores with the particular cut-off values as mentioned previously.
![]()
The demographic and clinical outcomes of the 157 HCV infected patients are briefly explained in Table 1. The evaluation of chronic HCV activity (inflammatory grade) showed mild chronic hepatitis in 51 patients, moderate chronic hepatitis in 67 patients and severe chronic hepatitis in 39 patients. The determination of liver fibrosis showed stage F0 in 29, F1 in 39, 34 patients in F2 and F3 stage each and 21 patients in F4 or advanced fibrosis leading to cirrhosis. Our data showed the presence of genotype 1a in 22 and 3a in 135 patients, 95 patients were < 40 years of age, while 62 were > 40 years of age.
Relationship Between Clinical Findings and Fibrosis
Liver fibrosis stages were statistically significant between age groups (p< 0.05). Mild and moderate fibrosis was diagnosed mostly in younger patients while more advanced stages were observed in patients over 40 years old. Patients with F0 fibrosis were too young as compared to those who developed moderate or severe fibrosis leading to cirrhosis (Mean age ± SD, 25.9 ± 2.4 years). The distribution of liver fibrosis stages with regard to gender and genotypes of patients illustrated in Table 2 showed no significant differences (for gender: p = 0.247 and for genotypes: p = 0.258). Univariate analysis revealed that serum viral loads, bilirubin, albumin, platelet count, AST and ALP levels were significantly different in various fibrosis stages (Table 2).
Diagnosis of Fibrosis Using Already Available AAR, APRI, F-Index, and FIB-4 Serum Indexes
The relationship between the fibrosis stages and four serum indexes: AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 is illustrated in Figure 1 (see also Table 2). There was a significant relationship between fibrosis stages and serum indexes except AAR (p > 0.05). A gradual increase in the level of APRI, FI and FIB-4 indexes was observed in fibrosis stages.
![]()
The AUROCs of the serum non-invasive indexes scores are shown in Table 3. AUROC of FI was higher than APRI (p< 0.05) for differentiating minimal fibrosis from significant fibrosis (Figure 2). To predict cirrhosis, FI showed high AUROC than AAR. Spearman correlation between each serum index score and fibrosis stages was high for F-Index, FIB-4 and APRI, while, AAR showed significantly low 'r' index indicated in Table 3. By using published cut-off values for each index, we analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of each index for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Patients with minimal fibrosis can be identified from advanced/significant or cirrhotic patients using FIB-4, AAR, APRI and F-Index with sensitivity 51%, 67.6%, 19.1% and 100% and specificity 85.4%, 42.8%, 97.7% and 58.4%, respectively. At a cut-off value > 3.25 for FIB-4, > 1.5 for APRI, > 1 for AAR and > 3.3 for F-Index have 59.2%, 34.8%, 42.8% and 38.1% sensitivity and 82.3%, 67.6%, 67.6% and 100% specificity, respectively, to discriminate advanced fibrosis stages from minimal.
![]()
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic curves generated by four serum markers, AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and FI for differentiation between patients in fibrosis stage F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4.
Diagnosis of Fibrosis with Clinic-pathological Features Including Viral Load, Hb Level, Bilirubin, ALT, ALP, AST, Albumin and Platelet Count
Viral load was significant among fibrosis stages. It gradually increased in advanced fibrosis, and then suddenly dropped in cirrhosis. ALT and Hb levels were not significant, while AST levels were noteworthy to differentiate liver fibrosis stages. Meanwhile, only 16 (10.1%) and 21 (13.3%) patients showed normal ALT and AST levels, respectively, independent of fibrosis stage. The discriminative values of the biochemical markers for the prediction of different fibrosis stages were determined by logistic regression analysis. By univariate analysis (p < 0.05, Table 2), viral load, bilirubin, ALP, AST, albumin and platelet count were significantly associated with various fibrosis stages. However, in multivariate analysis, bilirubin, ALP, albumin and platelet count were found to be independently predictive (Table 4). This information related to these biochemical markers can also be helpful in differentiating liver fibrosis stages. Figure 3 shows the box plot of these four markers with liver histological stages. It is clear from Figure 3 and Table 2 that as the fibrosis increased, bilirubin and serum ALP level also increased, while platelet count and albumin level gradually reduced in cirrhosis. It was interesting to note that serum ALP and bilirubin was 2 times and 5 times higher in cirrhotic patients, respectively, than normal limits.
![]()
Figure 3.
Relationship between fibrosis stages and the ALP, bilirubin, serum albumin and fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI). The lines through the middle of the boxes represent the median, while the top and bottom of the boxes are the 25th and 75th percentiles. The error bars represent measurement range (maximum and minimum values).
Based on ROC curve analysis as illustrated in Figure 4, four significant serum markers ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count showed superior diagnostic power with high AUROCs for differentiating various fibrotic stages and cirrhosis as given in Table 5. Our data showed that if these four serum markers ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count are used simultaneously, they have high PPV and NPV for predicting cirrhosis and differentiating no/minimal fibrosis from significant fibrosis.
![]()
Figure 4.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for individual serum markers; ALP, bilirubin, platelet count and serum albumin for the predication of F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4 fibrosis stages.
For the detection of significant cirrhosis, platelet count less than 100 showed 81% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 89% PPV and 97% NPV. For the same outcome, ALP > 240 IU/l had sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 90%, 92%, 60.7% and 97%, respectively. The bilirubin and albumin were also quite sensitive for the presence of cirrhosis. Bilirubin level > 1.5 had a sensitivity 66.6%, specificity 95.5%, PPV 70% and NPV 94%, while albumin < 3.85 g/dl has sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV 71.4%, 93%, 60% and 95%, respectively.
In no/minimal fibrosis, ALP < 120 IU/l showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV 85%, 70%, 68% and 86%, respectively. At cut-off value > 150, platelet count also showed high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (70%) with 71.2% PPV and 98% NPV. Serum bilirubin and albumin also showed same pattern with high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV as shown in Table 5.
Construction of a New Index for the Prediction of Fibrosis Stage
Based on the relationship of the regression coefficients of four-biochemical markers, ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count, we developed a new fibrosis-cirrhosis index for the prediction of HCV disease progression from initial fibrosis stage to end stage cirrhosis.
It can be represented as
![]()
The FCI distribution for the patients in the respective fibrosis stages is represented in Figure 5. The median values for FCI in F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4 patients were 0.085, 0.32 and 1.9, respectively. FCI significantly correlated with the liver fibrosis stages (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, r = 0.818, P< 0.05). The diagnostic values of F1 to differentiate F0-F1 and F4 patients were evaluated using the AUROCs (Figure 6). The AUC for F0-F1 and F4 was 0.932 (CI: 0.895–0.969) and 0.996 (CI: 0.989–1.002), respectively. The cutoff values obtained from the respective ROC curves were < 0.130 and > ≥1.25 in discriminating F0-F1 and F4 patients, respectively. Table 5 illustrates the diagnostic accuracy of FCI. Using a cutoff value of < 0.130, FCI had a sensitivity of 81%, PPV of 82% also with a specificity of 87% and NPV of 82% for the prediction of F0-F1. On the other hand, at a cutoff value of 1.25 or more, FCI had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity and PPV of 100% and 98% NPV for the prediction of cirrhosis (F4).
![]()
Figure 5.
Box plot of fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) for each fibrosis stage. The horizontal line inside each box represents the median, while the top and bottom of boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Vertical lines from the ends of the box encompass the extreme data points.
![]()
Figure 6.
Receiver operating characteristic curves generated by the fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) to discriminate fibrosis stages F0-F1 and F4. FCI showed maximum AUC for prediction of F4 (cirrhosis).
Discussion
Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic cirrhosis are consequences of chronic hepatitis C. The mean infection time to onset of cirrhosis is approximately 30 years, but cirrhosis may occur within a range of 10–50 years.[20] Fibrosis and its extension in hepatic tissue is most common evidence of cirrhosis. Several indexes are available to predict cirrhosis but no method or score is available on exclusive basis to diagnose earlier fibrosis stages.
Genotype 3a is the most common one followed by 1a in Pakistan [,[3,21] and[22] and same was also observed in this study. Almost, 86% patients had genotype 3a while remaining 14% had genotype 1a. A recent study also reported high prevalence of genotype 3 in HCC patients in Pakistan.[23] Patients with none or initial stage (F0-F1) of fibrosis showed a remarkable difference of age with advanced stages (F2 and F3) of fibrosis and cirrhosis. Most patients with age more than 40 years showed severe fibrosis and cirrhosis. These results confirmed the previous studies that patients with mild fibrosis stage were younger than the moderate and severe disease grade and stage is independent of gender.[24–26]
Our results showed positive correlation of ALT with APRI and FI, and negative correlation with AAR and platelet, however, no correlation was established between ALT levels with disease severity and fibrosis stages. Our observation is in agreement with previous reports that serum ALT levels do not accurately predict the presence of hepatic liver damage.[27,28] Several authors reported persistently normal ALT levels (< 42 IU/l) in patients with chronic HCV. Almost, 30% of patients with chronic HCV infection reflect steadily normal serum ALT levels,[29–32] however, in our data only 10% (n = 16) patients showed normal ALT levels.
Our data showed gradual increase in serum ALP and bilirubin levels (Table 2) in fibrosis stages when compared to early infection. Both ALP and bilirubin showed strapping significant correlation with disease progression. These results lead them to an important predictor of disease severity. An increased ALP is usually associated with liver metastasis, extraheptic bile obstruction, intraheptic cholestasis, infiltrative liver disease and hepatitis.[33,34] According to Lee et al, elevated serum ALP levels were common in liver abscess patients.[35] High bilirubin levels are associated with liver metastases and liver tumor involvement leading to hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis by active or non-active HCV or HBV.[36] Limited literature is available on the role of elevated ALP and bilirubin levels in liver fibrosis stages. However, according to Imbert-Bismut et al.,[37] bilirubin may be used as marker of liver injury, while a change in ALP levels greater than 120 U/L can be indicative of advanced disease progression.[12] These findings suggest that serum ALP and bilirubin may be used as serum markers to assess the disease progression and fibrosis stages in chronic HCV patients.
Many studies supported that platelet count alone may be clinically valuable as a non-invasive serum marker for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.[38,39] Platelets not only predict fibrosis but also correlate with fibrotic stages.[40–42] Lackner et al,[43] showed high AUROC of 0.89 for predicting cirrhosis at platelet value < 150 × 109/L and AUROC of 0.71 for non-cirrhotic patients at a cutoff value > 150 × 109/L. Our data is also in accordance with these results as platelet count showed high AUROC (≥ 0.900) to differentiate different liver fibrosis stages as given in Table 5 and Figure 4. In our study, platelet count was significantly low in cirrhotic patients. At a cutoff value of platelet, < 100 × 109/L has an AUROC of 0.990 for prediction of cirrhosis with 81% sensitivity and 98% specificity. Ginnani et al, reported platelet < 130 × 109/L for prediction of cirrhosis in HCV patients with 91.1% sensitivity, 88.3% specificity, PPV 81.2% and NPV 94.7%.[44]
We also examined the ability of AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and F-Index for staging liver fibrosis and to differentiate them from cirrhosis. Giannini et al, reported a high diagnostic accuracy of AAR > 1.16 with 81.3% sensitivity and 55.3% specificity for the prediction of cirrhosis.[44] However, AAR was not able to differentiate among liver fibrosis stages in our sample data. At value of > 1.0, AAR has 43% sensitivity and 70% specificity for differentiating fibrosis from cirrhosis (Table 3). This poor performance of AAR is similar to that reported by Lackner et al.[43]
We observed comparatively high APRI (1.24 ± 0.8) and FIB-4 (1.76 ± 1.35) values in F0-F1 patients. The group F0-F1 contains two subgroups, patients with no fibrosis (F0) and with minimal fibrosis (F1). The mean value of APRI and FIB-4 in F0 was 1.04 and 1.21, and in F1 1.39 and 2.17, respectively (Table 2). It is reported that APRI < 0.42 predict mild fibrosis and APRI > 1.2, significant fibrosis in HCV patients with 90% NPV for absence of fibrosis and 91% PPV for fibrosis presence.[45–47] Our results showed that APRI > 1.5 could predict fibrosis with 55% sensitivity, 67% specificity. Moreover, by using same cutoff value of APRI > 1.5 in a recent study by Macias et al,[48] found that it has 28% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 79% PPV and 55% NPV for predicting significant fibrosis, and for absence of fibrosis APRI < 0.5 has 78%, 44%, 59% and 66% sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, respectively.
FIB-4 was developed by Sterling et al in 2006 for diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. We examined this index only for HCV infected patients. A cutoff value of < 1.45 FIB-4 has a NPV for the exclusion of advanced fibrosis of 90%, while a cutoff value > 3.25 has a PPV for the diagnosis of extended fibrosis of 65%.[49] At a cutoff value of < 1.45, Vallet-Pichard observed a high NPV of 94.7% with a sensitivity of 74.3% to exclude severe fibrosis. Where as, for confirming the presence of advanced fibrosis at cutoff value > 3.25, FIB-4 had a PPV of 82.1% with specificity of 98.2%.[18] Our results are not in agreement with Sterling or Vallet-Pichard, as we observed a low NPV (70%) for excluding significant fibrosis, however, we detected a PPV of 83% with specificity of 45% for the presence of advanced fibrosis at cutoff value > 3.25. Trang et al,[50] proposed new cutoff values of FIB-4 ≤ 1.39 for F0-F1 and ≥2.05 for F2-F4 stage in HCV/HIV co infected patients. At these cutoffs, we observed sensitivity 52%, specificity 76%, PPV 63% and NPV 68% for no/minimal fibrosis and 60%, 63%, 68% and 55% for advanced fibrosis, respectively. Although, we observed low statistical values, our results were in accordance to advance stage prediction. The cut off values proposed by Trang et al better predict fibrosis stages in co infected patients and we applied on only HCV infected patients.
Fibrosis index (FI) showed high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUROC for discriminating different fibrosis stages. Ohta developed this simple index in 2006. At cutoff value < 2.1 FI showed sensitivity and specificity for predicting F0–1 stage 66.8% and 78.8% in initial cohort and 68.5% and 63.6% in validation cohort, respectively.[17] At same cutoff, our data showed 100% sensitivity and 58.4% specificity with AUROC 0.939 for the prediction of none/minimal fibrosis. While for predicting cirrhosis in HCV patients, FI value > 3.30 has sensitivity and specificity 67.7% and 75% in initial cohort, and 70.8% and 81% in validation cohort, respectively. However, at this value we observed 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting cirrhosis (Table 3). We proposed that a new cutoff value of FI > 2.5 can better predict cirrhosis with 95.2% sensitivity and 94% specificity.
The readily available indexes are associated with some limitations like population discrepancy, not able to distinguish all fibrosis stages individually or some primarily developed for co-infected patients. So there is a need to develop a new index that can distinguish minimal fibrosis (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F4) and advanced (F2-F3) from cirrhosis (F4). While considering substantial relationship of routinely applied tests; serum ALP, ALT, AST, Hb level, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count with liver fibrosis stages, we found that four serum markers ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count have high potential to differentiate different fibrosis stages and cirrhosis at given cutoff values (Table 5 and Figure 4). We also observed that combination of these serum markers could better differentiate among fibrosis stages with high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV.
Our newly derived index FCI showed better performance for discriminating between fibrosis stages as compared to AAR, APRI and FI. In initial cohort, the AUROC for predicting F0-F1 stage for FCI was 0.932 when compared to recently used non-invasive serum markers like AAR (AUROC = 0.570),[15] APRI (AUROC = 0.880),[16] FI (AUROC = 0.741),[17] FIB-4 (AUROC = 0.793),[18] Forn's index (AUROC = 0.860),[51] and Fibrotest (AUROC = 0.870).[52] Moreover, FCI (AUROC = 0.996) showed better performance for predicting cirrhosis than above mentioned serum indexes. Although in our study, platelet count showed high AUROC to predict fibrosis stages, systematic literature reviews consistently shown that panel of fibrosis markers are more accurate than single marker. Combination of two or more serum markers in a mathematical algorithm provide better chance of predicting phase of disease progression instead of individual one.[37,53–57] This analysis showed that FCI has tendency to reflect respective fibrosis stages from no/minimal to cirrhosis with great accuracy (Table 5, Figure 5 and 6). However, several studies are needed to verify these results. Secondly, because of poverty and fear of biopsy, we are not yet able to get enough patient data for verification of our FCI results in new cohort.
Conclusions
For Pakistani population the mostly used markers were failed to predict fibrosis stages in patients with HCV with accuracy. This study concluded that a simple index (FCI) containing ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count may accurately classify different fibrosis stages from none to cirrhosis. Future studies are required to assess the applicability of this fibrosis-cirrhosis index within different populations and in patients with HBV or other fatty liver diseases.
References
1.Giannini C, Brechot C: Hepatitis C virus biology. J Virology 2003, 10:S27–S38.
2.Alter MJ: Epidemiology of hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997, 26:62S-65S.
3.Raja NS, Janjua KA: Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Pakistan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2008, 41:4–8.
4.Idrees M, Riazuddin S: Frequency distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in different geographical regions of Pakistan and their possible routes of transmission. BMC Infect Dis 2008, 8:69.
5.EL-Serag HB: Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology 2002, 36:S74–S83.
6.Moriya K, Fujie H, Shintani Y, Yotsuyanagi H, Tsutsumi T, Ishibashi K, Matsuura Y, Kimura S, Miyamura T, Kpike K: The Core protein of hepatitis C virus induces hepatocellular carcinoma in transgenic mice. Nat Med 1998, 4:1065–1077.
7.Adinolfi LE, Gambardella M, Andreana A, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Ruggiero G: Steatosis accelerates the progression of liver damage of chronic hepatitis C patients and correlates with specific HCV genotype and visceral obesity. Hepatology 2001, 33:1358–1364.
8.National Institute of health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. Hepatology 2002, 36:973–977.
9.Silva RG Jr, Fakhouri R, Nascimento TV, Santos IM, Barbosa LM: Aspartate aminotransferase-to-Platelet ration index for fibrosis and cirrhosis prediction in chronic hepatitis C patients. Braz J Infect Dis 2008, 12:15–19.
10.Pratt DS, Kaplan MM: Evaluation of abnormal liver-enzyme results in asymptomatic patients. N Eng J Med 2000, 342:1266–1271.
11.Parise ER, Oliveira AC, Figueiredo-Mendes C, Lanzoni V, Martins J, Nader H, Ferraz ML: Noninvasive serum markers in the diagnosis of structural liver damage in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int 2006, 26:1095–1099.
12.Azzari C, Resti M, Moriondo M, Ferrari R, Lionetti P, Vierucci A: Vertical transmission of HCV is related to maternal peripheral blood mononucleat cell infection. Blood 2000, 96:2045–2048.
13.Kowala-Piaskowska A, Mozer-Lisewska I, Figlerowicz M, Sluzewski W: Influence of the presence of HCV-RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on the clinical course of chronic hepatitis C in children. Eur J Epidemiol 2007, 22:343–348.
14.Castera L, Pinzani M: Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: are we ready. Lancet 2010, 375:1419–1420.
15.Hoofnagle JH, Williams AL: Ratio of serum aspartate to alanine aminotransferase in chronic hepatitis: relationship to cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1988, 95:734–739.
16.Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS: A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003, 38:518–526.
17.Ohta T, Sakaguchi K, Fujiwara A, Fujioka S, Iwasaki Y, makino Y, Araki Y, Shiratori Y: Simple surrogate index of the fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis C patients using platelet count and serum albumin level. Acta Med Okayama 2006, 60:77–84.
18.Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B, Verkarre V, Nalpas A, Dhalluin-Venier V, Fontaine H, Pol S: FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and FibroTest. Hepatology 2007, 46:32–36.
19.The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group: Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1994, 20:15–20.
20.Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P: Natural history of liver history of liver fibrosis progression in Patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet 1997, 349:825–832.
21.Ahmad W, Ijaz B, Javed FT, Jahan S, Shahid I, Khan FM, Hassan S: HCV genotype distribution and possible transmission risks in Lahore, Pakistan. World J Gastroenterology 2010, 16:4321–4328.
22.Kobayashi M, Tanaka E, Sodeyama T, Urushihara A, Matsumoto A, Kiyosawa K: The natural course of chronic hepatitis C: a comparison between patients with genotypes 1 and 2 hepatitis C viruses. Hepatology 1996, 23:695–699.
23.Idrees M, Rafique S, Irshad-ur-rehman , Akbar H, Yousaf MZ, Butt S, Awan Z, Manzoor S, akram M, Aftab M, Khubaib B, Riazuddin S: Hepatitis C genotype 3a infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: Pakistan experience. World J Gasteroenterol 2009, 15:5080–5085.
24.Mendes SCL, Nita EM, Ono-Nita KS, Mello SE, Silva CL, Alves VA, Carriho FJ: Prognostic factors for progression of liver structural lesions in chronic hepatitis C patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008, 14:2522–2528.
25.Tassopoulos NC, Papatheodoridis GV, Katsoulidou A, Delladetsima JK, Sypsa V, Touloumi G, Nikandros M, Hatzakis A: Factors associated with severity and disease progression in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatogastroenterology 1998, 45:1678–1683.
26.Ramalho F, Costa A, Pires A, Cabrita P, Sereojo F, Correia AP, Fatela N, Cloria H, Lopes J, Pinto HC, Marinho R, Raimundo M, Velosa J, Batista A, de Moura MC: Correlation of genotypes and route of transmission with histologic activity and disease stage in chronic hepatitis C. Dig Dis Sci 2000, 45:182–187.
27.Puoti C, Magrini A, Stati T, Rigato P, Montagnese F, Rossi P, Aldegheri L, Resta S: Clinical, histological, and virological features of hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal or abnormal alanine transaminase levels. Hepatology 1997, 26:1393–1398.
28.Haber MM, West AB, Haber AD, Reuben A: Relationship of aminotransferases to liver histological status in chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 1995, 90:1250–1257.
29.Bacon BR: Treatment of patients with hepatitis C and normal serum aminotransferase levels. Hepatology 2002, 32:634–643.
30.Moatter T, Hussainy AS, Hamid S, Ahmad Z, Siddiqui S: Comparative analysis of viral titers and histologic features of Pakistani patients infected with hepatitis C virus type 3. Int J Infect Dis 2002, 6:272–276.
31.Shafique M, Ahmad N, Awan FR, Mustafa T, Ullah M, Qureshi JA: Investigating the concurrent presence of HCV in serum, oral fluid and urine samples from chronic HCV patients in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Arch Virol 2009, 154:1523–1527.
32.Mastoi AA, Devrajani BR, Shah SZA, Rohopoto Q, Memon SA, Baloch M, Qureshi GA, Sami W: Metabolic investigations in patients with hepatitis B and C. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16:603–607.
33.Viroj W: High serum alkaline phosphatase levels, a study in 181 Thai adult hospitalized patients. BMC Family Practice 2001, 2:2.
34.Saif MW, Alexander D, Wicox CM: Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Level as Prognostic Tool in Colorectal Cancer: A study of 105 patients. J Appl Res 2005, 5:88–95.
35.Lee GH, Benner D, Regidor DL, Kalatar-Zadeh K: Impact of kidney bone disease and its management on survival of patients on dialysis. J Ren Nutr 2007, 17:38–44.
36.Raymond E, Boige V, Faivre S, Sanderink G, Rixe O, Vernillet L, Jacques C, Gatineau M, Ducreux M, Armand JP: Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of Irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:4303–4312.
37.Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, Charlotte F, Benhamou Y, Poynard T: Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet 2001, 357:1069–1075.
38.Myres RP, De Torres M, Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Poynard T, MULTIVIRC Group: Biochemical markers of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a comparison with prothrombin time, platelet count, and age-platelet index. Dig Dis Sci 2003, 48:271–278.
39.Ghany MG, Lok AS, Everhart JE, Everson GT, Lee WM, Cuto TM, Wright EC, Stoddard AM, Sterling RK, Di Bisceglie AM, Bonkovsky HL, Morishima C, Morgan TR, Dienstag JL, HALT-C Trial Group: Predicting clinical and histologic outcomes based on standard laboratory tests in advanced chronic hepatitis C. Gasteroenterology 2010, 138:136–146.
40.Murawaki Y, Koda M, Okamoto K, Mimura K, Kawasaki H: Diagnostic value of serum type IV collagen test in comparison with platelet count for predicting the fibrotic stage in patients with chronic hepatitis. J Gastroentrol Hepatol 2001, 16:777–781.
41.Pohl A, Behling C, Oliver D, Kilani M, Monson P, Hassanein T: Serum aminotransferase levels and platelet counts as predictors of degree of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:3053–3055.
42.Fusegawa H, Shiraishi K, Ogasawara F, Shimizu M, Haruki Y, Miyachi H, Matsuzaki S, Ando Y: Platelet activation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2002, 27:101–106.
43.Lackner C, Struber G, Liegl B, Leibl S, Ofner P, Bankuti C, Bauer B, Stauber RE: Comparison and validation of simple noninvasive tests for prediction of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2005, 41:1376–1382.
44.Giannini E, Risso D, Botta F, Chiarbonello B, Fasoli A, Malfatti F, Romagnoli P, testa E, Ceppa P, Testa R: Validity and clinical utility of the aspartate aminotransferase-alanine aminotransferase ration in assessing disease severity and prognosis in patients with hepatitis C virus related chronic liver disease. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:218–224.
45.Shaikh S, Memon MS, Ghani H, Baloch GH, Jaffery M, Shaikh K: Validation of Three Non-Invasive Markers in Assessing the Severity of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C. JCPSP 2009, 19:478–482.
46.Khan DA, Fatima-Tuz-Zuhra , Khan FA, Mubarak A: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of apri for prediction of fibrosis in hepatitis c patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008, 20:122–126.
47.Snyder N, Gajula L, Xiao SY, Grady J, Luxon B, Lau DT, Soloway R, Petersen J: APRI: an easy and validated predictor of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006, 40:535–542.
48.Macias J, Gonzalez J, Ortega E, Tural C, Cabrero E, Burgos A, Pineda JA, GRAFIHCO Study Team: Use of simple noninvasive biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfection in routine clinical practice. HIV Med 2010, 11:439–447.
49.Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, Sulkowski SM, Torriani FJ, Dieterich DT, Thomas DL, Messinger D, Nelson M, APRICOT Clinical Investigators: Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology 2006, 43:1317–1325.
50.Trang T, Petersen JR, Snyder N: Non-invasive markers of hepatic fibrosis in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV: Comparison of the APRI and FIB-4 index. Clinica Chimica Acta 2008, 397:51–54.
51.Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Liovet JM, Aponte J, Quinto L, Marteniz-Bauer E, Bruguera M, Sanchez-Tapias JM, Rodes J: Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology 2003, 36:986–992.
52.Myers RP, Ratziu V, Imbert-Bismut F, Charlotte F, Poynard T, MULTIVIRIC Group: Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis: a comparison with histological features in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gasteroenterol 2002, 97:2419–2425.
53.Guha IN, Parkes J, Roderick PR, Harris S, Rosenberg WM: Non-invasive markers associated with liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 2. GUT 2006, 55:1650–1660.
54.Parkes J, Guha IN, Roderick P, Rosenberg W: Performance of serum marker panels for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatology 2006, 44:462–474.
55.Pinzani M: The ELF panel: a new crystal ball in hepatology? Gut 2010, 59:1165–1167.
56.Wang M, Long RE, Comunale MA, Junaidi O, Marrero J, Di Bisceglie AM, Block TM, Mehta AS: Novel Fucosylated Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:1914–1921.
57.Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, Hubscher S, Roskams T, Pinzani M, Arthur MJ: European Liver Fibrosis Group: Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology 2004, 127(6):1704–1713.
Source
Waqar Ahmad; Bushra Ijaz; Fouzia T Javed; Sana Gull; Humera Kausar; Muhammad T Sarwar; Sultan Asad; Imran Shahid; Aleena Sumrin; Saba Khaliq; Shah Jahan; Asim Pervaiz; Sajida Hassan
Posted: 06/24/2011; BMC Gastroenterology. 2011;11 © 2011 BioMed Central, Ltd.
Abstract and Introduction
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis C can lead to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. We compared readily available non-invasive fibrosis indexes for the fibrosis progression discrimination to find a better combination of existing non-invasive markers.
Methods: We studied 157 HCV infected patients who underwent liver biopsy. In order to differentiate HCV fibrosis progression, readily available AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 serum indexes were tested in the patients. We derived a new fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) comprised of ALP, bilirubin, serum albumin and platelet count. FCI = [(ALP × Bilirubin)/(Albumin × Platelet count)].
Results: Already established serum indexes AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 were able to stage liver fibrosis with correlation coefficient indexes 0.130, 0.444, 0.578 and 0.494, respectively. Our new fibrosis cirrhosis index FCI significantly correlated with the histological fibrosis stages F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4 (r = 0.818, p < 0.05) with AUROCs 0.932 and 0.996, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of FCI at a cutoff value < 0.130 for predicting fibrosis stage F0-F1 was 81% and 82%, respectively with AUROC 0.932. Corresponding value of FCI at a cutoff value ≥1.25 for the prediction of cirrhosis was 86% and 100%.
Conclusions: The fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) accurately predicted fibrosis stages in HCV infected patients and seems more efficient than frequently used serum indexes.
Background
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is considered as a major basis of liver associated diseases throughout the world. More than 350 million people (3% of the world's populations)[1,2] and almost 10 million people in Pakistan are infected with HCV.[3] The genotypes 3a, 3b, 1a and 4a are most prevalent in Pakistan.[4] It is predicted that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops in 1–4% of HCV infected patients in the first five years following the onset of cirrhosis, but cirrhosis may occur with in the range of 10–50 years.[5] In HCV infected patients, liver biopsy is considered essential to stage liver fibrosis. Procedure of liver biopsy is invasive, expensive and not suitable for all patients. Patients can have severe side effects like pain andharsh complications also leading to death [[1,3] and.[5]] Many previous studies reported that host factors reflect fibrosis development leading to HCC,[6,7] so these can be used as non-invasive means to overcome the weaknesses arise from biopsy procedures. Chronic hepatitis C is known as hepatic lesions associated with increased levels of aminotransferases more than 6 months. Moreover, treatment with interferon therapy should be based on the liver fibrosis stage.[8] Various authors tried to find accurate non-invasive markers and develop correlations between the serum aminotransferases levels, hyluronic acid level, collagen level, platelet count and HCV viral titer with fibrosis stages but no clear conclusions were formed. Several scoring systems like AST to ALT ratio (AAR), AST-Platelet ratio (APRI), Fibrotest (FT), Fibrosis Index (FI) and FIB-4 with different thresholds to predict presence or absence of fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients infected with HCV had been proposed. However, mild fibrosis (F0) to end stage cirrhosis cannot be predicted accurately using a single system.[9–18]
In this study, we compared and evaluated diagnostic accuracy of the readily available non-invasive serum indexes including AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 to find accurate and reliable non-invasive markers for evaluating fibrosis progression. We also developed a new non-invasive serum marker index for this purpose by evaluating several clinic-pathological features. A marker with high predictive values would eliminate the need of liver biopsy that also reduces the cost and risks associated to it.
Methods
Patients
This study was conducted at the Department of Pathology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore; Mayo Hospital, Lahore and Liver Centre, Faisalabad in collaboration with Applied and Functional Genomics Lab, National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. HCV RNA-positive patients were identified among HCV antibody (anti-HCV) positive patients. Later, the study plan was discussed with patients and the biopsy was taken only from those patients who were willing for this procedure. The purpose of this study was to design a new Index so that disease progression can be evaluated non-invasively and future need of biopsy can be eliminated. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. This analytical study was carried out from March 2008 to September 2010.
Patients who received a previous course of INF or immunosuppressive therapy or who had clinical evidence of HBV or HIV and any type of liver cancer were excluded from the study. Patients who refused to have a liver biopsy or for whom it was contraindicated, i.e., because of a low platelet count, prolonged prothrombin time or decompensated cirrhosis were also excluded from the study. The liver biopsy procedure, its advantages and possible adverse effects were explained to the patients. Informed consent were obtained from patients contained information about demographic data, possible transmission route of HCV infection, clinical, virological and biochemical data. This study included 157 patients (M/F 114/43; mean age 38.1 ± 10.2, age range 19–58 years). The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB, CEMB). The Federal-wide Assurance document (ID: FWA00001758) was approved by the local office for Human Research Protection.
Histological Evaluation of Biopsy Samples
The histological evaluation of paraffin-embedded liver specimens was carried out at the Pathology Department, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, according to METAVIR scoring system.[19] Liver biopsies were evaluated by two independent pathologists without prior information to patient's history. Histological staging based on the degree of fibrosis have five degrees of fibrosis: as F0 (no fibrosis), F1 (mild fibrosis without septa), F2 (moderate fibrosis with few septa), F3 (severe fibrosis with numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 (cirrhosis). We further grouped fibrosis stages as F0-F1 (minimal fibrosis), F2-F3 (advanced fibrosis), F4 (cirrhosis) and F2-F4 (significant fibrosis).
HCV RNA Detection and Quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted from 140 μl serum samples using QIAamp viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen USA cat # 52906) according to the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus (MmLV) reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA). First round and nested PCRs were carried out with Taq Polymerase (Fermentas USA) and analyzed on 2% agarose gel. Qiagen HCV quantitative kit was used to perform HCV RNA quantification with 10 ul of the extracted RNA on Roche Real Time PCR using fluorescent probes to detect amplification after each replicating cycle.
HCV Genotyping
HCV genotyping was carried out using Invader HCV genotyping assay (Third wave technology USA). Briefly, about 100 ng of the HCV RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using 200U of MmLV (Invitrogen, USA). From the amplified product, 2 μl was taken and the genotyping assay was performed for 12 different HCV types.
Comparison of Already Available Non-invasive Serum Biomarkers to Evaluate Patient's Liver Biopsy Data
Serum samples and liver specimens collected from each patient were stored at -70°C for further biochemical analysis. The routine liver function tests (LFTs), Hb, serum albumin and direct bilirubin levels were anticipated for each patient. All biochemical tests and their scores were made without knowledge of liver biopsy results and all patients were evaluated for AAR, APRI, Fibrosis Index (FI) and FIB-4 indexes.
The following formulas were used to review the predicted scores with the particular cut-off values as mentioned previously.
Statistical Analysis
The data was analyzed using statistical package SPSS version 16 for windows. A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data was presented as mean values or no. of patients. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the significant association between continuous variables and liver fibrosis stages. The student t-test was used to compare arithmetic means and parameters while Chi-square (X2) test was used to compare categorical data, correlation with Fisher's exact test was used when appropriate. Patients were divided into three main groups as, patients with no or minimal fibrosis (F0-F1), patients with significant fibrosis (F2-F3) and patients with clinically significant cirrhosis (F4). The independently distinguished values of biochemical markers and AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and FI indexes for the prediction of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were evaluated using univariate and multiple regression analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUROCs) was used to compare and deduce the diagnostic accuracies of the selected bio-markers.
Results
Patient's Data
The demographic and clinical outcomes of the 157 HCV infected patients are briefly explained in Table 1. The evaluation of chronic HCV activity (inflammatory grade) showed mild chronic hepatitis in 51 patients, moderate chronic hepatitis in 67 patients and severe chronic hepatitis in 39 patients. The determination of liver fibrosis showed stage F0 in 29, F1 in 39, 34 patients in F2 and F3 stage each and 21 patients in F4 or advanced fibrosis leading to cirrhosis. Our data showed the presence of genotype 1a in 22 and 3a in 135 patients, 95 patients were < 40 years of age, while 62 were > 40 years of age.
Relationship Between Clinical Findings and Fibrosis
Liver fibrosis stages were statistically significant between age groups (p< 0.05). Mild and moderate fibrosis was diagnosed mostly in younger patients while more advanced stages were observed in patients over 40 years old. Patients with F0 fibrosis were too young as compared to those who developed moderate or severe fibrosis leading to cirrhosis (Mean age ± SD, 25.9 ± 2.4 years). The distribution of liver fibrosis stages with regard to gender and genotypes of patients illustrated in Table 2 showed no significant differences (for gender: p = 0.247 and for genotypes: p = 0.258). Univariate analysis revealed that serum viral loads, bilirubin, albumin, platelet count, AST and ALP levels were significantly different in various fibrosis stages (Table 2).
Diagnosis of Fibrosis Using Already Available AAR, APRI, F-Index, and FIB-4 Serum Indexes
The relationship between the fibrosis stages and four serum indexes: AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 is illustrated in Figure 1 (see also Table 2). There was a significant relationship between fibrosis stages and serum indexes except AAR (p > 0.05). A gradual increase in the level of APRI, FI and FIB-4 indexes was observed in fibrosis stages.
Figure 1.
Box plots of the AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and FI for different fibrosis stages. The horizontal line inside each box represents the median, while the top and bottom of boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Vertical lines from the ends of the box encompass the extreme data points.
The AUROCs of the serum non-invasive indexes scores are shown in Table 3. AUROC of FI was higher than APRI (p< 0.05) for differentiating minimal fibrosis from significant fibrosis (Figure 2). To predict cirrhosis, FI showed high AUROC than AAR. Spearman correlation between each serum index score and fibrosis stages was high for F-Index, FIB-4 and APRI, while, AAR showed significantly low 'r' index indicated in Table 3. By using published cut-off values for each index, we analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of each index for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Patients with minimal fibrosis can be identified from advanced/significant or cirrhotic patients using FIB-4, AAR, APRI and F-Index with sensitivity 51%, 67.6%, 19.1% and 100% and specificity 85.4%, 42.8%, 97.7% and 58.4%, respectively. At a cut-off value > 3.25 for FIB-4, > 1.5 for APRI, > 1 for AAR and > 3.3 for F-Index have 59.2%, 34.8%, 42.8% and 38.1% sensitivity and 82.3%, 67.6%, 67.6% and 100% specificity, respectively, to discriminate advanced fibrosis stages from minimal.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic curves generated by four serum markers, AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and FI for differentiation between patients in fibrosis stage F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4.
Diagnosis of Fibrosis with Clinic-pathological Features Including Viral Load, Hb Level, Bilirubin, ALT, ALP, AST, Albumin and Platelet Count
Viral load was significant among fibrosis stages. It gradually increased in advanced fibrosis, and then suddenly dropped in cirrhosis. ALT and Hb levels were not significant, while AST levels were noteworthy to differentiate liver fibrosis stages. Meanwhile, only 16 (10.1%) and 21 (13.3%) patients showed normal ALT and AST levels, respectively, independent of fibrosis stage. The discriminative values of the biochemical markers for the prediction of different fibrosis stages were determined by logistic regression analysis. By univariate analysis (p < 0.05, Table 2), viral load, bilirubin, ALP, AST, albumin and platelet count were significantly associated with various fibrosis stages. However, in multivariate analysis, bilirubin, ALP, albumin and platelet count were found to be independently predictive (Table 4). This information related to these biochemical markers can also be helpful in differentiating liver fibrosis stages. Figure 3 shows the box plot of these four markers with liver histological stages. It is clear from Figure 3 and Table 2 that as the fibrosis increased, bilirubin and serum ALP level also increased, while platelet count and albumin level gradually reduced in cirrhosis. It was interesting to note that serum ALP and bilirubin was 2 times and 5 times higher in cirrhotic patients, respectively, than normal limits.
Figure 3.
Relationship between fibrosis stages and the ALP, bilirubin, serum albumin and fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI). The lines through the middle of the boxes represent the median, while the top and bottom of the boxes are the 25th and 75th percentiles. The error bars represent measurement range (maximum and minimum values).
Based on ROC curve analysis as illustrated in Figure 4, four significant serum markers ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count showed superior diagnostic power with high AUROCs for differentiating various fibrotic stages and cirrhosis as given in Table 5. Our data showed that if these four serum markers ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count are used simultaneously, they have high PPV and NPV for predicting cirrhosis and differentiating no/minimal fibrosis from significant fibrosis.
Figure 4.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for individual serum markers; ALP, bilirubin, platelet count and serum albumin for the predication of F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4 fibrosis stages.
For the detection of significant cirrhosis, platelet count less than 100 showed 81% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 89% PPV and 97% NPV. For the same outcome, ALP > 240 IU/l had sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 90%, 92%, 60.7% and 97%, respectively. The bilirubin and albumin were also quite sensitive for the presence of cirrhosis. Bilirubin level > 1.5 had a sensitivity 66.6%, specificity 95.5%, PPV 70% and NPV 94%, while albumin < 3.85 g/dl has sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV 71.4%, 93%, 60% and 95%, respectively.
In no/minimal fibrosis, ALP < 120 IU/l showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV 85%, 70%, 68% and 86%, respectively. At cut-off value > 150, platelet count also showed high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (70%) with 71.2% PPV and 98% NPV. Serum bilirubin and albumin also showed same pattern with high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV as shown in Table 5.
Construction of a New Index for the Prediction of Fibrosis Stage
Based on the relationship of the regression coefficients of four-biochemical markers, ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count, we developed a new fibrosis-cirrhosis index for the prediction of HCV disease progression from initial fibrosis stage to end stage cirrhosis.
It can be represented as
Box plot of fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) for each fibrosis stage. The horizontal line inside each box represents the median, while the top and bottom of boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Vertical lines from the ends of the box encompass the extreme data points.
Receiver operating characteristic curves generated by the fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) to discriminate fibrosis stages F0-F1 and F4. FCI showed maximum AUC for prediction of F4 (cirrhosis).
Discussion
Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic cirrhosis are consequences of chronic hepatitis C. The mean infection time to onset of cirrhosis is approximately 30 years, but cirrhosis may occur within a range of 10–50 years.[20] Fibrosis and its extension in hepatic tissue is most common evidence of cirrhosis. Several indexes are available to predict cirrhosis but no method or score is available on exclusive basis to diagnose earlier fibrosis stages.
Genotype 3a is the most common one followed by 1a in Pakistan [,[3,21] and[22] and same was also observed in this study. Almost, 86% patients had genotype 3a while remaining 14% had genotype 1a. A recent study also reported high prevalence of genotype 3 in HCC patients in Pakistan.[23] Patients with none or initial stage (F0-F1) of fibrosis showed a remarkable difference of age with advanced stages (F2 and F3) of fibrosis and cirrhosis. Most patients with age more than 40 years showed severe fibrosis and cirrhosis. These results confirmed the previous studies that patients with mild fibrosis stage were younger than the moderate and severe disease grade and stage is independent of gender.[24–26]
Our results showed positive correlation of ALT with APRI and FI, and negative correlation with AAR and platelet, however, no correlation was established between ALT levels with disease severity and fibrosis stages. Our observation is in agreement with previous reports that serum ALT levels do not accurately predict the presence of hepatic liver damage.[27,28] Several authors reported persistently normal ALT levels (< 42 IU/l) in patients with chronic HCV. Almost, 30% of patients with chronic HCV infection reflect steadily normal serum ALT levels,[29–32] however, in our data only 10% (n = 16) patients showed normal ALT levels.
Our data showed gradual increase in serum ALP and bilirubin levels (Table 2) in fibrosis stages when compared to early infection. Both ALP and bilirubin showed strapping significant correlation with disease progression. These results lead them to an important predictor of disease severity. An increased ALP is usually associated with liver metastasis, extraheptic bile obstruction, intraheptic cholestasis, infiltrative liver disease and hepatitis.[33,34] According to Lee et al, elevated serum ALP levels were common in liver abscess patients.[35] High bilirubin levels are associated with liver metastases and liver tumor involvement leading to hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis by active or non-active HCV or HBV.[36] Limited literature is available on the role of elevated ALP and bilirubin levels in liver fibrosis stages. However, according to Imbert-Bismut et al.,[37] bilirubin may be used as marker of liver injury, while a change in ALP levels greater than 120 U/L can be indicative of advanced disease progression.[12] These findings suggest that serum ALP and bilirubin may be used as serum markers to assess the disease progression and fibrosis stages in chronic HCV patients.
Many studies supported that platelet count alone may be clinically valuable as a non-invasive serum marker for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.[38,39] Platelets not only predict fibrosis but also correlate with fibrotic stages.[40–42] Lackner et al,[43] showed high AUROC of 0.89 for predicting cirrhosis at platelet value < 150 × 109/L and AUROC of 0.71 for non-cirrhotic patients at a cutoff value > 150 × 109/L. Our data is also in accordance with these results as platelet count showed high AUROC (≥ 0.900) to differentiate different liver fibrosis stages as given in Table 5 and Figure 4. In our study, platelet count was significantly low in cirrhotic patients. At a cutoff value of platelet, < 100 × 109/L has an AUROC of 0.990 for prediction of cirrhosis with 81% sensitivity and 98% specificity. Ginnani et al, reported platelet < 130 × 109/L for prediction of cirrhosis in HCV patients with 91.1% sensitivity, 88.3% specificity, PPV 81.2% and NPV 94.7%.[44]
We also examined the ability of AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and F-Index for staging liver fibrosis and to differentiate them from cirrhosis. Giannini et al, reported a high diagnostic accuracy of AAR > 1.16 with 81.3% sensitivity and 55.3% specificity for the prediction of cirrhosis.[44] However, AAR was not able to differentiate among liver fibrosis stages in our sample data. At value of > 1.0, AAR has 43% sensitivity and 70% specificity for differentiating fibrosis from cirrhosis (Table 3). This poor performance of AAR is similar to that reported by Lackner et al.[43]
We observed comparatively high APRI (1.24 ± 0.8) and FIB-4 (1.76 ± 1.35) values in F0-F1 patients. The group F0-F1 contains two subgroups, patients with no fibrosis (F0) and with minimal fibrosis (F1). The mean value of APRI and FIB-4 in F0 was 1.04 and 1.21, and in F1 1.39 and 2.17, respectively (Table 2). It is reported that APRI < 0.42 predict mild fibrosis and APRI > 1.2, significant fibrosis in HCV patients with 90% NPV for absence of fibrosis and 91% PPV for fibrosis presence.[45–47] Our results showed that APRI > 1.5 could predict fibrosis with 55% sensitivity, 67% specificity. Moreover, by using same cutoff value of APRI > 1.5 in a recent study by Macias et al,[48] found that it has 28% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 79% PPV and 55% NPV for predicting significant fibrosis, and for absence of fibrosis APRI < 0.5 has 78%, 44%, 59% and 66% sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, respectively.
FIB-4 was developed by Sterling et al in 2006 for diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. We examined this index only for HCV infected patients. A cutoff value of < 1.45 FIB-4 has a NPV for the exclusion of advanced fibrosis of 90%, while a cutoff value > 3.25 has a PPV for the diagnosis of extended fibrosis of 65%.[49] At a cutoff value of < 1.45, Vallet-Pichard observed a high NPV of 94.7% with a sensitivity of 74.3% to exclude severe fibrosis. Where as, for confirming the presence of advanced fibrosis at cutoff value > 3.25, FIB-4 had a PPV of 82.1% with specificity of 98.2%.[18] Our results are not in agreement with Sterling or Vallet-Pichard, as we observed a low NPV (70%) for excluding significant fibrosis, however, we detected a PPV of 83% with specificity of 45% for the presence of advanced fibrosis at cutoff value > 3.25. Trang et al,[50] proposed new cutoff values of FIB-4 ≤ 1.39 for F0-F1 and ≥2.05 for F2-F4 stage in HCV/HIV co infected patients. At these cutoffs, we observed sensitivity 52%, specificity 76%, PPV 63% and NPV 68% for no/minimal fibrosis and 60%, 63%, 68% and 55% for advanced fibrosis, respectively. Although, we observed low statistical values, our results were in accordance to advance stage prediction. The cut off values proposed by Trang et al better predict fibrosis stages in co infected patients and we applied on only HCV infected patients.
Fibrosis index (FI) showed high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUROC for discriminating different fibrosis stages. Ohta developed this simple index in 2006. At cutoff value < 2.1 FI showed sensitivity and specificity for predicting F0–1 stage 66.8% and 78.8% in initial cohort and 68.5% and 63.6% in validation cohort, respectively.[17] At same cutoff, our data showed 100% sensitivity and 58.4% specificity with AUROC 0.939 for the prediction of none/minimal fibrosis. While for predicting cirrhosis in HCV patients, FI value > 3.30 has sensitivity and specificity 67.7% and 75% in initial cohort, and 70.8% and 81% in validation cohort, respectively. However, at this value we observed 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting cirrhosis (Table 3). We proposed that a new cutoff value of FI > 2.5 can better predict cirrhosis with 95.2% sensitivity and 94% specificity.
The readily available indexes are associated with some limitations like population discrepancy, not able to distinguish all fibrosis stages individually or some primarily developed for co-infected patients. So there is a need to develop a new index that can distinguish minimal fibrosis (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F4) and advanced (F2-F3) from cirrhosis (F4). While considering substantial relationship of routinely applied tests; serum ALP, ALT, AST, Hb level, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count with liver fibrosis stages, we found that four serum markers ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count have high potential to differentiate different fibrosis stages and cirrhosis at given cutoff values (Table 5 and Figure 4). We also observed that combination of these serum markers could better differentiate among fibrosis stages with high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV.
Our newly derived index FCI showed better performance for discriminating between fibrosis stages as compared to AAR, APRI and FI. In initial cohort, the AUROC for predicting F0-F1 stage for FCI was 0.932 when compared to recently used non-invasive serum markers like AAR (AUROC = 0.570),[15] APRI (AUROC = 0.880),[16] FI (AUROC = 0.741),[17] FIB-4 (AUROC = 0.793),[18] Forn's index (AUROC = 0.860),[51] and Fibrotest (AUROC = 0.870).[52] Moreover, FCI (AUROC = 0.996) showed better performance for predicting cirrhosis than above mentioned serum indexes. Although in our study, platelet count showed high AUROC to predict fibrosis stages, systematic literature reviews consistently shown that panel of fibrosis markers are more accurate than single marker. Combination of two or more serum markers in a mathematical algorithm provide better chance of predicting phase of disease progression instead of individual one.[37,53–57] This analysis showed that FCI has tendency to reflect respective fibrosis stages from no/minimal to cirrhosis with great accuracy (Table 5, Figure 5 and 6). However, several studies are needed to verify these results. Secondly, because of poverty and fear of biopsy, we are not yet able to get enough patient data for verification of our FCI results in new cohort.
Conclusions
For Pakistani population the mostly used markers were failed to predict fibrosis stages in patients with HCV with accuracy. This study concluded that a simple index (FCI) containing ALP, bilirubin, albumin and platelet count may accurately classify different fibrosis stages from none to cirrhosis. Future studies are required to assess the applicability of this fibrosis-cirrhosis index within different populations and in patients with HBV or other fatty liver diseases.
References
1.Giannini C, Brechot C: Hepatitis C virus biology. J Virology 2003, 10:S27–S38.
2.Alter MJ: Epidemiology of hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997, 26:62S-65S.
3.Raja NS, Janjua KA: Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Pakistan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2008, 41:4–8.
4.Idrees M, Riazuddin S: Frequency distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in different geographical regions of Pakistan and their possible routes of transmission. BMC Infect Dis 2008, 8:69.
5.EL-Serag HB: Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology 2002, 36:S74–S83.
6.Moriya K, Fujie H, Shintani Y, Yotsuyanagi H, Tsutsumi T, Ishibashi K, Matsuura Y, Kimura S, Miyamura T, Kpike K: The Core protein of hepatitis C virus induces hepatocellular carcinoma in transgenic mice. Nat Med 1998, 4:1065–1077.
7.Adinolfi LE, Gambardella M, Andreana A, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Ruggiero G: Steatosis accelerates the progression of liver damage of chronic hepatitis C patients and correlates with specific HCV genotype and visceral obesity. Hepatology 2001, 33:1358–1364.
8.National Institute of health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. Hepatology 2002, 36:973–977.
9.Silva RG Jr, Fakhouri R, Nascimento TV, Santos IM, Barbosa LM: Aspartate aminotransferase-to-Platelet ration index for fibrosis and cirrhosis prediction in chronic hepatitis C patients. Braz J Infect Dis 2008, 12:15–19.
10.Pratt DS, Kaplan MM: Evaluation of abnormal liver-enzyme results in asymptomatic patients. N Eng J Med 2000, 342:1266–1271.
11.Parise ER, Oliveira AC, Figueiredo-Mendes C, Lanzoni V, Martins J, Nader H, Ferraz ML: Noninvasive serum markers in the diagnosis of structural liver damage in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int 2006, 26:1095–1099.
12.Azzari C, Resti M, Moriondo M, Ferrari R, Lionetti P, Vierucci A: Vertical transmission of HCV is related to maternal peripheral blood mononucleat cell infection. Blood 2000, 96:2045–2048.
13.Kowala-Piaskowska A, Mozer-Lisewska I, Figlerowicz M, Sluzewski W: Influence of the presence of HCV-RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on the clinical course of chronic hepatitis C in children. Eur J Epidemiol 2007, 22:343–348.
14.Castera L, Pinzani M: Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: are we ready. Lancet 2010, 375:1419–1420.
15.Hoofnagle JH, Williams AL: Ratio of serum aspartate to alanine aminotransferase in chronic hepatitis: relationship to cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1988, 95:734–739.
16.Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS: A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003, 38:518–526.
17.Ohta T, Sakaguchi K, Fujiwara A, Fujioka S, Iwasaki Y, makino Y, Araki Y, Shiratori Y: Simple surrogate index of the fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis C patients using platelet count and serum albumin level. Acta Med Okayama 2006, 60:77–84.
18.Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B, Verkarre V, Nalpas A, Dhalluin-Venier V, Fontaine H, Pol S: FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and FibroTest. Hepatology 2007, 46:32–36.
19.The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group: Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1994, 20:15–20.
20.Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P: Natural history of liver history of liver fibrosis progression in Patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet 1997, 349:825–832.
21.Ahmad W, Ijaz B, Javed FT, Jahan S, Shahid I, Khan FM, Hassan S: HCV genotype distribution and possible transmission risks in Lahore, Pakistan. World J Gastroenterology 2010, 16:4321–4328.
22.Kobayashi M, Tanaka E, Sodeyama T, Urushihara A, Matsumoto A, Kiyosawa K: The natural course of chronic hepatitis C: a comparison between patients with genotypes 1 and 2 hepatitis C viruses. Hepatology 1996, 23:695–699.
23.Idrees M, Rafique S, Irshad-ur-rehman , Akbar H, Yousaf MZ, Butt S, Awan Z, Manzoor S, akram M, Aftab M, Khubaib B, Riazuddin S: Hepatitis C genotype 3a infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: Pakistan experience. World J Gasteroenterol 2009, 15:5080–5085.
24.Mendes SCL, Nita EM, Ono-Nita KS, Mello SE, Silva CL, Alves VA, Carriho FJ: Prognostic factors for progression of liver structural lesions in chronic hepatitis C patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008, 14:2522–2528.
25.Tassopoulos NC, Papatheodoridis GV, Katsoulidou A, Delladetsima JK, Sypsa V, Touloumi G, Nikandros M, Hatzakis A: Factors associated with severity and disease progression in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatogastroenterology 1998, 45:1678–1683.
26.Ramalho F, Costa A, Pires A, Cabrita P, Sereojo F, Correia AP, Fatela N, Cloria H, Lopes J, Pinto HC, Marinho R, Raimundo M, Velosa J, Batista A, de Moura MC: Correlation of genotypes and route of transmission with histologic activity and disease stage in chronic hepatitis C. Dig Dis Sci 2000, 45:182–187.
27.Puoti C, Magrini A, Stati T, Rigato P, Montagnese F, Rossi P, Aldegheri L, Resta S: Clinical, histological, and virological features of hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal or abnormal alanine transaminase levels. Hepatology 1997, 26:1393–1398.
28.Haber MM, West AB, Haber AD, Reuben A: Relationship of aminotransferases to liver histological status in chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 1995, 90:1250–1257.
29.Bacon BR: Treatment of patients with hepatitis C and normal serum aminotransferase levels. Hepatology 2002, 32:634–643.
30.Moatter T, Hussainy AS, Hamid S, Ahmad Z, Siddiqui S: Comparative analysis of viral titers and histologic features of Pakistani patients infected with hepatitis C virus type 3. Int J Infect Dis 2002, 6:272–276.
31.Shafique M, Ahmad N, Awan FR, Mustafa T, Ullah M, Qureshi JA: Investigating the concurrent presence of HCV in serum, oral fluid and urine samples from chronic HCV patients in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Arch Virol 2009, 154:1523–1527.
32.Mastoi AA, Devrajani BR, Shah SZA, Rohopoto Q, Memon SA, Baloch M, Qureshi GA, Sami W: Metabolic investigations in patients with hepatitis B and C. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16:603–607.
33.Viroj W: High serum alkaline phosphatase levels, a study in 181 Thai adult hospitalized patients. BMC Family Practice 2001, 2:2.
34.Saif MW, Alexander D, Wicox CM: Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Level as Prognostic Tool in Colorectal Cancer: A study of 105 patients. J Appl Res 2005, 5:88–95.
35.Lee GH, Benner D, Regidor DL, Kalatar-Zadeh K: Impact of kidney bone disease and its management on survival of patients on dialysis. J Ren Nutr 2007, 17:38–44.
36.Raymond E, Boige V, Faivre S, Sanderink G, Rixe O, Vernillet L, Jacques C, Gatineau M, Ducreux M, Armand JP: Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of Irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:4303–4312.
37.Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, Charlotte F, Benhamou Y, Poynard T: Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet 2001, 357:1069–1075.
38.Myres RP, De Torres M, Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Poynard T, MULTIVIRC Group: Biochemical markers of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a comparison with prothrombin time, platelet count, and age-platelet index. Dig Dis Sci 2003, 48:271–278.
39.Ghany MG, Lok AS, Everhart JE, Everson GT, Lee WM, Cuto TM, Wright EC, Stoddard AM, Sterling RK, Di Bisceglie AM, Bonkovsky HL, Morishima C, Morgan TR, Dienstag JL, HALT-C Trial Group: Predicting clinical and histologic outcomes based on standard laboratory tests in advanced chronic hepatitis C. Gasteroenterology 2010, 138:136–146.
40.Murawaki Y, Koda M, Okamoto K, Mimura K, Kawasaki H: Diagnostic value of serum type IV collagen test in comparison with platelet count for predicting the fibrotic stage in patients with chronic hepatitis. J Gastroentrol Hepatol 2001, 16:777–781.
41.Pohl A, Behling C, Oliver D, Kilani M, Monson P, Hassanein T: Serum aminotransferase levels and platelet counts as predictors of degree of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:3053–3055.
42.Fusegawa H, Shiraishi K, Ogasawara F, Shimizu M, Haruki Y, Miyachi H, Matsuzaki S, Ando Y: Platelet activation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2002, 27:101–106.
43.Lackner C, Struber G, Liegl B, Leibl S, Ofner P, Bankuti C, Bauer B, Stauber RE: Comparison and validation of simple noninvasive tests for prediction of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2005, 41:1376–1382.
44.Giannini E, Risso D, Botta F, Chiarbonello B, Fasoli A, Malfatti F, Romagnoli P, testa E, Ceppa P, Testa R: Validity and clinical utility of the aspartate aminotransferase-alanine aminotransferase ration in assessing disease severity and prognosis in patients with hepatitis C virus related chronic liver disease. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:218–224.
45.Shaikh S, Memon MS, Ghani H, Baloch GH, Jaffery M, Shaikh K: Validation of Three Non-Invasive Markers in Assessing the Severity of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C. JCPSP 2009, 19:478–482.
46.Khan DA, Fatima-Tuz-Zuhra , Khan FA, Mubarak A: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of apri for prediction of fibrosis in hepatitis c patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008, 20:122–126.
47.Snyder N, Gajula L, Xiao SY, Grady J, Luxon B, Lau DT, Soloway R, Petersen J: APRI: an easy and validated predictor of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006, 40:535–542.
48.Macias J, Gonzalez J, Ortega E, Tural C, Cabrero E, Burgos A, Pineda JA, GRAFIHCO Study Team: Use of simple noninvasive biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfection in routine clinical practice. HIV Med 2010, 11:439–447.
49.Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, Sulkowski SM, Torriani FJ, Dieterich DT, Thomas DL, Messinger D, Nelson M, APRICOT Clinical Investigators: Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology 2006, 43:1317–1325.
50.Trang T, Petersen JR, Snyder N: Non-invasive markers of hepatic fibrosis in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV: Comparison of the APRI and FIB-4 index. Clinica Chimica Acta 2008, 397:51–54.
51.Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Liovet JM, Aponte J, Quinto L, Marteniz-Bauer E, Bruguera M, Sanchez-Tapias JM, Rodes J: Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology 2003, 36:986–992.
52.Myers RP, Ratziu V, Imbert-Bismut F, Charlotte F, Poynard T, MULTIVIRIC Group: Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis: a comparison with histological features in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gasteroenterol 2002, 97:2419–2425.
53.Guha IN, Parkes J, Roderick PR, Harris S, Rosenberg WM: Non-invasive markers associated with liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 2. GUT 2006, 55:1650–1660.
54.Parkes J, Guha IN, Roderick P, Rosenberg W: Performance of serum marker panels for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatology 2006, 44:462–474.
55.Pinzani M: The ELF panel: a new crystal ball in hepatology? Gut 2010, 59:1165–1167.
56.Wang M, Long RE, Comunale MA, Junaidi O, Marrero J, Di Bisceglie AM, Block TM, Mehta AS: Novel Fucosylated Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:1914–1921.
57.Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, Hubscher S, Roskams T, Pinzani M, Arthur MJ: European Liver Fibrosis Group: Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology 2004, 127(6):1704–1713.
Source
Iron in fatty liver and in the metabolic syndrome: a promising therapeutic target
Articles in Press
Paola Dongiovanni, Anna Ludovica Fracanzani, Silvia Fargion, Luca Valenti
Received 22 February 2011; received in revised form 29 May 2011; accepted 31 May 2011. published online 20 June 2011.
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
The dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome (DIOS) is now a frequent finding in the general population, as is detected in about one third of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the metabolic syndrome. The pathogenesis is related to altered regulation of iron transport associated with steatosis, insulin resistance, and subclinical inflammation, often in the presence of predisposing genetic factors. Evidence is accumulating that excessive body iron plays a causal role in insulin resistance through still undefined mechanisms, that probably involve a reduced ability to burn carbohydrates and altered function of adipose tissue. Furthermore, DIOS may facilitate the evolution to type 2 diabetes by altering beta-cell function, the progression of cardiovascular disease by contributing to the recruitment and activation of macrophages within arterial lesions, and the natural history of liver disease by inducing oxidative stress in hepatocytes, activation of hepatic stellate cells, and malignant transformation by promotion of cell growth and DNA damage.
Based on these premises, the association among DIOS, metabolic syndrome, and NAFLD is being investigated as a new risk factor to predict the development of overt cardiovascular and hepatic diseases, and possibly hepatocellular carcinoma, but most importantly, represents also a treatable condition. Indeed, iron depletion, most frequently achieved by phlebotomy, has been shown to decrease metabolic alterations and liver enzymes in controlled studies in NAFLD. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate the potential of iron reductive therapy on hard clinical outcomes in patients with DIOS.
Keywords: Iron, Insulin Resistance, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Metabolic Syndrome, Vascular Damage, Hereditary Hemochromatosis, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Oxidative Stress
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
Department of Internal Medicine, Centro Malattie Metaboliche del Fegato, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Fondazione IRCCS “Ca’ Granda” Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
PII: S0168-8278(11)00442-9
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.008
© 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Paola Dongiovanni, Anna Ludovica Fracanzani, Silvia Fargion, Luca Valenti
Received 22 February 2011; received in revised form 29 May 2011; accepted 31 May 2011. published online 20 June 2011.
Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
The dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome (DIOS) is now a frequent finding in the general population, as is detected in about one third of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the metabolic syndrome. The pathogenesis is related to altered regulation of iron transport associated with steatosis, insulin resistance, and subclinical inflammation, often in the presence of predisposing genetic factors. Evidence is accumulating that excessive body iron plays a causal role in insulin resistance through still undefined mechanisms, that probably involve a reduced ability to burn carbohydrates and altered function of adipose tissue. Furthermore, DIOS may facilitate the evolution to type 2 diabetes by altering beta-cell function, the progression of cardiovascular disease by contributing to the recruitment and activation of macrophages within arterial lesions, and the natural history of liver disease by inducing oxidative stress in hepatocytes, activation of hepatic stellate cells, and malignant transformation by promotion of cell growth and DNA damage.
Based on these premises, the association among DIOS, metabolic syndrome, and NAFLD is being investigated as a new risk factor to predict the development of overt cardiovascular and hepatic diseases, and possibly hepatocellular carcinoma, but most importantly, represents also a treatable condition. Indeed, iron depletion, most frequently achieved by phlebotomy, has been shown to decrease metabolic alterations and liver enzymes in controlled studies in NAFLD. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate the potential of iron reductive therapy on hard clinical outcomes in patients with DIOS.
Keywords: Iron, Insulin Resistance, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Metabolic Syndrome, Vascular Damage, Hereditary Hemochromatosis, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Oxidative Stress
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
Department of Internal Medicine, Centro Malattie Metaboliche del Fegato, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Fondazione IRCCS “Ca’ Granda” Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
PII: S0168-8278(11)00442-9
doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.008
© 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)